On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:08 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com said:
On most laptops, however, which are the most common types of system sold
today, a firewall is very definitely needed when you're connecting to
hotel networks, public wifi
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:50 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Still not seeing how /etc/iptables.d wouldn't work ...
Here is how:
When I ask CUPS for a list of network printers, it runs the backends
in /usr/lib/cups/backend. One of those is /usr/lib/cups/backend/snmp,
which:
a) binds to a
Sorry list,
Couldn't find where to find the correct info\contact for this.
sha256sum -c *-CHECKSUM
Fedora-14-i386-DVD.iso: OK
sudo mount -o loop
/home/frank/Torrents/Fedora_14/Fedora-14-i386-DVD/Fedora-14-i386-DVD.iso
/mnt
diff -r /mnt /media/Fedora 14 i386 DVD
diff:
Compose started at Tue Dec 7 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
amarok-2.3.90-1.fc15.x86_64 requires
libampache_account_login.so()(64bit)
balsa-2.4.9-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libesmtp.so.5()(64bit)
On 12/07/2010 02:41 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 7.12.2010 04:50, Genes MailLists napsal(a):
* Will fedora bring app-armor (and GUI's tools perhaps) as an selinux
partner for f15 now that its accepted in upstream kernel too ?
Gosh, I hope not, but I have my doubts.
Matěj
Oh why ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: broken dependencies in EPEL6beta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660652
Summary: broken dependencies in EPEL6beta
Product: Fedora EPEL
Hi everyone!
During Richard Hughes' Linux and application installing thread[1] I
had argued that just showing a list of packages won't cut it for most
use cases around package handling. One of those use cases is showing
which packages are installed on a system. For getting an idea about a
Once upon a time, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com said:
In the cups case might be probably reasonable to default to localhost.
However for rpcbind it is clearly not so - what's the point of starting
things that are mostly needed for NFS when you would be able to mount
only NFS provided by the
Once upon a time, Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com said:
When I ask CUPS for a list of network printers, it runs the backends
in /usr/lib/cups/backend. One of those is /usr/lib/cups/backend/snmp,
which:
a) binds to a local unprivileged UDP port
b) sends a broadcast SNMP request
c) listens for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/06/2010 07:03 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 00:38 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Cron - but should be activated only when cron files exist
It seems to me that the list:
- ssh
- Dbus
- syslog
- iptables
- ip6tables
-
2010/12/7 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:08 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com said:
On most laptops, however, which are the most common types of system sold
today, a firewall is very definitely needed when you're connecting
Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) said:
a) binds to a local unprivileged UDP port
b) sends a broadcast SNMP request
c) listens for (unicast) responses to that request
We don't hear any of those responses because they are not recognised as
related by the kernel. The iptables rules
Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com said:
Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) said:
a) binds to a local unprivileged UDP port
b) sends a broadcast SNMP request
c) listens for (unicast) responses to that request
We don't hear any of those responses because they are
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:50:22AM +, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:50 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Still not seeing how /etc/iptables.d wouldn't work ...
Here is how:
When I ask CUPS for a list of network printers, it runs the backends
in /usr/lib/cups/backend. One
On 12/07/2010 04:28 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:50:22AM +, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:50 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Still not seeing how /etc/iptables.d wouldn't work ...
Here is how:
When I ask CUPS for a list of network printers, it
On 12/07/2010 10:20 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
How many users use NFS on desktop? This is not even used on all servers.
So the question is - do we want to have NFS by default?
I use samba and I don't want to force all users to install it by default.
No idea how many but count me
On 12/07/2010 02:48 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody explain this change between f14 and f15?
f14: perl -V:vendorarch
vendorarch='/usr/lib64/perl5';
f15: perl -V:vendorarch
vendorarch='/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl';
This causes f15 to install their vendorarch'ed modules
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:44:02AM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 7.12.2010 00:21, Jesse Keating napsal(a):
Actually bittorrents that have upnp work. Routers I've seen come
pre-configured to allow upnp, so an app on a computer, or a game
console, sends out a upnp request to open up/forward a
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:25:30PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 12/06/2010 12:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com writes:
The argument of default firewall or not would probably quiet down quite
a bit if we had any sort of decent UI to help users get the firewall out
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 17:04 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 11:44 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501227
I'm writing to devel list just if anybody can say will there be any
chance to
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 14:56 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
ah, printing.
Is there anything that's not last century?
So you are trying to defend the last-century firewall technology by
calling everything that wants to share data last century ?
That seems not the most constructive attitude...
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:10 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 14:56 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
ah, printing.
Is there anything that's not last century?
So you are trying to defend the last-century firewall technology by
calling everything that wants to share
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:50:22AM +, Tim Waugh wrote:
If the CUPS snmp backend could say to the firewall, hey, please allow
responses on this port I've got for the next few seconds -- which can
be controlled using PolicyKit -- then this network discovery would
finally work.
