Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:11 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pac23/Kernel-clear/ updated copr link > Nice ! Having more kernel options for Fedora users is really cool Apart from that , what could give a good boost in numerical apps might be this

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pac23/Kernel-clear/ updated copr link On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:27 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Sorry for the really delayed reply. > > > Please take a look at my slides : > > https://schd.ws/hosted_files/ossna2017/6b/Boosting_GLIBC_GCC.pdf > > from last

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Sorry for the really delayed reply. > Please take a look at my slides : > https://schd.ws/hosted_files/ossna2017/6b/Boosting_GLIBC_GCC.pdf > from last year OSSNA > There is a description of the main idea and how does it work here : >

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: >> Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the > > same approach > > TBH I don't really know how that'd be done with the current package,would > love to learn. > Please take a look at my slides :

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the > > same approach TBH I don't really know how that'd be done with the current package,would love to learn. On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, 3:09 AM Victor Rodriguez wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: > > Thank

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Thank you for the blog link victor , interesting read it is. > Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the same approach > - Manas > > On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 23:03 Victor Rodriguez, wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Thank you for the blog link victor , interesting read it is. - Manas On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 23:03 Victor Rodriguez, wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Hayden Barnes > wrote: > > Would it be possible to mirror the Clear Linux kernel in copr or a > third-party dnf repo? > > > > That would

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Hayden Barnes wrote: > Would it be possible to mirror the Clear Linux kernel in copr or a > third-party dnf repo? > > That would allow Fedora to keep it's general purpose kernel but then allow > performance hounds to install the Clear Linux kernel. > > There is

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> > >The processes run are listed in the mail on 16 July. The apps are mostly > Firefox with half a dozen tabs or so, Konsole with few tabs, Dolphin etc on > a KDE Plasma desktop. Occasionally postgresql database with a python2.7 > application, but the `perf' traces were taken while these aren't

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 07/23/2018 10:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> > >> Available Packages > >> kernel.src4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28 > >> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora >

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 07/23/2018 10:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> Available Packages >> kernel.src4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28 >> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora > > > This is what I get: > > # dnf list --all kernel > Installed

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> It's just a little tricky > installing packages that have the same name, but lower > version numbers than what is in the main Fedora repos. I will update the documentation,thanks. On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, 13:56 Samuel Sieb, wrote: > On 07/23/2018 11:53 PM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > This was

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On 07/23/2018 11:53 PM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: This was my first repo/package sorry if i messed up somewhere. I don't personally have any interest in this package, but I don't see anything wrong with how it's setup. It's just a little tricky installing packages that have the same name, but

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

This was my first repo/package sorry if i messed up somewhere. On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, 12:11 Samuel Sieb, wrote: > On 07/23/2018 10:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Available Packages > > kernel.src4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28 > > pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora > > This is

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On 07/23/2018 10:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: Available Packages kernel.src4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28 pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora This is what I get: # dnf list --all kernel Installed Packages kernel.x86_64 4.16.11-300.fc28

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 07/23/2018 11:06 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> I need installation instructions to use this kernel, apparently. I've >> got the copr enabled, but can't figure out how to actually install the >> kernel and kernel modules. > > > If you used

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On 07/23/2018 11:06 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: I need installation instructions to use this kernel, apparently. I've got the copr enabled, but can't figure out how to actually install the kernel and kernel modules. If you used dnf to enable the copr repository, then "dnf list --all kernel"

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:08 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: > > No offense but can you kindly rephrase whatever you said.Its kinda > difficult > > to decipher as your sentences seem to contradict. > > > I need installation instructions to

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > No offense but can you kindly rephrase whatever you said.Its kinda difficult > to decipher as your sentences seem to contradict. I need installation instructions to use this kernel, apparently. I've got the copr enabled, but can't

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Thank you for the information,i'll look into and get back asap. On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, 22:26 Rajeesh K V, wrote: > > > What additional information would you like to know? >> Like what you were running etc because i didn't notice anything that >> weird on my end.Sorry for the delay have been busy

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> > What additional information would you like to know? > Like what you were running etc because i didn't notice anything that weird > on my end.Sorry for the delay have been busy with college work. > The processes run are listed in the mail on 16 July. The apps are mostly Firefox with half a

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> What additional information would you like to know? Like what you were running etc because i didn't notice anything that weird on my end.Sorry for the delay have been busy with college work. On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Rajeesh K V wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:52 PM Manas

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:52 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Can you give some more details as those would help Investigate the problem > better. > What additional information would you like to know? [P.S.: please avoid top-posting.] -- Rajeesh ___

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

No offense but can you kindly rephrase whatever you said.Its kinda difficult to decipher as your sentences seem to contradict. On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 20:06 Chris Murphy, wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: > > The Actual Url > > > > > I've got the copr enabled,

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > The Actual Url > I've got the copr enabled, but I can't figure out how to install the kernel. Even though I don't have -devel -cross-headers -headers for this kernel installed, those packages are included in a normal 'dnf update' for

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Can you give some more details as those would help Investigate the problem better. On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 10:38 Rajeesh K V, wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:33 PM Manas Mangaonkar < > manasmangaon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The Actual Url >>

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Thabks On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 12:29 Rajeesh K V, wrote: > On 7/19/18, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > Good to here there haven't been any breakages. > > > > I will look into the swapper process issue asap. > > Thanks. > Output from $perf top -F 49 > > 16.19% [kernel] [k]

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On 7/19/18, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Good to here there haven't been any breakages. > > I will look into the swapper process issue asap. Thanks. Output from $perf top -F 49 16.19% [kernel] [k] sdhci_irq 7.72% [unknown] [.]

