New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

2010-08-24 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I just submitted updates for el5 and f1{2,3,4} as well as a build for rawhide (f15) of a new fedpkg build. Here is a summary from the rpm: - - Error check the update call. #625679 - - Use the correct remote when listing revs - - Add the bash

[Test-Announce] Bugzappers meeting slot 2010-08-24

2010-08-24 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, folks. There's a meeting slot tomorrow at the usual time, 2010-08-24 15:00 UTC. There's nothing new on the agenda page - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers:meeting-agenda-list - and I can't think of any particularly pressing topics, so we may not need to have a meeting. I'll be around

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED, v2] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-24 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 08/20/2010 10:25 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: The attached list shows currently orphaned packages in F-14. If they are not claimed by the end of next week, they will be blocked, potentially breaking dependencies (and causing more things to be blocked...) If you already co-maintain the

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-24 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:17:21 -0400, Matthew wrote: Was there a conversation other than this FESCO meeting? http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-06-15/fesco.2010-06-15-19.35.log.html#l-446 There, I see this discussion: 20:51:41 mezcalero so, i would like to keep the

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Jeff Garzik
On 08/23/2010 11:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: (intentionally breaking thread) Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said: Maybe I should start a new thread since this isn't really a bug, but it is a blocker -- we need to get some packaging guidelines out for systemd. I think that the last

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-24 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Friday, August 20, 2010 10:46:43 pm Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote: Hi all,, Hi! before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list about a work around to deliver the important notifications to the fedora desktop (whatever the desktop is). after some discussion, we started with

Re: yum appmarket

2010-08-24 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Saturday, August 21, 2010 02:25:08 am Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: That would likely be a bad idea. Mandriva did something similar a few years back, before I left, and it was pretty unpopular and often confusing for

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Rudolf Kastl
my desktop runs on software mirror raid below an lvm. not for performance but for data recovery reasons. mdmonitor does mail notification. will this be fixed? how about logwatch, it is really useful to have to get an overview what happened on the system in a neat summary. also handy for desktops

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: my desktop runs on software mirror raid below an lvm. not for performance but for data recovery reasons. mdmonitor does mail notification. will this be fixed? how about logwatch, it is really useful to have to get an

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2010/8/24 Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:06:32PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: SERVICE HANDLING - Running 'chkconfig foo (null)|on|off' on a service managed by systemd   will return the correct code/perform an appropriate action. Also, if chkconfig --add

Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

2010-08-24 Thread Jaroslav Skarvada
Thanks, but I have following problem: $ fedpkg co -B xterm Cloning into bare repository /home/yarda/git-fedora/xterm/fedpkg.git... remote: Counting objects: 657, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (333/333), done. remote: Total 657 (delta 274), reused 657 (delta 274) Receiving objects: 100%

Re: WebKit(s) SIG

2010-08-24 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Friday, August 06, 2010 04:45:39 pm Jaroslav Reznik wrote: Just an update: we hava our own WebKit SIG mailing list [1]. Feel free to subscribe. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit Thanks Jaroslav -- Jaroslav Řezník jrez...@redhat.com Software Engineer - Base

rawhide report: 20100824 changes

2010-08-24 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Aug 24 08:15:26 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- OpenSceneGraph-libs-2.8.3-2.fc14.i686 requires libpoppler.so.6 OpenSceneGraph-libs-2.8.3-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libpoppler.so.6()(64bit)

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Andrew Haley
On 08/23/2010 08:15 PM, Jon Masters wrote: On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:10 +0200, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I know its been discussed in the past but there's been reasons not to drop a default MTA but now

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/23/2010 08:15 PM, Jon Masters wrote: On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:10 +0200, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I know its been discussed in

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Andrew Haley
On 08/24/2010 12:47 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/23/2010 08:15 PM, Jon Masters wrote: On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:10 +0200, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:

Wrong packages in F14/rawhide composes

2010-08-24 Thread Adam Tkac
Hello, it seems there are some issues with recent mass rebuilds for perl 5.12.0 in F14/rawhide. Some packages were rebuilt against new perl and then were built again. However koji exposes only the older build. This is list of affected packages which I discovered during work on FES ticket

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:06 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Hey Bill, this is a very good initial list, this should make it very easy for QA to whip up a test plan for systemd. Some comments below. BOOTUP - System boots successfully to GUI, when configured. - System boots successfully to text

Re: Wrong packages in F14/rawhide composes

2010-08-24 Thread Paul Howarth
On 24/08/10 13:45, Adam Tkac wrote: Hello, it seems there are some issues with recent mass rebuilds for perl 5.12.0 in F14/rawhide. Some packages were rebuilt against new perl and then were built again. However koji exposes only the older build. This is list of affected packages which I

