Re: Tenacity

2023-02-10 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 17:46:51 +0100 Alec Leamas wrote: > Using several wxWidgets version is indeed a bit painful, been there, > done that. One quick fix is to configure alternatives to use the new > 3.2 version version of wx-config instead of the default 3.0. I'm not sure what alternatives is,

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-09 Thread Alec Leamas
Hi Stan, On 09/02/2023 16:55, stan via devel wrote: I downloaded the wxWidgets code from their site, and compiled it using their instructions on f37. Compiled easily, with only a warning about missing midi support. I installed it in /usr/local When I tried to get tenacity to use it, though,

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-09 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:51:37 -0700 stan via devel wrote: > lot of (any?) sound editing anymore. Just for the challenge. Maybe > not. :-) I see lots of other people have taken up the challenge, and reported issues they found, but I thought I would update with my unsuccessful results. I

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-09 Thread Scott Talbert
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Scott Talbert wrote: On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote: > On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: >> wxGTK should have that... > > It should, and they fixed

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-09 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Scott Talbert wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote: > > > On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > >> wxGTK should have that... > > > > It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X > series > > as far as I can

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-09 Thread Scott Talbert
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote: On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: wxGTK should have that... It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X series as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some reason liblibnyquist.so

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-08 Thread Brandon Nielsen via devel
On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: wxGTK should have that... It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X series as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some reason liblibnyquist.so is missing. F38 / Rawhide has some lisp issue with the

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-08 Thread Reon Beon via devel
wxGTK should have that... ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-08 Thread Brandon Nielsen via devel
On 2/8/23 10:59 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: stan via devel writes: As they say in the BUILDING.md file, though, fedora lacks wxWidgets 3.1.5 or greater. That stops the configuration, cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build when it errors out. That's odd; as far as I can see, F36 has 3.1.5 and F37

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-08 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> stan via devel writes: > As they say in the BUILDING.md file, > though, fedora lacks wxWidgets 3.1.5 or greater. That stops the > configuration, cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build when it errors out. That's odd; as far as I can see, F36 has 3.1.5 and F37 has 3.2.1. - J<

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-08 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:02:47 -0700 stan wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:44:30 -0700 > stan wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100 > > Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: > > > > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going > > > for Fedora? - I would prefer that

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-08 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:44:30 -0700 stan wrote: > On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100 > Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: > > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going > > for Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage > > version . > > I knew about the

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:22 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 7:26 PM Philip Rhoades via devel > wrote: > > > > People, > > > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for > > Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . . > >

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-08 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100 Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for > Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . I knew about the corporate takeover of audacity, but I didn't know about this fork.

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-07 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 7:26 PM Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: > > People, > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for > Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . . > As I recall, in the beginning, Tenacity (to perform most meaningful

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-07 Thread Brandon Nielsen via devel
On 2/7/23 1:25 PM, Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: People, Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . . Thanks, Phil. I have a copr[0]. It has some issues and the current version is old. I

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-07 Thread Philip Wyett
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 21:03 +, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tenacity ? > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-07 Thread Reon Beon via devel
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tenacity ? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: