On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 08:39 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
End of August I've opened tickets about duplicate and potentially
conflicting (because if noarch - arch differences) %doc files.
The response from packagers has not been brilliant so far.
These are _package bugs_ specific to Fedora,
On 2013-12-04, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Petr Pisar wrote:
[snip] and GPLv2 and GPLv3+.
Huh? WTF is upstream smoking there?
Upstream releases a tar ball bundling a lot of subprojects. Thus the
complicated license. I do a licence review each new release and I always
find new
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2013-12-04
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Well folks, we still have proposed blockers on the list, so you know
what that means: time for some more blocker review in just eight short
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:07:22 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
If you mentioned a list of bugs or at least a shared string from the
descriptions of all of them, maybe provenpackagers could take some time
to help out. (Well, I guess we could go digging in your bugzilla
history, but it seems like
I'd suggest to follow the Medium term goals from the page. That means
to choose the backend from one of the following libraries (in the order
of preference).
1. NSS
2. GNUTLS (with nettle as crypto backend, but nettle never used
directly by applications)
3. OpenSSL
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 09:54 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:07:22 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
If you mentioned a list of bugs or at least a shared string from the
descriptions of all of them, maybe provenpackagers could take some time
to help out. (Well, I guess we
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2013-12-03)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 16:02:38 UTC. The full logs are available
at
Compose started at Wed Dec 4 07:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037241
Dhiru Kholia dkho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1038083
Referenced
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:02:53PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
[libguestfs]
1:libguestfs-1.25.12-1.fc21.i686 requires libprocps.so.1
[open-vm-tools]
open-vm-tools-9.4.0-1.fc21.i686 requires libprocps.so.1(LIBPROCPS_0)
open-vm-tools-9.4.0-1.fc21.i686 requires
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 08:39:21AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
End of August I've opened tickets about duplicate and potentially
conflicting (because if noarch - arch differences) %doc files.
The response from packagers has not been brilliant so far.
These are _package bugs_ specific to
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Fennec:
5c2ea67ed482dfa6f4c536eb720538e7 Fennec-2.011.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org writes:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:42:44PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
The only issue compared to TC3 is one more file with wrong selinux
context (/var/log/cron).
So, for TC4:
# restorecon -R -v -n -e /proc -e /sys -e /dev -e/run -e/tmp /
commit 667e7ee070e27bc7007b564e953249b085bd50a8
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 4 13:58:50 2013 +0100
Filter private module Locale::Codes::LangFam_Retired from dependencies
perl-Locale-Codes.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
On Út, 2013-12-03 at 22:28 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 12/03/2013 07:58 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
I'd suggest to follow the Medium term goals from the page. That means
to choose the backend from one of the following libraries (in the order
of preference).
1. NSS
2. GNUTLS
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:08:08 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I've read this several times, and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
and I still don't understand what this message means.
My message or a specific bugzilla ticket?
How would this cause subpackage
Hi,
I got a format-security flag FTBFS bug[1] for fontmatrix package which I
maintain in Fedora. I am confused on how to fix line 86 qDebug() from
http://fpaste.org/58952/13861663/ to fix this FTBFS.
Can someone help to fix this?
Regards,
Parag.
[1]
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
*That's today: sorry about the late message. There's no surprise new
business, though.*
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
On 12/04/2013 03:26 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
I got a format-security flag FTBFS bug[1] for fontmatrix package
which I maintain in Fedora. I am confused on how to fix line 86 qDebug()
from http://fpaste.org/58952/13861663/ to fix this FTBFS.
Can someone help to fix this?
This should do
Dne 4.12.2013 15:47, Florian Weimer napsal(a):
On 12/04/2013 03:26 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
I got a format-security flag FTBFS bug[1] for fontmatrix package
which I maintain in Fedora. I am confused on how to fix line 86 qDebug()
from http://fpaste.org/58952/13861663/ to fix this FTBFS.
Hi,
Thanks for replying to my query. I also got same help on #fedora-kde
channel.
Regards,
Parag
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi,everyone
http://www.redhat.com/archives/shrike-list/2003-April/msg00069.html
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces
http://old-en.opensuse.org/Packaging/Debuginfo
This document said:passing -g to gcc or g++. And Note that the default
CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS of the distro already contain -g,
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, December 4th) at 4PM EST (9PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
1) Kernel Status Update
2) Aarch64 - Status Update
- Images
3) F20 TC4 - Testing Summary
4) F21 Wish list
Hi list(s),
We still doesn't have gnat compiler for %{arm} in Fedora. We (Ada community)
have compiled gcc with ada support using gcc-4.8.2 src.rpm and tested in.
It seems workable. At least we were able to compile most of the
packages from the stack with it.
I'd like to discuss way how to
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-12-05 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-12-05 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2013-12-05 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2013-12-05
This is just a pain. Can someone explain to me why this is good?
