On 03/15/2012 08:24 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Luke Macken does Bodhi. It certainly sounds non-trivial to me, for a
start, Bodhi uses FAS and Bugzilla does not.
It would be trivial if these decisions would be made by a human who is CCed
on both (i.e. the maintainer of the
Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit :
Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having
to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is
a real pain.
Have you tried fedora-easy-karma ?
On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit :
Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having
to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is
a real pain.
Have you tried fedora-easy-karma ?
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:15 AM, John Ellson john.ell...@comcast.net wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.9.3.995-0.6.git20120314.fc17
The update contains fixes for three problems: 800690, 798102, 802540
I contributed to the first bug, 800690, and duly tested and
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 12:15 -0400, John Ellson wrote:
On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit :
Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having
to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 12:15 -0400, John Ellson wrote:
On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit :
Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having
to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works
On 03/16/2012 05:15 PM, John Ellson wrote:
On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit :
Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having
to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is
a
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:29:33AM +0100, Emanuel Rietveld wrote:
On 03/15/2012 08:24 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Luke Macken does Bodhi. It certainly sounds non-trivial to me, for a
start, Bodhi uses FAS and Bugzilla does not.
It would be trivial if these decisions would
David Tardon wrote:
How do we prevent inexperienced testers from giving undeserved karma and
thus causing an update to be automatically pushed to stable?
One has to fulfil certain requirements before one becomes a packager.
But anyone with FAS account can give karma to an update...
+1, the
Adam Williamson wrote:
That might be an appropriate time to try and work some kind of
connection between Bugzilla and Bodhi. But I still think it might be
very difficult to do; it's very difficult to parse a freeform Bugzilla
comment
That's why it's best to leave this to a human!
Software is
On 03/16/2012 10:06 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
David Tardon wrote:
How do we prevent inexperienced testers from giving undeserved karma and
thus causing an update to be automatically pushed to stable?
One has to fulfil certain requirements before one becomes a packager.
But anyone with FAS
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, John Ellson john.ell...@comcast.net wrote:
Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to
find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is a real
pain.
Typically the link to the Bodhi update is provided in the BZ. I
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 12:04 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, John Ellson john.ell...@comcast.net wrote:
Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to
find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is a real
pain.
Adam Williamson wrote:
Luke Macken does Bodhi. It certainly sounds non-trivial to me, for a
start, Bodhi uses FAS and Bugzilla does not.
It would be trivial if these decisions would be made by a human who is CCed
on both (i.e. the maintainer of the package) rather than by software.
14 matches
Mail list logo
