Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:52 +0200, Remi wrote: From : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is specifically exempted from this but this will likely change in the future. This

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Yanko Kaneti
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 23:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:52 +0200, Remi wrote: From : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is specifically exempted

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Mattias Ellert
ons 2011-08-31 klockan 10:17 +0300 skrev Yanko Kaneti: # repoquery -f '*/jquery*.js' --qf=%{NAME}\n | sort | uniq | wc -l 356 jQuery FTW :) Most of these are probably doxygen generated documentation. Recent versions of doxygen provides a search option for the generated html documentation

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 31.8.2011 13:12, Mattias Ellert napsal(a): At the moment jquery is not package as a separate package. If it was packagers could replace them with a symlink to that. Help us to finish https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=nodejs and you can get

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Jorge Gallegos
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:46:36PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:52 +0200, Remi wrote: From : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is specifically

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:47, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:23:56AM -0700, Jorge Gallegos wrote: On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:46:36PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:52 +0200, Remi wrote: From :

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 31.8.2011 19:31, Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a): they all came from the same version of upstream jquery. And delivering just one large jquery that can be used is not going to fit what either upstreams, web developers OR their users want or need. I still haven't got the reason why jQuery

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:35 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: Dne 31.8.2011 19:31, Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a): they all came from the same version of upstream jquery. And delivering just one large jquery that can be used is not going to fit what either upstreams, web developers OR their users

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:35:50PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: * dojo/dijit - F/OSS, packaged Currently for any javascript library you are allowed to bundle. In the future this may not be the case so you may have a lot of work to do to maintain this application in the future. Note that no

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:49:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:35 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: Dne 31.8.2011 19:31, Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a): they all came from the same version of upstream jquery. And delivering just one large jquery that can be used is not

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 15:52, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: Real numbers before bald assertions please :-) Sorry I thought this was devel@lists.fedoraproject.org where fact was not needed and very much disdained :) I realized I have jumped onto the hype train of javascript

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-31 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 14:52 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Real numbers before bald assertions please :-) I resign! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list

Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-30 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey, all. So, I'm looking at packaging tt-rss - an RSS reader implemented as a PHP webapp - for Fedora, since I run it on my own server. It became rapidly clear that it's a landmine of bundled PHP libraries and snippets and uncertain licensing. I'm unsure which of the things it bundles would be

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-30 Thread Vít Ondruch
Speaking about prototype and scriptaculous, I am sure that they are bundled also in Rails and if there are some Rails applications packaged, they will be included also in them. However I am not sure if they should be packaged separately or just copylibs. Vit Dne 31.8.2011 06:35, Adam

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

2011-08-30 Thread Remi
From : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is specifically exempted from this but this will likely change in the future. This explain why so much .js libraries are bundled in so much