On 01/18/2012 10:42 PM, BJ Dierkes wrote:
Sorry, I didn't mean to start a heated thread on SysV vs. Systemd or anything.
Unfortunately my question wasn't really answered. I*am* removing SysV support
from gearmand … and have already implemented Systemd scripts. My question is… for
existing
Sorry, I didn't mean to start a heated thread on SysV vs. Systemd or anything.
Unfortunately my question wasn't really answered. I *am* removing SysV support
from gearmand … and have already implemented Systemd scripts. My question is…
for existing users still on SysV in Fedora 17 …. are
Hi,
On 18/01/12 22:42, BJ Dierkes wrote:
Sorry, I didn't mean to start a heated thread on SysV vs. Systemd or anything.
Unfortunately my question wasn't really answered. I *am* removing SysV support
from gearmand … and have already implemented Systemd scripts. My question is… for
existing
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 16:42 -0600, BJ Dierkes wrote:
My question is… for existing users still on SysV in Fedora 17 …. are
there any safeguards I need to put in place as to not break them… or
should I just rip out all the SysV stuff and hope for the best?
I read that shouldn't or not allowed
what about looking at existing ones?
no,, it takes some minutes for 90% of all services
If you believe so, file patches
well, attached are the one i am using with F15
most of them written by myself or derived
from F16/F17 packages
CAUTION: they are from mixed sources
*
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 14.01.2012 01:17, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:32 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
what exactly is the problem to convert a existing
sysv-init script to a systemd-unit
I don't know convert ?
Am 14.01.2012 18:26, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Am 14.01.2012 01:17, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:32 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
what exactly is the problem to convert a existing
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
well, attached are the one i am using with F15
most of them written by myself or derived
from F16/F17 packages
You have to seperate them out and file them in bugzilla if you want them to
reach the maintainers.
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 18:59 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.01.2012 18:26, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Am 14.01.2012 01:17, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:32 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Hello,
I have this bug open:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781451
And so, I am needing to remove my sysvinit scripts from gourmand in rawhide.
I've read the docs on SysVInit Scripts and Systemd but haven't found an answer…
How should I handle removing the init script? Should
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:31 PM, BJ Dierkes
wdier...@5dollarwhitebox.org wrote:
Hello,
I have this bug open:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781451
And so, I am needing to remove my sysvinit scripts from gourmand in rawhide.
I've read the docs on SysVInit Scripts and Systemd
Am 13.01.2012 23:39, schrieb Richard Shaw:
I'm sure someone will correct me if I mis-speak, but I don't think
your bug is currently valid. There's currently no requirement that you
convert to systemd, although I would highly recommend it. There was
some talk about forcing conversion at some
On 01/13/2012 10:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm sure someone will correct me if I mis-speak, but I don't think
your bug is currently valid. There's currently no requirement that you
convert to systemd, although I would highly recommend it. There was
some talk about forcing conversion at some
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:51 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I'm not so sure how you figure out that this bug is not valid and how
you come to the conclusion that it's not a requirement to switch to
native systemd units and still shipping legacy sysv init script is
already considered
Am 14.01.2012 00:27, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:51 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I'm not so sure how you figure out that this bug is not valid and how
you come to the conclusion that it's not a requirement to switch to
native systemd units and still shipping legacy
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:32 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
what exactly is the problem to convert a existing
sysv-init script to a systemd-unit
I don't know convert ? , took hours ?
I don't have time to understand how systemd works , have you any magic
script to covert it ? or o quick todo ?
Am 14.01.2012 01:17, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:32 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
what exactly is the problem to convert a existing
sysv-init script to a systemd-unit
I don't know convert ? , took hours ?
what about looking at existing ones?
no,, it takes some minutes
17 matches
Mail list logo
