On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:03:33PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
for decades. Fedora 14's init system isn't that different to the first
version
of RHL (4.0) I started using back in 96.
This is somewhat misleading.
What is the status of the MultiLiveCD,
that was being mooted last year.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ok, it looks like I have managed to fix it.
I have blacklisted b43 and removed rpc and some other things.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/12/2011 03:27 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
What is the status of the MultiLiveCD,
that was being mooted last year.
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/releases/15/Multi/
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the status of the MultiLiveCD,
that was being mooted last year.
We were able to work through all the technical issues with the
proposal, and Release Engineering has created Multi-Desktop LiveDVD
images for Fedora
Compose started at Sun Jun 12 08:15:22 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadmsslutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadminutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.x86_64
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:19:23 +0200, Jared K. Smith wrote:
We were able to work through all the technical issues with the
proposal, and Release Engineering has created Multi-Desktop LiveDVD
images for Fedora 15. They even auto-detect whether you're on an i386
or x86_64 platform, but of course
On 06/12/2011 04:55 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
so when there exists now a releng-approved biarch spin why isn't the default
Download button on http://fedoraproject.org finally the biarch-autodetecting
spin? A biarch single-desktop download would be enough with under 2GB size.
1GB USB flash
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:16:41 +0200, John Reiser wrote:
1GB USB flash storage often can be scavenged for no monetary cost.
2GB USB flash storage more often costs real money.
I got my 2GB flash for free, I do not find this 1GB-2GB difference relevant,
the availability also differs according to
On 12/06/11 12:19, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the status of the MultiLiveCD,
that was being mooted last year.
We were able to work through all the technical issues with the
proposal, and Release Engineering has
Am Sonntag, den 12.06.2011, 10:57 +0100 schrieb Frank Murphy:
What is the status of the MultiLiveCD, that was being mooted last
year.
It is available for download at
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/releases/15/Multi/
AFAIK the NA ambassadors have received their media already while EMEA is
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:27:44PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 2011-06-11 12:11, Lucas wrote:
Actually it does relabel by it self after boot with option selinux=0
That sounds rather useful. How does it know whether or not it was
previously booted with selinux=0?
booting with
Am Sonntag, den 12.06.2011, 13:55 +0200 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
I was trying to push it since 2009:
[Fedora-livecd-list] auto-biarch (x86_64 + i686) LiveDVD patch + ISO
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-livecd-list/2009-June/msg00018.html
2011/4/28 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com:
In a move that will surprise few, I'm retiring hal-info in devel and
orphaned it in f15. If hal gets blocked for f16, then I'll do the same
for hal-info.
The only thing that requires hal-info is hal, and libmtp-hal.
Fixed this the other day,
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:49:18 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
* It is still a new technology and only got a very limited amount
of testing [1]. It was not tested during the release cycle at
all but only last minute. Making it default would IMHO be to
risky.
It is
Greetings.
This is a reminder email about the end of life process for Fedora 13.
Fedora 13 will reach end of life on 2011-06-24, and no further updates
will be pushed out after that time. Additionally, with the recent
release of Fedora 15, no new packages will be added to the Fedora 13
Hi.
My name is Carlos Olmedo and I'm the upstream developer of
libsysactivity [1] and i want to maintain the fedora package because
it's old and orphaned. I filed a review request [2] but now i need a
sponsor. Anybody interested?
~Carlos
[1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/libsysactivity/
[2]
Hello list,
Any tips how to debug why laptop CPU temperature is around 30 degrees celsius
higher on Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 compared to Windows 7 ? Both Linux and Windows
were idle when measuring..
I tried both Fedora 14 (Linux 2.6.35) and Fedora 15 (Linux 2.6.38).
