Reindl Harald wrote:
oh even if people like i did some hundret dist-upgrades over the
years it was us told that linux has to go the windows way:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OfflineSystemUpdates
Yeah, this is a really insane feature!
Let me assure you that this feature is only
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such machines
because nobody tests the bleeding edge Fedora kernels on such obsolete
hardware.
FYI, kernel-3.7.3-101.fc17.i686 runs fine on a Pentium 4 Northwood (which
predates EM64T, i.e. what's now known as
James Hogarth wrote:
Right now there's no roadmap for 4.0 - no milestone dates, alpha dates or
beta dates... The best that exists for this is a nightly snapshot from
trunk covered in caveats about how unstable it's likely to be.
The openoffice.org wiki doesn't even mention 3.4 much less
Jef Spaleta wrote:
yum info dpkg
That dpkg package is there only for tools like debootstrap or alien to work,
not as an alternative to RPM.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Adam Williamson wrote:
It's an *initial* state, not a never-changing one. When I first decided
I was going to try Linux, I wanted to try Linux. I wanted exactly what
our download page gives you - a simple link to a thing called Linux I
could download and fiddle with. I'm not sure I wanted my
Debarshi Ray wrote:
I know this applies, but installing gnome-shell pulls in gdm.
I.e. removing gdm without removing gnone-shell is not possible.
Because gnome-shell (running in a special mode) is nowadays the greeter
used by GDM. That does not mean GDM won't let you log into KDE if you
Debarshi Ray wrote:
Keep in mind that to get to the point of installing an alternative-only
DE, in current Fedora, you normally first have a full blown Gnome3
installed, which is close to impossible to get rid of.
[citation needed]
There's no straightforward way to remove GNOME: yum
Adam Williamson wrote:
...but as Rahul said, they all allow you to log in to any desktop. There
seems to be a meme in this thread that GDM does not, but that's not
correct, it does. The choice is not visible unless you actually have
multiple desktops installed, but when you do, it gives you
drago01 wrote:
There is no easy way to install applications (regular user don't want
to mess up with packages).
Huh? Fire up gnome-packagekit or Apper, choose your app, make 2 or 3 clicks
(install, apply, confirm dependencies if any), enter your root password and
the app is there. How do you
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 02:59 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
, but since you started it: OpenSUSE is doing just fine
doing exactly what I suggest (making people actually pick their
download). Their download button actually points to a selector, not
directly to an ISO.
Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-02-05 21:46, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
You ordered Gnome and have been served Pizza for a long time - now
you're being served Burgers :-)
Well, from a nutrition perspective that's actually a big step forward.
Perhaps time to trust the chef? ;)
Huh? A plain cheese
Le 25/01/2013 19:46, Norvald Ryeng a écrit :
We'll try to do better in the future.
So I will also try to work better,
and so will report the annoying packaging bugs.
MySQL Workbench 5.2.46 is released, so
Connector/C++
http://bugs.mysql.com/68320
Missing option for library
Rave it wrote:
There is a current poll at fedora forum.
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=284463
The winner is...
There are several factors which bias this poll:
* GNOME 3 is the default in Fedora, so of course more Fedora users will be
using it, merely due to the fact that
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Odd question, AFAIK I have understood the wiki page for this feature
offline updates woriking only, if you are have running a GUI on your
system. For a servere without a GuI offline update is not realize.
It is actually only implemented in gnome-packagekit. Current Apper
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
In Scope I see KDE's networking layers likely require an update to use
the new API, as will any other direct client of ModemManager. However, the
functionality that most networking applets require from ModemManager is
fairly simple,
Ouch, good that you noticed that.
So
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Additionally we will be mass patching config.guess and config.sub to
support aarch64 in preperation for 64 bit arm support
Ugh, this really shows how bundled autocrap sucks!
How are you going to determine the packages that need patching? Anything
running autoreconf,
On 7 February 2013 16:41, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.comwrote:
On 02/07/2013 04:23 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Can someone who knows firewalld please do a HOWTO to on setting up a
secondary DHCP with DNS and HTTPS access for PXEBOOTing of Fedora18 please
to go with the PXEBOOT HOWTO :-
Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 08 février 2013 à 16:54 +0100, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
That's quite a few :( Don't forget about other formats - .der, .p12
at least; possibly also the native NSS and Java formats.
I will add .dev and .p12. For the native formats, I am not a certificate
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Additionally we will be mass patching config.guess and config.sub to
support aarch64 in preperation for 64 bit arm support
Ugh, this really shows how bundled autocrap sucks!
How are you going
Hi Kevin,
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:09:15 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
There are several factors which bias this poll:
* GNOME 3 is the default in Fedora, so of course more Fedora users
will be using it, merely due to the fact that it is the default.
* Some people actually left Fedora over GNOME
Peter Robinson wrote:
Nor should anything that's run their make dist tarball process with
the latest tools. Jon Masters was going to confirm if anything was
needed for cmake and any other non autotools build tools too.
If any CMake support is needed, it will be only in the system cmake package
Martin Sourada wrote:
That's the first time I've seen XFCE win over GNOME, LOL.
It shouldn't be, it was the same last year (and I had already posted the
link back then). :-)
On 9 February 2013 00:37, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com
wrote:
* Gnome 3's target audience does not enclose majority of Gnome 2's
target audience, though it *does* have some intersection. Many of
those are
Le samedi 09 février 2013 à 11:09 +0100, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
Rave it wrote:
There is a current poll at fedora forum.
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=284463
The winner is...
