Re: how to declare %config with a list of files ?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 07:45:57AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
Hi,
I have in my package config (/etc) a large list of files.
Is there a way to define the %config from a list of file rather than
listing individually each of the file ?
Something like:
%config -f list_of_my_etc_files
You can use wildcards:
%files
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/foo/*.cfg
Or, if you already have the list of files in a file:
%install
command_that_outputs_config_files list_of_my_etc_files
sed -i list_of_my_etc_files 's!^/etc!%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}!'
%files -f list_of_my_etc_files
-Toshio
pgpOm15JaBcPh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[RPM Spec] Shall we use Local time or UTC for %changelog date?
Hi list, I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone. I live in time zone GMT+10. On 0:10, 18th July, I wrote my changelog as: * Mon Jul 18 2011 .. And then run rpmlint, which give me: packageName: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-07-18 So I am wondering which one I should use: local time or convert it to UTC? Regards, -- Ding-Yi Chen Software Engineer Internationalization Group Red Hat, Inc. Register now for Red Hat Virtual Experience, December 9. Enterprise Linux, virtualization, cloud, and more. http://www.redhat.com/virtualexperience -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F15: ugly behavior of df
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 23:15 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 21.07.2011 23:04, schrieb Karel Zak: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:09:08AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: /proc/mounts does not seem to distinguish bind mounts - so this may have to be a kernel change and perhaps adding /proc/mounts/bind and moving bind mounts 1 level down - this is not an area I know a lot about however, so I'll leave this to the real experts. I've already talked about it in this list... bind is operation, not state of any mountpoint. Something like /proc/mounts/bind does not make sense from kernel's point of view sorry but if i get borked as suer with endless lists in df and useless warnings while callign df the kernels point of view does not matter for me! you want a example of the real world - here it is: * openssh / sftp * chroot Match User anyuser ChrootDirectory /some/mepty/folder * to use sftp as ftp-replacement you need bind-mounts * create 20 empty folders * every of this gets a bind-mount to the users webspaces having 100 user with 5 subfolders in F15 means you see a list with 500 entries calling df in F15 is this funny? no it is not! But it still does just mean that df must be fixed, not that /proc/mounts/bind would make any sense or even if patched somehow would be acceptable into the kernel. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
self introduction
Hi, as I am trying to put a new package on Fedora as a new maintainer, I've seen on the Fedora wiki that I should introduce myself on the dev list. SO, let's go I manage the developments on a BioInformatics platform in France. While my previous experience was on Telecommunications (Mobile and VoIP), I changed of field a few years ago. I have now more than 10 years of experience in development, mainly Java/web oriented (though using quite often Ruby and Perl). I also have lots of experience on project management as a previous project manager at Alcatel-Lucent. I am a package maintainer in the Debian community for a few month now. I am quite new on RPM packaging, but my recent Debian packaging experience should help me to follow quickly the Fedora policy. I am also seeking a sponsor for my new package (I am upstream maintainer). Bug link is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724883 Thanks Olivier -- Olivier Sallou IRISA / University of Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (pgp.mit.edu) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F15: ugly behavior of df
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:55:54AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 22.07.2011 00:39, schrieb Karel Zak: * bind mounts are represented as /A - /B dependence, reality is /A - device, /B - device (and /A could be umounted, moved, ...) this is not generally true # mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/A # mount --bind /mnt/A /mnt/B # findmnt /dev/sdb1 TARGET SOURCEFSTYPE OPTIONS /mnt/A /dev/sdb1 ext4 rw,relatime,barrier=1,stripe=32,data=ordered /mnt/B /dev/sdb1 ext4 rw,relatime,barrier=1,stripe=32,data=ordered # umount /mnt/A # findmnt /dev/sdb1 TARGET SOURCEFSTYPE OPTIONS /mnt/B /dev/sdb1 ext4 rw,relatime,barrier=1,stripe=32,data=ordered [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ umount /Volumes/dune/www-servers umount: /Volumes/dune/www-servers: device is busy. (In some cases useful info about processes that use the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1)) [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ umount /Volumes/dune/www-servers/phpincludes [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ umount /Volumes/dune/www-servers [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mount /Volumes/dune/www-servers/phpincludes mount: Einhängepunkt /Volumes/dune/www-servers/phpincludes existiert nicht [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mount /Volumes/dune/www-servers [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mount /Volumes/dune/www-servers/phpincludes [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /etc/fstab | grep www-servers /mnt/data/www/thelounge.net /Volumes/dune/www-servers none bind /mnt/data/www/phpincludes/Volumes/dune/www-servers/phpincludes none bind so something, somewhere knows that one bind-mount is inside another Oh... this is generic thing, you cannot umount any part of VFS if there is active submount. This is not related to bind mounts. # mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/A # mkdir /mnt/A/subdir # mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/A/subdir # umount /mnt/A umount: /mnt/A: device is busy. (In some cases useful info about processes that use the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1)) I hope that umount(8) in Fedora-17 will support --recursive option. Karel -- Karel Zak k...@redhat.com http://karelzak.blogspot.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [RPM Spec] Shall we use Local time or UTC for %changelog date?
Ding Yi Chen wrote: Hi list, I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone. I live in time zone GMT+10. On 0:10, 18th July, I wrote my changelog as: * Mon Jul 18 2011 .. And then run rpmlint, which give me: packageName: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-07-18 So I am wondering which one I should use: local time or convert it to UTC? Certainly convert it to UTC. As at any other international things (post, airports) the time must be unique. Regards, Dmitry Butskoy http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [RPM Spec] Shall we use Local time or UTC for %changelog date?
Dne 22.7.2011 14:31, Dmitry Butskoy napsal(a): Ding Yi Chen wrote: Hi list, I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone. I live in time zone GMT+10. On 0:10, 18th July, I wrote my changelog as: * Mon Jul 18 2011 .. And then run rpmlint, which give me: packageName: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-07-18 So I am wondering which one I should use: local time or convert it to UTC? Certainly convert it to UTC. As at any other international things (post, airports) the time must be unique. Regards, Dmitry Butskoy http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy Alternatively you can use rpmlint just after 10 AM and you will be safe ;) Vit -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Class-Prototyped] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit 7d6203c465dcc7166341a8d9a92cfd3e75d1884e
Author: Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 14:30:47 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-Class-Prototyped.spec | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-Prototyped.spec b/perl-Class-Prototyped.spec
index efdfee8..cb93c9a 100644
--- a/perl-Class-Prototyped.spec
+++ b/perl-Class-Prototyped.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Class-Prototyped
Version:1.11
-Release:10%{?dist}
+Release:11%{?dist}
Summary:Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -21,12 +21,17 @@ have objects inherit their behavior and state from another
object.
%prep
%setup -q -n Class-Prototyped-%{version}
+# RPM 4.8 style
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_provides /^perl(My[^)]*Class)$/g
%filter_from_requires /^perl(Class::Prototyped::Graph)$/g
%filter_requires_in %{_docdir}/examples
%filter_setup
}
+# RPM 4.9 style
+%global __provides_exclude
%{?__provides_exclude?__provides_exclude|}^perl\\(My[^\\)]*Class\\)$
+%global __requires_exclude
%{?__requires_exclude?__requires_exclude|}^perl\\(Class::Prototyped::Graph\\)$
+%global __requires_exclude_from
%{?__requires_exclude_from?__requires_exclude_from|}%{_docdir}/examples
# Documentation and libraries should not be executable
chmod -x perf/* examples/* Changes lib/Class/*.pm lib/Class/Prototyped/*
@@ -57,6 +62,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.11-11
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+
* Fri Jun 17 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.11-10
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: [RPM Spec] Shall we use Local time or UTC for %changelog date?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 22.7.2011 14:31, Dmitry Butskoy napsal(a): Ding Yi Chen wrote: Hi list, I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone. I live in time zone GMT+10. On 0:10, 18th July, I wrote my changelog as: * Mon Jul 18 2011 .. And then run rpmlint, which give me: packageName: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-07-18 So I am wondering which one I should use: local time or convert it to UTC? Certainly convert it to UTC. As at any other international things (post, airports) the time must be unique. Regards, Dmitry Butskoy http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy Alternatively you can use rpmlint just after 10 AM and you will be safe ;) Alternatively you can just ignore the warning. That is what I would do. D. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Kwiki-NewPage] Add IO::All BR
commit e1e4ba141fd8bfe4e597f36dd3c14fc6d8497908
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:37:45 2011 +0200
Add IO::All BR
perl-Kwiki-NewPage.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Kwiki-NewPage.spec b/perl-Kwiki-NewPage.spec
index 9a4f4a5..d69f560 100644
--- a/perl-Kwiki-NewPage.spec
+++ b/perl-Kwiki-NewPage.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Kwiki-NewPage
Version:0.12
-Release:18%{?dist}
+Release:19%{?dist}
Summary:Kwiki New Page Plugin
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/I/IN/INGY/Kwiki-NewPage-%{version
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.34
Requires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.34
@@ -49,6 +50,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.12-19
+- BuildRequire IO::All
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.12-18
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 years as sysvinit did or the next replacement will be finished BEFORE release including the correspondending parts of the distribution Just to be clear as this has been mentioned several times in recent threads: System V style initialisation is _not_ 40 years old. SysV was only released in 1983 (and even after that time there were alternatives - the BSDs never adopted this approach to system initialisation). so let it be 28 years now Still way too old ... technology has advanced a lot in the past 28 years ... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F15 updates push needed
It seems there has been no F15 update push since Jul 18. Is this expected? We need a push to fix the thunderbird-lightning requirement on thunderbird 5.0. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-DBIx-Class] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit 9cb2339a3e78e87375d3b316f2326271a39af0bf
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 16:56:50 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-DBIx-Class.spec | 24 +++-
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBIx-Class.spec b/perl-DBIx-Class.spec
index 931361f..7c4f8f6 100644
--- a/perl-DBIx-Class.spec
+++ b/perl-DBIx-Class.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Name: perl-DBIx-Class
Summary:Extensible and flexible object - relational mapper
Version:0.08127