Laptop specs:
- HP
is there any clean way to get newer intel-graphics drivers
on fedora 14? performance is horrible and under kde the
desktop often hangs for some seconds
this is nothing i would expect with http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=52213
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 08:19:03AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:03:33PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
for decades. Fedora 14's init system isn't that different to the first
version
of RHL
if have the following two network cards
the 02:00.0 is an additional pci-express-card and recognized as eth0
the 00:19.0 is on-board and ignored from the system
00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit Network
Connection (rev 04)
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 08:19:03AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:03:33PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
for decades. Fedora
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
is there any clean way to get newer intel-graphics drivers
on fedora 14? performance is horrible and under kde the
desktop often hangs for some seconds
1) Wrong list
2) Update to F15
--
devel mailing list
Am 12.06.2011 18:37, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
is there any clean way to get newer intel-graphics drivers
on fedora 14? performance is horrible and under kde the
desktop often hangs for some seconds
1) Wrong list
because
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 18:37, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
is there any clean way to get newer intel-graphics drivers
on fedora 14? performance is horrible
Am 12.06.2011 18:53, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be able to install
and use it.
and why in the world is systemd forced after a upgrade via yum where
upstart was in use
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 18:53, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be able to install
and use it.
and why in
Am 12.06.2011 18:56, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 18:53, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 18:56, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 18:53, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Reindl Harald
Am 12.06.2011 19:03, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
you said upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be able to
install and use it - so how and why damned must be a init-replace
in a early state forced on a existing
On 06/12/2011 09:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 19:03, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Reindl Haraldh.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
you said upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be able to
install and use it - so how and why damned must be a
Am 12.06.2011 19:14, schrieb Lucas:
On 06/12/2011 09:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Look, to be able to use Sandy Bridge you need - i915 driver, kernel, and Xorg.
You can add Fedora 15 repository and update only kernel, Xorg and intel
driver.
All of this you can download from koji and
On 06/12/2011 12:55 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 18:53, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Reindl Haraldh.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be able to install
and use it.
and why in the world is systemd forced after a
On Sunday 12 June 2011 16:56:33 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello list,
Any tips how to debug why laptop CPU temperature is around 30 degrees
celsius higher on Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 compared to Windows 7 ? Both
Linux and Windows were idle when measuring..
I tried both Fedora 14 (Linux 2.6.35)
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 06:20:55PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Sunday 12 June 2011 16:56:33 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello list,
Any tips how to debug why laptop CPU temperature is around 30 degrees
celsius higher on Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 compared to Windows 7 ? Both
Linux and Windows
On 06/12/2011 09:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 19:14, schrieb Lucas:
On 06/12/2011 09:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Look, to be able to use Sandy Bridge you need - i915 driver, kernel, and
Xorg.
You can add Fedora 15 repository and update only kernel, Xorg and intel
driver.
On 06/12/2011 09:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 19:14, schrieb Lucas:
On 06/12/2011 09:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Look, to be able to use Sandy Bridge you need - i915 driver, kernel, and
Xorg.
You can add Fedora 15 repository and update only kernel, Xorg and intel
driver.
Hi Reindl,
You could also build it from sources. You should already have the
latest kernel and the X server updates, compiling the intel driver
will then produce a couple of user-space shared libraries that you can
place in /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers. That's it.
-Ilyes
2011/6/12 Reindl
2011/6/12 Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi:
Hello list,
Any tips how to debug why laptop CPU temperature is around 30 degrees celsius
higher on Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 compared to Windows 7 ? Both Linux and
Windows
were idle when measuring..
I tried both Fedora 14 (Linux 2.6.35) and Fedora 15
On Thursday 02 June 2011 16:28:56 Bill Nottingham wrote:
1) This feature will also allow firefox and thunderbird to earn
langpacks as they deserve.
It certainly allows for it - it requires that the packagers take advantage
of it. ISTR discussions in the past that the mechanics of creating
Am 12.06.2011 19:28, schrieb Lucas:
Strange, I did exactly the same thing with Fedora 14, I add new kernel,
changed xorg and intel driver.
But I have i686.
mhh - strange - an trying to update glibc results in chaos
Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden means file not found in english
yes
On 06/12/2011 10:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 19:28, schrieb Lucas:
Strange, I did exactly the same thing with Fedora 14, I add new kernel,
changed xorg and intel driver.
