I'm not sure nmcli does everything cnetworkmanager did -- e.g. Can you
create new (wireless) connection with nmcli?
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 08:51 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I've just orphaned cnetworkmanager.
Upstream is pretty dead, and nmcli does everything cnetworkmanager did
and more.
José Matos wrote:
1) This feature will also allow firefox and thunderbird to earn
langpacks as they deserve.
Yes that was my hope but it needs acceptance from the fedora mozilla
packagers...
Support and encouragement is welcome.
In F15 asking
yum list *langpack*
shows that only
koffice
- Original Message -
On 06/01/2011 09:59 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Best I can tell the current version of memtest86+ in Fedora is
v4.10
which is too old for Sandy Bridge which needs version v4.20.
Anyone know if there is some reason we haven't updated to the
current
libmemcached 0.49, in rawhide, now provides:
libhashkit.so.1
libmemcached.so.7
libmemcachedprotocol.so.0
libmemcachedutil.so.2
You may also have to check new syntax for config, which could affect
some clients:
Messaggio originale
Da: Peter Robinson
Inviato: 01/06/2011, 22:41
A: Development discussions related to Fedora
Oggetto: Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)
On 1 Jun 2011 19:44, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson
Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
pretty nasty.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Ron Yorston wrote:
I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work
together.
Except the Shut Down menu extension directly conflicts with the
alternative-status-menu extension. Sub-packages are the
Compose started at Thu Jun 2 08:15:28 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadmsslutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadminutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.x86_64
On 06/02/2011 04:44 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
- Original Message -
4.20 is in rawhide since March 07. I will push it to f14/f15 also. Please
file a bug next time
thanks regards
Jaroslav
Thanks - I did file a bug and see that you replied to the bug too - so
thanks. (my
Hello, all:
Now rawhide buildtree sees rubygems 1.8.5. The license changed from
(Ruby or GPL+) to (Ruby or MIT).
If you see any issues with new rubygems please feel free to report them,
thank you.
Regards,
Mamoru
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
pretty nasty.
This should do it:
rsync -az --progress -e ssh fedorapeople.org:/srv/repos/ /your/path
You do
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 07:32 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
pretty nasty.
This should do it:
rsync -az
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 23:54 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
upstream hat on I expect things to
On 06/01/2011 10:54 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
upstream hat on I expect things to further improve
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:54:05PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
upstream hat on I expect things
Am 01.06.2011 22:54, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
upstream hat on I expect things to further improve
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 01.06.2011 22:54, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that
On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
upstream hat on I expect things to
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:04 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default
install. In
my opinion it's in a good enough shape for
Am 02.06.2011 16:04, schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 01.06.2011 22:54, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
my
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:11 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 16:04, schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 01.06.2011 22:54, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
I'd like to have
Am 02.06.2011 16:15, schrieb seth vidal:
so PLEASE install a new fedora and remove anything not needed for
ssh, rsync, scp and tell me how long it takes to find all of them
what you do with such a machine:
decide what services you will install on this bare setup or
using as it is as
On 06/02/2011 09:07 AM, seth vidal wrote:
+1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
Sounds like a bug instead of a con.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:21 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
package-cleanup --leaves --all
is listing grub-0.97-66.fc14.x86_64
i hope you understand why i not trust this output :-)
grub isn't required.
and then tell why the count of unneeded base-packages should be increased
Am 02.06.2011 16:36, schrieb seth vidal:
please leave me in peace with discussins how a word is used and where
i mean simply the ability to install a minimal-system without any
optional software and this is getting harder every month
I don't disagree - but @base is not that group. @core is
On 06/02/2011 10:32 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 06/02/2011 09:07 AM, seth vidal wrote:
+1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
Sounds like a bug instead of a con.
+1 : Due to horrible
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is x?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
José Matos (jama...@fc.up.pt) said:
My problem in a sense is that it is limited in scope. :-(
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YumLangpackPlugin was the feature page
for when the feature was initially deployed. The purpose of this is post is
to
raise awareness for this feature and
Neal Becker writes:
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is x?
You mean you want to specify the dependency's version in a macro, that you
put into Requires:? If so, just use the macro in your build script, it'll be
expanded, and you can test its value. Bare-bones
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:22:25AM +0200, fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote:
This [1] may be of some help as a high level overview of how to deploy
IPv6 on a LAN and various operating system IPv6 compatibilities.
Fedora is doing quite well! The document is not a configuration help,
but it might make it
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:15:59PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs
default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't
believe 3-4 months is enough time to test it well enough. On 2.6.38.x I
still get
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:32:21AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
+1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
Sounds like a bug instead of a con.
