Hey Mattias,
On 1/5/22 09:39, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> would it be too late to upgrade Django for Fedora 36 to version 4.0.x?
> It may require some more package updates, not just Django itself.
>
> The releasenotes are here[1], We have version 3.2 in Fedora 35, which
> is a
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 10:17:29AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:12 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Uhh, I think something is wrong here. How did this article get
> > namespaced like that? Maybe Ben could help fix it if you don't know
> > how that happened...
>
> Fixed.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:12 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Uhh, I think something is wrong here. How did this article get
> namespaced like that? Maybe Ben could help fix it if you don't know
> how that happened...
Fixed.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:10 AM Matthias Runge wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:19:24AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > As hinted in the previous paragraph, I am not involved in any
> > > development connected to Django for some time now. This is a cry for
> > > help. The whole Django stack
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:19:24AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > As hinted in the previous paragraph, I am not involved in any
> > development connected to Django for some time now. This is a cry for
> > help. The whole Django stack in Fedora could use more helping hands.
> > Upstream is very good
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:41 AM Matthias Runge wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
> would it be too late to upgrade Django for Fedora 36 to version 4.0.x?
> It may require some more package updates, not just Django itself.
>
> The releasenotes are here[1], We have version 3.2 in Fedora 35, which
> is a
Hey there,
would it be too late to upgrade Django for Fedora 36 to version 4.0.x?
It may require some more package updates, not just Django itself.
The releasenotes are here[1], We have version 3.2 in Fedora 35, which
is a long-term supported release (until 2024)[2].
Unfortunately, I am not
