On 05/02/2012 05:34 AM, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
VÃt Ondruchvondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 26.4.2012 18:13, Alec Leamas napsal(a):
On 04/26/2012 05:49 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:32:17 +0200, AL (Alec) wrote:
[...]
I am thinking about some dumping repository,
I've updated the feature page.
--
Jiri
On 04/30/2012 10:24 PM, Kévin Raymond wrote:
Does that imply that new installs will be easily switched from firewalld
to static iptables? I always do new install but I want to keep my firewall
static, with my current iptables script.
Once we actually
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 00:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2012/4/28 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
W dniu 28 kwietnia 2012 09:52 użytkownik Adam Williamson
awill...@redhat.com napisał:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:18 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2012-05-03
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Note the non-usual time - Thursday instead of Friday.
We were able to get through some of the blockers at the review meeting
earlier today but
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 12:00 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
However, one pre-upgrade bug that may prevent you installing and is
not on the blockers list:
The blocker list is specifically intended to be open to nominations. We
still have the problem that people without editbugs privileges can't
change
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:22 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.04.2012 11:18, schrieb Adam Williamson:
Does that imply that new installs will be easily switched from firewalld
to static iptables? I always do new install but I want to keep my firewall
static, with my current iptables
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 14:56 +0100, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Just a warning to all, this bug is still present.
If the cupsd is running and you umount a USB disk, then the disk will not
be properly unmounted and any written data will not have been synced.
A pretty major bug that is still there ...
On Wed, 02 May 2012 08:55:22 +0200, AL (Alec) wrote:
I sort of like the submit a provisional spec approach. It will qualify
the requests, and the requester will get some basic understanding making
future communications with an upcoming packager easier. And, of course,
there will be users
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
1ab56a556b1ca9f9c1562c5d50226b53 Mojolicious-2.92.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e5d32ff176bdbd562fe0747ef877ec8aa294b8c9
Author: Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com
Date: Wed May 2 13:59:31 2012 +0300
Update to 2.92
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 13:30 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Hi all,
the fedora 17 schedule
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/17/Schedule lists the final
change freeze as 2012-05-07 this means that you need to make sure that
any changes you want in Fedora 17 final must be submited for
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 16:08 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
Back in Fedora 16 we tried to advance the state of the art. We switched
to using GPT disklabels by default, and in many cases this worked just
fine. But it has become increasingly obvious that the hardware isn't
ready for us. We continue
I forgot what the command is to get the text-readout of what happened
during boot; can someone remind me of this? Else my contribution may be
late in coming - apologies.
On 2012-05-02 2:11 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 00:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
On 05/01/2012 07:25 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
I've got to be honest here -- I don't like the wording of the
notification. /.../
Pádraig, Jared, Chris:
Thanks for the suggestions, I think these are definitely an improvement
over the original text. I'll reply with in line comments regarding
On 05/02/2012 08:47 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 05/01/2012 07:25 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
I've got to be honest here -- I don't like the wording of the
notification. /.../
Pádraig, Jared, Chris:
Thanks for the suggestions
How about this as the main text:
You are currently running
On 05/02/2012 03:59 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
If you are ready is a bit redundant. How about.
You are currently running Fedora from live media.
You can install Fedora now, or choose Install to Hard
Drive in the Activities overview at any later time.
I agree, this is the simplest and cleanest
On May 2, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 05/02/2012 03:59 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
If you are ready is a bit redundant. How about.
You are currently running Fedora from live media.
You can install Fedora now, or choose Install to Hard
Drive in the Activities overview at any
Hi Folks,
Thanks for joining us today in our weekly meeting. Here are the minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-05-02/fedora-meeting.2012-05-02-19.59.html
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2 May 2012 10:16, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 12:00 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
However, one pre-upgrade bug that may prevent you installing and is
not on the blockers list:
The blocker list is specifically intended to be open to nominations. We
still
Hello Guys,
am looking for someone who can make a review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817391
Regards, Adrian Alves.-
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Alvesadrian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-LibXML:
3427463988cb6393c39a33bdc9c2e288 XML-LibXML-1.97.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4ab556c7dabd23fdb342933fe4932a4d17c01025
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 2 15:01:57 2012 +0200
1.97 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-XML-LibXML.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for dspam:
0e0e405d3284485b2a43f47eaf6b09bb dspam-3.10.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7accda0717895f62e4f2d0a2e129ca0f44251a0d
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
Date: Wed May 2 09:39:02 2012 -0600
bump upstream version
.gitignore |1 +
dspam.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit b105366785c0d973ae3d7461255af0a627c3f615
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
Date: Wed May 2 10:03:11 2012 -0600
adjust documentation for 3.10.2
dspam-3.9.0-docs.patch |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/dspam-3.9.0-docs.patch
Summary of changes:
7accda0... bump upstream version (*)
b105366... adjust documentation for 3.10.2 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit b9f81aa0f357f71339e2e1afc50dca3d4da68663
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
Date: Wed May 2 10:27:10 2012 -0600
new upstream
dspam-3.9.0-docs.patch |2 +-
dspam.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4
commit 668fc196d5d86b305e61dd692d3dfc2c97b6b9dc
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
Date: Wed May 2 09:39:02 2012 -0600
new upstream release
.gitignore |2 +-
dspam-3.9.0-docs.patch |2 +-
dspam.spec |7 +--
sources|2
commit b0203d52c02e2defe505d371638313a2df3c10a5
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
Date: Wed May 2 09:39:02 2012 -0600
bump upstream version
.gitignore |1 +
dspam.spec |8
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 12ed6f6a876a64831c6580588f4cd7767a98ccd6
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
Date: Wed May 2 10:03:11 2012 -0600
adjust documentation for 3.10.2
dspam-3.9.0-docs.patch |2 +-
dspam.spec |5 -
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/353
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/353/0001-Ticket-353-coverity-12625-12629-leaks-dead-code-unch.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 04/21/2012 07:18 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
Hi there,
In a scenario where I'm trying to setup a 389 Directory Server automatically,
I ran into an issue with checking ports - no ports nor any networking, are
available when I execute the setup. FWIW, I'm bootstrapping the
I pushed the 389-ds-base-1.2.11 branch and released 389-ds-base-1.2.11.1
Unless you have fixes that are required to get into 1.2.11, just
continue to use master
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
33 matches
Mail list logo