But I have i686.
mhh - strange - an trying to update glibc results in chaos
Datei oder Verzeichnis
Am 12.06.2011 20:07, schrieb Lucas:
On 06/12/2011 10:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 19:28, schrieb Lucas:
Strange, I did exactly the same thing with Fedora 14, I add new kernel,
changed xorg and intel driver.
But I have i686.
mhh - strange - an trying to update glibc
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 07:09:19PM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
wrote:
while you're thinking about what to do in the area of virt-clone /
cloning VMs, I recon it would be nice not only to be able to clone
VMs that have image files, but also those that have a Logical Volume
as
On Sunday 12 June 2011 18:26:25 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
What is the graphics card?
It's ATI radeon RV635. Do you have the same graphics card?
I think so (but I think that are mixing the references :-) ):
# lspci | grep ATI
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc
2011/6/12 José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt:
On Sunday 12 June 2011 18:26:25 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
What is the graphics card?
It's ATI radeon RV635. Do you have the same graphics card?
I think so (but I think that are mixing the references :-) ):
# lspci | grep ATI
01:00.0 VGA compatible
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
* the system is running since years
* every dist-upgrade via yum was no problem
* now see screenshot
* WTF is there to relabel if started with selinux=0-kernel-param
WHY IN THE WORLD ARE USERS
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
* the system is running since years
* every dist-upgrade via yum was no problem
* now see screenshot
* WTF is
Am 12.06.2011 23:35, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
* the system is running since years
* every dist-upgrade via yum was no
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:39:17PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
WTF every three years a new pig is forced to run through the city
and if any subsystem is runnign well and debugged some idiot
comes out of his hole and try replace and force everybody
to use it
I don't agree with the design or
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 23:35, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as
Am 12.06.2011 23:43, schrieb John R. Dennison:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:39:17PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
WTF every three years a new pig is forced to run through the city
and if any subsystem is runnign well and debugged some idiot
comes out of his hole and try replace and force
Am 12.06.2011 23:45, schrieb Josh Boyer:
why are users of running systems are forced to change their
init-system to systemd? upstart is in the repos but ignored
I actually don't know the answer to this question other than Fedora
switched to systemd
cool - on linux the apple-way starts
On 12/06/11 22:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 23:45, schrieb Josh Boyer:
why are users of running systems are forced to change their
init-system to systemd? upstart is in the repos but ignored
snip
Try yum install upstart,
kernel arg init=/sbin/upstart
YMMV.
--
Regards,
Frank
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 23:23 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
I DO NOT NEED SYSTEMD ON 20 SERVERS HERE BECAUSE THEY ARE STARTING
FAST ENOUGH AND I NEED NO MAGIC WHICH THINKS KNOWS WHAT TO START
IN WHICH ORDER SINCE I KNOW WHAT IS RUNNING ON MY SYSTEMS
Why run Fedora itself on 20 servers? Those are
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
No one is stopping you from packaging upstart (assuming someone hasn't done so)
for F15.
* the system is running since years
* every dist-upgrade via yum was no problem
* now see
Am 12.06.2011 23:58, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On 12/06/11 22:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 23:45, schrieb Josh Boyer:
why are users of running systems are forced to change their
init-system to systemd? upstart is in the repos but ignored
snip
Try yum install upstart,
kernel arg
On 06/12/2011 05:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 23:35, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Reindl Haraldh.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
* the system is running since
Am 13.06.2011 00:00, schrieb Mike Chambers:
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 23:23 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
I DO NOT NEED SYSTEMD ON 20 SERVERS HERE BECAUSE THEY ARE STARTING
FAST ENOUGH AND I NEED NO MAGIC WHICH THINKS KNOWS WHAT TO START
IN WHICH ORDER SINCE I KNOW WHAT IS RUNNING ON MY SYSTEMS
Am 13.06.2011 00:13, schrieb Steve Clark:
WTF every three years a new pig is forced to run through the city
and if any subsystem is runnign well and debugged some idiot
comes out of his hole and try replace and force everybody
to use it
sarcasmdon't you know you will save 15-30 seconds
Am 13.06.2011 00:04, schrieb John Dulaney:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
No one is stopping you from packaging upstart (assuming someone hasn't done
so) for F15.
