Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

On 6/30/23 07:45, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: Kevin Kofler via devel writes: Carlos O'Donell wrote: And assembling those sysroots is not straight forward. The easiest way is to unpack a live image. If you are targeting an Arch- based or similar distro, you will probably get

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

Kevin Kofler via devel writes: > Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> And assembling those sysroots is not straight forward. > > The easiest way is to unpack a live image. If you are targeting an Arch- > based or similar distro, you will probably get away with just unpacking the > image, because it

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

Carlos O'Donell wrote: > And assembling those sysroots is not straight forward. The easiest way is to unpack a live image. If you are targeting an Arch- based or similar distro, you will probably get away with just unpacking the image, because it installs development files by default. But if you

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

On 6/27/23 20:21, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Practical cross-compilation to a completely different architecture needs > sysroots anyway. That way, one can also easily target a different > distribution on a different (or even the same) architecture, not just Fedora > on a different

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 3:22 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Kalev Lember wrote: > > I would like to have a layout similar to what Debian is doing, so that > > shared libraries would go in /usr/lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/ and /usr/lib64 > > would be a legacy symlink pointing to it. > > That

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 8:21 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Kalev Lember wrote: > > I would like to have a layout similar to what Debian is doing, so that > > shared libraries would go in /usr/lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/ and /usr/lib64 > > would be a legacy symlink pointing to it. > > That

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

Kalev Lember wrote: > I would like to have a layout similar to what Debian is doing, so that > shared libraries would go in /usr/lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/ and /usr/lib64 > would be a legacy symlink pointing to it. That layout is NOT compliant with the FHS. Which is particularly hilarious as

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

* Kalev Lember: > I would like to have a layout similar to what Debian is doing, so that > shared libraries would go in /usr/lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/ and > /usr/lib64 would be a legacy symlink pointing to it. The Debian layout is a bit misdesigned in that it's not possible to discover the

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

On 6/27/23 15:04, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 6:37 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: On 6/27/23 13:30, Kalev Lember wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:02 AM Vít Ondruch mailto:vondr...@redhat.com>> wrote: I don't think that GCC is always the best example to follow.

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 6:37 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 6/27/23 13:30, Kalev Lember wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:02 AM Vít Ondruch > > wrote: > > > > I don't think that GCC is always the best example to follow. > > > > Nevertheless, wouldn't it

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

On 27/06/2023 12:30, Kalev Lember wrote: I would like to have a layout similar to what Debian is doing, so that shared libraries would go in /usr/lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/ and /usr/lib64 would be a legacy symlink pointing to it. Debian isn't a good example here. I've fixed over a hundred

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

On 6/27/23 13:30, Kalev Lember wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:02 AM Vít Ondruch > wrote: I don't think that GCC is always the best example to follow. Nevertheless, wouldn't it be worth of phasing out the /lib64? I don't know what is the history

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

Dne 27. 06. 23 v 11:59 Nico Kadel-Garcia napsal(a): On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 5:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: I don't think that GCC is always the best example to follow. Nevertheless, wouldn't it be worth of phasing out the /lib64? I don't know what is the history behind, but I don't think this

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

Dne 27. 06. 23 v 12:30 Kalev Lember napsal(a): On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: I don't think that GCC is always the best example to follow. Nevertheless, wouldn't it be worth of phasing out the /lib64? I don't know what is the history behind, but I don't think

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > I don't think that GCC is always the best example to follow. > > Nevertheless, wouldn't it be worth of phasing out the /lib64? I don't > know what is the history behind, but I don't think this layout is > conceptual. > I would like to have a

Re: Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 5:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > I don't think that GCC is always the best example to follow. > > Nevertheless, wouldn't it be worth of phasing out the /lib64? I don't > know what is the history behind, but I don't think this layout is > conceptual. > > > Vít Until, and

Is there a chance to phase out `/lib64` directory?

I don't think that GCC is always the best example to follow. Nevertheless, wouldn't it be worth of phasing out the /lib64? I don't know what is the history behind, but I don't think this layout is conceptual. Vít Dne 27. 06. 23 v 3:19 Tom Stellard napsal(a): On 6/26/23 10:02, Fabio