Git question

2010-08-24 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, How I merge the latests changes from the remotes/origin/f13/master on to my f13/user/steved/pnfs-13 remote branch? Also, the kernel that is currently being built from my pnfs-13 branch fails to install with the following error: FATAL: Could not load

Re: Wrong packages in F14/rawhide composes

2010-08-24 Thread Adam Tkac
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:54:25PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: On 24/08/10 13:45, Adam Tkac wrote: Hello, it seems there are some issues with recent mass rebuilds for perl 5.12.0 in F14/rawhide. Some packages were rebuilt against new perl and then were built again. However koji

Re: Git question

2010-08-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/24/2010 08:55 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, How I merge the latests changes from the remotes/origin/f13/master on to my f13/user/steved/pnfs-13 remote branch? The easiest way would be to switch to the pnfs-13 branch and then do: git

Re: Git question

2010-08-24 Thread Jochen Schmitt
Am 24.08.10 14:55, schrieb Steve Dickson: How I merge the latests changes from the remotes/origin/f13/master on to my f13/user/steved/pnfs-13 remote branch? I think git cherry-pick is the command whar you want to use. With git cherry-pck you can apply the changes of a commit from an other

Re: Git question

2010-08-24 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote:  Am 24.08.10 14:55, schrieb Steve Dickson: How I merge the latests changes from the remotes/origin/f13/master on to my f13/user/steved/pnfs-13 remote branch? I think git cherry-pick is the command whar you want to

Re: Git question

2010-08-24 Thread Steve Dickson
On 08/24/2010 09:16 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/24/2010 08:55 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, How I merge the latests changes from the remotes/origin/f13/master on to my f13/user/steved/pnfs-13 remote branch? The easiest way

Re: Git question

2010-08-24 Thread Steve Dickson
On 08/24/2010 09:27 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote: Am 24.08.10 14:55, schrieb Steve Dickson: How I merge the latests changes from the remotes/origin/f13/master on to my f13/user/steved/pnfs-13 remote branch? I

[perl-DBD-SQLite] Fix testsuite to run with the latest sqlite (bugs.debian.org/591111).

2010-08-24 Thread Adam Tkac
commit acf6c396c24366416725a0b0d1dc32c98b80a94b Author: Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com Date: Tue Aug 24 15:35:41 2010 +0200 Fix testsuite to run with the latest sqlite (bugs.debian.org/59). Signed-off-by: Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com

Packages on which Thunderbird functionality depends!

2010-08-24 Thread mike cloaked
For the past week or so I have been battling with a problem that I had thought (after some chasing around) was a Thunderbird upstream problem. The issue was that selecting Edit-Preferences- General and allowing selection of a xxx.wav file to play for incoming mail did not work. It turned out that

Re: Packages on which Thunderbird functionality depends!

2010-08-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/24/2010 09:37 AM, mike cloaked wrote: For the past week or so I have been battling with a problem that I had thought (after some chasing around) was a Thunderbird upstream problem. The issue was that selecting Edit-Preferences- General and

[Bug 626765] The latest F14 ocaml-lablgtk has lower NVR than F13

2010-08-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-24 09:41:19 EDT --- ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14 has

git rebase OK on Fedora git branches?

2010-08-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Is it OK to use 'git rebase -i' to compress my mistakes together into a single working Fedora git commit? (Provided I don't push things in between or otherwise try to rewrite public history) I'm a bit confused by whether 'fedpkg commit', 'fedpkg build', 'fedpkg push' etc are doing magic that

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/24/2010 08:45 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:06 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Hey Bill, this is a very good initial list, this should make it very easy for QA to whip up a test plan for systemd. Some comments below.

[Bug 626765] The latest F14 ocaml-lablgtk has lower NVR than F13

2010-08-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com said: Neither of those need to run a MTA locally to work, you just need to point them to a mail server, even then they need to be configured to send the mail to something other than root anyway. They can't be configured that way; they

Re: git rebase OK on Fedora git branches?

