Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 14:30 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I read the readme in the Vulkan branch on the mesa git but how do you > > tell if your chipset is specifically supported? > > The driver emits a warning chirp if the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 14:30 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > I read the readme in the Vulkan branch on the mesa git but how do you > tell if your chipset is specifically supported? The driver emits a warning chirp if the chipset isn't fully supported, and will refuse to initialize on devices that are

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

- Original Message - > From: "Kevin Kofler" <kevin.kof...@chello.at> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Saturday, 20 February, 2016 12:14:00 PM > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan > > David Airlie wrote: > > No, nothing

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

David Airlie wrote: > No, nothing concrete has been mentioned in this area at all. > > sw rendering won't benefit from vulkan very much, in fact it would be > worse than GL in some cases, as Vulkan really works on the building up > long command buffers and executing them, rather than direct

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

> > Adam Jackson wrote: > > Currently the repository includes the driver loader, as well as Intel's > > open source drivers for gen8+ (Broadwell, Cherryview, Skylake, Broxton > > and Kabylake) GPUs. The Intel drivers also have incomplete support for > > Ivybridge, Haswell, and Baytrail devices; I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

Adam Jackson wrote: > Currently the repository includes the driver loader, as well as Intel's > open source drivers for gen8+ (Broadwell, Cherryview, Skylake, Broxton > and Kabylake) GPUs. The Intel drivers also have incomplete support for > Ivybridge, Haswell, and Baytrail devices; I can vouch

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

- Original Message - > From: "Zach Villers" <zachvatw...@gmail.com> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 17 February, 2016 11:34:47 PM > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora sup

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

I read the readme in the Vulkan branch on the mesa git but how do you tell if your chipset is specifically supported? Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Peter T. wrote: >>> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> >>> DRI3 is a prerequisite, yes. The F23 builds of the intel driver had it >>> disabled until fairly recently, but this update should

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Peter T. wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> >> >> DRI3 is a prerequisite, yes. The F23 builds of the intel driver had it >> disabled until fairly recently, but this update should sort you out: >> >>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:43:09AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > Peter T. wrote: > > >> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> > >> > >> DRI3 is a prerequisite, yes. The F23 builds of the intel driver had it > >> disabled until fairly recently, but this update should

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

Peter T. wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> >> >> DRI3 is a prerequisite, yes. The F23 builds of the intel driver had it >> disabled until fairly recently, but this update should sort you out: >> >>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

Anyone know if/when nvidia drivers will be included? On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:24 AM Peter T. wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > > > > DRI3 is a prerequisite, yes. The F23 builds of the intel driver had it > > disabled until

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > DRI3 is a prerequisite, yes. The F23 builds of the intel driver had it > disabled until fairly recently, but this update should sort you out: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606ca05253 This is great,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

I had just installed vulkan on my Alienware m14x, and it seemed to erase my previous light settings as well as making fedora unbootable. I'm currently looking into how to get around it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

- Original Message - > From: "Marcin Juszkiewicz" <mjuszkiew...@redhat.com> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, 17 February, 2016 8:59:51 AM > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan > > W dniu 16.02.2016 o 19:48, Ad

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

W dniu 16.02.2016 o 19:48, Adam Jackson pisze: > Currently the repository includes the driver loader, as well as Intel's > open source drivers for gen8+ (Broadwell, Cherryview, Skylake, Broxton > and Kabylake) GPUs. The Intel drivers also have incomplete support for > Ivybridge, Haswell, and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > $ vkcube > 1 physical devices > anv_device.c:405: FINISHME: Get correct values for VkPhysicalDeviceLimits > vendor id 8086, device name Intel(R) HD Graphics 520 (Skylake GT2) > vulkan: No DRI3 support > Vulkan not supported on given X

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > $ sudo dnf copr enable ajax/vulkan > $ sudo dnf install vulkan anvil vkcube > $ vulkaninfo vulkaninfo seems to work: [...] VkPhysicalDeviceProperties: === apiVersion = 4194306