On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:09 AM Jonathan Wright wrote:
> I just retired python-acme this morning in F38/39. It's now built by the
> certbot package.
Great, thank you for letting me know.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing
I just retired python-acme this morning in F38/39. It's now built by the
certbot package.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:02 AM Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:28 PM Jerry James wrote:
> > The maintainers of the packages I am about to mention are BCCed on this
> email.
>
> And that
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:28 PM Jerry James wrote:
> The maintainers of the packages I am about to mention are BCCed on this email.
And that is true of this email as well.
> A couple of months ago, I talked about updating the fontawesome-fonts
> package to version 6.x. I want to give an update
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:35:14PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 8:24 AM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > This is particulary nice for Fedora, since v6 includes our new logo!
> Great! Do you happen to be a web developer, or play one on TV? :-)
I have a hand-coded html personal
On pe, 04 marras 2022, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 1:37 AM Matthias Runge wrote:
As a former contributor to those packages, your assumption is correct.
python-XStatic-Font-Awesome can go away; I'll sync with Radomir on that
note.
Great! One less package for me to worry about.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 8:24 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
> This is particulary nice for Fedora, since v6 includes our new logo!
Great! Do you happen to be a web developer, or play one on TV? :-)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 1:37 AM Matthias Runge wrote:
> As a former contributor to those packages, your assumption is correct.
> python-XStatic-Font-Awesome can go away; I'll sync with Radomir on that
> note.
Great! One less package for me to worry about. :-)
> If someone relies on
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:23:02PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> package. Version 6.x has backwards compatibility helpers for both 4.x
> and 5.x, so I would like to see fontawesome-fonts upgraded to 6.x and
> the fontawesome5-fonts package retired. There are a few hurdles to
This is particulary
On 31/10/2022 19:23, Jerry James wrote:
Hi all,
One hurdle is that the current fontawesome-fonts maintainer doesn't
seem to have time to work on the package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488#c9. I'm willing
to help out with that, but would prefer to see somebody with more
