On 27. 12. 18 11:52, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
Am 19.12.18 um 15:20 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
This should all be gone after I mass retire on Monday.
If the package is already retired but not known to be, retiring it
again will make sure it is retired correctly.
it would be great to verify this. In
Hi,
Am 19.12.18 um 15:20 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
This should all be gone after I mass retire on Monday.
If the package is already retired but not known to be, retiring it
again will make sure it is retired correctly.
it would be great to verify this. In the past I spotted some packages
like
On 17. 12. 18 21:02, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
On 19. 12. 18 15:03, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Unfortunately, this list still contains many packages that were already
retired eons ago. (The information that the packages are retired must have
been lost for some reason during the migration to Pagure or during a Pagure
upgrade.) E.g., kdelibs4 was
Unfortunately, this list still contains many packages that were already
retired eons ago. (The information that the packages are retired must have
been lost for some reason during the migration to Pagure or during a Pagure
upgrade.) E.g., kdelibs4 was renamed to kdelibs years ago. (It might
I would take over doclifter.
Miro Hrončok writes:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:13:05PM +, Dave Love wrote:
> Miro Hrončok writes:
>
> > On 18. 12. 18 11:22, Dave Love wrote:
> >>> loveshack: makedepf90
> >>
> >> I don't think that's the case now. dl_poly used it, but I've removed
> >> the dependency and I wonder why it's showing up with a
Miro Hrončok writes:
> On 18. 12. 18 11:22, Dave Love wrote:
>>> loveshack: makedepf90
>>
>> I don't think that's the case now. dl_poly used it, but I've removed
>> the dependency and I wonder why it's showing up with a threat (I assume)
>> to remove dl_poly.
>
> Indeed:
>
> Depending on:
On Tuesday, 18 December 2018 at 11:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 18. 12. 18 11:22, Dave Love wrote:
> > > loveshack: makedepf90
> >
> > I don't think that's the case now. dl_poly used it, but I've removed
> > the dependency and I wonder why it's showing up with a threat (I assume)
> > to remove
On 18. 12. 18 11:22, Dave Love wrote:
loveshack: makedepf90
I don't think that's the case now. dl_poly used it, but I've removed
the dependency and I wonder why it's showing up with a threat (I assume)
to remove dl_poly.
Indeed:
Depending on: makedepf90 (1), status change: 2017-10-06 (62
I'll need to learn myself some python to be able to work with the code, but I'm
willing to take over blueman.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
On 17. 12. 18 22:02, Gwyn Ciesla wrote:
I've already filed a ticket for python-dropbox.
About that: I don't filter the "already filed" packages out now when
sending the e-mails, but I plan to filter them once retiring.
As long as the ticket has reasonable name, I will see it and not retire
I've already filed a ticket for python-dropbox.
On 12/17/18 2:02 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
> for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with
Hi Miro,
I can pick opencity and python-power from this long list and will file tickets
to unorphan both packages. There's a new release from upstream for opencity and
python-power development is quite active on GitHub.
Regards, Raphael
___
devel
14 matches
Mail list logo