Original Message
Subject: [Bug 1037125] hydrogen FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag
is used
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:33:47 +
From: bugzi...@redhat.com
To: brendan.jones...@gmail.com
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:10:39PM +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
This is just a pain. Can someone explain to me why this is good?
If you read the bug description you'll see the link which
answers your question.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Format-Security-FAQ
Daniel
--
|:
On 12/04/2013 07:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:10:39PM +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
This is just a pain. Can someone explain to me why this is good?
If you read the bug description you'll see the link which
answers your question.
Hi
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
I'm sorry, but I can't see why any of my packages (10+) are at risk
This is just a best practice to mitigate any risks that might exist just
like any of the other security improvements we make from time to time.
Even if you don't see
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/605
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/605/0001-Ticket-605-support-TLS-1.1-adding-backward-compatibi.patch
Description: commit 88d4beccb9d9f7bb89f5e24c47828d7516ba7ca8 always
expected the NSS version supporting TLS 1.2. It broke the build on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-12-04)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:59:34 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Pavel Zhukov pzhu...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi list(s),
We still doesn't have gnat compiler for %{arm} in Fedora. We (Ada community)
have compiled gcc with ada support using gcc-4.8.2 src.rpm and tested in.
It seems workable. At least we were able to compile most
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 07:11:40 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Pavel Zhukov pzhu...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi list(s),
We still doesn't have gnat compiler for %{arm} in Fedora. We (Ada
community) have compiled gcc with ada support using gcc-4.8.2 src.rpm
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net wrote:
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 07:11:40 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Pavel Zhukov pzhu...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi list(s),
We still doesn't have gnat compiler for %{arm} in Fedora. We (Ada
Hi,
kernel 3.12 is out a long time, and still do see it on Fedora 20, to me
doesn't make sense update it , just after lunching , should be test on
test before .
The politic of update stable kernel is fast to please me , sometimes in
middle of a stable release you bump kernel , almost without
Hi,
kernel 3.12 is out a long time, and still don't see it on Fedora 20, to me
doesn't make sense not update it, you will go update just after lunching ?
Should be test on test before .
The politic of update stables kernel is far to please me , sometimes in
middle of a stable release you bump a
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
kernel 3.12 is out a long time, and still don't see it on Fedora 20, to me
doesn't make sense not update it, you will go update just after lunching ?
Should be test on test before .
The politic of update stables
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 19:35:43 +
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
kernel 3.12 is out a long time, and still don't see it on Fedora 20,
to me doesn't make sense not update it, you will go update just after
lunching ? Should be test on test before . The politic of update
stables
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 19:33:32 +,
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
kernel 3.12 is out a long time, and still do see it on Fedora 20, to me
doesn't make sense update it , just after lunching , should be test on
test before .
The politic of update stable kernel is fast to please
Below are the minutes from today's Blocker Review Meeting. We made it
through all the listed blocker and freeze exception proposals. Looking
forward to the Go/No-Go Meeting tomorrow...
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F20-blocker-review
On 12/04/2013 07:59 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
I'm sorry, but I can't see why any of my packages (10+) are at risk
This is just a best practice to mitigate any risks that might exist just
like any of the other security improvements
On Qua, 2013-12-04 at 12:42 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Basically it landed too late to get into Beta, and we don't want to
ship final with a brand new kernel. It will be a update after
release.
This allows the installer images to use a known stable kernel, and
folks who want the new one to
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Qua, 2013-12-04 at 12:42 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Basically it landed too late to get into Beta, and we don't want to
ship final with a brand new kernel. It will be a update after
release.
This allows the installer
Hi
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
Overkill if you ask me,
It might be appear to be one till it ends up avoiding or mitigating a
security issue. It is just a bunch of trivial changes and I am sure you
can ask for help for patches if needed.
Rahul
--
devel mailing
Once again, there are obsolete packages still found in Rawhide. Obsolete
here really means they are obsoleted (=replaced!) by some other package.
Undead here means they are not marked dead in dist git.
Please note that retiring packages is easier nowadays:
python-ordereddict is obsolete also:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=100
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:58:47PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:08:08 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I've read this several times, and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
and I still don't understand what this message means.
My
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:18:31AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
- Original Message -
Dne 4.12.2013 12:37, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a):
(tkinter is actually a subpackage of python itself)
I guess you know what I mean here, but to be clear:
tkinter is only an example, we got
Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for
those unable the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-12-04/fedora-meeting-1.2013-12-04-21.00.html
Minutes (text):
Am 04.12.2013 21:15, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Qua, 2013-12-04 at 12:42 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Basically it landed too late to get into Beta, and we don't want to
ship final with a brand new kernel. It will be a update after
release.
