On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 20:11 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:20:14PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
* 960 - F18 schedule + the holidays (notting, 18:50:29)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JaroslavReznik/FedupF18Final -
not updated yet (jreznik, 18:58:15)
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 12:10:36AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 20:11 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:20:14PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
* 960 - F18 schedule + the holidays (notting, 18:50:29)
* LINK:
Dne 6.12.2012 18:23, Josh Boyer napsal(a):
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Also, there was dissent already in the auto-approving of leaf-features
during the meeting discussion so I am not sure that auto-accepting of
Features in general given a lack of
On 12/07/2012 09:28 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Feature is something somebody considers important enough to create
feature page for it. Period.
That describes the current state and is your point of view.
To me an Feature is a completely different thing.
I am not sure why do you want to
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 10:28 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 6.12.2012 21:40, Josh Boyer napsal(a):
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:20:22AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
As I said in the meeting yesterday, I think the
- Original Message -
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 10:28 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 6.12.2012 21:40, Josh Boyer napsal(a):
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:20:22AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
As I said in the
Dne 7.12.2012 11:13, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson napsal(a):
On 12/07/2012 09:28 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Feature is something somebody considers important enough to create
feature page for it. Period.
That describes the current state and is your point of view.
To me an Feature is a completely
On 12/07/2012 11:13 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 7.12.2012 11:13, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson napsal(a):
On 12/07/2012 09:28 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Feature is something somebody considers important enough to create
feature page for it. Period.
That describes the current state and is your point of
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Alternately, Feature could be the term for the any small or big thing
which is useful to track and tout for marketing purposes, and big
technical
changes could be, I dunno... Major Changes.
The meeting minutes showed that
- Original Message -
It doesn't matter from a get this thing into Fedora standpoint. It
very much matters from a marketing/communication standpoint. If it
didn't matter, Fedora Marketing wouldn't be picking specific items
out
of the overall Feature list.
The example I used in the
Dne 7.12.2012 15:06, Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a):
- Original Message -
It doesn't matter from a get this thing into Fedora standpoint. It
very much matters from a marketing/communication standpoint. If it
didn't matter, Fedora Marketing wouldn't be picking specific items
out
of the
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure why do you want to categorize it by size and impact, when it
will be autocategorized by feedback on ML.
It's common knowledge that you cant autocategorized by feedback on Mailing
list regardless
On 12/07/2012 04:46 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure why do you want to categorize it by size and impact, when it
will be autocategorized by feedback on ML.
It's common knowledge that you cant
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr wrote:
* Miloslav Trmač [07/12/2012 18:07] :
Advertising the feature on the _devel_ list is intended precisely to
get feedback from developers of other possibly affected components.
IIRC, being subscribed to devel@ is not
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 06:06:24AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Do not call it Feature Process but Planning process - as it
fits the decision to create F19 schedule after we know the scope
+1 to that!
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ mat...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel
On 12/07/2012 05:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:51:43PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/07/2012 04:46 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure why do you want to categorize
Le vendredi 07 décembre 2012 à 18:22 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:51:43PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/07/2012 04:46 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure why
On 12/07/2012 06:37 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
While I cannot answer for Jóhann, I think a proposal could be to
contact for example QA, as some features will have a huge impact for
them. Contact irc support, as they may have some insight on the common
issue reported by people, etc.
We have a
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:20:14PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
* 960 - F18 schedule + the holidays (notting, 18:50:29)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JaroslavReznik/FedupF18Final -
not updated yet (jreznik, 18:58:15)
* AGREED: Do not block on fedup signature checking (not
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:11:08PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
* 960 - F18 schedule + the holidays (notting, 18:50:29)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JaroslavReznik/FedupF18Final -
not updated yet (jreznik, 18:58:15)
* AGREED: Do not block on fedup signature checking (not a
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:28:16PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:11:08PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
* 960 - F18 schedule + the holidays (notting, 18:50:29)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JaroslavReznik/FedupF18Final -
not updated yet (jreznik,
Dne 5.12.2012 21:20, Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-12-05)
===
Meeting started by notting at 18:07:27 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
* 896 - Refine Feature Process (notting, 18:07:50)
* AGREED: Feature process modification: features are announced on
devel-announce by feature wrangler once wrangler verifies feature
page content (+:9, -:0)
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 09:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
* 896 - Refine Feature Process (notting, 18:07:50)
* AGREED: Feature process modification: features are announced on
devel-announce by feature wrangler once
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 09:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
* 896 - Refine Feature Process (notting, 18:07:50)
* AGREED: Feature process modification:
Dne 6.12.2012 17:02, Tomas Mraz napsal(a):
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 09:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
* 896 - Refine Feature Process (notting, 18:07:50)
* AGREED: Feature process modification: features are announced on
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Also, there was dissent already in the auto-approving of leaf-features
during the meeting discussion so I am not sure that auto-accepting of
Features in general given a lack of response is ever going to actually
happen. I
On 12/06/2012 04:20 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
As I said in the meeting yesterday, I think the definition of a Feature
needs to be cleared up before we can really tackle this one. Feature to
me is something important enough that it shouldn't be auto-accepted. If
there is some other class of thing
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:20:22AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
As I said in the meeting yesterday, I think the definition of a Feature
needs to be cleared up before we can really tackle this one. Feature to
me is something important enough that it shouldn't be auto-accepted. If
there is some
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-12-05)
===
Meeting started by notting at 18:07:27 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-12-05/fesco.2012-12-05-18.07.log.html
.
Meeting summary
30 matches
Mail list logo
