Re: dnf versus yum

On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:36:08 -0500 Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote: If is a drop in replacement for yum - then why not call it yum, then there is no learning curve. It's not a d.i.r.: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-January/193312.html ___ Regards, Frank

Re: dnf versus yum

Le jeudi 02 janvier 2014 à 16:45 -0500, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : Hi On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: It could be implemented as a plugin and still installed by default. It could be but I doubt that is the proposed change here. They just don't

Re: rawhide report: 20140102 changes

Hi On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Ah, I see it's nit-pick day. :) I did commit the fix to git. However, rawhide composes based on a tag from the rel-eng repo. I didn't move the tag up to the new revision Didn't mean to be nit picking. Just was wondering why the

File Module-ScanDeps-1.13.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-ScanDeps: 15fe01997c556f36d1a1b22722e4bd79 Module-ScanDeps-1.13.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: dnf versus yum

Hi On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: I could see a few. having a plugin permit to have it more extensible. For example, let's say I want to have a system that act a bit smarter, and prevent removing kernel, and several others stuff depending on the hostname ( ie, in a

Re: dnf versus yum

Am 03.01.2014 08:17, schrieb Adam Williamson: On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 02:48 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Steve Clark wrote: Also at least yum stood for something - Yellowdog Updater, Modified - as opposed to being some nonsensical conglomeration of letters. The only thing I am aware of that dnf

crash stats for Fedora 20

In last two weeks these components were crashing the most on Fedora 20: 1. gnome-shell seen 12370 times (23% of all reports) http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1380731/ RHBZ#995785 http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1380807/ RHBZ#995785 2. gnome-software seen 5545

Re: crash stats for Fedora 20

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com wrote: In last two weeks these components were crashing the most on Fedora 20: 3. kernel seen 4540 times (8% of all reports) http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/898437/

Re: dnf versus yum

On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:54:04PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 03.01.2014 08:17, schrieb Adam Williamson: On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 02:48 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Steve Clark wrote: Also at least yum stood for something - Yellowdog Updater, Modified - as opposed to being some nonsensical

[Bug 1046006] Slicing a .stl file fails if multiple threads are configured

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006 --- Comment #5 from Neil Darlow n...@darlow.co.uk --- ABRT was invoked and reported that Perl had caught a SIGABRT. This was with 2 threads selected and reducing threads to 1 allows Quick Slice and Save As... to work correctly. This is

Re: dnf versus yum

HI On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: But I also think naming is important, and that gratuitous renaming of an important piece of user-visible software functionality that makes up part of the sysadmin's user interface should be avoided without good reason, My

Re: dnf versus yum

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: My understanding is that dnf is only the name of the experimental fork of yum and the end result will continue to be called yum. Am I wrong about that? That was my understand as well (as of about a year ago), but I

Re: Fedora.next in 2013 -- Big Picture and Themes

Le 03/01/2014 19:14, Matthew Miller a écrit : Happy New Year everyone! And also, congratulations on and thank you for a really excellent Fedora 20 release. I've seen and heard a lot of positive feedback and I'm quite confident in telling people that this incarnation is the best Fedora yet.

Re: official fedora image for docker available

El Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:46:07 -0500 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com escribió: The official (unprefixed) fedora image for docker is now available here: https://index.docker.io/_/fedora/ It has fedora 20 (via tags 20, heisenbug and latest) and rawhide. As it wasn't created by Release

Re: EPEL epel7 planning and processes

On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 16:53:19 -0800 Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote: What's the process opt-in at this point? I'm a bit unclear. I see that epel-release was built for EPEL7 (and that the git branch is epel7

Re: official fedora image for docker available

On Sex, 2014-01-03 at 16:25 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: El Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:46:07 -0500 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com escribió: The official (unprefixed) fedora image for docker is now available here: https://index.docker.io/_/fedora/ It has fedora 20 (via tags 20, heisenbug and

Re: official fedora image for docker available

On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:38:56PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: I can't find any image , we need to login ? to download it ? $ sudo yum install docker-io $ sudo docker run fedora cat /etc/fedora-release (Second step can be not as root if you add yourself to the `docker` group.) -- Matthew

Re: official fedora image for docker available

On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:25:30PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: The official (unprefixed) fedora image for docker is now available here: https://index.docker.io/_/fedora/ As it wasn't created by Release Engineering, and afaik was not tested by QA. It is a remix and can not be called offical.

