trying to build guayadeque on Fedora 18 Alpha, but this fails with the
following error message:
[100%] Building C object src/CMakeFiles/guayadeque.dir/hmac/sha2.o
cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/guayadeque-svn1830/build-guayadeque/src
/usr/lib64/ccache/gcc -DTAGLIB_WITH_MP4_COVERS=1
Packages retired from fedora = 18
fusioninventory-agent
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-Deploy
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-ESX
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetDiscovery
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetInventory
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:15:40 +0200 (CEST), Martin Gansser wrote:
trying to build guayadeque on Fedora 18 Alpha, but this fails with the
following error message:
Linking CXX executable guayadeque
[...] -o guayadeque -rdynamic -pthread -Wl,-z,relro -lwx_baseu-2.8
-lwx_gtk2u_core-2.8
Compose started at Fri Sep 7 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires
Hi,
I haven't seen linux system killed so effectively for a lng time,
everytime I try to use bluetooth dongle my system just crashes.
Has this been reported? I searched this list and bugzilla but didn't
finy anything.
Kernel version: 3.4.9-2.fc16.x86_64
Is this a known issue?
Here is my
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases:
db8a99fc617f83321ae7d870f5e5884b CPAN-Perl-Releases-0.68.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Found it on bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768153
Isn't kernel supposed to be a bit more resilient, there is probably
some exploit in bluetooth code just waiting to be explited...
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:56 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
commit b93194907158886d21224faeba31c334d346d2e5
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Sep 7 07:01:31 2012 -0600
update to 0.68
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Summary of changes:
b931949... update to 0.68 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
b931949... update to 0.68 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
b931949... update to 0.68 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Gesendet: Freitag, 07. September 2012 um 11:35 Uhr
Von: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
An: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Betreff: Re: undefined reference to symbol 'gdk_pixbuf_save_to_buffer'
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:15:40 +0200 (CEST), Martin Gansser wrote:
trying to build guayadeque on
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 05. September 2012 um 12:08 Uhr
Von: Milan Bartos mbar...@redhat.com
An: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Betreff: Re: license question for bug review
A I'am working on a bug review of uayadeque
A
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:51:04 +0200 (CEST), Martin Gansser wrote:
hmm, the question is, in which file do i add the '-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0' linker
option ?
thanks
Martin
The one that creates/links the main executable. ;)
For a clean fix, intimate familiarity with CMake may be necessary, but
this
On Wed, 29.08.12 08:44, Jim Meyering (j...@meyering.net) wrote:
Jerry James wrote:
I've got two Rawhide VMs, one x86_64, one i686, both otherwise
identical. I last booted them yesterday and did a yum repo-sync.
Today, neither of them will boot.
First, systemd complained about being
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 18:30:10 +0200,
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Wed, 29.08.12 08:44, Jim Meyering (j...@meyering.net) wrote:
So this happened because somebody updated the Rawhide package, which
disabled package inheritance from F18. I have now untagged the package
in
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 18:30:10 +0200,
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Wed, 29.08.12 08:44, Jim Meyering (j...@meyering.net) wrote:
So this happened because somebody updated the Rawhide package, which
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:51:57 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
...snip...
I actually wish people would stop doing updates just for branched and
not doing new rawhide builds. This is especially bad during freezes
(and the current one has been very long), as rawhide doesn't inherit
On Fri, 07.09.12 11:00, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
I think our policy is that you should do rawhide builds, but at least
some significant groups of packagers actively don't do rawhide
builds. If that is going to continue, we should consider having
rawhide inherit from
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:00:07 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:51:57 -0500
I'd like to propose the opposite:
Lets drop any inheritance between branched and rawhide.
Will that really work as expected? The way we do branching has builds
effectively move out
On Fri, 07.09.12 11:51, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 18:30:10 +0200,
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Wed, 29.08.12 08:44, Jim Meyering (j...@meyering.net) wrote:
So this happened because somebody updated the Rawhide package, which
I'm going to release ownership of 4 of my packages because I do not use
them anymore for quite a while now.
These are:
bzr-explorer: The GUI frontend for the bzr version control system.
Because the latest upstream version requires bzr 2.6, it is still on
version 1.2.2 in Fedora. Updating to new
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Julian Aloofi
julian.fedorali...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm going to release ownership of 4 of my packages because I do not use
them anymore for quite a while now.
