On Seg, 2013-10-07 at 02:21 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 07.10.2013 02:17, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >> The *-keyring packages are not strictly
> >> dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate "Suggests:"
> >> if
> >> we had somet
On 07.10.2013 02:17, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
The *-keyring packages are not strictly
dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate "Suggests:"
if
we had something similar), since pbuilder is not limited to building
packages for debian
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> The *-keyring packages are not strictly
> dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate "Suggests:"
> if
> we had something similar), since pbuilder is not limited to building
> packages for debian and ubuntu, but might also be us
On 06.10.2013 06:27, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2013-09-23 at 10:30 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at
On 04.10.2013 20:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:30:11AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ...
I'll look into it as soon as it starts to look that devscripts will be approved.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On Seg, 2013-09-23 at 10:30 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >> On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:30:11AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro
On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> This has the downside that it'll add the dependency on gnupg,
> which is not great. Maybe simply create a keyrings-filesystem
> package with this directory and have whoever installs keyrings
> depend on it.
If gnupg owns the di
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an
> >>easy way to build deb p
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an
easy way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review
here: [1]), I've packaged devscripts,
On 20.09.2013 13:33, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an easy
way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review here: [1]),
I've packaged devscripts, debian-keyring, u
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an easy
> way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review here: [1]),
> I've packaged devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring and jetring.
> Reviews are
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an
> easy way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review
> here: [1]), I've packaged devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring
> and jetring. Rev
On 09/12/2013 09:36 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Okay.
So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor.
Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange. Btw,
you will notice that they are all very similar, so if you manage those
two, xfoil should be just as easy ;)
Sandro
I ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2013 07:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted the following package review requests: - #1007539 -
> xfoil: Subsonic Airfoil Development System - #1007540 - rotor:
> Design and analysis tools for propellers and windmills - #1007541 -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2013 09:36 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>> Okay. So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor.
>>
>>
>>
> Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002251 ;)
Btw,
> you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2013 08:32 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 12.09.2013 19:45, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/12/2013 07:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've posted the following package review requ
On 12.09.2013 22:05, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 09/12/2013 09:36 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Okay.
So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor.
Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange. Btw,
you will notice that they are all very similar, so if you manage those
two, x
Okay.
So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor.
Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange. Btw,
you will notice that they are all very similar, so if you manage those
two, xfoil should be just as easy ;)
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
On 12.09.2013 19:45, Antonio Trande wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2013 07:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
I've posted the following package review requests: - #1007539 -
xfoil: Subsonic Airfoil Development System - #1007540 - rotor:
Design and analysis tools for
Of course. Willing to review such packages. But I'm sorry I can't use
computer now.
I will review it tomorrow.
Cheers.
Sent from Note I
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/cod
Hi Christopher,
Would you please review this one ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989015
In exchange I would gladly review your other package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
Dridi
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:29 AM, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for y
Hi,
Thank you for your quick response.
I'll review this one!
fdm - A simple lightweight tool of fetching, filtering and delivering emails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989297
2013/7/29 Christopher Meng
> Or this one if you don't like the previous.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Or this one if you don't like the previous.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989297
fdm - A simple lightweight tool of fetching, filtering and delivering emails
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Co
Exchange
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> SkyX is taken, too.
>
> Swap again with sstp-client, Microsoft Secure Socket Tunneling
> Protocol (SSTP) Client
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976770
>
I've taken sstp-client, I'll get started on it later today.
Rich
--
SkyX is taken, too.
Swap again with sstp-client, Microsoft Secure Socket Tunneling
Protocol (SSTP) Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976770
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/21/2013 08:29 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
I've taken mosquitto aka BZ#958585.
Swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975701
Thanks Christopher, I've taken pcapfix.
Rich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
I've taken mosquitto aka BZ#958585.
Swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975701
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Forgot about this. Now it's taken...
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952229
> Review Request: canl-c++ - EMI Common Authentication library -
> bindings
> for C++
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Since there are no other volunteers I'll take these, too.
> 2 Globus Toolkit packages (these are simple since they follow the
> template used for all Globus toolkit packages):
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
> Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-lsf - Globus Toolkit - L
Am Montag, den 20.05.2013, 15:47 +0200 schrieb Mattias Ellert:
> Hi
Hi Mattias!