it is in the repos
and it is replaced by systemd via yum
On 06/12/2011 06:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.06.2011 00:13, schrieb Steve Clark:
WTF every three years a new pig is forced to run through the city
and if any subsystem is runnign well and debugged some idiot
comes out of his hole and try replace and force everybody
to use it
Am 13.06.2011 00:23, schrieb Steve Clark:
On 06/12/2011 06:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
sarcasmdon't you know you will save 15-30 seconds each time you boot
up/sarcasm
someone come out there and show me how will a 20 second-reboot on the
vmware-guest production servers will get 20 seconds
Am Sonntag, den 12.06.2011, 23:23 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
systems upgraded with yum still have upstart installed (I did it myself)
and you can select the init as a kernel parameter, so
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 07:09:19PM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
wrote:
while you're thinking about what to do in the area of virt-clone /
cloning VMs, I recon it would be nice not only to be able to clone
VMs that have image files, but also those that
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 08:01:24 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
This is a reminder email about the end of life process for Fedora 13.
Fedora 13 will reach end of life on 2011-06-24, and no further updates
will be pushed out after that time. Additionally, with the recent
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 13.06.2011 00:23, schrieb Steve Clark:
On 06/12/2011 06:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
sarcasmdon't you know you will save 15-30 seconds each time you boot
up/sarcasm
someone come out there and show me how will a
Am 13.06.2011 00:54, schrieb Christoph Wickert:
Am Sonntag, den 12.06.2011, 23:23 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
systems upgraded with yum still have upstart installed (I did it myself)
and
On 06/12/2011 12:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
is there any clean way to get newer intel-graphics drivers
on fedora 14? performance is horrible and under kde the
desktop often hangs for some seconds
this is nothing i would expect with http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=52213
I
Am 13.06.2011 01:54, schrieb Genes MailLists:
On 06/12/2011 12:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
is there any clean way to get newer intel-graphics drivers
on fedora 14? performance is horrible and under kde the
desktop often hangs for some seconds
this is nothing i would expect with
On 06/12/2011 04:11 PM, nomnex wrote:
I might wait for F16 to do a clean install. It's the first time I reach
an EOL. Can you tell me if the packages in the F13 repository
remains available (even though the packages are not updated)
past June, or not? Thanks
The archives are here:
Am 13.06.2011 00:04, schrieb John Dulaney:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
No one is stopping you from packaging upstart (assuming someone hasn't done
so) for F15.
it is in the repos
and it is replaced by
On 06/12/2011 07:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I have done this and its working - I've used rawhide with 2.6.39
kernel and also F15. See my comments below. I'll describe what you need
to do using subset of F15.
this forces a GLIBC-Upgrade, see my others posts
Yes - I said the same
Am 13.06.2011 02:28, schrieb John Dulaney:
not today but in some months
How so? How is it that in 'some months' you will be forced to use
systemd? Are the Chinese going to torture you until you make the
switch?
F14 EOL?
No Kernel 2.6.38 while Kernel-Update in the support-cycle not so
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:23:30 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
* now see screenshot
That's probably
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709681
* WTF is there to relabel if started with selinux=0-kernel-param
Although fedora-autorelabel.service is there, it does not imply that
anything is
Am 13.06.2011 02:29, schrieb Genes MailLists:
Perhaps this is not the way for you if you find it confusing ... my
suggestion then is deal with systemd and its bugs/quirks or perhaps
install F15 and replace systemd with upstart - that should work the same
as f14 + a few f15 packages.
you
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:16:00 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
[Sun Jun 12 23:30:40 2011] [error] (2)No such file or directory:
could not create /var/run/httpd/httpd.pid [Sun Jun 12 23:30:40 2011]
[error] httpd: could not log pid to file /var/run/httpd/httpd.pid
well this is the F14 build of Apache
Am 13.06.2011 02:38, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:23:30 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
* now see screenshot
That's probably
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709681
* WTF is there to relabel if started with selinux=0-kernel-param
Although
Am 13.06.2011 02:42, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:16:00 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
[Sun Jun 12 23:30:40 2011] [error] (2)No such file or directory:
could not create /var/run/httpd/httpd.pid [Sun Jun 12 23:30:40 2011]
[error] httpd: could not log pid to file
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 02:42:15 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
and why does it STOP the boot-process at a point no network is
available?