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/A/AB/ABRAXXA/DBIx-Class-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Time::Piece::MySQL)
BuildRequires: perl(namespace::autoclean) = 0.09
BuildRequires: perl(namespace::clean) = 0.20
+# RPM 4.8 filters
%{?filter_from_requires: %filter_from_requires /^perl(DBD::Pg)$/d }
%{?perl_default_filter:
%filter_from_requires
/^perl(DBIx::Class::\(Admin\|CDBICompat\|ClassResolver\|Storage\)/d
@@ -108,6 +109,24 @@ BuildRequires: perl(namespace::clean) = 0.20
%perl_default_filter
}
%{?perl_default_subpackage_tests}
+# RPM 4.9 filters
+%global __provides_exclude
%{?__provides_exclude:%__provides_exclude|}perl\\(DBD::Pg\\)$
+%global __requires_exclude
%{?__requires_exclude:%__requires_exclude|}perl\\(DBD::Pg\\)$
+%global __requires_exclude
%__requires_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::(Admin|CDBICompat|ClassResolver|Storage|Componentised|ResultSourceProxy)
+%global __provides_exclude_from
%{?__provides_exclude_from:%__provides_exclude_from|}%{perl_vendorlib}/DBIx/Class/Admin
+%global __requires_exclude_from
%{?__requires_exclude_from:%__requires_exclude_from|}%{perl_vendorlib}/DBIx/Class/Admin
+%global __provides_exclude_from
%__provides_exclude_from|%{perl_vendorlib}/DBIx/Class/CDBICompat
+%global __requires_exclude_from
%__provides_exclude_from|%{perl_vendorlib}/DBIx/Class/CDBICompat
+%global __provides_exclude_from
%__provides_exclude_from|%{perl_vendorlib}/DBIx/Class/PK/Auto
+%global __requires_exclude_from
%__provides_exclude_from|%{perl_vendorlib}/DBIx/Class/PK/Auto
+%global __provides_exclude_from
%__provides_exclude_from|%{perl_vendorlib}/DBIx/Class/SQLAHacks
+%global __requires_exclude_from
%__provides_exclude_from|%{perl_vendorlib}/DBIx/Class/SQLAHacks
+%global __provides_exclude %__provides_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::SQLAHacks\\)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::SQLAHacks\\)
+%global __provides_exclude
%__provides_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::Storage::DBIHacks\\)
+%global __requires_exclude
%__requires_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::Storage::DBIHacks\\)
+%global __provides_exclude
%__provides_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::SQLMaker::\\)
+%global __requires_exclude
%__requires_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::SQLMaker::\\)
%description
This is an SQL to OO mapper with an object API inspired by Class::DBI
@@ -168,6 +187,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.08127-5
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.08127-4
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: F15: ugly behavior of df
Am 22.07.2011 09:31, schrieb Tomas Mraz: On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 23:15 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 21.07.2011 23:04, schrieb Karel Zak: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:09:08AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: /proc/mounts does not seem to distinguish bind mounts - so this may have to be a kernel change and perhaps adding /proc/mounts/bind and moving bind mounts 1 level down - this is not an area I know a lot about however, so I'll leave this to the real experts. I've already talked about it in this list... bind is operation, not state of any mountpoint. Something like /proc/mounts/bind does not make sense from kernel's point of view sorry but if i get borked as suer with endless lists in df and useless warnings while callign df the kernels point of view does not matter for me! you want a example of the real world - here it is: * openssh / sftp * chroot Match User anyuser ChrootDirectory /some/mepty/folder * to use sftp as ftp-replacement you need bind-mounts * create 20 empty folders * every of this gets a bind-mount to the users webspaces having 100 user with 5 subfolders in F15 means you see a list with 500 entries calling df in F15 is this funny? no it is not! But it still does just mean that df must be fixed, not that /proc/mounts/bind would make any sense or even if patched somehow would be acceptable into the kernel who does it and will this happen this year or have we to wait until Fedora 16 as for clean systemd-servcies where QA forces even maintainers which having ready and from users confirmed to remove them becuase the are not allow should/must are nice words if nobody will do it i can't becuase i am no c/c++ programmer and even if i do not know until know WHERE the kernel spits out the informationif anything is a bind-mount signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
Am 22.07.2011 04:01, schrieb Doug Ledford: They have some valid reasons for wanting to avoid the risk of rendering machines inoperable or insecure because something didn't start and while making a dist-upgrade to F16 where the whole system is changed comes a helping angel or god himself holding our hands and then nothing will go wrong? have you ever heard release early, release often? greetings to QA, release early works well, but the release often to fix with the early thing introduced bad behavior is since a long time forgotten and has probably died but I have to agree with you that the half systemd, half sysv init thing is pretty damn fugly this is simply unacceptable and such things must not go GA not in business world nor in free software normally in free software world i heard it is released when it is ready seems this times are over abd marketing has won :-( signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F15: ugly behavior of df
Am 22.07.2011 10:24, schrieb Karel Zak: I hope that umount(8) in Fedora-17 will support --recursive option well, more important is to fix it generally for F15 who is responsible for that? where should a bugreport filed? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 years as sysvinit did or the next replacement will be finished BEFORE release including the correspondending parts of the distribution Just to be clear as this has been mentioned several times in recent threads: System V style initialisation is _not_ 40 years old. SysV was only released in 1983 (and even after that time there were alternatives - the BSDs never adopted this approach to system initialisation). so let it be 28 years now Still way too old ... technology has advanced a lot in the past 28 years this is poor argumentation which too many peopole follow unreflected with your argumentation we could throw away ls, touch, grep, find and thousands of other tools which will be working the next 28 years as long peopole not start breaking any backward-compatibility just for fun if you like this credo you are the perfect customer for Apple Inc. i am using linux because it is NOT Apple and NOT Microsoft for the same reason i use KDE and not a Mac or GNOME where the developers think reduce options is coll because their users are to dumb to use them what results in getting users which are really to dumb sooner or later because they never learned to really use a computer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-DBIx-Class] Fix the filters for perl(DBIx::Class::SQLMaker*)
commit 025516f2a52b8ba498b217350a5afe02d6803353
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 17:49:37 2011 +0200
Fix the filters for perl(DBIx::Class::SQLMaker*)
perl-DBIx-Class.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBIx-Class.spec b/perl-DBIx-Class.spec
index 7c4f8f6..e5dbddb 100644
--- a/perl-DBIx-Class.spec
+++ b/perl-DBIx-Class.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Name: perl-DBIx-Class
Summary:Extensible and flexible object - relational mapper
Version:0.08127
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:5.1%{?dist}
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/A/AB/ABRAXXA/DBIx-Class-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ BuildRequires: perl(namespace::clean) = 0.20
%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::SQLAHacks\\)
%global __provides_exclude
%__provides_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::Storage::DBIHacks\\)
%global __requires_exclude
%__requires_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::Storage::DBIHacks\\)
-%global __provides_exclude
%__provides_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::SQLMaker::\\)
-%global __requires_exclude
%__requires_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::SQLMaker::\\)
+%global __provides_exclude %__provides_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::SQLMaker::
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(DBIx::Class::SQLMaker::
%description
This is an SQL to OO mapper with an object API inspired by Class::DBI
@@ -187,6 +187,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.08127-5.1
+- Fix the filters for perl(DBIx::Class::SQLMaker*)
+
* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.08127-5
- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Perl-Critic] Reinstate author tests: META.yml creation issue fixed in perl-5.14.1-182
commit 370bf786cde4a34186eb5f5bb2e81bbd51c387ed
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Jul 22 16:08:30 2011 +0100
Reinstate author tests: META.yml creation issue fixed in perl-5.14.1-182
perl-Perl-Critic.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic.spec b/perl-Perl-Critic.spec
index e3f8a0c..6a6e847 100644
--- a/perl-Perl-Critic.spec
+++ b/perl-Perl-Critic.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Perl-Critic
Version:1.116
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:Critique Perl source code for best-practices
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ find . -type f -exec chmod -c -x {} +
%check
-LC_ALL=en_US ./Build test
+LC_ALL=en_US ./Build %{!?perl_bootstrap:author}test
%files
@@ -151,8 +151,11 @@ LC_ALL=en_US ./Build test
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.116-6
+- reinstate author tests: META.yml creation issue fixed in perl-5.14.1-182
+
* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 1.116-5
-- Completely disable author tests to avoid Kwalitee META complaints
+- completely disable author tests to avoid Kwalitee META complaints
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 1.116-4
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
On 07/22/2011 10:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Haraldh.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 years as sysvinit did or the next replacement will be finished BEFORE release including the correspondending parts of the distribution Just to be clear as this has been mentioned several times in recent threads: System V style initialisation is _not_ 40 years old. SysV was only released in 1983 (and even after that time there were alternatives - the BSDs never adopted this approach to system initialisation). so let it be 28 years now Still way too old ... technology has advanced a lot in the past 28 years this is poor argumentation which too many peopole follow unreflected with your argumentation we could throw away ls, touch, grep, find and thousands of other tools which will be working the next 28 years as long peopole not start breaking any backward-compatibility just for fun if you like this credo you are the perfect customer for Apple Inc. i am using linux because it is NOT Apple and NOT Microsoft for the same reason i use KDE and not a Mac or GNOME where the developers think reduce options is coll because their users are to dumb to use them what results in getting users which are really to dumb sooner or later because they never learned to really use a computer I completely support moving to new technology and think that systemd is quite attractive in many ways. That said, we must insure that critical services all work, especially for storage and file systems where screws will lose data and we will end up losing users. MD, NFS, clustering have complicated and complex needs. The systemd team - not just the developers of those subsystems - need to be directly engaged and proactive in getting all of these critical systems converted cleanly Ric -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages affected by RPM 4.9 filtering [was: News from rebuild]
