/*Vít Ondruch*/ wrote on Tue, 3 Oct 2017 08:21:57 +0200:
Dne 2.10.2017 v 22:31 Hedayat Vatankhah napsal(a):
/*Björn Persson*/ wrote on Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:28:02 +0200:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Today We rely on you as a packager
verifying the sources, and by uploading them
Dne 3.10.2017 v 08:21 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>
> Dne 2.10.2017 v 22:31 Hedayat Vatankhah napsal(a):
>> /*Björn Persson*/ wrote on Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:28:02 +0200:
>>> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Today We rely on you as a packager
verifying the sources, and by uploading them
Dne 2.10.2017 v 22:31 Hedayat Vatankhah napsal(a):
>
> /*Björn Persson*/ wrote on Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:28:02 +0200:
>> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> Today We rely on you as a packager
>>> verifying the sources, and by uploading them directly you are saying
>>> this is really what I
/*Björn Persson*/ wrote on Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:28:02 +0200:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Today We rely on you as a packager
verifying the sources, and by uploading them directly you are saying
this is really what I intended to send you and I have ensured that it
is good. You would
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Today We rely on you as a packager
> verifying the sources, and by uploading them directly you are saying
> this is really what I intended to send you and I have ensured that it
> is good. You would need to work with release engineering and
>
El mar, 26-09-2017 a las 01:49 +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah escribió:
> /*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200:
> > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:56:45AM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > > Currently, AFAIK, the suggested method to upload new sources for
> > > a
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Gerald Henriksen [26/09/2017 09:02] :
>>
>> That may be fine for any packagers who are actually paid to package
>> (though even then I would have my doubts that every line of source has
>> been checked), but it is clearly an impossible task in terms of time
>> required
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> :O Great! Currently, I can't even imagine maintaining any packages over
> few megabytes (maybe 100MiB tops, which will be a pain!), but not much
> long before, I had a hard time uploading a 21MiB data... specially since
> there is no way to resume uploading a source to
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:08:18PM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> However, is it really that hard/problematic/.. for Fedora to support
> such a use case? Certainly it'd be much more convenient for
> packagers if such a small (at least, this is how I look at it!)
> enhancement is made.
It's not
/*Matthew Miller*/ wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:28:07 -0400:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:38:07PM +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
If data volume is expensive or difficult for you, you could
look into renting a (virtual) private server and then devel-
oping there via ssh. Offers usually start at
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 05:30:50PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > That may be fine for any packagers who are actually paid to package
> > (though even then I would have my doubts that every line of source has
> > been checked), but it is clearly an impossible task in terms of time
> > required
* Gerald Henriksen [26/09/2017 09:02] :
>
> That may be fine for any packagers who are actually paid to package
> (though even then I would have my doubts that every line of source has
> been checked), but it is clearly an impossible task in terms of time
> required for all the volunteer
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:38:07PM +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> If data volume is expensive or difficult for you, you could
> look into renting a (virtual) private server and then devel-
> oping there via ssh. Offers usually start at less than
> $ 5,-/month. (I'm not aware of free solutions;
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:50:11 + (UTC), you wrote:
>On 2017-09-26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 07:18:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>> A packager is responsible for reviewing the code before uploading it to the
>>> Fedora infrastructure. It does not
On 2017-09-26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 07:18:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>> On 2017-09-25, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>> > /*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200:
>> >> It's an interesting idea but
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 07:18:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2017-09-25, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> > /*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200:
> >> It's an interesting idea but then it would become quite hard to check
> >> if there is a mitm
On 2017-09-25, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> /*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200:
>> It's an interesting idea but then it would become quite hard to check
>> if there is a mitm attack of some sort. With the current process, at
>> least the packager
> On Sep 25, 2017, at 5:38 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
>
> Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
>> […]
>> Yes, but even if I'm forced to download locally, it is much
>> better than being forced to upload it again. (Also, note
>> that the current process
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> […]
> Yes, but even if I'm forced to download locally, it is much
> better than being forced to upload it again. (Also, note
> that the current process doesn't prevent MITM if it happens
> when I download the source).
> Also, it is easier to
/*Richard W.m. Jones*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:11:55 +0100:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:56:45AM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Dear all,
Currently, AFAIK, the suggested method to upload new sources for a
package is using 'fedpkg new-sources' which uploads new sources from
your local
/*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:56:45AM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Dear all,
Currently, AFAIK, the suggested method to upload new sources for a package
is using 'fedpkg new-sources' which uploads new sources from your local
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:56:45AM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> Dear all,
> Currently, AFAIK, the suggested method to upload new sources for a
> package is using 'fedpkg new-sources' which uploads new sources from
> your local system. I wonder if there is a method to upload new
> sources from
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:56:45AM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> Dear all,
> Currently, AFAIK, the suggested method to upload new sources for a package
> is using 'fedpkg new-sources' which uploads new sources from your local
> system. I wonder if there is a method to upload new sources from a
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> Dear all,
> Currently, AFAIK, the suggested method to upload new sources for a
> package is using 'fedpkg new-sources' which uploads new sources from
> your local system. I wonder if there is a method to upload new sources
> from a URL rather than your local filesystem?
24 matches
Mail list logo