2010-08-24 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 14:43 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Is it OK to use 'git rebase -i' to compress my mistakes together into a single working Fedora git commit? (Provided I don't push things in between or otherwise try to rewrite public history) Yes. I'm a bit confused by whether

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Chris Adams wrote: What do we gain by not having any MTA installed (other than a little bit of disk space)? I understand that a little bit of disk space can add up quick, but a local queueing MTA is a pretty standard part of a Unix system. Why are you complaining? If your package needs an

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 08:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:06 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: BOOTUP - System boots successfully to GUI, when configured. - System boots successfully to text mode, when configured. - System properly handles being passed [1-5],

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:56:21AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: I'm still of the opinion that there should be _something_ at the de-facto standard location of /usr/sbin/sendmail that can queue messages for later delivery. I don't care whether it is actually sendmail or not. Preferably, it

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread seth vidal
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:00 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 08:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:06 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: BOOTUP - System boots successfully to GUI, when configured. - System boots successfully to text mode, when

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Andrew Haley
On 08/24/2010 02:58 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Chris Adams wrote: What do we gain by not having any MTA installed (other than a little bit of disk space)? I understand that a little bit of disk space can add up quick, but a local queueing MTA is a pretty standard part of a Unix system.

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:58:50AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Why are you complaining? If your package needs an MTA - put in a Requires! If we follow the general state of things: if a package might need something, toss it in as a requires!, this will totally defeat the purpose of the

Re: Python 3.2a1 in rawhide

2010-08-24 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:16 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: A suggested fix (caveat: not tested): ensure that the python-lxml.spec has a  BuildRequires: Cython = 0.12 and delete the .c file in the %prep, to ensure that Cython regenerates it during the build. Does this fix it?

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:00:55AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: I can't remember interactive boot ever working. It does in RHEL 5. It will need to be working for RHEL 7. -- Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional Research Computing Services Harvard School of

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Andrew Haley wrote: Not everything that runs on Fedora is a Fedora package: people run their own programs, too. Some things, like the existence of /bin/ls or being able to send mail by piping the message to either /bin/mail or/usr/{sbin,lib}/sendmail are basic features of UNIX. No one is

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com said: Chris Adams wrote: What do we gain by not having any MTA installed (other than a little bit of disk space)? I understand that a little bit of disk space can add up quick, but a local queueing MTA is a pretty standard part of a

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Matthew Miller wrote: If we follow the general state of things: if a package might need something, toss it in as a requires!, this will totally defeat the purpose of the comps change, since it will get pulled in by something important at some point. Rsyslog, for example, can send output via

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Paul Howarth
On 24/08/10 15:13, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Michael Cronenworthm...@cchtml.com said: Chris Adams wrote: What do we gain by not having any MTA installed (other than a little bit of disk space)? I understand that a little bit of disk space can add up quick, but a local queueing

Re: Packages on which Thunderbird functionality depends!

2010-08-24 Thread mike cloaked
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: I'm not a Thunderbird maintainer, so I don't know how feasible this is, but perhaps we could create a subpackage like 'thunderbird-sound-support' that has the appropriate dependencies on it. Then at least someone

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Jon Masters
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:09 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:58:50AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Why are you complaining? If your package needs an MTA - put in a Requires! If we follow the general state of things: if a package might need something, toss it in as

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Paul Howarth wrote: I use at on a regular basis, to schedule large downloads and uploads when my ADSL bandwidth becomes unmetered after midnight. And I like getting the resulting email in the morning showing that all went well, or not as the case may be. No one will prevent you from doing

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-24 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
Jaroslav Reznik wrote: Reading this - I'm not sure all Fedora notifications should go through system notification system. Why? I understand it for urgent/priority notification like Close your desktop, nuclear war out there (or just a security update combined with some steps how to fix

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:19 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: My previous objection was based on the precedent it sets. I don't want a Desktop distribution in Fedora. I want a server-usable distribution. Sure, it's just a dep and one can go install an MTA. But today it's killing the MTA, tomorrow

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:32:03PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: So, I'm honestly asking: what are the odds that these few things are the only improvements that cause a disruptive change to user interaction? I don't think it's unreasonable to wonder if there are other changes which fit

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Jon Masters
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:36 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:19 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: My previous objection was based on the precedent it sets. I don't want a Desktop distribution in Fedora. I want a server-usable distribution. Sure, it's just a dep and one

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:56:21AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: They can't be configured that way; they don't implement SMTP. It is a de-facto standard for Unix programs to send mail by piping the message to either /bin/mail or /usr/{sbin,lib}/sendmail. That has the advantage of queueing for

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Matthew Garrett wrote: The long term fix would arguably be to provide a stub /usr/sbin/sendmail that ties into a more generic event reporting interface, which in turn could be configured to send mail elsewhere but would default to popping up some sort of desktop notification. Already works

Re: Git question

2010-08-24 Thread M A Young
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Steve Dickson wrote: Also, the kernel that is currently being built from my pnfs-13 branch fails to install with the following error: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.34.5-43.pnfs_all_2.6.35_2010_08_19.fc13.x86_64-pnfs/modules.dep: No such file or directory