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 06:27:07PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/22/2011 03:56 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: Can we have some detailed documentation of rpm 4.9's dependency filtering and some detailed explanations of what we are supposed to do? So far, I am far from having understood what is going and could not be further away from being impressed Ralf It looks ugly, doesn't it? I think this is the thing to look at... https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/76 Also check out already modified packages for inspiration. You can use both old and new style filters in one spec file, they should not interfere, as far as I know. -- # Petr Sabata pgpvGbv3kfxkL.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: MD, NFS, clustering have complicated and complex needs. The systemd team - not just the developers of those subsystems - need to be directly engaged and proactive in getting all of these critical systems converted cleanly I think you actually got this backwards the developers of those subsystems not just the systemd team that needs to be directly engage and proactive in getting all of these critical systems converted cleanly anyway the end result is the same we need to work together to convert to systemd cleanly. JBG -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
RE: FYI: Debian multiarch project
I brought this up previously in the context of the Fedora ARM bootstrap. It will be one of topics in the writeup. -- Sent from my phone - message formatted and/or shortened accordingly. -Original Message- From: Richard W.M. Jones [rjo...@redhat.com] Received: Wednesday, 20 Jul 2011, 8:35 To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: FYI: Debian multiarch project Latest from the shores of Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/ The reason I noticed this is when I updated my Debian builder to the latest unstable, and noticed that most libraries have moved from /lib to /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ (including libc and ld-linux!) and similarly for /usr/lib - /usr/lib/arch-triple/ I'm actually considering reinstalling that machine ... Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Handling lamson
Hi, I am planning to package funnel, a software for online submissions and voting of talks as part of the FUDCon India effort. One if its dependencies is flask-mail[0] and in turn, lamson[1] is a dependency for it which was already in Fedora briefly but now it's orphaned due to some resistance from upstream. Without packaging lamson, we cannot package many modules that are dependent on it. Debian[2], Ubuntu and others distros have however packaged it already. What is the best way forward? Should I go ahead and package it and if so, should it be called lamson or python-lamson? [0] http://packages.python.org/Flask-Mail/ [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 [2] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/python-lamson Thanks and Regards. Praveen Kumar http://fedoraproject.org/ http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
On 07/22/2011 12:47 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: MD, NFS, clustering have complicated and complex needs. The systemd team - not just the developers of those subsystems - need to be directly engaged and proactive in getting all of these critical systems converted cleanly I think you actually got this backwards the developers of those subsystems not just the systemd team that needs to be directly engage and proactive in getting all of these critical systems converted cleanly anyway the end result is the same we need to work together to convert to systemd cleanly. JBG I don't have it backwards - my day job is to work on exactly getting this kind of cutting edge feature out to end users. When you propose and implement a massive change, you need to make sure that the system as a whole still works. Of course, the developers of code components *should* work with the systemd team, but if they don't (don't like it, have higher priorities, whatever), then the proponents of change need to do the heavy lifting. Heavy lifting can involve education, convincing others in a *nice* way or actually having to do the code. We simply cannot ship something that would lose data or cause critical components to fail for our users. Ric -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 years as sysvinit did or the next replacement will be finished BEFORE release including the correspondending parts of the distribution Just to be clear as this has been mentioned several times in recent threads: System V style initialisation is _not_ 40 years old. SysV was only released in 1983 (and even after that time there were alternatives - the BSDs never adopted this approach to system initialisation). so let it be 28 years now Still way too old ... technology has advanced a lot in the past 28 years this is poor argumentation which too many peopole follow unreflected Its not any poorer then it has been like that for 28 years so don't dare to change it. Where the sole reason for this kind of arguments seem to be I can't/don't want to learn anything new ... which is really tiresome. Working with technology like this requires change and / or learning something new at some point. You cant just get used to one thing and think you can stick to that for the rest of your life. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
On 07/22/2011 01:16 PM, drago01 wrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Reindl Haraldh.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Haraldh.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 years as sysvinit did or the next replacement will be finished BEFORE release including the correspondending parts of the distribution Just to be clear as this has been mentioned several times in recent threads: System V style initialisation is _not_ 40 years old. SysV was only released in 1983 (and even after that time there were alternatives - the BSDs never adopted this approach to system initialisation). so let it be 28 years now Still way too old ... technology has advanced a lot in the past 28 years this is poor argumentation which too many peopole follow unreflected Its not any poorer then it has been like that for 28 years so don't dare to change it. Where the sole reason for this kind of arguments seem to be I can't/don't want to learn anything new ... which is really tiresome. Working with technology like this requires change and / or learning something new at some point. You cant just get used to one thing and think you can stick to that for the rest of your life. I don't think there would be so much push back if it was painless to people and didn't break things. I know it is very frustrating to me when stuff that worked now all of sudden doesn't because somebody decided that we have better, faster, newer way of doing things so lets do it! Sound in fedora a few years ago under went this exact scenario and it took a couple of releases for me before it became somewhat stable again. -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Starting user UIDs at 1000 - please check your packages
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 2011-07-20 9:18, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Benjamin Lewisben.le...@benl.co.uk wrote: Out of curiosity, how does this affect existing systems which have human UIDs of 500, 501, etc..? Do they suddenly become system UIDs or is login.defs left alone then (and consequently no change happens)? login.defs is %config(noreplace), so nothing is changed for existing systems. I was under the impression that few users edit login.defs. Won't a package update replace it when it hasn't been manually changed? You're right, of course. I don't know how I could have not noticed this. Luckily we can achieve the same effect using scriptlets (#725073). Thanks for pointing this out. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
No specific armv7hl VFAD today
Hello, I'm traveling this week, so didn't make any specific plans to host the VFAD earlier today. Sorry for not announcing that. Of course, there's no reason to not build and contribute bits by joining us on #fedora-arm at any time, and by following the instructions: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora15_HardFP_Bootstrap Good progress has been made recently. Dennis has succeeded in making a minimal rootfs using the packages built so far, and it even boots :) I don't think it will be too long before we can get a useful buildroot. Unless it proves redundant due to insanely cool rate of progress, there will be another VFAD next week. We may (hopefully) soon be able to transition over to just a standard package building exercise, once we've got the standard Koji infrastructure up and running. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011-07-22 - F16 Alpha blocker bug review #2 - recap
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.log.html Meeting summary --- * Roll Call (jlaska, 17:00:17) * Basic information (jlaska, 17:03:23) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (jlaska, 17:03:26) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Alpha_Release_Criteria (jlaska, 17:03:30) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers (jlaska, 17:03:35) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722963 (jlaska, 17:05:36) * TypeError: %d format: a number is required, not str (jlaska, 17:05:46) * AGREED: 722963 - AcceptedBlocker for F16Final - appears to involve manual partition scenarios where the partition is not within the size limits for the format selected (jlaska, 17:11:31) * Patch out for review on anaconda-devel, likely will be fixed well before F16Final (jlaska, 17:11:45) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723144 (jlaska, 17:12:03) * anaconda 16.12 crashed after the partition process (jlaska, 17:12:09) * ACTION: jlaska will propose rewording Alpha release criteria for paritioning to include [X] Use LVM? (jlaska, 17:14:34) * AGREED: 723144 - AcceptedBlocker - Impacts default partition scenario and Alpha partition criteria (jlaska, 17:15:42) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723345 (jlaska, 17:16:35) * Rescue mode fails - TypeError: progressWindow() takes exactly 4 arguments (6 given) (jlaska, 17:16:40) * affects the Alpha criteria - The rescue mode of the installer must start successfully and be able to detect and mount an existing default installation (jlaska, 17:16:51) * AGREED: 723345 - AcceptedBlocker for F16Alpha - impacts rescue mode Alpha criteria (jlaska, 17:18:36) * Already fixed in anaconda-16.13-1 (jlaska, 17:18:57) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723475 (jlaska, 17:19:09) * anaconda-16.12 - Unable to activate networking in anaconda (stage2) (jlaska, 17:19:15) * group debated whether workaround of booting with asknetwork is acceptable for Alpha (jlaska, 17:32:22) * AGREED: 723475 - unable to determine if workaround is acceptable for Alpha, review blocker status again next week with more details on failure (jlaska, 17:40:40) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725040 (jlaska, 17:41:17) * rawhide installs generic-release package, instead of fedora-release (jlaska, 17:41:21) * AGREED: 725040 - AcceptedNTH for F16Alpha - leave on proposed blocker list until we can confirm this does not impact artwork (jlaska, 17:54:58) * adamw noted this bug may impact more than just artwork ... further investigation needed (jlaska, 17:56:15) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723526 (jlaska, 17:56:27) * firstboot always runs even with RUN_FIRSTBOOT=NO in /etc/sysconfig/firstboot (jlaska, 17:56:40) * AGREED: 723526 - Need more information to confirm whether bug exists after a *fresh* install (jlaska, 18:03:40) * ACTION: need confirmation whether firstboot is activated after a *fresh* install (jlaska, 18:03:55) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718722 (jlaska, 18:04:16) * Mismatched or corrupt version of stage1/stage2 (jlaska, 18:04:21) * AGREED: 718722 - AcceptedBlocker for F16Beta, CommonBugs? - only impacts upgrades from F15 which is covered by beta criteria (jlaska, 18:09:51) * pjones plans to investigate and we'll revisit if the severity increases (jlaska, 18:11:11) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723901 (jlaska, 18:11:14) * pre-release anaconda compose is disabling 'rawhide' repo ... leaves no repos available for install (jlaska, 18:11:19) * likely related to generic-release vs fedora-release troubles (jlaska, 18:19:27) * AGREED: 723901 - revisit next meeting - impacts rawhide installs now, but unclear whether this will affect Branched (f16) media installs too (jlaska, 18:21:12) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690930 (jlaska, 18:21:23) * microcode_ctl loops, impossible to boot (jlaska, 18:21:34) * LINK: http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/CompareProviders -- jlaska might want to add this to info for the previous bug (pjones, 18:23:57) * AGREED: 690930 - AcceptedBlocker - bootable AMD systems favored over intel microcode update support for Alpha ... if no fix available, re-apply broken fix to allow AMD systems to boot (jlaska, 18:29:00) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720034 (jlaska, 18:30:43) * AGREED: 720034 - request updated status in bug and revisit/retest before next meeting (jlaska, 18:33:56) *