This allows the installer images to use a known stable
On 12/04/2013 09:39 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
Overkill if you ask me,
It might be appear to be one till it ends up avoiding or mitigating a
security issue. It is just a bunch of trivial changes and I am sure you
can ask for help
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:56:23PM +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
Patching is not a problem. Unnecessary is the question. Explain to
me (not you in particular Rahul) how these printf's can possibly be
exploited?
Google for sudo format string exploit
Yours Tony
pgpit7eFTE85S.pgp
Description:
On 12/04/2013 04:56 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
Patching is not a problem. Unnecessary is the question. Explain to me
(not you in particular Rahul) how these printf's can possibly be exploited?
char *output;
output = get_user_input(...);
printf(output);
What happens when the user enters
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:38:49 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:58:47PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:08:08 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I've read this several times, and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:11:16PM -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 12/04/2013 04:56 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
Patching is not a problem. Unnecessary is the question. Explain to me
(not you in particular Rahul) how these printf's can possibly be exploited?
char *output;
output =
On 12/05/2013 12:11 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 12/04/2013 04:56 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
Patching is not a problem. Unnecessary is the question. Explain to me
(not you in particular Rahul) how these printf's can possibly be exploited?
char *output;
output = get_user_input(...);
It seems that this package is no longer needed. Please let me know
there is a reason that we should keep it. Will retire on all Fedora
releases next week.
Thanks,
Dan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Brendan Jones
brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/05/2013 12:11 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 12/04/2013 04:56 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
Patching is not a problem. Unnecessary is the question. Explain to me
(not you in particular Rahul) how these printf's can
On 12/05/2013 12:28 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Brendan Jones
brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/05/2013 12:11 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 12/04/2013 04:56 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
Patching is not a problem. Unnecessary is the question. Explain to me
(not
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Brendan Jones
brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/05/2013 12:28 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Brendan Jones
brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/05/2013 12:11 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 12/04/2013 04:56 PM, Brendan Jones
On 12/04/2013 12:10 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
This is just a pain. Can someone explain to me why this is good?
Good or not, this is not the right question to ask.
* Is this necessarry, and are the benefits worth the pains? *
This change is Sofa King stupid. Why couldn't we have just enabled
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
libmatekeyring
obsoleted by: mate-desktop
mate-keyring
obsoleted by: mate-desktop
We know about these 2 and will obsolete them soon.
Thanks,
Dan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
From: Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net
To: Sam Kottler skott...@redhat.com
Cc: epel-devel-l...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 4:45:45 PM
Subject: Re: EPEL -ANNOUNCE Puppet 2.7 upgrade in 6
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:53:46AM -0500, Sam
Hi all,
dropbear in EPEL6 will be updated to 2013.62 later in updates-testing
with support of ECC.
Full changelog is there: https://matt.ucc.asn.au/dropbear/CHANGES
If you have any questions or objections, please reply here.
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
592
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
106
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
82
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
592
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
106
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
48
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 21:42:10 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:45:44 +0400
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
commit 5120638ecf31c4c4170206c3ff9a5c6b87510c39
Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 2 17:55:12 2013 +
Update to 1.2.0 release
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
perl-Sys-Virt.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
2 files
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-14.fc21.x86_64 requires
libswipl.so.6.4.1()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-14.fc21.i686 requires libswipl.so.6.4.1
On armhfp:
perl-Locale-Codes has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Locale-Codes-3.28-1.fc21.noarch requires
perl(Locale::Codes::LangFam_Retired)
On i386:
perl-Locale-Codes-3.28-1.fc21.noarch requires
perl(Locale::Codes::LangFam_Retired)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037242
Dhiru Kholia dkho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1038083
Referenced
commit f136ea3e565deb541017943fb00fadadde4b2e68
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 4 12:56:53 2013 +0100
Rebuild against pl-6.6.0
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi.spec
commit 64a879bfca4627068b61b5fb84a7b91e30679b3b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Dec 4 12:09:52 2013 +
Update to 2.011
- New upstream release 2.011
- Typo fixes and documentation enhancements
- Support the generation of tracking debugging information
The lightweight tag 'perl-Fennec-2.011-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
64a879b... Update to 2.011
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
389-ds-base_Debian_Wheezy - Build # 130 - Fixed:
See attached build log for details.
build.log
Description: Binary data
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47587
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47587/0001-Ticket-47587-hard-coded-limit-of-64-masters-in-agree.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dne 4.12.2013 12:37, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a):
(tkinter is actually a subpackage of python itself)
I guess you know what I mean here, but to be clear:
tkinter is only an example, we got more, like pyserial, PyYAML...
Other thing:
What about apps? Do we want something in the guidelines
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:41:30PM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
Back in August, the {__python} macro was deprecated in favor of
{__python2}. This is cool as it paves the way for an eventual python3
takeover.
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Pythondiff=350838oldid=350837
80 matches
Mail list logo