Re: official fedora image for docker available

Hi On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com wrote: The official (unprefixed) fedora image for docker is now available here: https://index.docker.io/_/fedora/ It has fedora 20 (via tags 20, heisenbug and latest) and rawhide. What is the marketing pitch for this? Why

Re: Fedora.next in 2013 -- Big Picture and Themes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/03/2014 11:14 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: Since we can't afford a monthly conference (ha!), I want something that feels like it online. A hub for the community, where we have that interconnectedness all the time. I think this centers around

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 621 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 135 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5 111

EPEL libbluray soname bump in

I'd like to call attention to: Setting up Upgrade Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package libbluray.x86_64 0:0.2-0.6.20110710git51d7d60a96d06.el6 will be updated -- Processing Dependency: libbluray.so.0()(64bit) for package:

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 622 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 136 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5 112

EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 622 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 136 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6 78

EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 622 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 136 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6 78

[perl-DateTime/f19] 1.06 bump

commit 5e93c5f985e8b66c4bbb4e45bd6628947fd9601b Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 3 08:57:24 2014 +0100 1.06 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-DateTime.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-DateTime/f18] 1.06 bump

commit 144f27073254d1d4cea130e9542e91c682e8d4ca Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 3 08:57:24 2014 +0100 1.06 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-DateTime.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 1045912] perl-DateTime-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045912 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1045912] perl-DateTime-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045912 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DateTime-1.06-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-1.06-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1045912] perl-DateTime-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045912 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DateTime-1.06-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-1.06-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1045912] perl-DateTime-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045912 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DateTime-1.06-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-1.06-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail

File Encode-2.57.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Encode: 08029a56ab734069cbdacdafb0276acd Encode-2.57.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Encode] 2.57 bump

commit 91c2291417edeefe7e6f6e10e3a1bf8a0b1093bf Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 3 09:32:15 2014 +0100 2.57 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Encode.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 1039715] perl-Module-Starter-1.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039715 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Module-Starter-1.62-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1026763] Locale::Maketext interpolating escaped backslashes improperly

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026763 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Locale-Maketext-1.23-293.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1039712] perl-Gnome2-1.045 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Gnome2-1.045-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1045913] perl-Encode-2.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045913 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1039715] perl-Module-Starter-1.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039715 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Module-Starter-1.62-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1039712] perl-Gnome2-1.045 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Gnome2-1.045-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1039712] perl-Gnome2-1.045 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Gnome2-1.045-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1041304] FTBFS: self check failures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041304 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1048134] New: decode_utf8() returns gibberish on non-string value

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048134 Bug ID: 1048134 Summary: decode_utf8() returns gibberish on non-string value Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: perl-Encode Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter:

[perl-Encode/f20] Stringify all decode_utf8() arguments

commit b913bedacd9ab81cded5fc1f4b9f3c32582e9c54 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 3 10:38:39 2014 +0100 Stringify all decode_utf8() arguments ...-2.54-Stringify-all-decode_utf8-arguments.patch | 64 perl-Encode.spec

[perl-Encode/f19] Stringify all decode_utf8() arguments

commit 8a874f25ceb51c1cb8081e6f1131ccff88f4d3c5 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 3 10:38:39 2014 +0100 Stringify all decode_utf8() arguments ...-2.54-Stringify-all-decode_utf8-arguments.patch | 64 perl-Encode.spec

[Bug 1048134] decode_utf8() returns gibberish on non-string value

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048134 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Encode-2.54-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Encode-2.54-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1048134] decode_utf8() returns gibberish on non-string value

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048134 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Encode-2.54-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Encode-2.54-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1047691] perl-Term-UI-0.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047691 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1048152] New: perl-Test-Prereq-1.038 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048152 Bug ID: 1048152 Summary: perl-Test-Prereq-1.038 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Prereq Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1046009] Resolution setting not migrated from 0.9.10 to 1.0.0RC1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046009 --- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- Are you satisfied with upstream explanation, or you want me to dig deeper? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

File Term-UI-0.42.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Term-UI: cc9465134bcb923d65ac1f190d21b04f Term-UI-0.42.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Term-UI] 0.42 bump

commit 3a9c8e7fab7b354f1d26c7604a095c9b46dc261e Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 3 11:20:56 2014 +0100 0.42 bump .gitignore|1 + perl-Term-UI.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp:

[Bug 1046009] Resolution setting not migrated from 0.9.10 to 1.0.0RC1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046009 Neil Darlow n...@darlow.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1047691] perl-Term-UI-0.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047691 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1013249] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013249 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[perl-Module-ScanDeps] 1.13 bump

commit 4473a5cbef3b484bf3f1f4022e9495ff3ad15167 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 3 13:08:26 2014 +0100 1.13 bump .rpmlint |2 ++ perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec | 11 ++- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2

[Bug 1013249] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013249 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

File Perl-Critic-Tics-0.008.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Tics: 7de444a2810ebd1c8ca476b09956e504 Perl-Critic-Tics-0.008.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Perl-Critic-Tics] 0.008 bump

commit 3e9fd43b537b7be5ec1811db5348aca791a56f1a Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Jan 3 13:56:12 2014 +0100 0.008 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Perl-Critic-Tics.spec |9 + sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5

[Bug 1047216] perl-Perl-Critic-Tics-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047216 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[perl-Perl-Critic-Tics/f20] 0.008 bump

Summary of changes: 3e9fd43... 0.008 bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1047216] perl-Perl-Critic-Tics-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047216 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Perl-Critic-Tics-0.008-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl-Critic-Tics-0.008-1.fc20 -- You are

[Bug 1046009] Resolution setting not migrated from 0.9.10 to 1.0.0RC1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046009 --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- Feel free to propose that upstream, I have the same opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