Re: [RPM Spec] Shall we use Local time or UTC for %changelog date?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:27:58PM +0200, David Tardon wrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 22.7.2011 14:31, Dmitry Butskoy napsal(a): Ding Yi Chen wrote: Hi list, I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone. I live in time zone GMT+10. On 0:10, 18th July, I wrote my changelog as: * Mon Jul 18 2011 .. And then run rpmlint, which give me: packageName: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-07-18 So I am wondering which one I should use: local time or convert it to UTC? Certainly convert it to UTC. As at any other international things (post, airports) the time must be unique. Regards, Dmitry Butskoy http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy Alternatively you can use rpmlint just after 10 AM and you will be safe ;) Alternatively you can just ignore the warning. That is what I would do. yep, if it's just that the date you've used is different according to timezone. (Of course, be careful that you didn't just flub the date :-) The rpm changelog can reasonably be in any timezone. It's primarily for people to check on their machines by running rpm -q[p] --changelog (which could be days later because the update has to be built in koji and then pushed to the repos. Its also used when you or another maintainer has to see what was done to a package in the past... which is usually (not always but in the majority of cases) also days later. -Toshio pgpjgeEWRxMX7.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Handling lamson
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:26:34PM +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote: Hi, I am planning to package funnel, a software for online submissions and voting of talks as part of the FUDCon India effort. One if its dependencies is flask-mail[0] and in turn, lamson[1] is a dependency for it which was already in Fedora briefly but now it's orphaned due to some resistance from upstream. Without packaging lamson, we cannot package many modules that are dependent on it. Debian[2], Ubuntu and others distros have however packaged it already. What is the best way forward? Should I go ahead and package it and if so, should it be called lamson or python-lamson? [0] http://packages.python.org/Flask-Mail/ [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 [2] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/python-lamson So... actually the request for people who have bugs to filter them through the distribution doesn't seem unreasonable/out of the ordinary in any sense. The first part where he prefers that it not be packaged at all is out of the odinary but from the conciliatory tone of the rest, perhaps its literally just him talking about his idea of an ideal world. You may package this. You may want to let upstream know that you have and that he can feel free to direct people using the Fedora packages to our bugzilla/IRC channels. Naming wise... applications do not have to use python-* but a lot of python applications (lamson seems to be in this boat) contain python modules and those really should be named python-*. Especially nowadays when we build python3 versions of a lot of modules. From the sound of the review request (I consider Lamson analogous to frameworks[...]) this should probably be named python-lamson. -Toshio pgpbcAZ9IltYO.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
Am 22.07.2011 19:16, schrieb drago01: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves: On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 years as sysvinit did or the next replacement will be finished BEFORE release including the correspondending parts of the distribution Just to be clear as this has been mentioned several times in recent threads: System V style initialisation is _not_ 40 years old. SysV was only released in 1983 (and even after that time there were alternatives - the BSDs never adopted this approach to system initialisation). so let it be 28 years now Still way too old ... technology has advanced a lot in the past 28 years this is poor argumentation which too many peopole follow unreflected Its not any poorer then it has been like that for 28 years so don't dare to change it. Where the sole reason for this kind of arguments seem to be I can't/don't want to learn anything new ... which is really tiresome. Working with technology like this requires change and / or learning something new at some point. You cant just get used to one thing and think you can stick to that for the rest of your life you do not know anything what i am learning and working every day i am learning, optimizing and rewriting software all day long but not with a good reason or if some liked improvement is not bigger than the bad things coming with it if fedora as distribution decides to change things than the distribution with ALL packages have to be fixed / improved why? normally a user can not rebuild / fix packages if things worked for a long time and after replacing them packages of the distribution are broken this is not really my area - it should not happen learning: THIS is the state of learning on fedora/redhat-side, a little late! * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714426#c33 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714426#c33 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714426#c40 NOBODY has clear ideas what the guidelines are saying and F15 is GA since a longer time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714426#c47 so please do not tell me what is tiresome i tell you: a release like F15 is tiresome topic learning: as long the whole distribution is a wild mix of systemd/lsb/sysvinit there is nothing to learn because the whole system is currently diry in my eyes and after ALL fedora packages using the from fedora decided init-system and all the bugs going with this are fixed starts the time to learn for users currently many packagers seems to be in a early learning state, but no probmem we release unfinished things, break basiscs like df and writing guidelines for unbaken cakes - wonderful! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:48:29 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: and the same guy who pushed pulseaudio in a total unuseable state to fedora instead finish his work and push it after that does is the maintainer of systemd - so maybe if we would not have the expierience how long it takes until the things are working as expected we would not be so hard with our comments his attitude in case of usability is sometimes strange https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714525#c3 Hey, that's my comment and it shows no attitude at all. It's a completely neutral question with the purpose to understand what the problem is. Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
Am 22.07.2011 23:18, schrieb Michal Schmidt: On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:48:29 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: and the same guy who pushed pulseaudio in a total unuseable state to fedora instead finish his work and push it after that does is the maintainer of systemd - so maybe if we would not have the expierience how long it takes until the things are working as expected we would not be so hard with our comments his attitude in case of usability is sometimes strange https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714525#c3 Hey, that's my comment and it shows no attitude at all. It's a completely neutral question with the purpose to understand what the problem is. sorry - yes THIS is your comment but i know many answers of Lennart in contect of systemd which are unacceptable and showing that he means that the world should be turned around systemd and all existing things which do not work as clean as they did before systemd are faulty and have to be fixed look at my othe rpoints from today - this are all things which were never a problem now we are some months after F15/systemd and they are still dirty, ugly or call it waht you like signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
I'd like to suggest: a) Please avoid getting personal, stick to technical arguments/issues. b) Is there any further useful discussion to be had in this thread? Perhaps it's time to give it a rest for the weekend (or longer). kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
Am 23.07.2011 00:17, schrieb Kevin Fenzi: I'd like to suggest: a) Please avoid getting personal, stick to technical arguments/issues. it is not my intention to get personally and hurt anybody as person, really! i try to get borked things fixed which i can not fix by myself and had to learn that things are only changed if they are hurting enough people believe me, there are thousands of users out there which are perfectly happy with F14 in different environemnts and waiting until F14 is EOL for upgrading to F15 in the hope most of things are fixed until then b) Is there any further useful discussion to be had in this thread? Perhaps it's time to give it a rest for the weekend (or longer) no problem, no rush NOW but the time goes fast and F14-EOL will affect users in many ways what i hardly need is a relieable mysqld in a way that every service (and not only shipped with fedora ones) will 100% start clean and much more feedback of systemctl after that is clean and there is a way to backport to F15 i am partly happy, but as long systemctl start some.service wil give no feedback if the start was sucessful or not this is not acceptable for me because in the time typing systemctl status some.service i ccould start to think and look why it has failed and i think you will also agree that it is boring restart a machine over Lights-Out-Managment with some TB disks and the beast starts filesystem-check without feedback and you can not hear if the machine is frozen or still working, for someone this might be a little probmem - for a perfectionist it is unacceptable __ the myslqd.service/mysqld.socket MUST working perfectly and after that i am much more relaxed than now because my whole work of the last 10 years depends on that and tjere was no single problem until systemd came in my life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714426 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
On 07/22/2011 05:02 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: I don't have it backwards - my day job is to work on exactly getting this kind of cutting edge feature out to end users. Which feature of this magnitute have you put out to your users? Serously if you have some motivation tips to get things moving I and others would gladly like to hear them.. When you propose and implement a massive change, you need to make sure that the system as a whole still works. Certanly. Of course, the developers of code components *should* work with the systemd team, but if they don't (don't like it, have higher priorities, whatever), then the proponents of change need to do the heavy lifting. Heavy lifting can involve education, convincing others in a *nice* way or actually having to do the code. Regarding your education response we have man pages upstream documentation Lennart's blog posts and various interviews he has done along with very active upstream mailings and irc channel and if man pages or other documentation are *vague* about any issue only thing people need to do is ask. You don't receive answers if you don't ask and we can't force knowledge upon people or have them to educate themselves. Regarding your convincing people this is the third release cycle that we have to act nice repeat answers to both end users sysadmins and developers alike and at the same time be our work ridiculed belittled and we subdued to personal attacks. You may think third time is the charm and I honestly don't how Lennart does cope with this but I decided to draw the nice line here the third release cycle we are put through this. As much as I would like us to have the authority to do the code that unfortunately wont cut it since we lack the expertise, the experience and insight that maintainers have through maintaining their component so having us walsing in and do the conversion might actually be doing more harm then good however working together will deliver the best result. We simply cannot ship something that would lose data or cause critical components to fail for our users. I completly agree and from my pov it's like maintainers do not understand how important that is for us to manage to convert all the 500 - 600 daemons in one release cycle. Beside the obvious unfortinate experience our user may go through like the one Reindl Harald and perhaps others have experienced then this may also break and hinder work for other developers that build their application stack