These are:
bzr-explorer: The GUI frontend for the bzr version control system.
Because the latest
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:44 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Hi Miloslav,
On Wednesday 29 August 2012 18:42:44 Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Considering that it's not reasonable to expect that the replacement
will cover 100% of the previous functionality, the old and new
projects will have to live side
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:16:39 +0200
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Fri, 07.09.12 11:00, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
I think our policy is that you should do rawhide builds, but at
least some significant groups of packagers actively don't do
rawhide builds. If
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:20 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2012 02:47:38 Bill Nottingham wrote:
I'm not saying you *can't* do it, but it's also not something to do
lightly.
Totally agreed. But what are really the points of maximum stickiness?
Obviously, configuration files
Summary of changes:
52ec456... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
c93ed6f... Perl mass rebuild (*)
a4f9fb6... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
6b30f5e... update to 0.2 (*)
86bff38... update to 0.3 (*)
343ab90... Perl 5.16
DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package:
jack-audio-connection-kit-1.9.8-10.fc18.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: libfreebob.so.0()(64bit)
:-( This is unacceptable! Please avoid breaking the koji buildroot like
this. You could have rebuilt jack-audio-connection-kit prior to
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase:
4df51c5a21935393dc054280ee416663 Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 13:23 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 08/30/2012 08:55 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
Olaf Kirch (o...@suse.de) said:
On Wednesday 29 August 2012 21:56:45 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/29/2012 11:58 AM, Olaf Kirch
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:20 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Wednesday 29 August 2012 19:48:29 Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Olaf, I'm very interested to learn more about wicked. Can you perhaps
itemize the set of features available to wicked (current as well as
in-development) that
commit 55a7c4d2d2bf62ae4e202df60c4fc3c289dfefd2
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Sep 7 12:20:22 2012 -0600
update to 0.13
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase.spec | 11 +++
sources|2 +-
3
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 07:44 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Thursday 30 August 2012 04:16:23 Adam Williamson wrote:
*** Network Manager is just another daemon created for a task
which historically often did not need any daemons. It's almost as if
the new generation of Unix
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 16:48 +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if one way to deal with the network configuration issue is to
try and help different configuration systems work with each other,
rather than to try and create one system which does everything. Last
time I looked into
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 15:17 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On 08/29/2012 01:58 PM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Your feedback is very much welcome!
Regards,
Olaf
Why Did You Do This?!
Do we really need yet another network management thing?
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mouse:
bc84af3461b16e631a000fe979b3ce2a Mouse-1.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit cb4f628e1baedf498662a618ddb7fc0a66d10f21
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Sep 7 12:37:32 2012 -0600
update to 1.02
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Mouse.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:06:36 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
-
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-13308/jack-audio-connection-kit-1.9.8-11.fc18
- in updates-testing only
I've requested a buildroot override for this one as a temporary fix:
$ koji wait-repo --target f18
On Fri, 07.09.12 12:03, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:16:39 +0200
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Fri, 07.09.12 11:00, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
I think our policy is that you should do rawhide builds, but at
least some
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.11.14 for Testing. This release fixes a bug with
CLEANALLRUV and winsync, and a race condition in the replication
consumer extop code.
The new packages and versions are:
389-ds-base 1.2.11.14
NOTE: 1.2.11 will
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:20 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
On Thursday 30 August 2012 08:55:02 Bill Nottingham wrote:
The systemd people do have some ideas they've already been kicking around
for this already... have you seen it?
To be clear, I'm not really convinced yet that this is
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 13:23:37 -0500,
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
That's NM's heritage, but that's certainly not its focus. We're
actually focusing a *lot* more on enterprise use-cases these days,
including lots of knobs that admins like to turn.
Is there a good source of
Gesendet: Freitag, 07. September 2012 um 17:03 Uhr
Von: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
An: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Betreff: Re: undefined reference to symbol 'gdk_pixbuf_save_to_buffer'
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:51:04 +0200 (CEST), Martin Gansser wrote:
hmm, the question is, in which
On 09/07/2012 06:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 09/07/2012 11:48 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Humm. I don't agree with this. As long as F18 is unreleased Rawhide will
be basically untested and I also wonder what testing it at this point
would bring, given that it right now is mostly F18 and
Hello,
I am working on a package called VirtualGL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834127
After contacting the upstream on their mailing list, they seem obsessed
with being able to install their own rprms and my package together at the
same time. This seems odd / bad to me since only
On 09/07/2012 07:13 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
I'm not sure the right place for this sort of
thing is in the init system.