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:04:43PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: As to not keep moving the goal posts for Lennart, I believe that some group (perhaps FESCo) should come up with a set of do or die functionality for systemd, that can be tested for at the test day. That way the goals are clearly

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:43:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: There's certainly a set of people who want an MTA for this - in a server environment it's obviously far more straightforward to get mailed on failure, and that's something that you'll probably configure when This isn't

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:18:27AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: File /etc/inittab should keep working at the same level it is now. Now it only selects default runlevel. How about: - If /etc/inittab exists and contains an initdefault line, the default target will be set accordingly. - any

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Andrew Haley
On 08/24/2010 03:37 PM, Jon Masters wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:36 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:19 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: My previous objection was based on the precedent it sets. I don't want a Desktop distribution in Fedora. I want a server-usable

Announcing the release of Fedora 14 Alpha!!

2010-08-24 Thread Dennis Gilmore
The Fedora 14 Laughlin Alpha release is available! This release offers a preview of some of the best free and open source technology currently under development. Catch a glimpse of the future: http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease == What is the Alpha release? == The Alpha release contains

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Andrew Haley wrote: I think there's a much more fundamental question here, which is whether a default Fedora installation is intended to be a real UNIX-like system or just the dependencies for GNOME. I was going to reply to Chris, but I'll reply here. What benefit do I, or anyone else,

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:45:33AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: GENERAL SANITY - Booting a system shall achieve a similar result as booting in upstart: -- The same set of services will be started. I don't think this is a requirement on systemd, really. If we make changes to the default

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread seth vidal
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:10 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Andrew Haley wrote: I think there's a much more fundamental question here, which is whether a default Fedora installation is intended to be a real UNIX-like system or just the dependencies for GNOME. I was going to reply to

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:46:26AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Matthew Garrett wrote: The long term fix would arguably be to provide a stub /usr/sbin/sendmail that ties into a more generic event reporting interface, which in turn could be configured to send mail elsewhere but would

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:53:13AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:43:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: There's certainly a set of people who want an MTA for this - in a server environment it's obviously far more straightforward to get mailed on failure, and

Re: Python 3.2a1 in rawhide

2010-08-24 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 09:10 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:16 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: A suggested fix (caveat: not tested): ensure that the python-lxml.spec has a BuildRequires: Cython = 0.12 and delete the .c file in the %prep, to ensure

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:06:32PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: RUNTIME TOOLS - telinit [0123456] does the proper thing. It currently doesn't, by the way. But there's been upstream fixes which aren't yet in rawhide, so I'll retest when that's available. - the 'runlevel' command displays

Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

2010-08-24 Thread buildsys
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com said: What benefit do I, or anyone else, receive by shipping a 100% Unix-clone environment by default? With PCs evolving every 5-10 years, will Unix-like be necessary for much longer? Are we making a Fedora for people to use or for

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:06:32PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: SERVICE HANDLING - Running 'chkconfig foo (null)|on|off' on a service managed by systemd will return the correct code/perform an appropriate action. - Running 'service foo start|stop|...' on a service managed by systemd will

Bodhi updates

2010-08-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bodhi updates can have multiple packages associated with a single update as long as they are on different branches. Why this restriction? At least in the case of something like a security update, I would think that it would be beneficial to be able

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-24 Thread Manuel Escudero
2010/8/24 Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org Jaroslav Reznik wrote: Reading this - I'm not sure all Fedora notifications should go through system notification system. Why? I understand it for urgent/priority notification like Close your desktop, nuclear war out there (or just a

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines

2010-08-24 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:06:32PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: PACKAGING - The syntax of systemd units shall be frozen for the release (all future releases? Some set number of releases?) ADMIN INTERFACE - The files and paths used by systemd shall be frozen for future releases. - The

systemd: targets which are runlevel-like

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
As I was thinking about Bug 626840, I noticed something. With the current runlevel system, it's easy to know what your options are. The systemd FAQ helpfully explains that systemctl isolate graphical.target is the replacement, and that systemctl list-units --type=target will show me the various

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Jesse Keating
Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/24/2010 02:58 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Chris Adams wrote: What do we gain by not having any MTA installed (other than a little bit of disk space)? I understand that a little bit of disk space can add up quick, but a local queueing MTA is a

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:43:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: The problem with delivering this to a user's mailbox via an MTA is that in the typical case it doesn't result in the user noticing anything until they've logged in as root and find out that the you have new mail message

Re: Packages on which Thunderbird functionality depends!