on top of those daemons. One such example is the freeipa stack where the freeipa team needs to rewrite/replace and or add seperated systemd spesific code and if I'm not mistaken they will only support sysv on sysv platforms and systemd on systemd platforms instead of trying to support mixed match of both init system ( Freeipa guys feel free to correct me if I'm wrong ). Freeipa is built on top of 389 Directory Server, MIT Kerberos, NTP, DNS,and Dogtag ( which I dont recall having any daemons ) of that only the NTP has been converted work is being done on converting 389 and I think the native systemd units for freeipa server daemons are ready but they are not being shipped yet however that leaves out bind and mit kerberos with no movement what so ever on those two components atleast there has been no respons on the relevant bug report for those two components as is with so many others and I have not heard a word from either of those maintainers on irc. Now their new code depends on all of those components to be converted and it does not take more then one of those components to not convert and their whole work is being thrown out the window and they are forced to rewrite their code to support a mixed batch of sysv legacy scripts and native systemd units and they have the time from from Beta to GA to test that code on that mixed batch of init files which at the same time those unit files might be subdued to various testing and rewriting as an indvidual standalone services. See my point on how vital it can be to convert to those unit files as soon as possible and that's just one application stack built on top of five components. The main problem here are the maintainers that do not respond to the bug report or when I ping them on irc because then I dont get the status from them which in turn FESCO wont either since I deliver them progress report on each meeting along with keeping [1] updated. I'm not asking for much of maintainers *valuable* time (apparently others people time does not matter here. We are all busy with work life and what not, expecial those of us that are not working full time on fedora and are doing this work on our freetime and apparently it's not considered rude on maintainers behalf to not respond to bug reports to the people reporting them ) only that they respond if they are looking at this or not or will be after a week for that matter. ( which is like minute of two
Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:38 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: in the past there were real developers which was able to ah, the True Scotsman rears its head! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Call for Test Days for Fedora 16
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 10:23 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: Hi Adam, On the week of Aug 7 David Shein and I will be at POSSE-RIT teaching professors how open source communities work. On the Wednesay afternoon and Thursday of that week, the participants are jumping in to a few open source projects and getting their feet wet; if there was a test day on August 11 you could have a small pool of enthusiastic labor with some on-the-ground guidance. We might be able to do testing that would require some set-up, e.g., we could bring in a switch and create a test LAN. Let me know if this would be useful and we'll set it up... Hi, Chris. There almost certainly will be a Test Day on that date; we usually fill up the schedule. I'll see if we can wiggle things around a bit and make sure it's a beginner-appropriate event on that date. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Handling lamson
the distribution doesn't seem unreasonable/out of the ordinary in any sense. The first part where he prefers that it not be packaged at all is out of the odinary but from the conciliatory tone of the rest, perhaps its literally just him talking about his idea of an ideal world. You may package this. You may want to let upstream know that you have and that he can feel free to direct people using the Fedora packages to our bugzilla/IRC channels. Naming wise... applications do not have to use python-* but a lot of python applications (lamson seems to be in this boat) contain python modules and those really should be named python-*. Especially nowadays when we build python3 versions of a lot of modules. From the sound of the review request (I consider Lamson analogous to frameworks[...]) this should probably be named python-lamson. -Toshio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Thanks Toshio I will mail to upstream about lamson package. Thanks and Regards, Praveen Kumar http://fedoraproject.org/ http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent
On 07/14/2011 01:07 PM, seth vidal wrote: googling around gets me info on how magnet links work. Now, what tools do we have in fedora to generate them and the Distributed Hash Tables. Sorry for the delay again. There's no tool required. As long as you know the hash of the torrent you can make a magnet link. Example: Fedora 15 DVD infohash: c221142c59abb4fcbffc4da1e2a19719e35a9217 Magnet link: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:c221142c59abb4fcbffc4da1e2a19719e35a9217 That's it! Of course, you can get fancy and add the name of the torrent, etc. if you wish, too. Feel free to try it now by adding it to your torrent downloader that supports magnet links. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Net-FTP-AutoReconnect] Perl mass rebuild
commit c55fd17b47681bc7b33b9de8249def7e4bcf0891
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 09:28:59 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Net-FTP-AutoReconnect.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Net-FTP-AutoReconnect.spec b/perl-Net-FTP-AutoReconnect.spec
index 997d207..2d7b7ac 100644
--- a/perl-Net-FTP-AutoReconnect.spec
+++ b/perl-Net-FTP-AutoReconnect.spec
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: perl-%{_module_name}
Version:0.3
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
Summary:FTP client class with automatic reconnect on failure
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.3-4
+- Perl mass rebuild
+
* Mon Jul 18 2011 Bernard Johnson bjohn...@symetrix.com - 0.3-3
- remove duplicated doc spec
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-Runtime] Perl mass rebuild
commit de7728b4695b50e7bab35063066c71fa279215b3
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 09:29:00 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Module-Runtime.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Runtime.spec b/perl-Module-Runtime.spec
index 44a99f9..25111ab 100644
--- a/perl-Module-Runtime.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-Runtime.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# This file is licensed under the terms of GNU GPLv2+.
Name: perl-Module-Runtime
Version:0.008
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Runtime module handling
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.008-2
+- Perl mass rebuild
+
* Mon Jul 11 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 0.008-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
- Remove BuildRoot and defattr
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Net-FTP-RetrHandle] Perl mass rebuild
commit eb6feba37661106f914f10a6a44d0a6f6db8c9fc
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 09:29:01 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Net-FTP-RetrHandle.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Net-FTP-RetrHandle.spec b/perl-Net-FTP-RetrHandle.spec
index dec5caa..9dfb988 100644
--- a/perl-Net-FTP-RetrHandle.spec
+++ b/perl-Net-FTP-RetrHandle.spec
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: perl-%{_module_name}
Version:0.2
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
Summary:Provides a file reading interface for reading files on a
remote FTP server
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.2-4
+- Perl mass rebuild
+
* Wed Jul 20 2011 Bernard Johnson bjohn...@symetrix.com - 0.2-3
- remove extraneous doc section
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-NOCpulse-Gritch] Perl mass rebuild
commit 0a4e717344902c384084a7a53619ae65953b7954
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 10:15:32 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch.spec b/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch.spec
index 4cb0be1..26968a5 100644
--- a/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch.spec
+++ b/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch
Version: 1.27.9
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
Summary: Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk
URL: https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk
Source0:
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/p/spacewalk/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%doc LICENSE
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 1.27.9-4
+- Perl mass rebuild
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 1.27.9-3
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SOAP-Lite] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added, Perl 5.14 patch
commit f29ece2e713fcb57e427b49fea198c67e541675e
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 11:56:52 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added, Perl 5.14 patch
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-XML-Parser-Lite-514.patch | 58
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec| 14 +-
2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-XML-Parser-Lite-514.patch
b/perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-XML-Parser-Lite-514.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..b9f2d35
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-XML-Parser-Lite-514.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+diff --git a/lib/XML/Parser/Lite.pm b/lib/XML/Parser/Lite.pm
+index cee2348..65e5602 100644
+--- a/lib/XML/Parser/Lite.pm
b/lib/XML/Parser/Lite.pm
+@@ -167,7 +167,8 @@ sub _final {
+ sub _start {
+ die multiple roots, wrong element '$_[0]'\n if $level++ !@stack;
+ push(@stack, $_[0]);
+-Start(__PACKAGE__, @_);
++my $r=Start(__PACKAGE__, @_);
++ref($r) eq 'ARRAY' ? $r : undef;
+ }
+
+ sub _char {
+@@ -181,29 +182,36 @@ sub _char {
+ die junk '$_[0]' @{[$level ? 'after' : 'before']} XML element\n
+ if index(\n\r\t , substr($_[0],$i,1)) 0; # or should ' $[' be
there
+ }
++# not sure about this...
++return [];
+ }
+
+ sub _end {
+ no warnings qw(uninitialized);
+ pop(@stack) eq $_[0] or die mismatched tag '$_[0]'\n;
+-End(__PACKAGE__, $_[0]);
++my $r=End(__PACKAGE__, $_[0]);
++ref($r) eq 'ARRAY' ? $r : undef;
+ }
+
+ sub comment {
+-Comment(__PACKAGE__, $_[0]);
++my $r=Comment(__PACKAGE__, $_[0]);
++ref($r) eq 'ARRAY' ? $r : undef;
+ }
+
+ sub end {
+- pop(@stack) eq $_[0] or die mismatched tag '$_[0]'\n;
+- End(__PACKAGE__, $_[0]);
+- }
++pop(@stack) eq $_[0] or die mismatched tag '$_[0]'\n;
++my $r=End(__PACKAGE__, $_[0]);
++ref($r) eq 'ARRAY' ? $r : undef;
++}
+
+ sub _doctype {
+-Doctype(__PACKAGE__, $_[0]);
++my $r=Doctype(__PACKAGE__, $_[0]);
++ref($r) eq 'ARRAY' ? $r : undef;
+ }
+
+ sub _xmldecl {
+-XMLDecl(__PACKAGE__, $_[0]);
++my $r=XMLDecl(__PACKAGE__, $_[0]);
++ref($r) eq 'ARRAY' ? $r : undef;
+ }
+
+
diff --git a/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec b/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
index bffb444..24385be 100644
--- a/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
+++ b/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-SOAP-Lite
Version:0.712
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
Summary:Client and server side SOAP implementation
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/SOAP-Lite/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MK/MKUTTER/SOAP-Lite-%{version}.tar.gz
# rhbz#663931, rt#58538
Patch0: perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-mod_perl.patch
+# rt#68088
+Patch1: perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-XML-Parser-Lite-514.patch
BuildArch: noarch
# Core package
@@ -48,12 +50,17 @@ Requires: perl(URI)
Requires: perl(XML::Parser)
Requires: perl(XML::Parser::Lite)
+# RPM 4.8 filters
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_requires /perl(My::/d
%filter_from_provides /perl(My::/d
%filter_from_provides /perl(LWP::Protocol)/d
%?perl_default_filter
}
+# RPM 4.9 filters
+%global __provides_exclude
%{?__provides_exclude:%__provides_exclude|}perl\\(My::.*\\)
+%global __provides_exclude %__provides_exclude|perl\\(LWP::Protocol\\)
+%global __requires_exclude
%{?_requires_exclude:%__requires_exclude|}perl\\(My::\\)
%description
SOAP::Lite is a collection of Perl modules which provides a simple and
@@ -63,6 +70,7 @@ client and server side.