> I have a few review requests that I would like to arrange swaps for:
>
> 3 packages related to particle physics simulation:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877275
> Review Request: lhapdf - Les Hou
On 03/04/2013 11:16 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
I've got few review requests which got stuck for a while, and I'd love
to trading reviews with anyone.
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/906473 - erlang-ranch - Socket acceptor
pool for TCP protocols
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/906481 - erla
On 08/02/13 10:52, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> Will do. I'm currently packaging a tonne of deps for buddycloud, so
>> many review swaps may be imminent!
>
> Ah, buddycloud in Fedora? Cool. I'll have to try it out one day :-)
Hopefully "one day" is going to be reasonably soon :)
There are qui
Quoting Jamie Nguyen (2013-02-08 10:12:12)
> On 07/02/13 21:33, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Thu 07 Feb 2013 02:26:48 PM EST, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> >> On 07/02/13 19:24, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> >>> Now that I'm a bit more familiar with node.js packaging (ie,
> >>> never even looked at node.js befo
On 07/02/13 21:33, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu 07 Feb 2013 02:26:48 PM EST, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> On 07/02/13 19:24, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>>> Now that I'm a bit more familiar with node.js packaging (ie,
>>> never even looked at node.js before this week...), I'll take
>>> it.
>>>
>>> I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 07 Feb 2013 02:26:48 PM EST, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> On 07/02/13 19:24, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> Now that I'm a bit more familiar with node.js packaging (ie, never even
>> looked at node.js before this week...), I'll take it.
>>
>> I don't currently
On 07/02/13 19:24, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Now that I'm a bit more familiar with node.js packaging (ie, never even
> looked at node.js before this week...), I'll take it.
>
> I don't currently have any packages for you to review, so you get off
> scot-free. Well, for now at least ;)
Oops, looks lik
On 05/02/13 23:19, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Anyone want to swap reviews for some of my outstanding Node.js reviews?
>
> FPC recently approved guidelines for Node.js packaging that are fairly
> easy to check against:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Node.js
>
> The most criti
On 10/29/2012 02:18 PM, Clément David wrote:
Hi folks,
Would anyone want to swap reviews? I need "scirenderer[1]" reviewed in
order to update scilab to the latest (5.4.0) version.
[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661
Thanks,
I can take this if you'd like to take on
https:
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:46 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have a number of outstanding reviews that are available for swap.
> All
> are fairly trivial so shouldn't take too much time:
Hey Brendan,
>
> ams - ALSA Modular Synth - a port from the CCRMA repo
> https://bugzilla.redhat.
Hello!
2012/7/16 Brendan Jones :
I took these:
> Add64 - an additive synthesizer for JACK
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830664
>
> samplv1 -A polyphonic sampler synthesizer with stereo fx
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829971
It would be great if you review these
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Dan Callaghan wrote:
> Excerpts from Kalpa Welivitigoda's message of Sat Jun 30 18:07:07 +1000 2012:
>> Hi, I have packaged three sugar activities and I would like for review swaps.
>>
>> sugar-nutrition: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823234
>> sugar-
Excerpts from Jason L Tibbitts III's message of Mon Jul 02 07:38:40 +1000 2012:
> > "DC" == Dan Callaghan writes:
>
> DC> I will take all three (they look straightforward :-) in exchange for
> DC> saslwrapper:
>
> Since you appear to be familiar with sugar, is there any possibility
> that yo
> "DC" == Dan Callaghan writes:
DC> I will take all three (they look straightforward :-) in exchange for
DC> saslwrapper:
Since you appear to be familiar with sugar, is there any possibility
that you (or anyone else who is familiar with sugar stuff) could cast a
glance at https://bugzilla.re
Excerpts from Kalpa Welivitigoda's message of Sat Jun 30 18:07:07 +1000 2012:
> Hi, I have packaged three sugar activities and I would like for review swaps.