Well I happen to be sure that the init systemd regardless of which
flavor of the month it is should handle this because it is responsible
to signal the service(s) and or
Hi,
i tried to check my package with fedora-review, but this fails.
martin@fc17 SPECS$ fedora-review -b 853553
Processing bugzilla bug: 853553
Bugzilla v0.7.0 initializing
Chose subclass RHBugzilla v0.1
Trying bugzilla cookies for authentication
Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 853553
--
Le vendredi 07 septembre 2012 à 23:04 +0200, Martin Gansser a écrit :
Hi,
i tried to check my package with fedora-review, but this fails.
martin@fc17 SPECS$ fedora-review -b 853553
Processing bugzilla bug: 853553
Bugzilla v0.7.0 initializing
Chose subclass RHBugzilla v0.1
Trying
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 23:04 +0200, Martin Gansser wrote:
sqlite and sqlite-devel are installed, a local rpmbuild works.
Did you try with mock?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 21:02 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 09/07/2012 07:13 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
I'm not sure the right place for this sort of
thing is in the init system.
Well I happen to be sure that the init systemd regardless of which
flavor of the month it is should
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:04:14 +0200 (CEST), Martin Gansser wrote:
-- checking for module 'sqlite3'
-- package 'sqlite3' not found
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:46 (MESSAGE):
sqlite3 not found!
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
sqlite and sqlite-devel are installed, a local
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 14:49 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 13:23:37 -0500,
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
That's NM's heritage, but that's certainly not its focus. We're
actually focusing a *lot* more on enterprise use-cases these days,
including lots of
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:54:03AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Fedora 18 is basically closed for new feature work, and instead the
focus needs to be on integration of the existing feature set and
bugfixes. But as you state there is a large amount of time before
F18 releases, which means new
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:54 -0400, Gary Gatling wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a package called
VirtualGL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834127
After contacting the upstream on their mailing list, they seem
obsessed with being able to install their own rprms and my
On 09/07/2012 02:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:54:03AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Fedora 18 is basically closed for new feature work, and instead the
focus needs to be on integration of the existing feature set and
bugfixes. But as you state there is a large amount
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 20:43:23 +,
\Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\ johan...@gmail.com wrote:
As you know we ( QA Community ) want all the testing to be focused on
the release we are about to push out the door and we would like ( and
some expect ) that maintainers are keeping the same focus and
Dan Williams wrote:
'man NetworkManager' is a good place to start here, which leads you to
NetworkManager.conf, which leads you to:
dns=dnsmasq
which with 0.9.6 and any options you put into custom configuration
in /etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d, should do exactly what you want. The
local
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 14:42:20 -0700,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
I'm of the opinion that rawhide should be inheriting from the builds
of the previous release, so long as there haven't been any builds
directly on rawhide. I'm also of the opinion that the inheritance
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 16:38:27 -0500,
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
'man NetworkManager' is a good place to start here, which leads you to
NetworkManager.conf, which leads you to:
dns=dnsmasq
I knew about that, but I don't use dnsmasq, I use dnscache.
which with 0.9.6 and any
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:46 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 16:38:27 -0500,
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
'man NetworkManager' is a good place to start here, which leads you to
NetworkManager.conf, which leads you to:
dns=dnsmasq
I knew about that, but I
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:44 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
'man NetworkManager' is a good place to start here, which leads you to
NetworkManager.conf, which leads you to:
dns=dnsmasq
which with 0.9.6 and any options you put into custom configuration
in
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
That's not usually something Fedora does. The package name takes the
name of the upstream project, because the package *is* the delivery
option for that software in Fedora. We do not care that much about
upstream RPMs that
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu wrote:
But like everything else he is talking about, I feel its not my problem. And
I don't really care. Maybe thats evil/wrong of me?