%prep
%setup -q -n SOAP-Lite-%{version}
%patch0 -p1 -b .mod_perl
+%patch1 -p1 -b .xml-parser-lite-514
find examples -type f -exec chmod ugo-x {} \;
%build
@@ -93,6 +101,10 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man1/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.712-8
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+- Add patch for XML::Parser::Lite from rt#68088; perl5.14 fix
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.712-7
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 724927] New: perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.04 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.04 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724927 Summary: perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.04 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-Module-ScanDeps AssignedTo: st...@silug.org ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: st...@silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Latest upstream release: 1.04 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.02 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-ScanDeps/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 724927] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.04 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724927 --- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-07-22 06:54:09 EDT --- *** Bug 723183 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 724927] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.04 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724927 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|st...@silug.org |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Fedora-Rebuild] Use IO::Handle
commit e2c34f2a6d559f65df173c06b8691b27491cec10
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 13:26:27 2011 +0200
Use IO::Handle
Fedora-Rebuild-0.8.0-use-io-handle.patch | 13 +
perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec |7 ++-
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/Fedora-Rebuild-0.8.0-use-io-handle.patch
b/Fedora-Rebuild-0.8.0-use-io-handle.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..8793df8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Fedora-Rebuild-0.8.0-use-io-handle.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+diff --git a/lib/Fedora/Rebuild/Package/StateLock.pm
b/lib/Fedora/Rebuild/Package/StateLock.pm
+index 9824f8c..045ca2f 100644
+--- a/lib/Fedora/Rebuild/Package/StateLock.pm
b/lib/Fedora/Rebuild/Package/StateLock.pm
+@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ use Data::Dumper;
+ use Storable qw(nstore_fd retrieve);
+ use DateTime;
+ use namespace::clean;
+-
++use IO::Handle;
+
+ has package = (
+ is = 'ro',
diff --git a/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec b/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec
index 3e5c57c..5d66460 100644
--- a/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec
+++ b/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
# This file is lincensed under the terms of GPLv2+.
Name: perl-Fedora-Rebuild
Version:0.8.0
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch
License:GPLv3+
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Rebuild/
Source0:
http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Rebuild/Fedora-Rebuild-v%{version}.tar.gz
+Patch0: Fedora-Rebuild-0.8.0-use-io-handle.patch
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
# Tests:
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ new interpreter.
%prep
%setup -q -n Fedora-Rebuild-v%{version}
+%patch0 -p1 -b .iohandle
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -71,6 +73,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.8.0-3
+- Use IO::Handle to build with perl5.14
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.8.0-2
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Ace] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit 34e1d307890c2e578e41a662d3971cb8af932bf7
Author: Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 13:15:44 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-Ace.spec |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Ace.spec b/perl-Ace.spec
index 6a69fff..e04d6c3 100644
--- a/perl-Ace.spec
+++ b/perl-Ace.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Ace
Version:1.92
-Release:9%{?dist}
+Release:10%{?dist}
Summary:Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -22,10 +22,13 @@ laboratory data.
%prep
%setup -q -n AcePerl-%{version}
+# RPM 4.8 style
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_requires /perl(Ace::Browser::LocalSiteDefs)$/d
%filter_setup
}
+# RPM 4.9 style
+%global __requires_exclude
%{?__requires_exclude:__requires_exclude|}perl\\(Ace::Browser::LocalSiteDefs\\)$
# remove all execute bits from the doc stuff and fix interpreter
# so that dependency generator doesn't try to fulfill deps
find examples -type f -exec chmod -x {} 2/dev/null ';'
@@ -62,6 +65,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.92-10
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+
* Tue Jun 21 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.92-9
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-AnyEvent] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit 1f433d46a0e172f14ead502b259d9f4755bbd96b
Author: Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 13:22:41 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-AnyEvent.spec | 13 -
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-AnyEvent.spec b/perl-AnyEvent.spec
index 78f250b..83b740c 100644
--- a/perl-AnyEvent.spec
+++ b/perl-AnyEvent.spec
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: perl-AnyEvent
Version:5.27
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:Framework for multiple event loops
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -16,11 +16,19 @@ BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
# Needed for test
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Simple)
+# RPM 4.8 style
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_requires /perl(Tk)/d; /perl(EV)/d; /perl(Irssi)/d; /perl(Qt/d;
/perl(AnyEvent::Impl::Qt/d
%filter_from_provides /perl(AnyEvent::Impl::Qt/d
%filter_setup
}
+# RPM 4.9 style
+%global __requires_exclude %{?__requires_exclude:__requires_exclude|}perl(Tk)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl(EV)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl(Irssi)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl(Qt
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl(AnyEvent::Impl::Qt
+%global __provides_exclude
%{?__provides_exclude:__provides_exclude|}perl(AnyEvent::Impl::Qt
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
@@ -65,6 +73,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 5.27-6
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+
* Mon Jun 20 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 5.27-5
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-AppConfig] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit 81667eab65bd2d8b6537db59d41aac8537e04f08
Author: Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 13:33:08 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-AppConfig.spec |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-AppConfig.spec b/perl-AppConfig.spec
index 071d191..fb5a501 100644
--- a/perl-AppConfig.spec
+++ b/perl-AppConfig.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-AppConfig
Version:1.66
-Release:13%{?dist}
+Release:14%{?dist}
Summary:Perl module for reading configuration files
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -24,10 +24,13 @@ develop the functionality of this package and its features
will
automatically become available through AppConfig.
# filter out the unversioned provide AppConfig::State from Getopt.pm:
+# RPM 4.8 style
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_provides /^perl(AppConfig::State)$/d
%?perl_default_filter
}
+# RPM 4.9 style
+%global __provides_exclude
%{?__provides_exclude:__provides_exclude|}^perl\\(AppConfig::State\\)$
%prep
@@ -63,6 +66,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.66-14
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 1.66-13
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-App-cpanminus] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit e455b1e3163fc847a9fee2a8a6b6f1ebd1c7d06e
Author: Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 13:39:25 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-App-cpanminus.spec |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-App-cpanminus.spec b/perl-App-cpanminus.spec
index aa0f741..eb87313 100644
--- a/perl-App-cpanminus.spec
+++ b/perl-App-cpanminus.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-App-cpanminus
Version:1.4008
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:Library for get, unpack, build and install CPAN modules
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -27,10 +27,13 @@ Requires: perl(YAML)
Provides: cpanminus = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: cpanminus = 1.2002
+# RPM 4.8 style
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_requires /^perl(App::cpanminus::script)$/d
%?perl_default_filter
}
+# RPM 4.9 style
+%global __requires_exclude
%{?__requires_exclude:__requires_exclude|}^perl\\(App::cpanminus::script\\)$
%description
Why? It's dependency free, requires zero configuration, and stands alone
@@ -62,6 +65,9 @@ make test
%{_bindir}/cpanm
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.4008-3
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+
* Fri Jun 17 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.4008-2
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Perl-Critic] Disable author tests
commit a3afed86337684f760910d51712944039e575afa
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 14:03:28 2011 +0200
Disable author tests
perl-Perl-Critic.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic.spec b/perl-Perl-Critic.spec
index fafc7ee..e3f8a0c 100644
--- a/perl-Perl-Critic.spec
+++ b/perl-Perl-Critic.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Perl-Critic
Version:1.116
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:Critique Perl source code for best-practices
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ find . -type f -exec chmod -c -x {} +
%check
-LC_ALL=en_US ./Build %{!?perl_bootstrap:author}test
+LC_ALL=en_US ./Build test
%files
@@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ LC_ALL=en_US ./Build %{!?perl_bootstrap:author}test
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 1.116-5
+- Completely disable author tests to avoid Kwalitee META complaints
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 1.116-4
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-bioperl] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit 0ede80aaf15914226251f231a2be8d092ff79708
Author: Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 14:05:11 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-bioperl.spec | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-bioperl.spec b/perl-bioperl.spec
index ba5ee74..6bf4548 100644
--- a/perl-bioperl.spec
+++ b/perl-bioperl.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-bioperl
Version:1.6.1
-Release:9%{?dist}
+Release:10%{?dist}
Summary:Perl tools for computational molecular biology
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -59,8 +59,11 @@ Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl}
-V:version`; echo $version))
# Bio::Tools::Run::* module requirements; they are either self-satisfied
# (and thus redundant) or they bring dependency on perl-bioperl-run.
## be careful when commenting this out: macros are expanded even in comments
+# RPM 4.8 style
#%%filter_from_requires /perl(Bio::Tools::Run::/d
#%%?perl_default_filter
+# RPM 4.9 style
+#%%global __requires_exclude
%%{?__requires_exclude?__requires_exclude|}perl\\(Bio::Tools::Run::
%description
BioPerl is a toolkit of Perl modules useful in building bioinformatics
@@ -68,10 +71,13 @@ solutions in Perl. It is built in an object-oriented manner
so that
many modules depend on each other to achieve a task.