>
> sugar-nutrition: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823234
> sugar-recall: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823236
>
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
wrote:
> Oops, I remembered I did look very quickly in cliquer, and it was
> because I just made a few quick patches to your package :-)
> You may want to check
> http://kenobi.mandriva.com/~pcpa/cliquer-1.21-1.fc16.src.rpm
> for the
2012/5/1 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
:
> 2012/5/1 Jerry James :
>> I'm interested in swapping reviews. Here are the ones I need reviewed:
>>
>> vinci: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790560
>> permlib: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797312
>>
>> Let me know what I can r
2012/5/1 Jerry James :
> I'm interested in swapping reviews. Here are the ones I need reviewed:
>
> vinci: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790560
> permlib: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797312
>
> Let me know what I can review for you. Thanks,
Ok. I replied in the ab
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've a simple new package containing some
> support scripts for the OpenStack packages:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811601
This looks very simple, so I took it.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Gro
Hi,
I'll take the following if you could take:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814924
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814916
Thanks
Brendan
On 04/21/2012 04:14 PM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
One package split:
voms-api-java:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I've got two reviews I need completed which are dependencies for
> another package I'd like to submit.
>
> Pivy
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975
Please open a new review request so $reporter == ${submitter of review
reques
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I've got two reviews I need completed which are dependencies for
> another package I'd like to submit.
>
> Pivy
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975
>
> zipios++
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812058
I've starte
Hi,
On 01/06/2012 06:09 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 01/06/2012 05:03 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
2011/12/15 Brendan Jones:
I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so feel
free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
Am Freitag, 6. Januar 2012, 18:09:08 schrieb Brendan Jones:
> On 01/06/2012 05:03 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> > Hello All!
> >
> > 2011/12/15 Brendan Jones:
> >> I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so
> >> feel free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority:
>
On 01/06/2012 05:03 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
2011/12/15 Brendan Jones:
I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so feel
free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760270
lv2-ams-plugins - LV2 port of
Hello All!
2011/12/15 Brendan Jones :
> I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so feel
> free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760270
> lv2-ams-plugins - LV2 port of the Alsa Modular Synth modules
>
> https:
On 01/06/2012 12:33 PM, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2012, 16:31:49 schrieb Brendan Jones:
On 12/15/2011 07:14 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so
feel free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority:
https://bug
On 01/06/2012 10:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760270
lv2-ams-plugins - LV2 port of the Alsa Modular Synth modules
Hans if you could take the lv2-ams-plugins that would be great! I will
eagerly await yours ...
As for the ladspa plugins, sure, happy t
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2012, 16:31:49 schrieb Brendan Jones:
> On 12/15/2011 07:14 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
> > I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so
> > feel free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Hi,
On 01/05/2012 04:31 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 12/15/2011 07:14 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so
feel free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760270
lv2-ams-plugins - LV
On 12/15/2011 07:14 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so
feel free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760270
lv2-ams-plugins - LV2 port of the Alsa Modular Synth modules
https://b
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Brendan Jones
wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 10:27 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>
>>
>> polybori
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742388
>> This is a package rename review. The original package,
>> python-polybori, ships the C++ and Python interfaces in the same
>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Scott Tsai wrote:
> I'll trade you js-of-ocaml:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767042
> for gap.
Sounds great. Thanks, Scott.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On 12/20/2011 10:27 PM, Jerry James wrote:
polybori
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742388
This is a package rename review. The original package,
python-polybori, ships the C++ and Python interfaces in the same
package. The package is being renamed to facilitate splitting the C++
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:27:07 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> gap
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756635
I'll trade you js-of-ocaml:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767042
for gap.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
On 11/21/2011 07:04 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> Is anyone willing to swap a couple of reviews? I need reviews for:
>
> cryptominisat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721174
> In spite of the name, there's nothing cryptographic about this
> package. The author thinks it would be a useful
On ۱۱/۱۱/۲۱ 03:06, Jiri Popelka wrote:
> I've taken them.
>
> Here is mine (SpliX - Driver for QPDL/SPL2 printers)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755069
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiri
Thanks, I took yours.
Hedayat
>
> On 11/21/2011 11:15 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
* Sorry, it was supposed to be in both HTML and text formats *
Hi all,
I'd like to swap these reviews with some other (not-so-complicated) ones:
Saaghar[1]- A Cross-Platform Persian Poetry Software
This is a Qt based application, and should not be complicated.
jcal[2] - Unix cal-like interfac
I've taken them.
