Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-05 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 14:54 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 4 December 2017 at 14:17, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] om> wrote: > > 4) He found a fix for it, created a new patch and added it into the > > package > > I maintain/own. > > Did you say thanks? To any proven packagers out

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-05 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:22:00PM +0100, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: >On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Richard Hughes >wrote: > > On 4 December 2017 at 14:17, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] > wrote: > > 4) He found a fix for it, created

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:17:32 +0100, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > What happened in the case that lead me to write my initial e-mail was this: > 1) Proven packager received a BZ report for his own package. > 2) Proven packager discovered the issue was actually caused by package I > maintain/own.

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
2 Richard: I think we've hit the cause of misunderstanding here. Many people around me (including) me use the word "own", because it's shorter (faster to say/write), even though we mean maintain (in a contributor sense). It's a slang for us. I don't know anyone around ne who would take the word

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 14:54 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 4 December 2017 at 14:17, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] > wrote: > > 4) He found a fix for it, created a new patch and added it into the package > > I maintain/own. > > Did you say thanks? To any proven packagers out

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 04/12/17 15:17 +0100, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: * The specfile change was not referencing the BZ it was suppose to fix. It was containing only a link to upstream commit, where the commit message was completely irrelevant to the actual BZ. * The dist-git commit didn't contain the BZ number

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread Richard Hughes
On 4 December 2017 at 15:22, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > For what? Creating more work for me? :) I think maybe it's time to take a step back and reconsider what it is to be a Fedora "contributor". You don't _own_ anything; we're all working together as a team. Richard.

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 04.12.2017 um 16:22 schrieb David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]: > >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Richard Hughes > > wrote: >> >> On 4 December 2017 at 14:17, David

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 4 December 2017 at 14:17, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] > wrote: > > 4) He found a fix for it, created a new patch and added it into the > package > > I maintain/own. > > Did you say thanks? ​For

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread Richard Hughes
On 4 December 2017 at 14:17, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > 4) He found a fix for it, created a new patch and added it into the package > I maintain/own. Did you say thanks? To any proven packagers out there, feel free to fix bugs in any of the packages I own. Richard

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
​Hello Christian,​ On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: > Hi all, > > sorry but I think this mail goes into the completely wrong direction… You > claim that you don't want to point any fingers, but instead you blame *all* > proven packagers,

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
So, to clarify - I'm OK with proven packagers to make changes to package I (actively) maintain in case I'm unavailable for some longer period of time (weekend, vacation, etc.), and the changes needed to be done fall into one of these categories: * my package received some high/critical CVE that

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread Christian Dersch
llo folks, > > I do not want to point any fingers, so I'll be adressing this to all proven > packagers... > > Stop messing with other people packages without trying to contact them via > e-mail/IRC, or openind new BZ! > Especially when you see they are actively maintaining the pa

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:33:09PM +0100, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > Hello folks, > > I do not want to point any fingers, so I'll be adressing this to all proven > packagers... > > Stop messing with other people packages without trying to contact them via > e-mail/I

Re: Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 7:33 AM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] <dkas...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I do not want to point any fingers, so I'll be adressing this to all proven > packagers... > > Stop messing with other people packages without trying to contact them via

Proven packagers - stop messing with other people packages!!

2017-12-04 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
Hello folks, I do not want to point any fingers, so I'll be adressing this to all proven packagers... Stop messing with other people packages without trying to contact them via e-mail/IRC, or openind new BZ! Especially when you see they are actively maintaining the package and your changes