Is there a
On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 12/07/2010 02:48 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody explain this change between f14 and f15?
f14: perl -V:vendorarch
vendorarch='/usr/lib64/perl5';
f15: perl -V:vendorarch
vendorarch='/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl';
This
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 14:56 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
ah, printing.
Is there anything that's not last century?
So you are trying to defend the last-century firewall technology by
calling everything that wants to share data last century ?
That seems not the most constructive attitude...
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:12 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
dude, read to the end of the thread. I walked away - I conceded the
point about disabling the firewall.
Sorry, sent too early (and twice, to add insult to injury).
Anyway, to put a more positive note on this, I'm looking forward to
On 12/07/2010 08:03 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
There's also more to life than TCP ports. UDP ports, ICMP, other
protocols, other unrecognized protocols, packets containing completely
random stuff ... Having a firewall that lets through every TCP port
does still give you protection from
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:26 AM, FlorianFesti ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
This is now implemented as show-installed which is part of
yum-utils-1.1.29-2.fc15 found in Fedora devel.
Awesome! I'm very happy to see this!
--
Jared Smith
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:01:20PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-8.fc12 [u'631374 NEW'] (build/make) sailer,rjones
mingw32-pangomm-2.26.0-1.fc12 [u'631208 NEW'] (build/make) sailer,rjones
mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-4.fc12 [u'631082 NEW'] (build/make) sailer,rjones
Bug 467267 got this message:
--- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org
2010-12-05 02:07:18 EST ---
Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:45:58PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
How do I reopen the bug? Previously in the bug report I stated that
this affects F14 as well (not F13), but I can not change the version.
Do I have to file a new bug?
I have reopened it for you.
--
Siddhesh
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:18:53 +
Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry list,
Couldn't find where to find the correct info\contact for this.
sha256sum -c *-CHECKSUM
Fedora-14-i386-DVD.iso: OK
sudo mount -o loop
2010/12/7 Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com:
On 12/07/2010 10:20 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
How many users use NFS on desktop? This is not even used on all servers.
So the question is - do we want to have NFS by default?
I use samba and I don't want to force all users to install it by
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.03-4.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660749
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-5.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660755
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-HTML-FillInForm-2.00-4.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660761
Summary: FTBFS perl-HTML-FillInForm-2.00-4.fc14
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto-1.32-2.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660762
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Untaint-1.26-9.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660774
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Untaint-1.26-9.fc14
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode-1.02-4.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660777
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.06000-2.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660763
Summary: FTBFS perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.06000-2.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM-2.3-5.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660775
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97-2.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660771
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Session-4.35-5.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660792
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Session-4.35-5.fc14
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Class-Can-0.01-5.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660810
Summary: FTBFS perl-Class-Can-0.01-5.fc14
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-CAPTCHA-0.01-2.fc15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660787
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings-0.04-4.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660808
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.17-2.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660800
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.17-2.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-POE-Component-DBIAgent-0.26-7.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660827
Summary: FTBFS perl-POE-Component-DBIAgent-0.26-7.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Class-DBI-AsForm-2.42-11.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660826
Summary: FTBFS perl-Class-DBI-AsForm-2.42-11.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP-2.04-1.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660836
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-POE-Component-SNMP-1.1001-4.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660832
Summary: FTBFS perl-POE-Component-SNMP-1.1001-4.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch-1.02-4.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660821
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream-2.10-4.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660857
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.5-2.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660860
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Class-Observable-1.04-8.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660849
Summary: FTBFS perl-Class-Observable-1.04-8.fc14
Product:
While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a
question.
Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per
Fedora branch? I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there
real value in ACLs for f13, f14, devel, etc...?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora --
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a
question.
Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per
Fedora branch? I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there
Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per
Fedora branch? I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there
real value in ACLs for f13, f14, devel, etc...?
The pkgdb interface distinguishes them. Apparently there was some
motivation for that in the first
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:20:28AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a
question.
Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per
Fedora branch? I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there
real
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 09:24, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/07/2010 08:03 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
There's also more to life than TCP ports. UDP ports, ICMP, other
protocols, other unrecognized protocols, packets containing completely
random stuff ... Having a firewall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.66-1.fc15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661086
Summary: FTBFS perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.66-1.fc15
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.28-1.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661092
Summary: FTBFS perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.28-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-File-Comments-0.07-7.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661088
Summary: FTBFS perl-File-Comments-0.07-7.fc14
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-PDF-API2-0.73-4.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661083
Summary: FTBFS perl-PDF-API2-0.73-4.fc14
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182507
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=467113action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=467113action=edit
Description:
Replication drops unhashed passwords which is necessary for
the AD password sync. This patch allows
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
I would like to propose blocking packages at the F15 alpha compose
point if they have not resolved their FTBFS from F14 or earlier. The
lists may be broken down by when they last did build. With 3
exceptions, these 110 bugs are all still in
Dne 7.12.2010 19:57, Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
Or something like that. I do remember a lot of over-engineering and
then a very simple it does this from Alan. And I remember a lot of
issues we were having with customers going away after having them run
it.