Here is mine (SpliX - Driver for QPDL/SPL2 printers)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755069
Thanks,
Jiri
On 11/21/2011 11:15 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to swap these reviews with some other (not-so-complicated) ones:
Saaghar[1]- A Cross-Platf
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 01:45:25PM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
>
>
> body
> p { margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt; }
>
>bidimailui-detected-decoding-type="UTF-8" bgcolor="#FF"
> text="#00">
> Hi all,
> I'd like to swap these reviews with some o
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719152
> gappalib-coq - Coq support library for gappa (requires flocq)
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719757
> apron - Numerical abstract domain library
Thomas swapped 1 review with
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Thomas Spura
wrote:
> Do you consider this an easy or a hard one: ;)
> espresso - Extensible Simulation Package for Research on Soft matter
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740846
Molecular dynamics simulations! Wow, I suddenly flashed back to grad
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:18:55 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> The first two should be dead easy. From Fedora's point of view,
> they're just data packages; no libraries or binaries are involved.
> The third one is a bit complex. I had to tweak a lot of pathnames to
> match existing Fedora practice, as
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:37:10PM +0200, Volker Fröhlich wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737401
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722709
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710648
>
> I did a couple of reviews lately, but I would swap.
I've never don
Tom Callaway wrote:
> I have two packages that need to be reviewed:
>
> * gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
> ( This one is a bit colorful, but it should be easy enough to review. )
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203
>
> * freewrl - X3D / VRML visua
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 14:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Sure, I can probably pick one up. I don't have any unassigned right
> now but I'll settle for finishing up OpenImageIO[1] :)
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720411
>
>
I'm just finishing up with
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would any one like to swap reviews :)?
>
> These two are *very very* simple packages that need to be reviewed.
> They're holding up xmedcon[1]
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714327
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
On 06/15/2011 04:03 PM, Ian Weller wrote:
> 712562 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-deviantart - the deviantart
>> gnome-shell theme
>> 712567 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-ubuntu-ambiance - the
>> ubuntu-ambiance gnome-shell theme
Yeah, both of these should really be renamed. The tron one wa
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:18:28PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 08:39 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 712566 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy - the tron-legacy
> > gnome-shell theme
>
> This is a pretty clear trademark infringement concern. I'm about to go
> block
> On 06/15/2011 08:39 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 712566 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy - the tron-legacy
>> gnome-shell theme
>
> This is a pretty clear trademark infringement concern. I'm about to go
> block this as FE-Legal, but you should come up with a different name.
On 06/15/2011 08:39 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
> 712566 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy - the tron-legacy
> gnome-shell theme
This is a pretty clear trademark infringement concern. I'm about to go
block this as FE-Legal, but you should come up with a different name.
~tom
==
Hi Jerry,
/*Jerry James */ wrote on 04/28/2011 10:19:39 PM
+0450:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to swap a couple of reviews. My packages:
>
> openfst: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681976
> This is the next chunk of a voice recognition stack (CMU Sphinx) I've
> slowly been pushing into Fed
On 03/11/2011 05:07 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to swap reviews. My stalled review requests are:
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652543 - erlang-riak_client
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/680488 - erlang-basho_stats
>
> This review is different - it depends on previous
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on packaging lcd4linux (to use together with the digital
> picture frames I also wrote a libgphoto driver for a while ago).
>
> The packaging is complete and now I'm looking for reviewers for the
> following 3 packa
Taking the remaining one: erlang-webmachine.
Here is mine (openresolv):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668153
Jiri
On 01/10/2011 07:30 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine ones (all of them are
> Erlang-related):
>
> * erlang-ebloo
Hello Peter,
I have one gnome-guitar (gtk mono based) at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663018
I will take erlang-ebloom and erlang-skerl .
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine ones (all of them
2010/11/17 Hans de Goede :
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for someone to swap 2 reviews with, I would like to see the
> following reviewed:
>
> cortado - Java media framework:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649781
I'll take this.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing li
26.08.2010 18:34, Chen Lei пишет:
> I've have several review requests that have been sitting around for a while
> now. Many of them are new dependencies for existing packages in
> fedora, anyone want to swap?
>
> EmfEngine(new dep for qtiplot 0.9.8.1):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:34:14PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> I've have several review requests that have been sitting around for a while
> now. Many of them are new dependencies for existing packages in
> fedora, anyone want to swap?
> libqmf (dep for qt-mobility):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bu
On 08/14/2010 02:19 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Matthias Runge
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> currently I'm looking for a review for two of my packages:
>> lockfile-progs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115
>> is a dependency of
>> logcheck: ht
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Matthias Runge
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> currently I'm looking for a review for two of my packages:
> lockfile-progs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115
> is a dependency of
> logcheck: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
>
> liblockfil
201 - 294 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
