On 12 May 2011 12:41, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> So, reading between the lines, is it fair to say that Ubuntu seem to
> have chosen a display manager to avoid dbus and consolekit?
I'm pretty sure Ubuntu chose it because it's not gdm.
Differentiation FTW.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> I don't think the available information supports any such conclusions
> concerning motivation. If you want to know the motivations for the
> decision hop the fence and go have a polite friendly chat about it
> with the people who made the dec
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> So, reading between the lines, is it fair to say that Ubuntu seem to
> have chosen a display manager to avoid dbus and consolekit?
I don't think the available information supports any such conclusions
concerning motivation. If you want to
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 01:01:24PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 17:12 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:29:18AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > Which functions is it missing?
> >
> > Approximately anything that's been implemented in gdm since 2003.
> >
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 12:05 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 11:29 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:11:51AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > > Sounds interesting:
> > > >
> > > > http://digitizo
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 17:12 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:29:18AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > It's less functional than gdm, and by the time it's as functional as gdm
> > > it'll be larger than gdm becaus
So, reading between the lines, is it fair to say that Ubuntu seem to
have chosen a display manager to avoid dbus and consolekit?
-Cam
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Sounds interesting:
>
> http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
Public discussion background see this thread:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-October/msg00226.html
Specifically:
http://mail.gnome.org/arch
Dne 12.5.2011 18:05, Adam Jackson napsal(a):
>> Which functions is it missing?
>
> Accessibility, for one.
And who cares about that ... :(
(My wife has MS and writing on keyboard is getting to be
difficult, so I am really disgusted with the level of ignoring a11y in
most current project ... Gn
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:29:18AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > It's less functional than gdm, and by the time it's as functional as gdm
> > it'll be larger than gdm because it also has to be as functional as kdm.
> > So I don't see any
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 11:29 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:11:51AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > Sounds interesting:
> > >
> > > http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
> >
> > It's less functiona
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:11:51AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> > Sounds interesting:
> >
> > http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
>
> It's less functional than gdm, and by the time it's as functional as gdm
> it'll be l
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:11:51AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> Sounds interesting:
>
> http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
It's less functional than gdm, and by the time it's as functional as gdm
it'll be larger than gdm because it also has to be as functional as kdm.
So I don
Sounds interesting:
http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
14 matches
Mail list logo