Yeah. Bash-completion could stand to be broken up into
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:22:25AM +0200, fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote:
This [1] may be of some help as a high level overview of how to deploy
IPv6 on a LAN and various operating system IPv6 compatibilities.
Fedora is doing
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Neal Becker writes:
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is x?
You mean you want to specify the dependency's version in a macro, that you
put into Requires:? If so, just use the macro in your build script, it'll be
expanded, and you can test
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Is there an easy way I can set up IPv6 and a handful of machines on my
LAN for testing, without requiring any IPv6 internet connection or an
IPv6 assigned prefix?
Yes, every system automatically chooses a link-local address.
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The Linux machines on my LAN appear to have acquired IPv6 addresses, eg:
$ ip addr show eth0
2: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 11:48:35AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Neal Becker writes:
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is x?
You mean you want to specify the dependency's version in a macro, that you
put into Requires:? If so, just use
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:00:44PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The Linux machines on my LAN appear to have acquired IPv6 addresses, eg:
$ ip addr show eth0
2: eth0:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 05:06:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
) = $minversion ]; then
That test should be != instead of =
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574195
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
12:08:41 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
On 06/02/2011 12:06 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
How about this evil untested recursive invocation of rpm?
%prep
%configure
package=glibc
minversion=2.13.89
if [ $(
rpm -q --queryformat '%{version}\n' $package |
cat - (echo $minversion) |
sort -V |
head -1
) =
Neal Becker writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Neal Becker writes:
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is x?
You mean you want to specify the dependency's version in a macro, that you
put into Requires:? If so, just use the macro in your build script, it'll
be
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:07:47 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:00:44PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
The Linux machines on my LAN appear to have
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:32:21AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
+1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
Sounds like a bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564798
--- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
12:33:45 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555849
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
12:52:21 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548098
--- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
13:06:26 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548097
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
13:06:34 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 12:16:13PM -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:07:47 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:00:44PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard W.M.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:15:59PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs
default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't
believe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543660
--- Comment #13 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
13:13:55 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
--- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
13:18:26 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548098
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548097
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529172
--- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
13:36:35 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
On 06/02/2011 01:14 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
These sort of issues are my priority and I've spent the last 2 months
specifically working on the kvm performance differences between ext4
and btrfs. Now we're not on par with ext4 yet, but we aren't 2-3
times slower any more, maybe at the most
Hello,
dasher in Fedora has been broken for me since Fedora 12.
The bug I entered has recently been automatically closed.
dasher doesn't work in 64-bit and can be crashed by asking it to go
fullscreen.
What's the procedure to get the package removed?
Thanks.
Ref:
nodata wrote:
Hello,
dasher in Fedora has been broken for me since Fedora 12.
The bug I entered has recently been automatically closed.
dasher doesn't work in 64-bit and can be crashed by asking it to go
fullscreen.
What's the procedure to get the package removed?
Thanks.
Ref:
Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2011, 12:16 -0400 schrieb Bernd Stramm:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:07:47 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:00:44PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:00 PM, nodata l...@nodata.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
dasher in Fedora has been broken for me since Fedora 12.
The bug I entered has recently been automatically closed.
dasher doesn't work in 64-bit and can be crashed by asking it to go
fullscreen.
What's the procedure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705308
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
15:00:15 EDT ---
perlbrew-0.22-1.fc15 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692060
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-06-02 15:04:08 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692060
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709269
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Is there an easy way I can set up IPv6 and a handful of machines on my
LAN for testing, without requiring any IPv6 internet connection or an
IPv6 assigned prefix?
If you do want an assigned prefix, or real connectivity
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 12:44:46PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com said:
These sort of issues are my priority and I've spent the last 2 months
specifically working on the kvm performance differences between ext4
and btrfs. Now we're not on par
On Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:48:36 PM David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:53 +0200, Phil Knirsch wrote:
We have tested them on a Power7 box as well as on an older Apple G5, but
your mileage may vary. Especially on Power5 and Power6 the problem still
exists that the unified
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
It doesn't integrate into GNOME 3 any more, since it relies on a panel
applet and GNOME 3 doesn't support those.
It seems to work really well in Gnome 3. The applet sits down in the
notification bar (like empathy) and is almost as
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com said:
Maybe I'm not understanding your question correctly, but a filesystem
is more general than LVM. You can create directories corresponding to
your current VGs and files for your LVs, with the advantage that you
can nest directories
Hi,
Our dtrace script in systemtap-sdt-devel starts #!/usr/bin/python.
Usually this leads to an implicit Requires: /usr/bin/python, but for
some reason our rawhide build did not get this. The F15, F14, and F13
builds from the same spec required python as expected.
