On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:01 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 4.7.2018 v 12:18 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > What about just doing a mass specfile update now? I think asking
> > individual maintainers to fix their packages isn't worth their
> > time.
>
> -1
>
> I like the Jason
Dne 4.7.2018 v 12:18 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> What about just doing a mass specfile update now? I think asking
> individual maintainers to fix their packages isn't worth their
> time.
-1
I like the Jason attitude much more. It gives time to discuss it. To find false
positives.
On 07/10/2018 08:53 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 10.7.2018 17:45, Till Maas wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:36:08AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>
>>> I haven't written any scripts which modify specfiles, only scripts which
>>> find issues. And in any case:
>>>
>>>
In case it wasn't obvious from all of the commit messages, I did go
ahead and remove many needless %defattr directives from a large number
of packages a few hours ago.
I used the output of the find-needless-defattr script from
https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities as a guide for which
On 10.7.2018 17:45, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:36:08AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
I haven't written any scripts which modify specfiles, only scripts which
find issues. And in any case:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mass_package_changes#Automated_cleanup
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:36:08AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I haven't written any scripts which modify specfiles, only scripts which
> find issues. And in any case:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mass_package_changes#Automated_cleanup
>
> Besides... this is git. And
> "NK" == Nico Kadel-Garcia writes:
NK> Would you please post, or post a link to, your updated filter
NK> script?
It remains at https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities :
https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities/blob/master/f/find-needless-defattr
I currently have no unpushed
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 7:53 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
>
> KF> I agree. If this could be done before mass rebuild we can catch any
> KF> issues/typos/mistakes in this with the mass rebuild.
>
> I've been away from computers for a bit, but I could certainly
> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
KF> I agree. If this could be done before mass rebuild we can catch any
KF> issues/typos/mistakes in this with the mass rebuild.
I've been away from computers for a bit, but I could certainly do this
without too much effort. I just know that some people are
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:35:39AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" as the initial line in a %files section even
> > though this has not been needed for well over a decade now. This
> > construct even appears in new specfiles, perhaps because it appears in
> > so many
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
> Hi Nico.
>
>
> On 07/04/2018 03:58 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Yeah, but since it's many thousands of packages, I think maybe you
>> didn't have to send the whole list?
> I like that he sent the whole list, then I can search for my
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> In a %files section of a specfile, the %defattr directive is used to set
> the default file ownership and permissions. RPM has provided a sensible
> default since version 4.4 (which predates FC6 and RHEL5), but very many
> specfiles still include an initial %defattr
On 07/04/2018 03:18 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 02:02:16PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> I ran the find-needless-defattr command from
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities to find specfiles which
>> include a non-default-changing %defattr
On Wednesday, July 04 2018, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
> On 07/04/2018 03:58 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Yeah, but since it's many thousands of packages, I think maybe you
>> didn't have to send the whole list?
> I like that he sent the whole list, then I can search for my username
> and check if
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:18:00 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> What about just doing a mass specfile update now? I think asking
>> individual maintainers to fix their packages isn't worth their
>> time. It's a safe change,
>
> Is it? I haven't found whether this
On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:18:00 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> What about just doing a mass specfile update now? I think asking
> individual maintainers to fix their packages isn't worth their
> time. It's a safe change,
Is it? I haven't found whether this change is compatible with
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 02:02:16PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I ran the find-needless-defattr command from
> https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities to find specfiles which
> include a non-default-changing %defattr as the first line of a %files
> section. This found 2513
Hi Nico.
On 07/04/2018 03:58 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Yeah, but since it's many thousands of packages, I think maybe you
> didn't have to send the whole list?
I like that he sent the whole list, then I can search for my username
and check if I am on the list.
> It's been useful for
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
In a %files section of a specfile, the %defattr directive is used to set
the default file ownership and permissions. RPM has provided a sensible
default since version 4.4 (which predates FC6 and RHEL5), but very many
specfiles still include an
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> In a %files section of a specfile, the %defattr directive is used to set
> the default file ownership and permissions. RPM has provided a sensible
> default since version 4.4 (which predates FC6 and RHEL5), but very many
> specfiles
20 matches
Mail list logo