2010-08-24 Thread Bill Nottingham
Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said: I'm not a Thunderbird maintainer, so I don't know how feasible this is, but perhaps we could create a subpackage like 'thunderbird-sound-support' that has the appropriate dependencies on it. Then at least someone doing a yum search on thunderbird

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:43:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: The problem with delivering this to a user's mailbox via an MTA is that in the typical case it doesn't result in the user noticing anything until they've

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:09 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:58:50AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Why are you complaining? If your package needs an MTA - put in a Requires! If we follow

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-24 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:58:50AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Why are you complaining? If your package needs an MTA - put in a Requires! If we follow the general state of things: if a package might need something,

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:52 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: It's just risk management. I think we'd be better off acknowledging there are unknown unknowns and try to mitigate them. One way we could have done that this time around was making it an optional feature (as Matt was mentioning in a

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-24 Thread Eric Sandeen
Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:52 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: It's just risk management. I think we'd be better off acknowledging there are unknown unknowns and try to mitigate them. One way we could have done that this time around was making it an optional feature (as Matt

Re: Bodhi updates

2010-08-24 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/24/10 9:45 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said: Bodhi updates can have multiple packages associated with a single update as long as they are on different branches. Why this restriction? At least in the

Re: F-14 Branched report: 20100824 changes

2010-08-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:42:17PM +, Branched Report wrote: 1:libguestfs-1.5.2-4.fc14.i686 requires /lib/libxtables.so.4 This seems to be a warning about an older version than what's currently in F14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=190165

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-24 Thread Mike McGrath
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Eric Sandeen wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:52 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: It's just risk management. I think we'd be better off acknowledging there are unknown unknowns and try to mitigate them. One way we could have done that this time

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 11:15 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:45:33AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: GENERAL SANITY - Booting a system shall achieve a similar result as booting in upstart: -- The same set of services will be started. I don't think this is a

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Mike McGrath
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 11:15 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:45:33AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: GENERAL SANITY - Booting a system shall achieve a similar result as booting in upstart: -- The same set of services

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 12:02 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: Well, ironically enough, Lennart's last big revolution illustrates the problem with that. PulseAudio - previously PolypAudio, remember - was 'opt-in' for several releases; it was packaged in Fedora and many other major distributions,

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 12:10 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: People like you and me would opt-in. (well I would on some hosts) because we know what we're doing. Expert eyes get a look at it before it's forced onto our users, who are already leaving in leaps and bounds. Again, Pulse/PolypAudio

Re: Bodhi updates

2010-08-24 Thread Bill Nottingham
Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said: Bodhi updates can have multiple packages associated with a single update as long as they are on different branches. Why this restriction? At least in the case of something like a security update, I would think that it would be beneficial to be

[Bug 626920] New: [abrt] crash in perl-Padre-0.32-2.fc12: wxStyledTextCtrl::SendMsg: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

2010-08-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [abrt] crash in perl-Padre-0.32-2.fc12: wxStyledTextCtrl::SendMsg: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Bill Nottingham
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said: How about: - If /etc/inittab exists and contains an initdefault line, the default target will be set accordingly. - any other non-comment, non-blank lines in /etc/inittab will be logged as warnings. This leaves a migration path (ditch the

Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:06 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: This, however, is just packaging guidelines. From readng the thread, there are many things that I think people would like covered with systemd before they would feel comfortable with it. So, I'm going to attempt to quantify what would

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-24 Thread Mahmoud Abdul Jawad
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.orgwrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:54 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: Whatever we do please make it an option NOT to have any window splat on the screen anywhere - let it stay in the system tray and not interfere with my

Re: Git question

2010-08-24 Thread M A Young
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Steve Dickson wrote: On 08/24/2010 10:46 AM, M A Young wrote: On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Steve Dickson wrote: Also, the kernel that is currently being built from my pnfs-13 branch fails to install with the following error: FATAL: Could not load

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-24 Thread Mike McGrath
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 12:10 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: People like you and me would opt-in. (well I would on some hosts) because we know what we're doing. Expert eyes get a look at it before it's forced onto our users, who are already leaving

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:19:38 -0700 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 12:10 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: People like you and me would opt-in. (well I would on some hosts) because we know what we're doing. Expert eyes get a look at it before it's forced onto

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 24.08.10 09:29, Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) wrote: On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:17:21 -0400, Matthew wrote: Was there a conversation other than this FESCO meeting? http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-06-15/fesco.2010-06-15-19.35.log.html#l-446 There, I

  1   2   3   >