+# RPM 4.8 style
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_requires /perl(Bio::Expression::FeatureSet)/d
%{?perl_default_filter}
}
+# RPM 4.9 style
+%global __requires_exclude
%{?__requires_exclude:__requires_exclude|}perl\\(Bio::Expression::FeatureSet\\)
%prep
%setup -q -n BioPerl-%{version}
@@ -133,6 +139,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.6.1-10
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 1.6.1-9
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Kwiki] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit c2c01ea85329f669d3523b9cf3c3b516aee198b6
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 14:19:27 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-Kwiki.spec | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Kwiki.spec b/perl-Kwiki.spec
index 01dcd25..8b968f7 100644
--- a/perl-Kwiki.spec
+++ b/perl-Kwiki.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Kwiki
Version:0.39
-Release:13%{?dist}
+Release:14%{?dist}
Summary:Kwiki Wiki Building Framework
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -9,16 +9,20 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/I/IN/INGY/Kwiki-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Memory::Cycle)
BuildRequires: perl(Spoon) = 0.22
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+# RPM 4.8 filters
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_requires /^perl(mixin)/d
%{?perl_default_filter}
}
+# RPM 4.9 filters
+%global __requires_exclude
%{?__requires_exclude:__requires_exclude|}^perl\\(mixin\\)$
%description
A Wiki is a website that allows its users to add pages, and edit any
@@ -70,6 +74,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.39-14
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+- BuildRequire IO::All
+
* Tue Jul 19 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.39-13
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-CGI] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit 1b044aa9f0387b936ada358b43fb9ab0a5342df8
Author: Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 14:09:15 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-CGI.spec | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CGI.spec b/perl-CGI.spec
index 5a548bd..cb05045 100644
--- a/perl-CGI.spec
+++ b/perl-CGI.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Name: perl-CGI
Summary:Handle Common Gateway Interface requests and responses
Version:3.51
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MA/MARKSTOS/CGI.pm-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -31,12 +31,17 @@ with built-in support for mod_perl and mod_perl2 as well as
FastCGI.
%prep
%setup -q -n CGI.pm-%{version}
+# RPM 4.8 style
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_provides /^perl(Fh)$/d
%filter_from_provides /^perl(MultipartBuffer)$/d
%filter_from_provides /^perl(utf8)$/d
%filter_setup
}
+# RPM 4.9 style
+%global __provides_exclude
%{?__provides_exclude:__provides_exclude|}^perl\\(Fh\\)$
+%global __provides_exclude %__provides_exclude|^perl\\(MultipartBuffer\\)$
+%global __provides_exclude %__provides_exclude|^perl\\(utf8\\)$
iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8 Changes Changes.1
mv Changes.1 Changes
@@ -67,6 +72,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 3.51-4
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+
* Mon Jun 20 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 3.51-3
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-CHI] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit 3ed5ffe88661b931119fc068dca312777ff7970d
Author: Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:00:21 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-CHI.spec | 12 +++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CHI.spec b/perl-CHI.spec
index 00305b2..76200a7 100644
--- a/perl-CHI.spec
+++ b/perl-CHI.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-CHI
Version:0.44
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:Unified cache handling interface
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl}
-V:version`; echo $versi
%{?perl_filter_default}
+# RPM 4.8 style
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_provides /^perl(Bar)/d
%filter_from_provides /^perl(Baz)/d
@@ -72,6 +73,12 @@ Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl}
-V:version`; echo $versi
%filter_from_requires
s/^perl(Time::Duration::Parse)$/perl(Time::Duration::Parse) = 0.03/
%filter_setup
}
+# RPM 4.9 style
+%global __provides_exclude
%{?__provides_exclude:__provides_exclude|}^perl\\(Bar\\)
+%global __provides_exclude %__provides_exclude|^perl\\(DummySerializer\\)
+%global __provides_exclude %__provides_exclude|^perl\\(Foo\\)
+# Replace unversioned dependencies with versioned ones.
+# Already auto-discovered. In addition, RPM 4.9 does not offer replacing.
%description
CHI provides a unified caching API, designed to assist a developer in
@@ -136,6 +143,9 @@ make test %{?with_author_tests:AUTHOR_TESTING=1}
%{?with_smoke_tests:AUTOMATED_T
%{perl_vendorlib}/CHI/Test*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.44-6
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.44-5
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Bio-Graphics] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit fd668ab7371768b9714978bc5affaf8142d0507c
Author: Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:19:11 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-Bio-Graphics.spec |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Bio-Graphics.spec b/perl-Bio-Graphics.spec
index fcf2384..04c4b6c 100644
--- a/perl-Bio-Graphics.spec
+++ b/perl-Bio-Graphics.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Bio-Graphics
Version:2.14
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:Generate GD images of Bio::Seq objects
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -25,10 +25,13 @@ to draw sequence annotations, physical (contig) maps,
protein domains,
or any other type of map in which a set of discrete ranges need to be
laid out on the number line
+# RPM 4.8 style
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_requires /^perl(colors)/d
%{?perl_default_filter}
}
+# RPM 4.9 style
+%global __requires_exclude
%{?__requires_exclude:__requires_exclude|}perl\\(colors\\)
%prep
%setup -q -n Bio-Graphics-%{version}
@@ -65,6 +68,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.14-5
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 2.14-4
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs] Add IO::All BR
commit 275ae4ab3c4dcdad4a9206288b7c545892df9f76
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:23:30 2011 +0200
Add IO::All BR
perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs.spec b/perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs.spec
index fdb5a31..bb5ee1b 100644
--- a/perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs.spec
+++ b/perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Kwiki-Archive-Rcs
Version:0.16
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:Kwiki Page Archival Using RCS
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DR/DROLSKY/Kwiki-Archive-Rcs-%{
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.38
Requires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.38
@@ -48,6 +49,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.16-5
+- BuildRequire IO::All
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.16-4
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Contextual-Return] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
commit bcf94727736cbf80c9ed38db88809f9613d68177
Author: Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:24:45 2011 +0200
RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
perl-Contextual-Return.spec | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Contextual-Return.spec b/perl-Contextual-Return.spec
index 69dcc59..cc7c722 100644
--- a/perl-Contextual-Return.spec
+++ b/perl-Contextual-Return.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Contextual-Return
Version:0.2.1
-Release:10%{?dist}
+Release:11%{?dist}
Summary:Create context-sensitive return values
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -12,10 +12,13 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::More), perl(Want), perl(version)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod), perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+%{?perl_default_filter}
+# RPM 4.8 style
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_provides /^perl(DB)/d
-%?perl_default_filter
}
+# RPM 4.9 style
+%global __provides_exclude
%{?__provides_exclude:__provides_exclude|}^perl\\(DB\\)
%description
@@ -52,6 +55,9 @@ make test
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.2.1-11
+- RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added
+
* Mon Jun 20 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.2.1-10
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Kwiki-Attachments] Add IO::All BR
commit fe393219592d3305aa1762354a6db23737c91d2c
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:35:54 2011 +0200
Add IO::All BR
perl-Kwiki-Attachments.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Kwiki-Attachments.spec b/perl-Kwiki-Attachments.spec
index 93a3856..45ea3e3 100644
--- a/perl-Kwiki-Attachments.spec
+++ b/perl-Kwiki-Attachments.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Kwiki-Attachments
Version:0.21
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:Kwiki Page Attachments Plugin
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SU/SUE/Kwiki-Attachments-%{vers
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.37
Requires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.37
@@ -50,6 +51,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.21-5
+- BuildRequire IO::All
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.21-4
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges] Add IO::All BR
commit 28f91e37d6b43f3fac6df157bbfe71ec51505bda
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:43:50 2011 +0200
Add IO::All BR
perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges.spec b/perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges.spec
index 60d107a..db43cf6 100644
--- a/perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges.spec
+++ b/perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges
Version:0.14
-Release:15%{?dist}
+Release:16%{?dist}
Summary:Kwiki Recent Changes Plugin
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GU/GUGOD/Kwiki-RecentChanges-%{
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.37
Requires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.37
@@ -52,6 +53,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.14-16
+- BuildRequire IO::All
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.14-15
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Kwiki-Revisions] Add IO::All BR
commit 0dcce248a35a00be6b24c93297793b81e44c5c83
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:44:24 2011 +0200
Add IO::All BR
perl-Kwiki-Revisions.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Kwiki-Revisions.spec b/perl-Kwiki-Revisions.spec
index fff32bf..dc8621c 100644
--- a/perl-Kwiki-Revisions.spec
+++ b/perl-Kwiki-Revisions.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Kwiki-Revisions
Version:0.15
-Release:17%{?dist}
+Release:18%{?dist}
Summary:Kwiki Revisions Plugin
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/I/IN/INGY/Kwiki-Revisions-%{versi
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.38
Requires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.38
@@ -52,6 +53,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.15-18
+- BuildRequire IO::All
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.15-17
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Kwiki-UserName] Add IO::All BR
commit c2d12b20e43b2acfdf701100b51460437af33ecb
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:49:28 2011 +0200
Add IO::All BR
perl-Kwiki-UserName.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Kwiki-UserName.spec b/perl-Kwiki-UserName.spec
index d31ae12..19517eb 100644
--- a/perl-Kwiki-UserName.spec
+++ b/perl-Kwiki-UserName.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Kwiki-UserName
Version:0.14
-Release:17%{?dist}
+Release:18%{?dist}
Summary:Kwiki User Name Plugin
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/I/IN/INGY/Kwiki-UserName-%{versio
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.37
BuildRequires: perl(Kwiki::UserPreferences) = 0.13
