On 2023-05-29 10:50, Ben Cotton wrote:
I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but I'm not sure I'm in favor of
it. It certainly beats a company using a shared account against policy
to allow for multiple maintainers. On the other hand, what are the
practical use cases here? As Kevin and Zbigniew
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 01:50:04PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but I'm not sure I'm in favor of
> it. It certainly beats a company using a shared account against policy
> to allow for multiple maintainers. On the other hand, what are the
> practical use cases
I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but I'm not sure I'm in favor of
it. It certainly beats a company using a shared account against policy
to allow for multiple maintainers. On the other hand, what are the
practical use cases here? As Kevin and Zbigniew said in
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2929
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 07:49:54AM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 07:50 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:52 PM Ali Erdinc Koroglu
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 27/05/2023 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > * Kevin Fenzi:
> > > >
> > > > > Today we
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 08:56 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 8:50 AM Philip Wyett
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 07:50 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:52 PM Ali Erdinc Koroglu
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 27/05/2023 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 8:50 AM Philip Wyett wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 07:50 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:52 PM Ali Erdinc Koroglu
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 27/05/2023 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > * Kevin Fenzi:
> > > >
> > > > > Today we have
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 07:50 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:52 PM Ali Erdinc Koroglu
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 27/05/2023 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Kevin Fenzi:
> > >
> > > > Today we have packager groups used in src.fedoraproject.org to allow a
> > > > group of
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:52 PM Ali Erdinc Koroglu
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 27/05/2023 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Kevin Fenzi:
> >
> >> Today we have packager groups used in src.fedoraproject.org to allow a
> >> group of people to maintain packages. In the past this has been used for
> >>
On 27/05/2023 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Kevin Fenzi:
Today we have packager groups used in src.fedoraproject.org to allow a
group of people to maintain packages. In the past this has been used for
SIGs/packaging areas. ie, python-packaging-sig or robotics-sig or the
like.
FESCo has
* Kevin Fenzi:
> Today we have packager groups used in src.fedoraproject.org to allow a
> group of people to maintain packages. In the past this has been used for
> SIGs/packaging areas. ie, python-packaging-sig or robotics-sig or the
> like.
>
> FESCo has been asked about creating company
On 26/05/2023 19:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Should such groups require FESCo approval?
Yes.
If so, what would be requirements to approve/deny?
All group members must prove that they're familiar with Fedora packaging
guidelines, i.e. they must receive sponsorship through the standard
Il 26/05/23 19:39, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> FESCo has been asked about creating company related groups.
> ( https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2966 and https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2929 )
> ie, foocorp-sig / foocopr-packagers. These groups would then be used to
> help maintain packages that foocorp
> Am 27.05.2023 um 07:41 schrieb Benson Muite :
>
> On 5/26/23 20:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Greetings everyone.
>> ….
>> Should we require some documentation? ie, should the group have to make
>> a doc/wiki page explaining what it's for and how to reach group owners
>> in case of problems?
>>
On 5/26/23 20:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> Today we have packager groups used in src.fedoraproject.org to allow a
> group of people to maintain packages. In the past this has been used for
> SIGs/packaging areas. ie, python-packaging-sig or robotics-sig or the
> like.
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