There is something weird about
commit c8550842012e10312c157dc7ffa90c4159ab6817
Merge: 4906ac0 a0afb94
Author: Steven Pritchard steven.pritch...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Dec 7 13:17:47 2010 -0600
Sync with rawhide.
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-BerkeleyDB.spec | 72 +++---
Jesse Keating wrote, at 12/08/2010 03:20 AM +9:00:
While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a
question.
Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per
Fedora branch? I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there
real value in ACLs
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 22:26 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
4 as well (not F13), but I can not change the version.
Do I have to file a new bug?
I have reopened i
So what kind of special access do you have to have to bugzilla in order
to change version?
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 22:26 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
4 as well (not F13), but I can not change the version.
Do I have to file a new bug?
I have reopened i
So what kind of special access do you have to have
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:20:28AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a
question.
Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per
Fedora branch? I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there
real
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:48 +0100, François Cami wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 22:26 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
4 as well (not F13), but I can not change the version.
Do I have to file a new bug?
I have
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 09:01:26PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Yeah, general discovery. From the top of my head:
- Pulseaudio sinks and sources
- libvirt instances for virt-manager
- VNC desktops for Vinagre
- local web pages (think SOHO router config page) for zeroconf
enabled
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544738
Steven Pritchard st...@silug.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438244
Steven Pritchard st...@silug.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 02:10:00PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
I would like to propose blocking packages at the F15 alpha compose
point if they have not resolved their FTBFS from F14 or earlier. ??The
lists may be broken down by when they
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a
question.
Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per
Fedora branch?
No
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
This from Matej, who tried to send it a while ago, but who appears to be
unable to post to the mailing list for some reason (I blame Canonical):
Some of leading members of our glorious BugZappers crew presented some
unreasonable requirements, like they would to sleep sometimes and stuff,
but in
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
Note that I am not advocating keeping these packages unfixed. I wanted
to point out that things might turn ugly and might even trigger an
avalanche when you remove the FTBFS packages from the repo and then
the packages
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:08:49PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com said:
On most laptops, however, which are the most common types of system sold
today, a firewall is very definitely needed when you're connecting to
hotel networks, public wifi
On 12/07/2010 10:25 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a
question.
Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per
Fedora branch? I've seen
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:16:11PM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 7.12.2010 19:57, Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
Or something like that. I do remember a lot of over-engineering and
then a very simple it does this from Alan. And I remember a lot of
issues we were having with customers going
On 12/07/2010 10:27 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
The pkgdb interface distinguishes them. Apparently there was some
motivation for that in the first place. If the git hooks are not
going to distinguish them, then pkgdb should change not to either.
Currently the git ACLs do enforce per-branch
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:02:48PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:54 -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
Yep, that happens. There are also people that add +0 comments to
updates saying Untested. There is an obvious need for more
fine-grained karma types.
I've sent out
On 12/07/2010 11:22 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
There can be a case that F-13 package and F-14 package are completely
different, even if the packages have the same name.
For example there may be a case that a package of older version
shipped in F-13 is written in perl, and new version shipped
commit 4251ea8ea7680dc3db15c010bfae00d7ebe543a5
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Tue Dec 7 22:54:01 2010 +0100
Add perl(CGI) to BuildRequires and add perl default filter
perl-HTML-FillInForm.spec |9 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1
On 12/07/2010 11:52 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:20:28AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a
question.
Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per
Fedora branch? I've seen some argument
commit 5220207659e6a65796b33ef02646a7b12aab5f99
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Tue Dec 7 23:07:15 2010 +0100
Add perl(CGI) and perl(Class::ISA) to BuildRequires
Add perl default filter
perl-CGI-Application.spec | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658976
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660960
Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658976
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:55:26PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 12/07/2010 11:52 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:20:28AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a
question.
Is anybody seeing any real value of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658976
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658976
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 12/07/2010 02:25 PM, Till Maas wrote:
To properly display the state of the package in PackageDB. E.g. if a
package has different owners in different releases, it is more clear who
is responsible. E.g. sometimes packages are faded out from Fedora and
therefore orphaned in devel, but not in
On 12/03/2010 04:09 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
We're working on this. It won't always be practical, however; in the
current case, for example, you need specific hardware to test mdadm.
Uh, this is md, not dm, you don't need very special HARDWARE (basically only
2 HDDs,
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:16 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
It used to say there was none; after updating gnome-settings-daemon
to
2.91.4-1.fc15.x86_64 (which prevented Gnome fromn starting) and
downgrading back to 2.91.3-1.fc15.x86_64 it works (?!).
Very highly unlikely to actually be
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 14:53 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
snip
One thing is e.g notifications to users when some service/app requests
to open a port. First version won't have network zones yet, but he and
Dan Williams are working on that for the next generation which will then
basically
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:20:28AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a
question.
Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per
Fedora branch? I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there
real
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
