On Sun, Jul 25, 2021, 04:03 Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
> > for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
> >
> > This means installing the relevant packages and
On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi everybody,
we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
This means installing the relevant packages and restarting kojid
processes on the builders, which will restart any tasks which are
Peter Oliver kirjoitti 19.7.2021 klo 10.53:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 08:08 Otto Urpelainen, wrote:
However, copr seems to understand rpmautospec.
Not really. The release will always be 1. When a package builds again,
end users won't receive the updated version.
Otto Urpelainen writes:
> Dan Čermák kirjoitti 18.7.2021 klo 23.38:
>> Otto Urpelainen writes:
>>
>>> Dan Čermák kirjoitti 17.7.2021 klo 23.10:
Robert-André Mauchin writes:
> What is the situation wrt new packages? Should we enforce the use of
> rpmautospec during reviews or
On 2021-07-19 09:07, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
However, copr seems to understand rpmautospec. Here is a build that
started from a specfile that uses rpmautospec and completed
successfully:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lcts/nextcloud/build/2329596/
Not quite. It doesn't error, but it
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 08:08 Otto Urpelainen, wrote:
>
> However, copr seems to understand rpmautospec.
>
Not really. The release will always be 1. When a package builds again,
end users won't receive the updated version.
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/rpmautospec/issue/199
--
Peter Oliver
>
Dan Čermák kirjoitti 18.7.2021 klo 23.38:
Otto Urpelainen writes:
Dan Čermák kirjoitti 17.7.2021 klo 23.10:
Robert-André Mauchin writes:
What is the situation wrt new packages? Should we enforce the use of
rpmautospec during reviews or is it completely optional?
I think we should
Otto Urpelainen writes:
> Dan Čermák kirjoitti 17.7.2021 klo 23.10:
>> Robert-André Mauchin writes:
>>
>>> What is the situation wrt new packages? Should we enforce the use of
>>> rpmautospec during reviews or is it completely optional?
>>
>> I think we should encourage the usage of
Dan Čermák kirjoitti 17.7.2021 klo 23.10:
Robert-André Mauchin writes:
What is the situation wrt new packages? Should we enforce the use of
rpmautospec during reviews or is it completely optional?
I think we should encourage the usage of rpmautospec for new packages,
provided that the
Robert-André Mauchin writes:
*snip*
> What is the situation wrt new packages? Should we enforce the use of
> rpmautospec during reviews or is it completely optional?
I think we should encourage the usage of rpmautospec for new packages,
provided that the packager feels comfortable enough to
17. heinäkuuta 2021 10.23.34 GMT+03:00 Christopher Engelhard
kirjoitti:
>On 17.07.21 00:59, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 16. 07. 21 19:58, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>>> On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi everybody,
we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed
On 17.07.21 00:59, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 16. 07. 21 19:58, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>> On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
>>> for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
>>>
>>> This means installing
Hi Nils,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 03:19:25PM +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> in order to use rpmautospec features, it needs to be available on the
> builder machines (which are F34) and, for local operations, on the
> machine running fedpkg or equivalent. I.e. making it available on EL8
> will
On 16. 07. 21 19:58, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi everybody,
we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
This means installing the relevant packages and restarting kojid
processes on the
Hi Nils,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 03:19:25PM +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> in order to use rpmautospec features, it needs to be available on the
> builder machines (which are F34) and, for local operations, on the
> machine running fedpkg or equivalent. I.e. making it available on EL8
> will
On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi everybody,
we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
This means installing the relevant packages and restarting kojid
processes on the builders, which will restart any tasks which are
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 11:01 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 10/07/21 11:07, Robert-André Mauchin ha scritto:
> > I haven't followed the dev of this project closely, is there a
> > guide for packagers to explain how it works and how to integrate it
> > to our workflow?
> >
> > Best
Hi Michel,
On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 17:27 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via devel
wrote:
> Now that this is in the Koji builders... would this be sufficient to
> have it enabled for EPEL8 specs as well?
>
> - branch and build python-rpmautospec for EPEL8
> - add Requires: rpmautospec-rpm-macros to
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 05:30:28PM +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> rpmautospec[1] is now deployed on the Koji builders. It took a little
> longer than expected, but went smoothly otherwise—at most, you should
> have noticed any currently running builds of yours being restarted
>
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 05:30:28PM +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> rpmautospec[1] is now deployed on the Koji builders. It took a little
> longer than expected, but went smoothly otherwise—at most, you should
> have noticed any currently running builds of yours being restarted
>
On Fri, 2021-07-09 at 00:27 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> So ... I've now been able to try this out, since exam season is
> finally over (sigh), and - after one case of "RTFM" - this stuff
> seems
> to ... just work.
> Thanks a lot for working on this feature, it's going to save me *so
> much
Il 10/07/21 11:07, Robert-André Mauchin ha scritto:
> On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
>> for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
>>
>> This means installing the relevant packages and restarting kojid
On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi everybody,
we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
This means installing the relevant packages and restarting kojid
processes on the builders, which will restart any tasks which are
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 5:31 PM Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> rpmautospec[1] is now deployed on the Koji builders. It took a little
> longer than expected, but went smoothly otherwise—at most, you should
> have noticed any currently running builds of yours being restarted
> when we
Hi everybody,
rpmautospec[1] is now deployed on the Koji builders. It took a little
longer than expected, but went smoothly otherwise—at most, you should
have noticed any currently running builds of yours being restarted
when we restarted the kojid processes.
We invite you to use automatic
Hi everybody,
rpmautospec[1] is now deployed on the Koji builders. It took a little
longer than expected, but went smoothly otherwise—at most, you should
have noticed any currently running builds of yours being restarted
when we restarted the kojid processes.
We invite you to use automatic
26 matches
Mail list logo