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Good to here there haven't been any breakages. I will look into the swapper process issue asap. On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 10:38 Rajeesh K V, wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:33 PM Manas Mangaonkar < > manasmangaon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The Actual Url >>

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:33 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > The Actual Url > > FYI, have been running kernel 4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28.x86_64 since a day, haven't noticed any breakages :-) But

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

The Actual Url On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: > > Rpm Generation Done, Sorry for the really long delay. Request

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Rpm Generation Done, Sorry for the really long delay. Request someone to > test it out. > URL? -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Rpm Generation Done, Sorry for the really long delay. Request someone to test it out. On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Just a update,Ended up with a somewhat broken kernel that had performance > issues with the lts patches even after lot of tweaking.Apparently the

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Just a update,Ended up with a somewhat broken kernel that had performance issues with the lts patches even after lot of tweaking.Apparently the clear linux base kernel source tree is stable and working with latest Linux kernels. Still working on it incase anyone is wondering if this was abandoned.

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> >The upstream non LTS kernels have had the mitigation for > >meltdown/spectre longer than LTS and they likely have more robust > >implementations. All Fedora releases have had fixes for some time. > I meant the clear linux kernel,they seem to have diff kernel bundles and i want to go with

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 4:11 PM, stan wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2018 16:24:17 +0530 > Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > >> For the record,I am going with the kernel Lts given that it has >> patches for meltdown & spectre. > > There are recent

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Sat, 19 May 2018 16:24:17 +0530 Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > For the record,I am going with the kernel Lts given that it has > patches for meltdown & spectre. There are recent kernels without the patches? I think they are standard in all fedora kernels. To get your

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

For the record,I am going with the kernel Lts given that it has patches for meltdown & spectre. On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > On Thu, 17 May 2018, 1:08 p.m. Peter Robinson, > wrote: > >> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, 17 May 2018, 1:08 p.m. Peter Robinson, wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: > >> Put the patch name in ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec just before END OF > >> PATCHES. > >> > >> Run rpmbuild -bb kernel.spec >

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: >> Put the patch name in ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec just before END OF >> PATCHES. >> >> Run rpmbuild -bb kernel.spec >> >> You will have the kernel rpm files in ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64 >> >> The gotchas are left

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> > Put the patch name in ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec just before END OF > PATCHES. > > Run rpmbuild -bb kernel.spec > > You will have the kernel rpm files in ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64 > > The gotchas are left as an exercise for the reader (if you are a > newbie, there will be lots of them). :-)

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Wed, 16 May 2018 20:39:02 +0530 Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > Yes, if someone wishes to build and maintain that kernel. > > How difficult is this ? newbie, sophmore cse student but would like > to give this a shot if this isn't too difficult.Want to start >

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On 16 May 2018 at 11:09, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: >> Yes, if someone wishes to build and maintain that kernel. > > How difficult is this ? newbie, sophmore cse student but would like to give > this a shot if this isn't too difficult.Want to start contributing. > > It is

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 10:48 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:39 PM Hayden Barnes > wrote: > > > Would it be possible to mirror the Clear Linux kernel in copr or a > > third-party dnf repo? > > Yes, if someone wishes to build and maintain that kernel.

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> Yes, if someone wishes to build and maintain that kernel. How difficult is this ? newbie, sophmore cse student but would like to give this a shot if this isn't too difficult.Want to start contributing. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue,

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:39 PM Hayden Barnes wrote: > Would it be possible to mirror the Clear Linux kernel in copr or a third-party dnf repo? Yes, if someone wishes to build and maintain that kernel. josh ___ devel mailing

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Would it be possible to mirror the Clear Linux kernel in copr or a third-party dnf repo? That would allow Fedora to keep it's general purpose kernel but then allow performance hounds to install the Clear Linux kernel. There is something similar already for people who want to use upstream

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:42:26AM +0200, František Zatloukal wrote: > Hi, > Phoronix recently release article[1] about Intel's Clear Linux with some > cool graphs showing nice performance gain compared to Xubuntu. > > I didn't have time to dig in and look how it's performing against Fedora, >

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:42:26AM +0200, František Zatloukal wrote: >> I think i'll be interesting to look into it and find out if Fedora can't >> tweak compiler settings (eg use LTO for critical things like Mesa,

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:42:26AM +0200, František Zatloukal wrote: > I think i'll be interesting to look into it and find out if Fedora can't > tweak compiler settings (eg use LTO for critical things like Mesa, Kernel, > ...). I think it could be interesting fo Fedora users to have this enabled

Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Hi, Phoronix recently release article[1] about Intel's Clear Linux with some cool graphs showing nice performance gain compared to Xubuntu. I didn't have time to dig in and look how it's performing against Fedora, but I'd assume Fedora can be compared to Xubuntu in terms of compiler settings. I