On 2012-08-27 22:08, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le lundi 27 août 2012 à 17:48 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On 2012-08-24 13:49, Rave it wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had
trouble
communicating and working together.
I do wish to thank you
Dne 28.8.2012 00:37, Jerry James napsal(a):
Bodhi seems to be enforcing 7 days in updates-testing for F18. Are we
going to switch to the 3 day minimum described in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Pre_Beta?
We are in Alpha Freeze now [1, 2], so your update will spend in Bodhi
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:11:39 -0400
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
This is the problem: In F18+, systemd now uses a system-wide policy
(which can be overridden) to define what services are enabled, it is
no longer
On 28 August 2012 09:39, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
After all, the F17 and F18 spec files will do _different_ things. I
don't think it's unreasonable that the spec files themselves will be
different - yes, that may be less convenient than having the same spec
file for all branches,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
He's not ignoring it, he's saying that on F18+, the expansion of
%systemd_post_enable should be exactly the same as the expansion of
%systemd_post, i.e. not enabled by
On 28/08/12 07:08, Michael Scherer wrote:
Just stating facts as well, that's slightly wrong.
Wolfgang aka raveit use the login niceandgently on github.
The one who accuse Dan mashal of calling him portuguese noob is
ketheriel, aka Nelson Marques, on 23-07-2012.
He also reuse the
Hey,
My name is Sebastian Dyroff. I am from Germany, Berlin. I've just
finished my studies of computer science.
I am a Linux user for a decade or so and tried a lot of different
Distros. For a long time I used gentoo (don't know if it is a good idea
to tell here:-) ), but switched to
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
That said it's probably less work to grab a copy of pango-1.30.1 and
just build compat-pangox from that.
I would prefer if we could
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
That said it's probably less work to grab a copy of
Le Mar 28 août 2012 03:12, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On 2012-08-25 22:52, M.M. wrote:
Or is it better to add an explicit Requires (for e.g. GNOME Shell
3.4.x) to the Spec files? In such case, is something like Requires:
gnome-shell=3.4.* allowed to specify all sub-releases belonging to
the
I assume this is a known (and temporary problem):
fedpkg scratch-build
Could not execute scratch_build: database outage
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Neal Becker wrote:
I assume this is a known (and temporary problem):
fedpkg scratch-build
Could not execute scratch_build: database outage
yep - it is coming back in just a tick
-sv
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Neal Becker wrote:
I assume this is a known (and temporary problem):
fedpkg scratch-build
Could not execute scratch_build: database outage
yep - it is coming back in just a tick
It's
Scott Schmit i.g...@comcast.net writes:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Miloslav TrmaÄ wrote:
This optimizes the migration path at the cost of making the final
state ugly; I'm not sure that is a good bargain.
Once F20 rolls out and F17 goes EOL, maintainers can simply
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852190
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm a Perl developer / sys-admin working for the PacketFence[1] open
source project which has strong RHEL roots.
A few months ago I've switched to Fedora as my desktop and I'm trying
to upstream some of our own packages to improve their quality
Rex Dieter wrote:
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.
I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he
(and I
with him) are working on.
I personally don't feel it helps taking your greivances public, as
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400,
On 08/27/2012 10:59 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Hi Gerry,
Try contacting the main dev. mailing-list of DirectFB. I'm sure you'll get an
answer there.
Btw, DirectFB-1.5.3 is rather old, DirectFB-1.6.1 is rather the latest stable
release.
-Ilyes
Thanks Ilyes.
I'll try posting over on the
ack.
On 08/27/2012 01:44 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Stefano Karapetsas wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.
I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he
(and I
with him) are working on.
I personally don't feel it helps
# F18 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2012-08-29
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Note: This is the new time for regular blocker review meetings
We'll be running through the alpha blockers and nice-to-haves. The
current list
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:37:27 -0600
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
Bodhi seems to be enforcing 7 days in updates-testing for F18. Are we
going to switch to the 3 day minimum described in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Pre_Beta?
It's set that way in it's config, but
The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while newer
versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need it. Creating a compat-guile or a
guile2 package can be
Debarshi Ray wrote:
The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while
newer versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need it. Creating a
compat-guile
I've got two Rawhide VMs, one x86_64, one i686, both otherwise
identical. I last booted them yesterday and did a yum repo-sync.
Today, neither of them will boot.
First, systemd complained about being unable to find
systemd-journal-flush.service. Sure enough, it wasn't in the
initramfs. So I
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:43:14 -0600
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got two Rawhide VMs, one x86_64, one i686, both otherwise
identical. I last booted them yesterday and did a yum repo-sync.
Today, neither of them will boot.
...snip...
Does anybody recognize the problem?
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Yes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418
downgrade to:
systemd-188-3.fc18
(NOTE: NOT fc19)
then rebuild your initramfs with dracut
Thank you, Kevin! I was hunting through dracut bugs looking for this,
hello guy I want to build smuxi irc client for fedora but just wondering
first if anybody is working on it?
http://www.smuxi.org/page/About
Let me know asap
Regards, Adrian.-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I'm working on the Fedora/Rhel7 firstboot module, and I have some
changes to the firstboot module pot files. I wonder who I should cantact
for these translating things which are visible to end user.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks a lot
Dave
--
devel mailing list
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on the Fedora/Rhel7 firstboot module, and I have some
changes to the firstboot module pot files. I wonder who I should cantact
for these translating things which are visible to end user.
