> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 07:45:03AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
>
> mokutil.c:1977:16: error: comparison of integer expressions of different
> signedness:
> 'unsigned int' and 'int' [-Werror=sign-compare]
> 1977 | if (salt_size > settings_len - (next - settings)) {
> |^
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 07:45:03AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:38:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > We're in final freeze now. Any progress?
> >
> > Zbyszek
>
> I poked mokutil with a couple of upstream fixes, now it fails only on i686.
>
> https://koji.fedora
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:38:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> We're in final freeze now. Any progress?
>
> Zbyszek
I poked mokutil with a couple of upstream fixes, now it fails only on i686.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38515227
_
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:38:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 10. 09. 19 13:35, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >>On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>>efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then
> >>>
On 10. 09. 19 13:35, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then
unretired and they still fail to build from source.
Following the policy:
https:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then
> > unretired and they still fail to build from source.
> >
> > Following the policy:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/
On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then
unretired and they still fail to build from source.
Following the policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
I kindly ask
On 14. 08. 19 12:54, Peter Robinson wrote:
Well you can't currently see the forest for the trees and this
bullshit, for the first time in 15 years in making me think about
quitting the Fedora project, and I spoke with many at Flock are
seriously stressed about it and sick of it. I will be bringin
> On 13. 08. 19 19:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Firstly they're just FTBFS in F-30 This isn't exactly long
> > standing, if it was F-26 like some that were retired I could
> > completely understand that statement but F-30 is pushing the rhetoric
> > a bit here.
>
> It has been half a year with
On 13. 08. 19 19:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
Firstly they're just FTBFS in F-30 This isn't exactly long
standing, if it was F-26 like some that were retired I could
completely understand that statement but F-30 is pushing the rhetoric
a bit here.
It has been half a year without any response.
Firstly they're just FTBFS in F-30 This isn't exactly long
standing, if it was F-26 like some that were retired I could
completely understand that statement but F-30 is pushing the rhetoric
a bit here.
> efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then
> unretired and
efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then
unretired and they still fail to build from source.
Following the policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
I kindly ask the maintainers to rebuild them or orphan the
On 23. 06. 19 22:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages fail to build from source from at least Fedora 28 and
their FTBFs bugs are still in the NEW state.
Please make them build or retire them from Fedora. If you cannot work on the
packages but still consider them useful, orphan them:
The following packages fail to build from source from at least Fedora 28 and
their FTBFs bugs are still in the NEW state.
Please make them build or retire them from Fedora. If you cannot work on the
packages but still consider them useful, orphan them:
PyPE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
On 18. 06. 19 0:38, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:33 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear ltspfs maintainers,
please fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675332
Hey Miro,
According to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ltspfs, this package
has been retired a week ago,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:33 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Dear ltspfs maintainers,
> please fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675332
Hey Miro,
According to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ltspfs, this package
has been retired a week ago, after having been orphaned for more than
Dear ltspfs maintainers,
please fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675332
Thanks,
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
17 matches
Mail list logo
