On Monday, 04 December 2017 at 23:10, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
[...]
> About all we can say with certainty is that this package can't install
> /usr/bin/parallel.
Actually, it could if the packager coordinated with GNU parallel package
maintainer to use alternatives. This new package is suppose
Jason,
> If you discount the guidelines for multiple parallel-installable
> versions of the same package, we don't really have an established naming
> convention for alternate versions of a "thing".
Thanks for mentioning it and the detailed explanation.
I did misunderstand it.
I understand what y
> "JA" == Jun Aruga writes:
JA> Perl: perl-foo Python: python-foo NodeJs (NPM): nodejs-foo Ruby:
JA> rubygem-foo R: R-foo PHP: php-foo Golang: golang-foo
Those are all for libraries in the given language.
JA> The prefix pattern "rust-parallel" looks better.
This is not a library written in
