On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:54:56PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2011/3/27 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de:
On 03/27/2011 11:22 AM, gia...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to rebuild a package with an autotools based toolchain and
it's failing because they use -Werror and gcc 4.6 spits out few
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
In libguestfs we have some pretty complex autotools magic to deal with
all this:
http://git.annexia.org/?p=libguestfs.git;a=blob;f=configure.ac;h=f1b56d2dbe9a118901f7426bcc176f624d841f63;hb=HEAD#l67
CHASM has similar logic for CMake (also clang
On 03/28/2011 04:58 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote:
In libguestfs we have some pretty complex autotools magic to deal with
all this:
http://git.annexia.org/?p=libguestfs.git;a=blob;f=configure.ac;h=f1b56d2dbe9a118901f7426bcc176f624d841f63;hb=HEAD#l67
CHASM
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:08:33 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 03/28/2011 04:58 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote:
In libguestfs we have some pretty complex autotools magic to deal
with all this:
On 03/28/2011 07:40 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:08:33 +0200
Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 03/28/2011 04:58 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote:
In libguestfs we have some pretty complex autotools magic to deal
with all this:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:22:48 +0200, gia...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to rebuild a package with an autotools based toolchain and
it's failing because they use -Werror and gcc 4.6 spits out few new
warnings on the code.
You should fix those erors and and submit them upstream.
Now, is it
On 03/27/2011 11:22 AM, gia...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to rebuild a package with an autotools based toolchain and
it's failing because they use -Werror and gcc 4.6 spits out few new
warnings on the code.
Packages adding -Werror by themselves are poorly designed. Contact their
upstreams
2011/3/27 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de:
On 03/27/2011 11:22 AM, gia...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to rebuild a package with an autotools based toolchain and
it's failing because they use -Werror and gcc 4.6 spits out few new
warnings on the code.
Packages adding -Werror by themselves
Sergio Belkin wrote:
2011/3/27 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de:
Packages adding -Werror by themselves are poorly designed.
Just to learn: Ralf, Why do you say that? :-)
Using -Werror by default is a very bad idea. Warnings can have false
positives, or otherwise be harmless. And in
On 03/28/2011 12:48 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sergio Belkin wrote:
2011/3/27 Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de:
Packages adding -Werror by themselves are poorly designed.
Just to learn: Ralf, Why do you say that? :-)
Using -Werror by default is a very bad idea. Warnings can have false
10 matches
Mail list logo
