Updates for f31 and up submitted.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=mumble
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
Pull request has been rebased and is ready to be merged. Thanks for
your help with this Richard.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 6:59 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 4:34 PM Carl George wrote:
>>
>> I read the policy [0] as "major (bug | security) fixes", and the CVE
>> is only
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 4:34 PM Carl George wrote:
> I read the policy [0] as "major (bug | security) fixes", and the CVE
> is only rated as moderate [1]. Should the policy be read as "(major
> bug | any security) fixes"? I am not opposed to building the update
> on F31 as well.
>
> [0]
>
I read the policy [0] as "major (bug | security) fixes", and the CVE
is only rated as moderate [1]. Should the policy be read as "(major
bug | any security) fixes"? I am not opposed to building the update
on F31 as well.
[0]
In your original email you said that this resolves CVE bug [1], which says
in it:
"NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only
one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at
the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of
F32 is fine by me. Based on the updates policy [0], I don't believe
this update qualifies under the "major bug fixes and security fixes"
restriction for the previous stable release.
[0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#all-other-updates
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:54 PM
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:42 PM Carl George wrote:
> Yes, the patch is from an upstream pull request [0] that has already
> been merged to the master branch [1] and is planned to be included in
> their next release [2] (it's not part of the current 1.3.2 tag). The
> pull request includes a
Yes, the patch is from an upstream pull request [0] that has already
been merged to the master branch [1] and is planned to be included in
their next release [2] (it's not part of the current 1.3.2 tag). The
pull request includes a comment linking to said pull request, per the
packaging
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 3:30 PM Carl George wrote:
> Howdy folks,
>
> This is a non-responsive maintainer check for fedpop, in accordance with
> policy [0]. I submitted a pull request for the mumble package last month
> that has not been answered [1]. Merging this pull request would resolve
>
