Oh actually it's just started being pushed to stable. Thanks all.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 01:43:37PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 13:15, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:57:27AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > > >> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
> koji untag
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 01:41:23PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:58 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:38, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 13:42, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:58 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:38, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:36:44PM
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 13:15, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:57:27AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > >> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
> > You need to edit the update and remove these builds. You can click on the
> > "edit" button on the
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:58 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:38, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:56 AM Richard W.M.
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:57:27AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> >> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
> You need to edit the update and remove these builds. You can click on the
> "edit" button on the left side of the update status, then you will have a
> list
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:29, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:53:38AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > I agree, if this would not happen then everything would just blow up.
>
> Wouldn't the lower NVR builds simply be ignored?
>
The merging a side tag is not considering NVRs
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:38, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
> >
> > I guess it should be a
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:53:38AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> I agree, if this would not happen then everything would just blow up.
Wouldn't the lower NVR builds simply be ignored?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
>
> I guess it should be a fixed in bodhi. But for now you can remove the
> builds that it's
I agree, if this would not happen then everything would just blow up.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 8:33 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 23:38, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>>
>> I guess it should be a fixed in bodhi. But for now you can remove the
>> builds that it's complaining about in
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 23:38, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> I guess it should be a fixed in bodhi. But for now you can remove the
> builds that it's complaining about in the update.
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3991
Answered in the ticket, but I think Bodhi is behaving correctly
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 14:57, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
> >
> > This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday
> > morning which has been in pending for 2 days. (As it's Rawhide it's
>
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:34 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
> >
> > This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday
> > morning which has been in
I guess it should be a fixed in bodhi. But for now you can remove the
builds that it's complaining about in the update.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3991
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:57 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
> >
> > This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday
> > morning which has been in pending for 2 days. (As it's Rawhide
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
>
> This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday
> morning which has been in pending for 2 days. (As it's Rawhide it's
> supposed to spend 0 days in testing.) Is there any problem
For each of these stuck builds could you open up tickets in
https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue so we can track them down and fix them.
Currently there are 1.5 sysadmins and 1.5 release engineer and we are not
going to be able to track what and where we are doing things from mailing
list posts.
On
There is a problem right now with the part of koji that tags builds and
adds them to the various repos koji uses for new builds. So you can
build new packages, but can not rely on further builds seeing your
just-built packages.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
>
> This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday
> morning which has been in pending for 2 days. (As it's Rawhide it's
> supposed to spend 0 days in
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday
morning which has been in pending for 2 days. (As it's Rawhide it's
supposed to spend 0 days in testing.) Is there any problem with it,
or do we just have to wait
23 matches
Mail list logo
