Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2013-07-11 at 12:49 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2013-07-04 at 16:47 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Starting with 1.6 version of pkgdiff if you compare debug packages
and
add --details option on the command line then the tool will
On Seg, 2013-07-15 at 15:16 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2013-07-11 at 12:49 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2013-07-04 at 16:47 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Starting with 1.6 version of pkgdiff if you compare debug
On Qui, 2013-07-11 at 12:49 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2013-07-04 at 16:47 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Starting with 1.6 version of pkgdiff if you compare debug packages
and
add --details option on the command line then the tool will
automatically
Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2013-07-04 at 16:47 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Starting with 1.6 version of pkgdiff if you compare debug packages
and
add --details option on the command line then the tool will
automatically run abi-dumper to dump ABI of old and new shared
objects
found in
On Qui, 2013-07-04 at 16:47 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Starting with 1.6 version of pkgdiff if you compare debug packages
and
add --details option on the command line then the tool will
automatically run abi-dumper to dump ABI of old and new shared
objects
found in the packages and
Le mercredi 03 juillet 2013 15:03:53 Richard Shaw a écrit :
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my
packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even
versioning for that matter. That way I could always check a new release to
see if any of its
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com writes:
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my
packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even
versioning for that matter. That way I could always check a new
release to see if any of its dependencies needed
Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qua, 2013-07-03 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my
packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even
versioning for that matter. That way I could always check a new
release to see if
Xavier Bachelot wrote:
On 07/03/2013 10:03 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my packages
does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even versioning for that
matter. That way I could always check a new release to see if any of
Remi Collet wrote:
But I also use http://upstream-tracker.org/
Very usefull, except for not yet released version.
For some libraries we check unreleased versions from the upstream source
control (git, svn, etc.). See example:
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libssh.html
--
Andrey
Richard Shaw wrote:
This is an extreme example, but after removing the offending headers I
got this:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34775202/compat_reports/ffmpeg/0.10.7_to_1.2.1/compat_report.html
Thanks,
Richard
New approach (by using the abi-dumper tool) avoids such problems with
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Mathieu Bridon
boche...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
If anyone is curious about it, I don't mind typing up the process I go
through to make the checks. I think I've found a pretty good path of
least
Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Mathieu Bridon
boche...@fedoraproject.org mailto:boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
If anyone is curious about it, I don't mind typing up the
process I go
through to
Sounds like we need abi-dumper then... Anyone up for a review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980937
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my
packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even
versioning for that matter. That way I could always check a new release to
see if any of its dependencies needed to be rebuilt.
Since then, I've started using
On Qua, 2013-07-03 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my
packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even
versioning for that matter. That way I could always check a new
release to see if any of its
On 07/03/2013 10:03 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my packages
does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even versioning for
that
matter. That way I could always check a new release to see if any of its
dependencies
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Qua, 2013-07-03 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my
packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even
versioning for that matter.
IBook. 'Kiomjm
Em 03/07/2013 19:00, Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org escreveu:
On 07/03/2013 10:03 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my
packages
does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even versioning
for that
This is an extreme example, but after removing the offending headers I got
this:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34775202/compat_reports/ffmpeg/0.10.7_to_1.2.1/compat_report.html
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
If anyone is curious about it, I don't mind typing up the process I go
through to make the checks. I think I've found a pretty good path of least
resistance method :)
I've never used it, but I'd certainly be interested in reading that if
On Qui, 2013-07-04 at 00:00 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
On 07/03/2013 10:03 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my
packages
does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even versioning for
that
matter. That way I could
Le 03/07/2013 22:03, Richard Shaw a écrit :
I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my
packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even
versioning for that matter. That way I could always check a new release
to see if any of its dependencies needed
23 matches
Mail list logo