For translation
On 08/29/2012 10:54 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
For translation related issues contact to l10n people on
tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N
Thanks very much, will contact i10n list
Thanks,
Parag.
--
Thanks
Dave
--
devel mailing
2012/8/28 Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com:
On 08/29/2012 10:54 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
For translation related issues contact to l10n people on
tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N
Thanks very much, will contact i10n list
There is a
On 08/28/2012 08:17 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while
newer
versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need it.
commit 624bb76ca9590baac70a5c3f07ddb685575fdf8d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Aug 27 17:05:43 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec | 10 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851873
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847657
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
commit 892a95bf1145ab1839b3603a3edd8ae21bc3b46b
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 28 09:28:13 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-version.spec |8 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-version.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive:
381704c10802bbbf13e8e99d7ddccfbe Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 12e02c51fed6c88e8ee2ce0f7f4241cd23ee98fe
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Aug 28 08:57:43 2012 +0100
Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
Sub::Exporter is an incredibly powerful module, but with that power comes
great responsibility,
Summary of changes:
12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 9bf0afbc1aa61a8259b634fd327d719f38dd2478
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 28 10:36:39 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-URI.spec | 15 ++-
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-URI.spec b/perl-URI.spec
Summary of changes:
12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el5' was created
pointing to:
12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el6' was created
pointing to:
12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16' was created
pointing to:
12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc18' was created
pointing to:
12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc19' was created
pointing to:
12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el6 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 16.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el5 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 18.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 17.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852349
Bug ID: 852349
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
--- Comment #83 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 3.35
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.30
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mojolicious/
Please consult the package
commit 7df554d3f69ce00e03d5770742b9a1e2cf7eeb2a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Aug 1 16:44:38 2012 +0100
Update to 0.08
- New upstream release 0.08
- Switch to Sub::Exporter::Progressive
- BR: perl(Sub::Exporter::Progressive) ≥ 0.001002 rather than plain
commit 2e8d642cd0b5d13ee5e83c7e1d1ec886a1bebbc0
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Aug 9 10:14:06 2012 +0100
Update to 0.09
- New upstream release 0.09
- Rewrite completely broken pure-perl GD detection under threads
- Fix pure-perl implementation
Summary of changes:
7df554d... Update to 0.08 (*)
2e8d642... Update to 0.09 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18' was created
pointing to:
2e8d642... Update to 0.09
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844965
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18
--
commit fc0d4f28497dc996ef20a27e6ae75d12993a4b59
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 28 12:03:38 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Try-Tiny.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Try-Tiny.spec
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
commit 5b0705dd3c1a048c3b3b7db1976957ec109204c5
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Aug 28 12:26:36 2012 +0100
Spec clean-up
- BR: perl(base), perl(constant) and perl(lib)
- Install to vendor directories
- Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
- Don't need
commit 1a2c1d6348dd23f38951d3566880dc0b753dd5b8
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 28 13:59:08 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Tie-ToObject.spec |8 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Tie-ToObject.spec
The lightweight tag 'perl-JSON-PP-2.27200-241.fc19' was created pointing to:
5b0705d... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4a545199abfc3d7ea9906d22392a1bd0817565d9
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Aug 28 13:37:19 2012 +0100
Spec clean-up
- Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
- Don't delete the extra tests when
commit 8a24292816a01b7841f0d086755fc8e76b819ca4
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 28 14:37:28 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Test-use-ok.spec |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-use-ok.spec
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-OSType-1.002-241.fc19' was created pointing to:
4a54519... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783740
--- Comment #1 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt ---
perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.3-6 requirements:
$ rpm -qpR perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.3-6.el6.src.rpm
--
perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
/usr/bin/iconv
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
commit 7ca116b9ff30be66a819e5da2d88a307b897ce2d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 28 16:35:51 2012 +0200
Do not build-require itself
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec | 29 +
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit f5219056eb51e7a7512e1ed6dc9aa5506dde8a60
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 28 16:20:40 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-YAML.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-YAML.spec b/perl-YAML.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851721
Olivier Bilodeau oliv...@bottomlesspit.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852503
Olivier Bilodeau oliv...@bottomlesspit.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844965
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851873
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MailTools:
bb1ee1b02913b94104209acda0163933 MailTools-2.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 54eef31f5e3368b8aa2359458f5670a992401878
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Aug 28 22:07:07 2012 +0100
Update to 2.10
- New upstream release 2.10:
- Mail::Mailer::smtp set from address twice (CPAN RT#77161)
- Mail::Mailer::smtps did not support the
Summary of changes:
54eef31... Update to 2.10 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-MailTools-2.10-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
54eef31... Update to 2.10
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-MailTools-2.10-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
54eef31... Update to 2.10
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849609
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849609
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-local-lib-1.008004-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
89 matches
Mail list logo