The rawhide build which missed
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Aurimas Černius wrote:
Gnote gives status icon 2 seconds to appear and shows Search All Notes
window as main, if that fails. If you somehow delay the gnote start
(wrap to some script for example) until desktop components like tray are
available, it should
On Jun 2, 2011 9:26 PM, Josh Stone jist...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Our dtrace script in systemtap-sdt-devel starts #!/usr/bin/python.
Usually this leads to an implicit Requires: /usr/bin/python, but for
some reason our rawhide build did not get this. The F15, F14, and F13
builds from the
On 06/02/2011 01:34 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it set as executable? If not the department scan will ignore it.
Yes, it is executable:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=2556409filename=/usr/bin/dtrace
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 06/03/2011 12:47 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Moving it to default in @system-tools seems fine to me as a first step.
However, that's not in the 'default' install (but it would place it on
the install media.) If it's wanted in the default install, the @base
group is the best place for it (it
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:11:47PM +0200, fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Is there an easy way I can set up IPv6 and a handful of machines on my
LAN for testing, without requiring any IPv6 internet connection or an
IPv6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 2 Jun 2011 15:32, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
On 06/02/2011 09:07 AM, seth vidal wrote:
+1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
Sounds like a bug instead of a con.
I believe it
On 06/02/2011 04:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Setting up 6to4 involves at least joining a service like sixxs, which
even if free takes a certain amount of time and effort.
The method you quoted does not require an account with a tunnel provider.
There is an RFC giving provisions for global
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628655
rdv rdevries1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 04:53:25PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Setting up 6to4 involves at least joining a service like sixxs, which
even if free takes a certain amount of time and effort.
The method you quoted does not require an
Neal Becker wrote:
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is x?
I generally do something like:
%if 0%{?fedora} NN
%global have_foo_MMM 1
%endif
%if 0%{?have_foo_MMM}
BuildRequires: foo-devel = MMM
%else
BuildRequires: foo-devel MMM
%endif
…
%prep
%if 0%{?have_foo_MMM}
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ocaml-findlib should require ocaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710290
Summary: ocaml-findlib should require ocaml
Product: Fedora
On 06/02/2011 05:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Given that I mostly don't know about IPv6, what's the best way for
people to test IPv6 next Wednesday, given what I think are the
following common limitations:
- they'll have one (or two if we're lucky) Fedora machines
They could connect
I think we're talking at cross-purposes here. I want people to be
able to test IPv6 *on their local LAN only* next Wednesday with the
minimum amount of fuss.
They can just test that it works between two machines, one Fedora, one
might be Fedora or it might be something else like Windows acting
Jeremy pinged me about an issue with the hulahop package (#574484).
Disclaimer: I'm not the maintainer of the package but Simon has been a bit
quiet on this bug. I was opened for F12 over a year ago.
hulahop had it's Epoch bumped on the F-10 branch to hulahop-1:0.4.6-5.fc10
(commit 3c3f6d12edb)
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:51:55 +1000
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
hulahop had it's Epoch bumped on the F-10 branch to
hulahop-1:0.4.6-5.fc10 (commit 3c3f6d12edb) to undo 0.4.7 update.
That epoch bump was limited to F-10, no other branches saw it afaict.
So anyone who ever
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:21:14AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:51:55 +1000
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
hulahop had it's Epoch bumped on the F-10 branch to
hulahop-1:0.4.6-5.fc10 (commit 3c3f6d12edb) to undo 0.4.7 update.
That epoch bump was limited
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:39:13 +1000
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:21:14AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
However, given that the problematic package only appeared in Fedora
10 and upgrade paths are guaranteed by Fedora policy only from
F(N-1) to F(N),
On 06/02/2011 05:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I think we're talking at cross-purposes here. I want people to be
able to test IPv6*on their local LAN only* next Wednesday with the
minimum amount of fuss.
In that case: Since Fedora defaults to link-local, they would have to
run radvd
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 03:12:39AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:39:13 +1000
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:21:14AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
However, given that the problematic package only appeared in Fedora
10 and
Hi there!
Could someone please review these tickets? I'll be happy to review their
tickets in return :)
[1] FreeMedForms - An open Electronic Medical Record Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707002
[2] dcm4che - A DICOM implementation in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605836
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
06:19:23 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603230
--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
07:10:52 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710290
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2011-06-02 18:16:11
EDT ---
Orion, you're a trusted packager aren't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613872
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
02:47:28 EDT ---
perl-Chart-2.4.2-1.el5 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613872
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02
02:47:35 EDT ---
perl-Chart-2.4.2-3.el6 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613872
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709697
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ORLite:
92ee3dc784d13a1b6d612b43b047c49e ORLite-1.49.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
