On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:13:05 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann'
> Mierzejewski wrote:
> > On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 12:10, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > [...]
> > > The bottom line is that these tools need to support our
> > > workflows, not try
On 23/03/2020 15:35, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 12:10, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> [...]
>> The bottom line is that these tools need to support our workflows, not
>> try to shoehorn us into a particular way of working.
>
> Just writing an e-mail about the issu
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:13:05 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> There are a few things that also send emails on their own.
> Sadly, bodhi still does this (even though it should not)
Actually I'm not sad about this; I find the emails from bodhi
considerably more informative than their fedmsg equivalents
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 12:10, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> [...]
> > The bottom line is that these tools need to support our workflows, not
> > try to shoehorn us into a particular way of working.
>
> Just writing an
On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 12:10, Daniel Pocock wrote:
[...]
> The bottom line is that these tools need to support our workflows, not
> try to shoehorn us into a particular way of working.
Just writing an e-mail about the issue to the Fedora devel list will not
change anything, maybe apart from a
On 22/03/2020 18:15, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 22.03.20 um 14:19 schrieb Emmanuel Seyman:
>> I feel you've proved the opposite: filing bugs alone isn't sufficient and,
>> apparently, neither is sending out periodic reminders by mail. Perhaps we
>> need to be more agressive in encour
Hi all,
Am 22.03.20 um 14:19 schrieb Emmanuel Seyman:
> I feel you've proved the opposite: filing bugs alone isn't sufficient and,
> apparently, neither is sending out periodic reminders by mail. Perhaps we
> need to be more agressive in encouraging people to find co-maintainers
> that can help th
* Daniel Pocock [20/03/2020 13:22] :
>
> > Over how many bugs and what time period were the requests generated?
>
> More than a year
This is the core of your problem. Not responding to outstanding requests
in a timely manner is a sure way to get more reminders. I suspect
responding to these in a
On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 11:42 -0400, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> > Closing a bug doesn't clear the needinfo. Change the ? to blank under
> > flags (or I'm happy to clear it for you if you'd like).
> Ok, I have done it.
>
> But I believe the outstanding bugs reminder should not include close
On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 11:02 -0400, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> About outstanding bugs...
>
> In my opinion, the frequency at which it is sent: every day, is way too often.
> For me, once a month would make more sense.
> Maybe... maybe once a week.
>
> For me, the message contains this is a o
On 20/03/2020 13:30, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20. 03. 20 13:22, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> More than a year
>
> I my humble opinion, if you ignore outstanding Bugzillas for over a
> year, you cannot be surprised you have hundreds of remainders in your
> inbox.
Please remember I've given this feed
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:20 PM Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Closing a bug doesn't clear the needinfo.
I consider that a mis-feature, but I have
learned to live with it.
> As a package owner I like the daily reminder. If it only happened
> monthly then bad timing could make it so I miss a reminder f
> Closing a bug doesn't clear the needinfo. Change the ? to blank under
> flags (or I'm happy to clear it for you if you'd like).
Ok, I have done it.
But I believe the outstanding bugs reminder should not include closed bugs!
___
devel mailing list -
Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> About outstanding bugs...
>
> In my opinion, the frequency at which it is sent: every day, is way too often.
> For me, once a month would make more sense.
> Maybe... maybe once a week.
>
> For me, the message contains this is a one bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.c
On 20. 03. 20 16:02, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
About outstanding bugs...
In my opinion, the frequency at which it is sent: every day, is way too often.
For me, once a month would make more sense.
Maybe... maybe once a week.
Once a day is indeed too much. It used to be once a week.
For m
About outstanding bugs...
In my opinion, the frequency at which it is sent: every day, is way too often.
For me, once a month would make more sense.
Maybe... maybe once a week.
For me, the message contains this is a one bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700171
For most of the las
On 20. 03. 20 13:22, Daniel Pocock wrote:
More than a year
I my humble opinion, if you ignore outstanding Bugzillas for over a year, you
cannot be surprised you have hundreds of remainders in your inbox.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
__
On 20/03/2020 13:19, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> Hi, Daniel.
>
> * Daniel Pocock [20/03/2020 12:38] :
>>
>> - there were over 100 "outstanding requests" emails in my inbox
>
> Over how many bugs and what time period were the requests generated?
More than a year
>> - there are numerous bugs ab
Hi, Daniel.
* Daniel Pocock [20/03/2020 12:38] :
>
> - there were over 100 "outstanding requests" emails in my inbox
Over how many bugs and what time period were the requests generated?
> - there are numerous bugs about builds failing, FTBFS
These bugs are signal and not noise.
Not only are th
19 matches
Mail list logo