Mounts from /etc/fstab are considered required unless they are marked
with the nofail option.
why does it start the relabel service i never see with selinux=0
and
On 06/12/2011 08:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.06.2011 02:29, schrieb Genes MailLists:
Perhaps this is not the way for you if you find it confusing ... my
suggestion then is deal with systemd and its bugs/quirks or perhaps
install F15 and replace systemd with upstart - that should work
Am 13.06.2011 02:56, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 02:42:15 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
and why does it STOP the boot-process at a point no network is
available?
Mounts from /etc/fstab are considered required unless they are marked
with the nofail option.
why does it start
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 02:44:36 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
but it shows that the widely use of systemd is too soon because
this crap has to say FAILED and not OK in this case!
Apparently the httpd initscript returned with exit code 0.
A service can fail after starting successfully.
Michal
--
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:42:11 +0200 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 15:36 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Why does systemd link against libpam?
systemd does logins now, not /bin/login or gdm or ...?
to implement PAMName= (man systemd.exec)
I don't see any users of this
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:01:19 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.06.2011 02:56, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 02:42:15 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
and why does it STOP the boot-process at a point no network is
available?
Mounts from /etc/fstab are considered required unless
Am 13.06.2011 03:26, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:01:19 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.06.2011 02:56, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
interesting: mount /mnt/storage manually works after that
exclude the mountpint in /etc/fstab results in normal boot
and you have everytime
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocp-0.1.20-8.fc15
bodhi says of my update:
bodhi - 2011-06-10 05:03:46
This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now if
the maintainer wishes
But clicking the mark as stable button says:
This update has not yet met the
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Have you looked at the bug I linked to?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709681
Is it relevant for your situation?
Having a quick look at the link and at the steps to reproduce the bug
gave me shivers. Are we really sure that
On Sunday, June 12, 2011 09:30:30 AM Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:49:18 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
* It is still a new technology and only got a very limited amount
of testing [1]. It was not tested during the release cycle at
all but only
On 06/12/2011 07:27 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
On 06/12/2011 04:11 PM, nomnex wrote:
I might wait for F16 to do a clean install. It's the first time I reach
an EOL. Can you tell me if the packages in the F13 repository
remains available (even though the packages are not updated)
past June, or not?
On 06/09/2011 08:24 PM, Clément David wrote:
Hi,
My name is Clément DAVID (aka davidcl) and I'm a french software
developer. I'm currently working on Scilab [1].
I'm interested to become a packager for Scientific application or just
software toys :). My first package has been approved
On 06/07/2011 07:11 AM, Ryan Lewis wrote:
Hola Fedora developers, My name is Ryan! Currently i'm a PhD student
in computer science theory at dartmouth college. I'm a campus
ambassador at dartmouth college. My research interests are in
computational applied topology for a brief introduction
Hey Rahul,
I few things are in the works:
I am packing this program sketch, as a first taste of learning RPM's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547
I'm not sure why I haven't heard back from the reviewers after these few
days have gone by, maybe I will hear this week?
-rhl
On
On 06/13/2011 09:27 AM, Ryan Lewis wrote:
Hey Rahul,
I few things are in the works:
I am packing this program sketch, as a first taste of learning RPM's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547
I'm not sure why I haven't heard back from the reviewers after these
few days have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711261
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit b0870e36991178c5ed1f9b46508a54da49862546
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Jun 12 08:47:38 2011 +0200
BR perl(Test::Spec)
perlbrew.spec |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perlbrew.spec b/perlbrew.spec
index
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Shipwright-2.4.26 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712671
Summary: perl-Shipwright-2.4.26 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712694
--- Comment #1 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com 2011-06-12 10:36:48
EDT ---
This issue affect the versions of the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712694
Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712694
--- Comment #2 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com 2011-06-12 10:51:13
EDT ---
CVE Request:
[3]
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo