Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/12/2015 03:21 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > But if we're in a situation where we are just killing ourselves > shoehorning upstream's mess of bundled requirements into rpms and > their response is just 'well just run "pip install foo" and be done > with it', I think it's time to just let

Rpmbuild SPEC file - variable declaration

When declaring a variable value, I wonder if the any difference/best practice between these methods: export VAR=MyValue %{define} VAR MyValue %{global} VAR MyValue Thank you for hints. -- google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

On 09/09/2015 10:10 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: > I retired ScientificPython as it does require an older numpy and doesn't > build anytime soon with the current numpy and will be FTBFS for a longer > time [1]. How did you retire it? It doesn't appear to be blocked in koji for some reason and

Re: Rpmbuild SPEC file - variable declaration

I might add that fedora-review could be run on local spec + srpm and will warn you about these kinds of things. H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Rpmbuild SPEC file - variable declaration

Am 13.09.2015 um 15:39 schrieb arnaud gaboury: On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: arnaud gaboury wrote: When declaring a variable value, I wonder if the any difference/best practice between these methods: export VAR=MyValue %{define} VAR MyValue

F-23 Branched report: 20150913 changes

Compose started at Sun Sep 13 07:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [ScientificPython] ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.armv7hl requires libmpi.so.1 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Am 13.09.2015 um 10:16 schrieb Andrew Haley: I remember the time before free software distros like Fedora: it was chaotic, with messes of bundles and contradictory dependencies from all over the place, with no reliable tools for finding things. Relying on the upstream ecosystem's way of

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sex, 2015-09-11 at 22:41 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > > > On 09/11/2015 09:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > What does Fedora users gain with "dnf > > > install rails" or "dnf install ipython" versus "gem

Re: F21: fedora-easy-karma / bodhi / updates testing / kf5-baloo

Am 29.08.2015 um 13:16 schrieb Till Hofmann: On 08/29/2015 06:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 16:27 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: bodhi2 at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ is unusable for testers because the search field seeks for users, no idea how to get to the current

Re: Rpmbuild SPEC file - variable declaration

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 13.09.2015 um 15:39 schrieb arnaud gaboury: >> >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> >>> arnaud gaboury wrote: >>> When declaring a variable value, I wonder if

Re: Rpmbuild SPEC file - variable declaration

On Sep 13, 2015 4:07 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: > > > > Am 13.09.2015 um 16:01 schrieb arnaud gaboury: >> >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: export CFFLAGS= '-xHost -mavx -fp-model precise' %configure

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-13 10:16 GMT+02:00 Andrew Haley : > > The development model followed by much of the upstream world is > immature: it may not even be repeatable, let alone well-defined. > Shoehorning upstream's mess of bundled requirements is a very useful > service that we can provide to

Re: Rpmbuild SPEC file - variable declaration

Am 13.09.2015 um 16:01 schrieb arnaud gaboury: On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: export CFFLAGS= '-xHost -mavx -fp-model precise' %configure CFFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS ; \ Is above the the best way? no *

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Sex, 2015-09-11 at 22:41 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > On 09/11/2015 09:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > What does Fedora users gain with "dnf > > install rails" or "dnf install ipython" versus "gem install rails" and "pip > > install ipython"? > > This indeed is very good

rawhide report: 20150913 changes

Compose started at Sun Sep 13 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 [ScientificPython]

Re: Rpmbuild SPEC file - variable declaration

arnaud gaboury wrote: > When declaring a variable value, I wonder if the any difference/best > practice between these methods: > > export VAR=MyValue > %{define} VAR MyValue > %{global} VAR MyValue best practice is to use global, it is explicitly mentioned here:

Re: Rpmbuild SPEC file - variable declaration

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > arnaud gaboury wrote: > >> When declaring a variable value, I wonder if the any difference/best >> practice between these methods: >> >> export VAR=MyValue >> %{define} VAR MyValue >> %{global} VAR MyValue > > best

[Test-Announce] 2015-09-14 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2015-09-14 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's QA meeting time again! I don't really have a lot for the agenda, but we haven't met for a

Re: No autocomplete for new package in bodhi 2.0?

On 13/09/15 19:02, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:15:24 -0700 Dave Johansen wrote: I just finished the review for cppformat ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279 ) and went to submit the updates. I noticed that bodhi 2.0 won't autocomplete

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 2015-09-13, 13:13 GMT, Haïkel wrote: > But, distros have lost the influence they used to have then, we're in the > cloud/container era where people bundle everything ... And they won't retake it by giving up. Then they will just give ammunition to the idiots persuading them they are right. >

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 09:53:27AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > == Advantages to using shared libraries == > * Security/Bugs - When a bug or security vulnerability is located in > a library, it needs to be patched in only a single package in order to > fix all applications using that

Re: No autocomplete for new package in bodhi 2.0?

On Sun, 2015-09-13 at 19:28 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > Normally you're right, but if the package has only just been created > then it doesn't work. I assume bodhi catches up eventually but there > is > definitely a delay when a new package is created during which bodhi > won't find it and you

Fedora Rawhide 20150913 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde Live i386 Cloud base Disk i386 Cloud base Disk x86_64 Kde Live x86_64 Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Kde Disk armhfp Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150912: Security Live x86_64 Security Live i386 No images in Rawhide 20150912 but not this. Failed openQA tests:

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-13 20:40 GMT+02:00 Matěj Cepl : > On 2015-09-13, 13:13 GMT, Haïkel wrote: >> But, distros have lost the influence they used to have then, we're in the >> cloud/container era where people bundle everything ... > > And they won't retake it by giving up. Then they will just

Re: No autocomplete for new package in bodhi 2.0?

On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:15:24 -0700 Dave Johansen wrote: > I just finished the review for cppformat ( > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279 ) and went to > submit the updates. I noticed that bodhi 2.0 won't autocomplete the > names of updates. I believe

Fedora 23 Branched 20150913 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Cloud base Disk i386 No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150912 No images in 23 Branched 20150912 but not this. -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mailing

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 2015-09-13, 20:23 GMT, Haïkel wrote: > The Java world is definitively not moving in the right direction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Module_System is IMHO The Right Thing™ and it is still on the list of deliverables for Java 9 (still to be feature complete on 2015-12-10). > Recently,

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:30:13 +0200, you wrote: >On 2015-09-13, 20:23 GMT, Haïkel wrote: >> The Java world is definitively not moving in the right direction. > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Module_System is IMHO The >Right Thing™ and it is still on the list of deliverables for >Java 9

Broken dependencies: polymake

polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2 polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Test-AutoBuild

perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp:

eseyman pushed to perl-MooseX-App-Cmd (master). "Update to 0.32"

From 62f7504e424e86ef0fa3ec294eb4847a7c7d0acc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:11:13 +0200 Subject: Update to 0.32 diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index f415cc7..1e6b902 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@

Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-BeginLift

perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386:

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Method-Signatures

perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On i386: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV

perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-FindRef

perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686

Broken dependencies: perl-Test-AutoBuild

perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-POE-API-Peek

perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer

perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386:

Broken dependencies: polymake

polymake has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2 polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires

[Bug 1259962] perl-Email-Sender-1.300020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259962 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1259392] perl-MooseX-LogDispatch-1.2002-12.fc24 FTBFS: test fail with recent perl-Log-Dispatch

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259392 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1259396] perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch-0.02-18.fc24 FTBFS: tests fail with recent perl-Log-Dispatch

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259396 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-FindRef

perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686

Broken dependencies: perl-Method-Signatures

perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On i386: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV

perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer

perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386:

Broken dependencies: perl-POE-API-Peek

perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-BeginLift

perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386:

[Bug 1261760] perl-MooseX-App-Cmd-0.31-3.fc24 FTBFS: Failed test 'Internal hashes match'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261760 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

eseyman uploaded MooseX-App-Cmd-0.32.tar.gz for perl-MooseX-App-Cmd

3499156dc87db7f6399ab8194bf0a3c1 MooseX-App-Cmd-0.32.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd/MooseX-App-Cmd-0.32.tar.gz/md5/3499156dc87db7f6399ab8194bf0a3c1/MooseX-App-Cmd-0.32.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

eseyman pushed to bugzilla (master). "Update to 4.4.10"

From 514ce27a8bce37317b54b4288e0149964e040171 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 17:24:00 +0200 Subject: Update to 4.4.10 diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index d638e66..b874aa5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -22,3 +22,4 @@

[Bug 1262611] New: perl-Parse-RecDescent-1.967011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262611 Bug ID: 1262611 Summary: perl-Parse-RecDescent-1.967011 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Parse-RecDescent Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1262611] perl-Parse-RecDescent-1.967011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262611 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Failed to kick off scratch build. cmd: sha256sum /var/tmp/thn-H5gKbo/100.0% return code: 1 stdout: stderr: sha256sum:

eseyman uploaded bugzilla-4.4.10.tar.gz for bugzilla

c0490b7461a0d6520d118c720e1c3f37 bugzilla-4.4.10.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/bugzilla/bugzilla-4.4.10.tar.gz/md5/c0490b7461a0d6520d118c720e1c3f37/bugzilla-4.4.10.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing

eseyman pushed to bugzilla (f22). "Update to 4.4.10"

From bf7541ddc4cb49c23e9ce066c89afef8f88c569b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 17:24:00 +0200 Subject: Update to 4.4.10 diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index d638e66..b874aa5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -22,3 +22,4 @@

eseyman pushed to bugzilla (f23). "Update to 4.4.10"

From a3b8de1c1aa78ce44fad3667b564f8b41c2d38e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 17:24:00 +0200 Subject: Update to 4.4.10 diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index d638e66..b874aa5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -22,3 +22,4 @@

Fedora 23 Beta Freeze

Hi all, Tuesday was an important day on the Fedora 23 schedule[1], with two significant cut-offs. Tuesday was the Beta freeze[2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Beta composes. Other builds

eseyman pushed to bugzilla (f21). "Update to 4.4.10"

From e59bfd5003389db2f9fa34337bcf1625af6def4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 17:24:00 +0200 Subject: Update to 4.4.10 diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index d638e66..b874aa5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -22,3 +22,4 @@

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 305 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989 cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1 189 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 85

[Bug 1262405] CVE-2015-4499 bugzilla: Email address is not properly validated during registration [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262405 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- bugzilla-4.4.10-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15767 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1262611] perl-Parse-RecDescent-1.967012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262611 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1262611] perl-Parse-RecDescent-1.967012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262611 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Failed to kick off scratch build. cmd: sha256sum /var/tmp/thn-FrDseZ/100.0% return code: 1 stdout: stderr: sha256sum:

[Bug 1262405] CVE-2015-4499 bugzilla: Email address is not properly validated during registration [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262405 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 1262405] CVE-2015-4499 bugzilla: Email address is not properly validated during registration [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262405 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- bugzilla-4.4.10-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15769 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1166064] CVE-2012-6662 jquery-ui: XSS vulnerability in default content in Tooltip widget

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166064 Kurt Seifried changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|impact=moderate,public=2012

[Bug 1166064] CVE-2012-6662 jquery-ui: XSS vulnerability in default content in Tooltip widget

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166064 Kurt Seifried changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|impact=moderate,public=2012

2015-09-14 @ 14:00 UTC - Fedora QA Devel Meeting

# Fedora QA Devel Meeting # Date: 2015-09-14 # Time: 14:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net The last meeting seemed to go well, so let's continue the format. Please put noteworthy accomplishments under the status update