On 29 Dec 2012 01:48, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Dec 28, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones
brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Compose started at Sat Dec 29 08:15:13 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dogtag-pki]
dogtag-pki-10.0.0-0.16.b3.fc19.noarch requires dogtag-pki-server-theme
= 0:10.0.0
[ember]
ember-0.6.3-3.fc19.x86_64 requires
I noticed our package review process doesn't explicitly say After you
make an update to the package, bump the 'Release' number and post a
new link each time. This is a popular convention, but it doesn't seem
to be formally documented.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
Should
Compose started at Sat Dec 29 09:16:24 UTC 2012
Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 0
Upgraded Packages: 0
Compose finished at Sat Dec 29 16:03:38 UTC 2012
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 12/28/2012 08:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones
brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs?
Because Lennart insists on backporting only
On 12/28/2012 08:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones
brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs?
Because Lennart insists on backporting only
On 2012-12-29 17:01, Ken Dreyer wrote:
I noticed our package review process doesn't explicitly say After you
make an update to the package, bump the 'Release' number and post a
new link each time. This is a popular convention, but it doesn't seem
to be formally documented.
Alec Leamas:
On 2012-12-29 17:01, Ken Dreyer wrote:
I noticed our package review process doesn't explicitly say After you
make an update to the package, bump the 'Release' number and post a
new link each time. This is a popular convention, but it doesn't seem
to be formally documented.
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:23:35 +, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
I've seen on a few occasions reviewers mention that they can't tell what
has changed in the spec since the previous version, as the new packager
has overwritten the previous spec.
If the packager does that, it makes the rpmdev-diff
On 2012-12-29 19:45, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:23:35 +, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
I've seen on a few occasions reviewers mention that they can't tell what
has changed in the spec since the previous version, as the new packager
has overwritten the previous spec.
If the
My yum update on f18 took about 20 minutes installing 3380 packages.
Cleanup: bash-4.2.39-1.fc18.x86_64 3377/3380
Cleanup: nss-softokn-freebl-3.14-5.fc18 3378/3380
Cleanup: glibc-2.16-24.fc18 3379/3380
Cleanup: tzdata-2012i-1.fc18.noarch 3380/3380
And then it just sat
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:20:25 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2012-12-29 19:45, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:23:35 +, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
I've seen on a few occasions reviewers mention that they can't tell what
has changed in the spec since the previous version, as the
On 12/29/2012 07:24 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
My yum update on f18 took about 20 minutes installing 3380 packages.
Cleanup: bash-4.2.39-1.fc18.x86_64 3377/3380
Cleanup: nss-softokn-freebl-3.14-5.fc18 3378/3380
Cleanup: glibc-2.16-24.fc18 3379/3380
Cleanup:
Hi,
Hope this is not noise...
Just installed Fedora 3.6.10-4.fc18 32 bit on 32 bit VM Player on 64 bit
Windows 8 machine and it hangs on the blue background.
Will try 64 bit VM Player tomorrow.
Aaron
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 30 December 2012 03:39, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hope this is not noise...
Just installed Fedora 3.6.10-4.fc18 32 bit on 32 bit VM Player on 64 bit
Windows 8 machine and it hangs on the blue background.
Will try 64 bit VM Player tomorrow.
There was no 64 bit
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890734
Bug ID: 890734
Summary: client denied by server configuration:
/usr/share/rt3/html
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: rt3
Severity: urgent
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890736
Bug ID: 890736
Summary: perl-Net-DNS-0.72 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-DNS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
commit 1b22e908e2fdc142365ac3b972482aa34346fb46
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Sat Dec 29 14:41:17 2012 +0100
Add mod_authz_core.c support to rt3.conf.
rt3.conf.in |9 -
rt3.spec|5 -
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
Summary of changes:
1b22e90... Add mod_authz_core.c support to rt3.conf. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 0062c9e1dd523205c08d860ca71215b4b637b0db
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Dec 29 09:16:27 2012 -0700
gzip the sample dates file in documentation (rhbz#890441)
perl-DateTime-Format-Mail.spec | 24 +++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890441
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890734
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rt3-3.8.15-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rt3-3.8.15-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
24 matches
Mail list logo
