On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:47:07AM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:06 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > > Adding normal packages are requirements for a devel package just to make
> > it
> > > multilib feels... unclean? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. In
> > order
> > > to
On 26. 01. 21 13:24, Kamil Paral wrote:
Adding normal packages are requirements for a devel package just to make it
multilib feels... unclean? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. In order to
have the logic self-contained, why don't we add something like "Provides:
multilib(x86_64, i686)"
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:06 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Adding normal packages are requirements for a devel package just to make
> it
> > multilib feels... unclean? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. In
> order
> > to have the logic self-contained, why don't we add something like
> >
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 01:24:28PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> Here's one:
> https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/849
>
> Here's a second one, but yesterday I found out that there was a related PR
> merged, so I updated it:
> https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
>
> A third one:
>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:10 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> For rawhide, and branched (prerelease) yes, changes likely would need to
> be there.
> For updates its the infrastructure ansible repo.
>
Sigh.
So, IMHO, tickets for this should be filed as releng tickets
> and folks should note which they
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:00:58PM +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le lun. 25 janv. 2021 à 12:29, Kamil Paral a écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:17 AM Graham White
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to get to the bottom of bug #1901065 -
> >>
* Graham White:
> I'm trying to get to the bottom of bug #1901065 -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901065
>
> Anyone know why PackageKit-gtk3-module.i686 has been removed from the
> Fedora 33 repositories? This package was there for Fedora 32 and
> checking Koji it looks like the
Le lun. 25 janv. 2021 à 12:29, Kamil Paral a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:17 AM Graham White
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to get to the bottom of bug #1901065 -
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901065
>>
>> Anyone know why PackageKit-gtk3-module.i686 has been
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:17 AM Graham White
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get to the bottom of bug #1901065 -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901065
>
> Anyone know why PackageKit-gtk3-module.i686 has been removed from the
> Fedora 33 repositories? This package was there for
Hi,
I'm trying to get to the bottom of bug #1901065 -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901065
Anyone know why PackageKit-gtk3-module.i686 has been removed from the Fedora 33
repositories? This package was there for Fedora 32 and checking Koji it looks
like the 32-bit version is
10 matches
Mail list logo