17.03.2015 02:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:02:25 +0300
Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have
worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass
rebuild? It allow estimate amount of
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:02:25 +0300
Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have
worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass
rebuild? It allow estimate amount of broken packages and see
dependencies. Do
15.03.2015 16:57, Michael Schwendt пишет:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:49:28 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Right now, many issues/problems are interacting and affecting packages
simultanously, which occasionally render fixing these issues quite
complicated.
So far I've hit:
- GCC-5.0
-
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:49:28 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Right now, many issues/problems are interacting and affecting packages
simultanously, which occasionally render fixing these issues quite
complicated.
So far I've hit:
- GCC-5.0
- Hardening
- boost upgrade
- ImageMagick
-
On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in
On 03/10/2015 01:30 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23.
There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene only in
the case something goes wrong.
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene only in the
case
something goes wrong.
First attempt fails [1] with:
pfsinimgmagick.opfsoutimgmagick.o: : InIn
Hello.
06.03.2015 16:51, Tomáš Smetana wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23.
There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rather
than later as rawhide is
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru
wrote:
According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5 there no
planned mass-rebuild for GCC5.
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
05.03.2015 15:52, Tomáš Smetana wrote:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 02:09:00 +0300
Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Hello.
I have long outstanding update of ImageMagick[1] and plan do it in
rawhide in 1-3 days.
...
Affected packages needs to
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300
Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
pfsinimgmagick.opfsoutimgmagick.o: : InIn functionfunction
``writeFrames(readFramesint(,int ,char* *char)**)': /builddir/'build:/
14 matches
Mail list logo
