On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 8:35 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 6:28 AM Debarshi Ray via devel
> wrote:
>
> I wanted to wrap up this sub-thread on-list, after Owen and I chatted
> > about it off-list.
> >
> > I am fine with having the fedora-toolbox OCI images being defined as
> >
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 6:28 AM Debarshi Ray via devel
wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I wanted to wrap up this sub-thread on-list, after Owen and I chatted
> about it off-list.
>
> I am fine with having the fedora-toolbox OCI images being defined as
> kickstart files in the Fedora infrastructure and built by
Hey,
I wanted to wrap up this sub-thread on-list, after Owen and I chatted
about it off-list.
I am fine with having the fedora-toolbox OCI images being defined as
kickstart files in the Fedora infrastructure and built by ImageFactory
and published as another base image, just like the fedora base
I think it's worth to mention that many layered container images are
published directly on the Fedora's Quay.io organisation (
https://quay.io/organization/fedora).
The builds are not happening in OSBS or the Fedora infrastructure but IIRC
it's a GitHub Action that does the build and pushes the
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:47 AM Debarshi Ray wrote:
> Hey Owen,
>
> On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 12:39 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 8:16 AM Debarshi Ray via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > My main concern, which I had brought up in the Release Engineering
> > > tickets before
Hey Owen,
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 12:39 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 8:16 AM Debarshi Ray via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > My main concern, which I had brought up in the Release Engineering
> > tickets before [1,2] is whether the fedora-toolbox images would
> > continue to be
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 8:16 AM Debarshi Ray via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hey Owen,
>
> On Wed, 2023-05-24 at 13:50 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> >
> > What if we made the Toolbox container image just one more base image
> > and built it with ImageFactory?
> >
> > -
Hey Owen,
On Wed, 2023-05-24 at 13:50 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> What if we made the Toolbox container image just one more base image
> and built it with ImageFactory?
>
> - Integrated into the compose process
> - Across all architectures
> - No OSBS dependency
>
> The main disadvantage
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 01:50:21PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> What if we made the Toolbox container image just one more base image and
> built it with ImageFactory?
>
> - Integrated into the compose process
> - Across all architectures
> - No OSBS dependency
>
> The main disadvantage is
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 11:52 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Just a general answer/info here at the bottom of the thread...
>
> I realize our container build pipeline is not great, but it's currently
> working and I will keep it working until we replace it.
>
> I agree we should replace it, and there's
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 21:35 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 May 2023, 15:42 Debarshi Ray via devel,
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 09:45 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > >
> > > If we do this, we should also make the container base images
> > > release blocking since AFAIK
On Tue, 9 May 2023, 17:51 Kevin Fenzi, wrote:
> Just a general answer/info here at the bottom of the thread...
>
> I realize our container build pipeline is not great, but it's currently
> working and I will keep it working until we replace it.
>
> I agree we should replace it, and there's lots
On Tue, 9 May 2023, 15:42 Debarshi Ray via devel, <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hey Clement,
>
> On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 09:45 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 22:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:57:30PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 03:46:21PM +0200, Debarshi Ray via devel wrote:
> Hey Zbigniew,
>
> On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 19:57 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:24:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I'm broadly in favor here, some comments in line...
> > >
> > >
Just a general answer/info here at the bottom of the thread...
I realize our container build pipeline is not great, but it's currently
working and I will keep it working until we replace it.
I agree we should replace it, and there's lots of options, but I don't
think this thread is the place to
On 5/9/23 07:53, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 19:35, Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/8/23 19:09, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 7:05 PM Demi Marie Obenour
>> wrote:
On 5/8/23 18:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:29:02PM
Hey Kevin,
On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 09:24 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm broadly in favor here, some comments in line...
>
> ...snip...
> > It will be beneficial to consider the
> > [https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/fedora-toolbox
> > fedora-toolbox] images as release-blocking deliverables
Hey Zbigniew,
On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 19:57 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:24:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'm broadly in favor here, some comments in line...
> >
> > ...snip...
> > > First, we want to ensure that there are up to date
> > >
Hey Clement,
On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 09:45 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 22:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:57:30PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-
> > Szmek wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we need some clarity wrt. to the dependency order here.
> > >
On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 19:35, Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
> On 5/8/23 19:09, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 7:05 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/8/23 18:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:29:02PM +0100, Sebastian Crane wrote:
> Dear Kevin,
>
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 6:19 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 9:11 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:57:30PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we need some clarity wrt. to the dependency order here.
> > > Let's say we:
> > > >
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 9:11 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:57:30PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > I think we need some clarity wrt. to the dependency order here.
> > Let's say we:
> > > In order to do this at branch point, we will need to move building
On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 22:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:57:30PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > I think we need some clarity wrt. to the dependency order here.
> > Let's say we:
> > > In order to do this at branch point, we will need to move building this
On 5/8/23 19:09, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 7:05 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/8/23 18:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:29:02PM +0100, Sebastian Crane wrote:
Dear Kevin,
>> Hmm, quoting from https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11092:
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 7:05 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 5/8/23 18:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:29:02PM +0100, Sebastian Crane wrote:
> >> Dear Kevin,
> >>
> Hmm, quoting from https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11092:
> >> Also the aarch64 cluster is running
On 5/8/23 18:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:29:02PM +0100, Sebastian Crane wrote:
>> Dear Kevin,
>>
Hmm, quoting from https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11092:
>> Also the aarch64 cluster is running on Fedora 33 boxes, so we
>> should probably try to do a full
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:29:02PM +0100, Sebastian Crane wrote:
> Dear Kevin,
>
> > > Hmm, quoting from https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11092:
> > > >> Also the aarch64 cluster is running on Fedora 33 boxes, so we
> > > >> should probably try to do a full redeploy :-(
> > > > We can't upgrade it
On 5/8/23 16:10, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 15:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:24:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to note that making this blocking doesn't waive any kind of
>>> magic wand that makes our infrastructure
Dear Kevin,
> > Hmm, quoting from https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11092:
> > >> Also the aarch64 cluster is running on Fedora 33 boxes, so we
> > >> should probably try to do a full redeploy :-(
> > > We can't upgrade it from f33 because docker is no longer in f34+ and
> > > openshift origin /
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:57:30PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> I think we need some clarity wrt. to the dependency order here.
> Let's say we:
> > In order to do this at branch point, we will need to move building this
> > image into the compose process and mark it blocking.
>
On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 15:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:24:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > I'd like to note that making this blocking doesn't waive any kind of
> > magic wand that makes our infrastructure more reliable. ;)
> > The container build
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:24:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm broadly in favor here, some comments in line...
>
> ...snip...
> > First, we want to ensure that there are up to date
> > [https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/fedora-toolbox
> > fedora-toolbox] OCI images published on
> >
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 04:49:09PM +0100, Barry wrote:
> > fedora-toolbox] [https://opencontainers.org/ OCI] images must be
> This url does not exist.
> > [https://containertoolbx.org/ Toolbx] to be usable when a new Fedora
> Nor this one.
Both work fine here. Maybe some temporary network
I'm broadly in favor here, some comments in line...
...snip...
> First, we want to ensure that there are up to date
> [https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/fedora-toolbox
> fedora-toolbox] OCI images published on
> [https://registry.fedoraproject.org/ registry.fedoraproject.org] as
>
> On 8 May 2023, at 14:51, Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ToolbxReleaseBlocker
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only
35 matches
Mail list logo
