Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com writes:
When an F14 build goes stable through bodhi, it'll be inherited into
rawhide.
Unless there is already a release of the package tagged dist-f15, IIUC.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/12/2010 12:42 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com writes:
When an F14 build goes stable through bodhi, it'll be inherited into
rawhide.
Unless there is already a release of the package tagged dist-f15, IIUC.
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com writes:
Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be
newer than anything coming up from f14.
Which is exactly the situation with systemd.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84
On Thu, 12.08.10 00:52, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@redhat.com) wrote:
Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be
newer than anything coming up from f14.
Can I undo such a build? I did that mostly because I forgot that the
branching already happened when I built
Lennart Poettering wrote, at 08/12/2010 10:28 PM +9:00:
On Thu, 12.08.10 00:52, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@redhat.com) wrote:
Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be
newer than anything coming up from f14.
Can I undo such a build? I did that mostly because I
Hi Lennart,
I found that systemd-units depends on pkgconfig, is this dependency
really needed for minimum systemd?
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be
newer than anything coming up from f14.
Can I undo such a build? I did that mostly because I forgot that the
branching already happened when I built systemd the first time
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:10:25PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
I found that systemd-units depends on pkgconfig, is this dependency
really needed for minimum systemd?
Please file things like this in bugzilla so they don't get lost in the chaos
of this discussion list.
--
Matthew Miller
On Thu, 12.08.10 22:10, Chen Lei (supercyp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi Lennart,
Heya,
I found that systemd-units depends on pkgconfig, is this dependency
really needed for minimum systemd?
Yes, this is intended this way. udev does the same these days. We
consider .pc files simply a nice way
instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check
if a clean install of latest package would work properly with this
result:
Installing : systemd-units-5-2.fc15.x86_64
1/4
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sqw1k7: line 25: 19348
On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check
if a clean install of latest package would work properly with this
result:
Installing : systemd-units-5-2.fc15.x86_64
This is far from being the latest packages ( the latest
On 08/11/2010 10:32 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
2010/8/11 Jóhann B. Guðmundssonjohan...@gmail.com:
On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check
if a clean install of latest package would work properly with this
result:
2010/8/11 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 08/11/2010 10:32 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
2010/8/11 Jóhann B. Guðmundssonjohan...@gmail.com:
On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check
if a clean install of latest
On 11/08/10 11:32, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
snip
wrong:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10477
the newer versions have only been built for f14 not rawhide.
snip
I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14
systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken
Frank Murphy wrote:
I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14
systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updates to
F15(Rawhide)
Normally, development is supposed to happen in Rawhide FIRST.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 01:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14
systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updates to
F15(Rawhide)
Normally, development is supposed to happen in Rawhide FIRST.
Frank's guess
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 04:11 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 12.08.10 01:40, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14
systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updates to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2010 07:11 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 12.08.10 01:40, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14
systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same
On 04/08/10 20:41, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Disable selinux in grub and boot with upstart
Grap the latest systemd packages from koji ( systemd and systemd-units )
Remove systemd and systemd-units ( rpm -e systemd systemd-units )
Reinstall systemd and systemd unit.
reboot and allow
On 08/04/2010 02:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.08.10 02:40, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
On Wed, 04.08.10 00:10, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
Small addition. When I was referring to rawhide I meant both F-14 and
the new rawhide. i.e.
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
And here's another addition: you might also want to run this command
when upgrading from older rwahide to current F-14/rawhide:
# systemctl enable graphical.target
This makes sure the default.target link is created properly
I still
On Wed, 04.08.10 10:51, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
And here's another addition: you might also want to run this command
when upgrading from older rwahide to current F-14/rawhide:
# systemctl enable graphical.target
On 04/08/10 16:08, Lennart Poettering wrote:
# systemctl enable graphical.target
This makes sure the default.target link is created properly
I still believe that for this particular one (and a few of the others) we
should make the trivial changes to the spec to have it done automatically.
On Wed, 04.08.10 16:27, Frank Murphy (frankl...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 04/08/10 16:08, Lennart Poettering wrote:
# systemctl enable graphical.target
This makes sure the default.target link is created properly
I still believe that for this particular one (and a few of the others) we
On 04/08/10 16:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Well, can you be more precise? Can you try this bodhi build?
Just got my daughter to take a video of start up,
so will try grab snaps from it and or upload somewhere.
This from an F13.x86 F14-Rawhide F14-Branched Guest
(Host if F13.x86_64)
Some still from the video:
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185144.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185343.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185650.php
On 08/04/2010 06:05 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
This from an F13.x86 F14-Rawhide F14-Branched Guest
(Host if F13.x86_64)
Some still from the video:
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185144.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185343.php
On Wed, 04.08.10 02:40, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
On Wed, 04.08.10 00:10, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
Small addition. When I was referring to rawhide I meant both F-14 and
the new rawhide. i.e. both F-14 and F-15.
And here's another addition:
28 matches
Mail list logo