Well, there are occasions when upstream's priorities are somewhat
antithetical to what we're
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
Well, there are occasions when upstream's priorities are somewhat
antithetical to what we're doing in Fedora. And pissing off upstream
is never a great idea :) I think the goal is tread carefully, walking
the fine line
On Fri, 07.09.12 11:54, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net) wrote:
On 09/07/2012 11:48 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Humm. I don't agree with this. As long as F18 is unreleased Rawhide will
be basically untested and I also wonder what testing it at this point
would bring, given that it
On 07/09/12 22:07, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Fri Sep 7 09:15:28 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Who would like to re-arrange this report to be more effective and useful ?
1. The broken dependency first, not
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:42:20PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 09/07/2012 02:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
This makes sense, but it runs directly against the current
auto-inheritence behaviour. It's unsurprising that people end up with
different opinions of the right thing to do here.
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 01:28:53AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Sure, and that's clearly the behaviour that Lennart wanted as well. But
instead there was a mass rebuild that bumped his rawhide nvr and now he
needs to do rawhide work manually. If development should be happening in
rawhide
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 01:32:55 +0100
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 01:28:53AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Sure, and that's clearly the behaviour that Lennart wanted as well.
But instead there was a mass rebuild that bumped his rawhide nvr
and now he
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 10:11:44 +1000
David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On 07/09/12 22:07, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Fri Sep 7 09:15:28 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Who would like to re-arrange this
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:43:32PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This actually has nothing to do with mass rebuilds (unless I am
misunderstanding). Mass rebuilds are done _before_ branching to avoid
problems like this. :)
Argh, sorry, I was confusing it with something unrelated. Yeah, not a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 01:58:35 +0200
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Fri, 07.09.12 11:54, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net)
wrote:
On 09/07/2012 11:48 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Humm. I don't agree with this. As long
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 19:43:32 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 01:32:55 +0100
This actually has nothing to do with mass rebuilds (unless I am
misunderstanding). Mass rebuilds are done _before_ branching to avoid
problems like this. :)
Yeah this isn't as much
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 17:04:31 -0500,
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:46 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 16:38:27 -0500,
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
'man NetworkManager' is a good place to start here, which leads you to
Gesendet: Freitag, 07. September 2012 um 23:32 Uhr
Von: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
An: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Betreff: Re: fedora-review command fails on package
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:04:14 +0200 (CEST), Martin Gansser wrote:
-- checking for module 'sqlite3'
-- package
commit 19b1a4422e20f9100f672338ebc33df9bddeac34
Author: remi fed...@famillecollet.com
Date: Fri Sep 7 09:42:20 2012 +0200
lack of maintainer
.gitignore |1 -
dead.package|1 +
Summary of changes:
19b1a44... lack of maintainer (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a5dc4919adbdb496248ea81df58cb5660893a550
Author: remi fed...@famillecollet.com
Date: Fri Sep 7 09:44:26 2012 +0200
lack of maintainer
.gitignore|1 -
dead.package |1 +
Summary of changes:
a5dc491... lack of maintainer (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Package perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-Deploy in Fedora devel has been retired
by remi
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-Deploy
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Package perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-Deploy in Fedora 18 has been retired by
remi
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-Deploy
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854516
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854577
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-PatchPerl:
c8f0c475b544428073631a226f468c8f Devel-PatchPerl-0.76.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit be97ca444e4c9de3e6ea226f9004d1f01f9bcc22
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Sep 7 07:37:32 2012 -0600
update to 0.76
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Summary of changes:
be97ca4... update to 0.76 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
9651621... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
6b4ea32... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*)
819da70... Update to 0.19 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perlbrew:
5009d34c64be3453a6836bb4b12d7e23 App-perlbrew-0.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b33b507ed0162300f34f33008ba98642de2052c5
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Sep 7 08:56:47 2012 -0600
update to 0.50
.gitignore|1 +
perlbrew.spec | 12 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-All:
aa6ca3d3a06c29d9d0dd21dc675223fe IO-All-0.46.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 11362da588e0eec94dede150e1c6475b96d027ba
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Sep 7 09:03:02 2012 -0600
update to 0.46
.gitignore |1 +
perl-IO-All.spec |9 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 3c48c56a4ed1c4585cbd66e78c59ab8e45e872f5
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Sep 7 09:03:44 2012 -0600
clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
perl-IO-All.spec | 13 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-All.spec
Summary of changes:
b33b507... update to 0.50 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
b33b507... update to 0.50 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
b33b507... update to 0.50 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