There are several factors which bias this poll:
* GNOME 3 is the default in Fedora, so
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
* Gnome 3 is going the I-know-better-then-you-what's-good-for-you
way.
Sure by giving you an extension system that allows you to do whatever
you want with the desktop
Is anyone doing that?
Le samedi 09 février 2013 à 11:34 +, Ian Malone a écrit :
On 9 February 2013 00:37, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com
wrote:
* Gnome 3's target audience does not enclose majority of Gnome 2's
target
On Sex, 2013-02-08 at 10:08 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 02/05/2013 07:43 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Any advises or opinions ?
I think you haven't yet described the original problem you're trying to
solve.
Hi,
When we install VirtualBox from rpmfusion , I'd like create /dev/vboxusb
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 08:35:56PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Ven 8 février 2013 13:22, Olav Vitters a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
I am providing a datapoint that directly contradicts your original
statement, namely that there is a completely
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:21:49PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
I stand by my statement that this was a very awkward moment, with Vincent
and the GNOME team radiating unhappiness and pretty much everyone else
being perplexed and wondering whether they should take offence at being
accused of
Hello:
Can someone investigate F-19 newrepo below?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4939667
It seems that this task was created at Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:00:33 UTC
(more than 17 hours ago) and has not completed yet.
Regards,
Mamoru
--
devel mailing list
Michael Scherer wrote:
Gnome-shell is not mean to be used nor appropriate for a mobile phone.
And despite being rather usable on a touch screen ( I tested ), it is
still not sufficient there for 1 million of details ( Vincent Untz talk
also said the same, see gnome people to see the details ).
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
oh even if people like i did some hundret dist-upgrades over the
years it was us told that linux has to go the windows way:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OfflineSystemUpdates
Yeah, this
Michael Scherer wrote:
Well, a majority of people think such polls are useless,
Do you have a poll to prove that? ;-)
Seriously, the only thing more inaccurate than statistic is MADE UP
statistics. :-/
1) 792 people. Just to compare, there is 300 people on #fedora-devel on
irc, and 800 on
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 03:46:57PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael Scherer wrote:
Gnome-shell is not mean to be used nor appropriate for a mobile phone.
And despite being rather usable on a touch screen ( I tested ), it is
still not sufficient there for 1 million of details ( Vincent
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:42:10 +0900
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hello:
Can someone investigate F-19 newrepo below?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4939667
It seems that this task was created at Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:00:33 UTC
(more than 17 hours ago) and
Am 09.02.2013 15:52, schrieb drago01:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
oh even if people like i did some hundret dist-upgrades over the
years it was us told that linux has to go the windows way:
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 15:01 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 08:35:56PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Ven 8 février 2013 13:22, Olav Vitters a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
I am providing a datapoint that directly contradicts
Josh Boyer venit, vidit, dixit 08.02.2013 18:56:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Moschny
thomas.mosc...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/8 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com:
Yes, but fedpkg is currently relying on the existing git default, which
is matching. That is changing upstream in git, so
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:38:46PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
The only thing I can think of is that people turning their back on you,
not looking at you when you are asked to raise your hand on something
they worked on, this might be intimidating to some people.
I was not one of these,
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 10:22:41AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
drago01 wrote:
There is no easy way to install applications (regular user don't want
to mess up with packages).
Huh? Fire up gnome-packagekit or Apper, choose your app, make 2 or 3 clicks
(install, apply, confirm dependencies
Hi!
AFAIK, the next massive rebuild is scheduled for the 12th February, 2013.
Moreover, as you may know, Boost-1.53.0 has been successfully
built already (thanks to Petr!) on Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=382788
So, as a few of you have already suggested, it may be a
On 02/09/2013 03:34 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
1. I no longer use workspaces to manage different tasks unless there
are lots of windows and then I sometimes overflow onto 2. This is
because they're less useful as you now can't switch without going to
the activities view and they aren't segregated
On 2013-02-08, 17:42 GMT, Michael Scherer wrote:
Of course, when i mean ban all, I mean unless exceptions.
And finding those potential exceptions is also one reason to have this
thread :)
I will try to take a look at gajim ...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/909625
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:26:04 +0100
Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org wrote:
Hi!
AFAIK, the next massive rebuild is scheduled for the 12th February,
2013. Moreover, as you may know, Boost-1.53.0 has been successfully
built already (thanks to Petr!) on Koji:
commit 427e0fd7a129f75924c5064b30d01428f3cf781e
Author: Steven Roberts strob...@strobe.net
Date: Sat Feb 9 00:01:42 2013 -0800
fixed up the patch
perl-Mail-Procmail.spec |2 +-
pm_report.patch | 10 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
ca80ece... initial post review (*)
0fcc673... . (*)
b782532... some spec cleanup (*)
7c01e73... Added pm_report patch from rt.cpan.org #83152 (*)
427e0fd... fixed up the patch (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora
Summary of changes:
ca80ece... initial post review (*)
0fcc673... . (*)
b782532... some spec cleanup (*)
7c01e73... Added pm_report patch from rt.cpan.org #83152 (*)
427e0fd... fixed up the patch (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora
Summary of changes:
ca80ece... initial post review (*)
0fcc673... . (*)
b782532... some spec cleanup (*)
7c01e73... Added pm_report patch from rt.cpan.org #83152 (*)
427e0fd... fixed up the patch (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909136
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package abi-compliance-checker-1.98.8-1.fc17:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository,
* should be available at your local
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
52 matches
Mail list logo