File 1.0.0RC2.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by churchyard

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for slic3r: 4d17d404ec09b71d75f92ccca8c7ee6d 1.0.0RC2.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[slic3r] 1.0.0RC2

commit 228bba06b76a879081eb106d8c744cfeebe746ef Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz Date: Fri Jan 3 15:50:05 2014 +0100 1.0.0RC2 .gitignore |1 + slic3r-1543.patch | 104 --- slic3r-1545.patch | 116

[perl-HTML-FormFu] update to 1.00

commit 383829f2fb0be39a61b8ab5a4f05fa90885d5941 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Jan 3 07:56:33 2014 -0700 update to 1.00 .gitignore|1 + perl-HTML-FormFu.spec | 13 +++-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7

File HTML-FormFu-1.00.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-FormFu: 2ffa8dabaf659f98dccdaa88b9c877c1 HTML-FormFu-1.00.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[slic3r/f20] 1.0.0RC2

Summary of changes: 228bba0... 1.0.0RC2 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1046006] Slicing a .stl file fails if multiple threads are configured

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006 --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- Here is a scratch build of slic3r 1.0.0RC. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6353379 Could you please test, if it crashes for you too, when doing a quick slice with 2+

[Bug 1046006] Slicing a .stl file fails if multiple threads are configured

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006 --- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- I meant slic3r 1.0.0RC2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

File Convert-Color-0.10.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by corsepiu

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Convert-Color: 7531a59e7c0c88ba47062fe7eabe18c8 Convert-Color-0.10.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Convert-Color] Upstream update.

commit 5cc1f65bbb6d98863833be942d5b16f78c8e28c3 Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Fri Jan 3 17:43:26 2014 +0100 Upstream update. .gitignore |2 +- perl-Convert-Color.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7

[perl-Convert-Color/f20] Upstream update.

Summary of changes: 5cc1f65... Upstream update. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Convert-Color/f19: 4/4] Merge cleanup.

commit bc5528a0b9576e2a175df478d6d7b7f8c55f9e5a Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Fri Jan 3 17:47:59 2014 +0100 Merge cleanup. perl-Convert-Color.spec |6 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Convert-Color.spec

[perl-Convert-Color/f19] (4 commits) ...Merge cleanup.

Summary of changes: d08bfc7... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*) 6169084... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*) 5cc1f65... Upstream update. (*) bc5528a... Merge cleanup. (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1048316] New: missing dependency

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048316 Bug ID: 1048316 Summary: missing dependency Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Component: perl-Mail-Box Severity: medium Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1046006] Slicing a .stl file fails if multiple threads are configured

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006 --- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- Thanks for testing it. In the meantime, as a workaround, I recommend you either add the STL to the plater and use Export GCODE button, or if you want to be really quick, use command

[Bug 1048324] New: Reference to perl (5.18.1-288.fc20.x86_64) utf8 string is Invalid Argument to open

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048324 Bug ID: 1048324 Summary: Reference to perl (5.18.1-288.fc20.x86_64) utf8 string is Invalid Argument to open Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: perl Severity:

[Bug 1046006] Slicing a .stl file fails if multiple threads are configured

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006 --- Comment #7 from Neil Darlow n...@darlow.co.uk --- My desktop is a 3.3GHz 64-bit dual-core machine. I can live with just one thread for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this

File Role-Basic-0.13.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by corsepiu

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Role-Basic: 2985fbb47bd0a862bd56bc7cbba6e673 Role-Basic-0.13.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Role-Basic] Initial import.

commit 64e1b8a669a10f20c0e0d530aceba58e50459ed0 Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Sat Jan 4 05:12:49 2014 +0100 Initial import. .gitignore |1 + perl-Role-Basic.spec | 50 ++ sources |1

[perl-Role-Basic/f20] Initial import.

Summary of changes: 64e1b8a... Initial import. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Role-Basic/f19] Initial import.

Summary of changes: 64e1b8a... Initial import. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [389-devel] Please review (tests) 47628: port test cases to new DirSrv interface

Hi Everybody! First of all Happy New Year, hope it will be filled of fun! I am really sorry for not supporting you for so long, but as I told you I can't still spend too much extra-work time coding :(. I saw the evolution of the library and I'm glad of the new functionalities and the split-up

Re: [389-devel] Please review (tests) 47628: port test cases to new DirSrv interface

Hello Roberto, Thanks, I also wish you an happy new year and you recover well. It is great to talk to you again :-) . I am quite novice with python and my first approach was to use it as a real object oriented language, having instances of everything (suffix, MT, replica,

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47653 - Need a way to allow users to create entries assigned to themselves

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47653 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47653/0001-Ticket-47653-Need-a-way-to-allow-users-to-create-ent.patch -- Mark Reynolds 389 Development Team Red Hat, Inc mreyno...@redhat.com -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #47571: targetattr ACIs ignore subtype

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47571 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47571/0001-Ticket-47571-targetattr-ACIs-ignore-subtype.patch Description: Subtypes in targetattr, userattr in aci as well as filter and attribute list in the search are supported. * If targetattr