@@ -54,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.14-18
+- BuildRequire IO::All
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.14-17
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences] Add IO::All BR
commit 3c2564e770b116f9588a08ce7a8979a008e7de11
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:51:30 2011 +0200
Add IO::All BR
perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences.spec b/perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences.spec
index f19a172..50c5524 100644
--- a/perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences.spec
+++ b/perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences
Version:0.13
-Release:16%{?dist}
+Release:17%{?dist}
Summary:Kwiki User Preferences Plugin
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/I/IN/INGY/Kwiki-UserPreferences-%
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.37
Requires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.37
@@ -52,6 +53,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.13-17
+- BuildRequire IO::All
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.13-16
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Packages affected by RPM 4.9 filtering [was: News from rebuild]
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:08:40AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: List of perl packages whose spec file contains `filter_setup' string follows. These packages can be affected by transition to RPM 4.9 dependency filtering. We advise to migrate the filters after merging perl-5.14 into rawhide to get proper results. Also we advise to run rpmdiff on old and new package to check your spec file changes takes effect. Please note the list was generated from older git repositories mirror, so it does not reflect current state exactly. -- Petr ikiwiki lcgdm libdigidocpp mhonarc mod_perl perl-Ace perl-AnyEvent perl-Apache-DBI-Cache perl-AppConfig perl-App-cpanminus perl-autobox perl-Bio-Graphics perl-bioperl perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder perl-CGI perl-CHI perl-Class-Prototyped perl-Class-XSAccessor perl-Contextual-Return perl-Crypt-SSLeay perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK perl-DateTime So far, I checked and updated all this packages. Followings are not checked. perl-DateTime-Format-Mail perl-DateTime-Precise perl-DateTime-Set perl-DBD-CSV perl-DBI-Dumper perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch perl-Devel-Caller perl-Devel-CheckOS perl-ExtUtils-XSpp perl-File-ChangeNotify perl-File-FnMatch perl-File-Listing perl-File-PathList perl-File-ShareDir-PAR perl-Goo-Canvas perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp perl-HTTP-Cookies perl-HTTP-Daemon perl-HTTP-Message perl-HTTP-Negotiate perl-Kwiki perl-Kwiki-NewPage perl-Kwiki-Raw perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges perl-Kwiki-Revisions perl-Kwiki-Search perl-Kwiki-UserName perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences perl-Kwiki-Users-Remote perl-Language-Functional perl-libwww-perl perl-LWP-Protocol-https perl-Math-Random-MT-Auto perl-Math-Symbolic perl-Memoize-ExpireLRU perl-Module-Mask perl-MogileFS-Utils perl-MooseX-CascadeClearing perl-MooseX-Types-DateTimeX perl-NetAddr-IP perl-Padre perl-PathTools perl-PDL perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated perl-Perl-Critic-More perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp perl-Perl-Critic-Swift perl-Perlilog perl-Perl-Metrics-Simple perl-POE-Filter-HTTP-Parser perl-PPI perl-PPI-PowerToys perl-PPIx-EditorTools perl-PPIx-Regexp perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule perl-SOAP-Lite perl-Spoon perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel perl-Statistics-Basic perl-STD perl-Template-Toolkit perl-Test-DistManifest perl-Test-Perl-Critic-Progressive perl-Test-Smoke perl-Text-Aligner perl-Text-Table perl-Unicode-String perl-version perl-WWW-Curl perl-WWW-RobotRules perl-Wx perl-XML-Parser perl-XML-Twig perl-YUM-RepoQuery redland-bindings rt3 -- Petr pgp34wzrEInUu.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Kwiki-Raw] Add IO::All BR
commit c67a64e3bd8f7fa222a40db385a2f2e1de613e82
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:58:38 2011 +0200
Add IO::All BR
perl-Kwiki-Raw.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Kwiki-Raw.spec b/perl-Kwiki-Raw.spec
index 6e4bc28..7eea5ad 100644
--- a/perl-Kwiki-Raw.spec
+++ b/perl-Kwiki-Raw.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Kwiki-Raw
Version:0.02
-Release:16%{?dist}
+Release:17%{?dist}
Summary:Provide an action to retrieve the raw wikitext of a page
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/C/CD/CDENT/Kwiki/Kwiki-Raw-%{vers
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.37
Requires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.37
@@ -52,6 +53,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.02-17
+- BuildRequire IO::All
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.02-16
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Kwiki-Diff] Add IO::All BR
commit 75185e75c1b6eef007af5ff0b5c1115c54ff3e85
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:58:54 2011 +0200
Add IO::All BR
perl-Kwiki-Diff.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Kwiki-Diff.spec b/perl-Kwiki-Diff.spec
index c64a96d..5db7087 100644
--- a/perl-Kwiki-Diff.spec
+++ b/perl-Kwiki-Diff.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Kwiki-Diff
Version:0.03
-Release:15%{?dist}
+Release:16%{?dist}
Summary:Display differences between the current wiki page and older
revisions
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(Algorithm::Diff) = 1.18
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Kwiki) = 0.34
BuildRequires: perl(Kwiki::Revisions) = 0.12
BuildRequires: perl(Spiffy) = 0.22
@@ -57,6 +58,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 22 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.03-16
+- BuildRequire IO::All
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.03-15
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Perl-Critic] Created tag perl-Perl-Critic-1.116-6.fc16
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Critic-1.116-6.fc16' was created pointing to: 370bf78... Reinstate author tests: META.yml creation issue fixed in pe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: News from rebuild
Good news, everyone. The rebuild is almost over now. 1863 packages have been successfully rebuilt in dist-f16-perl. Still, there are twelve more that should be fixed by Monday: fusioninventory-agent golly perl-Git-CPAN-Patch perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC perl-MongoDB perl-NOCpulse-Debug perl-NOCpulse-Gritch perl-NOCpulse-Object perl-OpenFrame perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule perl-threads-tbb Feel free to help with that, in addition with the already mentioned filters migration. Let's hope it'll go much smoother with 5.16 next year. Regards, -- # Petr Sabata pgpvQVQ6DULgo.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 720295] perlbrew-0.27 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720295 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perlbrew-0.27-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-07-22 21:58:31 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 720295] perlbrew-0.27 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720295 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-22 21:58:26 EDT --- perlbrew-0.27-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 720295] perlbrew-0.27 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720295 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perlbrew-0.27-1.fc14|perlbrew-0.27-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 720295] perlbrew-0.27 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720295 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-22 22:01:37 EDT --- perlbrew-0.27-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 720744] Rebuild required to work correctly with perl 5.12.4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720744 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-22 22:06:49 EDT --- perl-Devel-Cover-0.78-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 720744] Rebuild required to work correctly with perl 5.12.4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720744 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-Cover-0.78-1.fc1 ||5 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-07-22 22:06:55 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File App-Daemon-0.13.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-Daemon: a2e75f124dc8281d991fbe84fc6d3bc8 App-Daemon-0.13.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-App-Daemon] update to 0.13
commit fb1eb65588cf68cf74161bd59e32e73da2b32802
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Jul 23 06:30:20 2011 +0200
update to 0.13
.gitignore |1 +
perl-App-Daemon.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index f01682e..8c0b625 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
App-Daemon-0.09.tar.gz
/App-Daemon-0.11.tar.gz
+/App-Daemon-0.13.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-App-Daemon.spec b/perl-App-Daemon.spec
index a734f58..f5cef83 100644
--- a/perl-App-Daemon.spec
+++ b/perl-App-Daemon.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-App-Daemon
-Version:0.11
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Version:0.13
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Start an Application as a Daemon
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Pid)
BuildRequires: perl(Log::Log4perl) = 1.0
BuildRequires: perl(Proc::ProcessTable)
+BuildRequires: perl(Sysadm::Install)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
@@ -52,6 +53,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Jul 23 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.13-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Tue Jul 19 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.11-4
- Perl mass rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index fe8d8a2..908bed5 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-35b98c4eb73691f250f1b394c69dcb74 App-Daemon-0.11.tar.gz
+a2e75f124dc8281d991fbe84fc6d3bc8 App-Daemon-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-App-Daemon] clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
commit 26489df9df39d656d1856b5e4bf17fedbb4023c9
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Jul 23 06:32:53 2011 +0200
clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
perl-App-Daemon.spec |8 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-App-Daemon.spec b/perl-App-Daemon.spec
index f5cef83..4f76632 100644
--- a/perl-App-Daemon.spec
+++ b/perl-App-Daemon.spec
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-Daemon/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MS/MSCHILLI/App-Daemon-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Pid)
@@ -31,8 +30,6 @@ sed -i -e 's!/usr/local!/usr!' eg/*
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
@@ -43,11 +40,7 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
%check
make test
-%clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes README eg
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
@@ -55,6 +48,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
* Sat Jul 23 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.13-1
- update to latest upstream version
+- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
* Tue Jul 19 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.11-4
- Perl mass rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-App-Daemon] Perl mass rebuild
commit 676ee6fa4146b2449530eddca9c023c64dc23e7c
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Jul 23 07:36:48 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-App-Daemon.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-App-Daemon.spec b/perl-App-Daemon.spec
index 4f76632..1386629 100644
--- a/perl-App-Daemon.spec
+++ b/perl-App-Daemon.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-App-Daemon
Version:0.13
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Start an Application as a Daemon
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Jul 23 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.13-2
+- Perl mass rebuild
+
* Sat Jul 23 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.13-1
- update to latest upstream version
- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
