Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Hi, On Thursday, 2022-09-08 00:59:17 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Sandro wrote: > > Mozilla's blog entry doesn't substantiate the claim and the linked bug > > report[1] is not publicly accessible. > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1784838 > > The best way then

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

and Thunderbird 102.2.2 with Security Fixes was released upstream yesterday On 9/8/22, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Sandro wrote: >> Mozilla's blog entry doesn't substantiate the claim and the linked bug >> report[1] is not publicly accessible. >> >> [1]

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > The best way then would be to check whether the one-line fix: > https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/log?rev=1784838 Actually, there are two parts, and the main one is more than one line. It had looked to me at a first glance that those are just the same commit

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Sandro wrote: > Mozilla's blog entry doesn't substantiate the claim and the linked bug > report[1] is not publicly accessible. > > [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1784838 The best way then would be to check whether the one-line fix:

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

On 07-09-2022 10:04, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Marius Schwarz wrote: I know it was a security update for https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2022-38/ , so better safe and live with some minor bugs, than to be

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Marius Schwarz wrote: >> I know it was a security update for >> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2022-38/ >> , >> so better safe and live with some minor bugs, than to be sorry. >

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Marius Schwarz wrote: > I know it was a security update for > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2022-38/ > , > so better safe and live with some minor bugs, than to be sorry. Debian claims on

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Moreover, thunderbird in on the critical path update list; Bodhi > requires 14 days of testing for those packages, but it is set to require > only +2 karma, so packagers easily bypass the testing phase, like it is > clearly happened here (pushed to stable just after

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Il 03/09/22 02:56, l...@fedoraproject.org ha scritto: > > On 2022-09-02 10:49 a.m., Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: >> Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. >> >> This new version was known to bring incompatible changes to several >> addons, yet it has been submitted to

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

W dniu 3.09.2022 o 10:47, Demi Marie Obenour pisze: On 9/3/22 04:42, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: W dniu 3.09.2022 o 02:56, l...@fedoraproject.org pisze: Which addons are incompatible? Additionally, use "Addon Compatibility Check" for the purpose. The best practice is to contact these addons

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

As I did those updates.. well explained, thx. But this then seems to be a more general problem of how we want to support a switch an application from one ESR/LTS release if it is EOL to the next. not terribly differently than others -- with an abundance of end-user education and caution?

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Hi, As I did those updates.. On Friday, 2022-09-02 17:49:57 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. Actually we already had 102.2.0 a week before on 2022-08-23 with https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ddee3eb27c for

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Am 03.09.22 um 08:58 schrieb Mattia Verga via devel: clearly happened here (pushed to stable just after 5 hours). I think critpath updates should spend more time in testing, maybe we should increase the critpath min karma to, at least, +5. Judging from past critpath updates for several apps,

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Am 02.09.22 um 19:49 schrieb Mattia Verga via devel: Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. This new version was known to bring incompatible changes to several addons, yet it has been submitted to a stable Fedora release with autopush enable and just a karma threshold of

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

On 9/3/22 04:42, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 3.09.2022 o 02:56, l...@fedoraproject.org pisze: >>> Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. >>> >>> This new version was known to bring incompatible changes to several >>> addons, yet it has been submitted to a stable

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

W dniu 3.09.2022 o 02:56, l...@fedoraproject.org pisze: Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. This new version was known to bring incompatible changes to several addons, yet it has been submitted to a stable Fedora release with autopush enable and just a karma threshold

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

On 9/3/22 02:58, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 03/09/22 06:36, Demi Marie Obenour ha scritto: >> On 9/2/22 13:49, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: >>> Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. >>> >>> This new version was known to bring incompatible changes to several >>>

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Il 03/09/22 06:36, Demi Marie Obenour ha scritto: > On 9/2/22 13:49, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: >> Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. >> >> This new version was known to bring incompatible changes to several >> addons, yet it has been submitted to a stable Fedora

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

On 9/2/22 13:49, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. > > This new version was known to bring incompatible changes to several > addons, yet it has been submitted to a stable Fedora release with > autopush enable and just a karma threshold

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

On 9/2/22 22:06, Ian Chapman wrote: > On 03/09/2022 01:49, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: >> Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. >> >> This new version was known to bring incompatible changes to several >> addons, yet it has been submitted to a stable Fedora release with

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

On 03/09/2022 01:49, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. This new version was known to bring incompatible changes to several addons, yet it has been submitted to a stable Fedora release with autopush enable and just a karma threshold of

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

On 2022-09-02 10:49 a.m., Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. This new version was known to bring incompatible changes to several addons, yet it has been submitted to a stable Fedora release with autopush enable and just a karma