Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-10-24 Thread Leigh Scott
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 07:45:03AM -, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > mokutil.c:1977:16: error: comparison of integer expressions of different > signedness: > 'unsigned int' and 'int' [-Werror=sign-compare] > 1977 | if (salt_size > settings_len - (next - settings)) { > |^

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-10-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 07:45:03AM -, Leigh Scott wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:38:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > We're in final freeze now. Any progress? > > > > Zbyszek > > I poked mokutil with a couple of upstream fixes, now it fails only on i686. > >

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-10-24 Thread Leigh Scott
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:38:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > We're in final freeze now. Any progress? > > Zbyszek I poked mokutil with a couple of upstream fixes, now it fails only on i686. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38515227

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-10-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:38:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10. 09. 19 13:35, Peter Robinson wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >>On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >>>efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then >

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-09-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10. 09. 19 13:35, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then unretired and they still fail to build from source. Following the policy:

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-09-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then > > unretired and they still fail to build from source. > > > > Following the policy: > >

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-09-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then unretired and they still fail to build from source. Following the policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ I kindly ask

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-08-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 14. 08. 19 12:54, Peter Robinson wrote: Well you can't currently see the forest for the trees and this bullshit, for the first time in 15 years in making me think about quitting the Fedora project, and I spoke with many at Flock are seriously stressed about it and sick of it. I will be

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-08-14 Thread Peter Robinson
> On 13. 08. 19 19:43, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Firstly they're just FTBFS in F-30 This isn't exactly long > > standing, if it was F-26 like some that were retired I could > > completely understand that statement but F-30 is pushing the rhetoric > > a bit here. > > It has been half a year

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-08-13 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 13. 08. 19 19:43, Peter Robinson wrote: Firstly they're just FTBFS in F-30 This isn't exactly long standing, if it was F-26 like some that were retired I could completely understand that statement but F-30 is pushing the rhetoric a bit here. It has been half a year without any response.

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-08-13 Thread Peter Robinson
Firstly they're just FTBFS in F-30 This isn't exactly long standing, if it was F-26 like some that were retired I could completely understand that statement but F-30 is pushing the rhetoric a bit here. > efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then > unretired

efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-08-13 Thread Miro Hrončok
efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then unretired and they still fail to build from source. Following the policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ I kindly ask the maintainers to rebuild them or orphan