Dne 12.12.2011 21:16, Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallaghersgall...@redhat.com wrote:
* #715 Provenpackager education/status/brainstorming (sgallagh,
18:43:02)
There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
extensions from being uploaded
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 14:06 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:22:06PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
To some extent I agree with both sgallagh's sentiment and the logical
conclusion you're drawing. However, I think the lookaside cache is
a necessary
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:12:30PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 14:06 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:22:06PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
To some extent I agree with both sgallagh's sentiment and the logical
conclusion you're drawing.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:53 PM, J. Bruce Fields bfie...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:12:30PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 14:06 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:22:06PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
To some extent I agree
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
* #715 Provenpackager education/status/brainstorming (sgallagh,
18:43:02)
There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
extensions from being uploaded to the lookaside cache. Could .patch
be added
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:16 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
* #715 Provenpackager education/status/brainstorming (sgallagh,
18:43:02)
There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
extensions from
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 15:21:11 -0500,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Of course, a whitelist might be a better idea. Maybe we only
allow .tar.gz, .tar.bz2 and .zip to be uploaded this way and make
additional exceptions as they arise.
.tgz is another common extension.
--
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 15:21:11 -0500,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Of course, a whitelist might be a better idea. Maybe we only
allow .tar.gz, .tar.bz2 and .zip to be uploaded this way and make
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 15:21:11 -0500,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Of course, a whitelist might be a better idea. Maybe we only
allow .tar.gz, .tar.bz2 and .zip to be uploaded this way and make
On 12/12/2011 10:16 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
extensions from being uploaded to the lookaside cache. Could .patch
be added to that list?
Please don't do that. In my opinion the lookaside cache is the proper
place for patches for
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:26 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 12/12/2011 10:16 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
extensions from being uploaded to the lookaside cache. Could .patch
be added to that list?
Please don't do that. In my
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:21 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:16 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
* #715 Provenpackager education/status/brainstorming (sgallagh,
18:43:02)
There was
On 12/12/2011 10:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:26 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 12/12/2011 10:16 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
extensions from being uploaded to the lookaside cache. Could .patch
be added to
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:34:12 +0100
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:21 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:16 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
* #715 Provenpackager
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:52 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:34:12 +0100
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:21 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:16 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:47:53PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 12/12/2011 10:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Patches should never be in the lookaside cache, because
it is very difficult to view them.
IMO if that'd be a consideration, the lookaside cache shouldn't really
exist at all,
On 12/12/2011 04:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
So I think for me, lookaside isn't there to separate data from upstream from
data generated by Fedora -- it's there to supplement the SCM when a file is
not suitable for direct inclusion into the SCM.
I agree, and the tooling we're building into
On 12/12/2011 11:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:47:53PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 12/12/2011 10:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Patches should never be in the lookaside cache, because
it is very difficult to view them.
IMO if that'd be a consideration, the
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:24 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 15:21:11 -0500,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Of course, a whitelist might be a better idea. Maybe we only
allow .tar.gz,
19 matches
Mail list logo
