Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Am 14.09.2015 um 12:41 schrieb Vít Ondruch: Dne 11.9.2015 v 23:09 Orion Poplawski napsal(a): What does Fedora users gain with "dnf install rails" or "dnf install ipython" versus "gem install rails" and "pip install ipython"? Easier installation of packages with binary extensions? RubyGems

Re: Need the i686 rpms for plugins in the x86_64 repo

Alejandro Alvarez Ayllon wrote: > Hello, > > A couple of packages I [co-]maintain are heavily plugin-based, and those > plugins are installed under /usr/lib(64)//, while the core > libraries are installed into /usr/lib(64) > > Then, there are other projects that have their own set of libraries,

Re: rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:03:13 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > %build > > mkdir %{buildroot}/etc/R > > I already tried this method, with no sucess. Finally, after a close > look at my SPEC file, I found one $ which has to be moved to % (I > rewrote my file trying to use the conventional % for

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/13/2015 09:23 PM, Haïkel wrote: > I'm not speaking about PHP, most of the upstream I deal with > are python developers. Bad habits are rather spreading than > regressing. We're not going to solve that problem by adopting bad habits ourselves. Andrew. -- devel mailing list

Re: rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

On 09/14/2015 09:52 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > For some practical reason, I want sysconfdir to be /etc/R, and not the > default /etc This will break quite a few RPM macros. Why, exactly, do you want to do this? -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security -- devel mailing list

Re: rpmbuild SPEC file - shared library path

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 14/09/15 12:00 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> >> I build my app with shared libraries. In my spec file, I source a >> script which export LD_LIBRARY_PATH. >> Below is how I proceed in my spec file: >> >>

F-23 Branched report: 20150914 changes

Compose started at Mon Sep 14 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [ScientificPython] ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.armv7hl requires libmpi.so.1 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-14 13:17 GMT+02:00 Andrew Haley : > On 09/13/2015 09:23 PM, Haïkel wrote: >> I'm not speaking about PHP, most of the upstream I deal with >> are python developers. Bad habits are rather spreading than >> regressing. > > We're not going to solve that problem by adopting bad

Re: rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 09/14/2015 09:52 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> For some practical reason, I want sysconfdir to be /etc/R, and not the >> default /etc > > This will break quite a few RPM macros. Why, exactly, do you want to do > this?

Re: rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

arnaud gaboury wrote: > %configure > --sysconfdir=/etc/R Add \ at the end of line to continue, ie, use instead: %configure \ --sysconfdir=/etc/R (or put it all on one line). -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rpmbuild SPEC file - shared library path

On 14/09/15 12:00 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: I build my app with shared libraries. In my spec file, I source a script which export LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Below is how I proceed in my spec file: %global _prod_dir /opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016/linux

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-14 12:45 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald : > > > > and much more important: > > if Fedora changes to more and more recommend "pip", "gem" and "cpan" like > installs instead RPM packages it is no longer a distribution over the long > because that would mean finally you have

rawhide report: 20150914 changes

Compose started at Mon Sep 14 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 [ScientificPython]

Re: rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

On 09/14/2015 02:20 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:03 PM, arnaud gaboury > wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> On 09/14/2015 09:52 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: For some practical reason, I

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

On 09/14/2015 08:28 AM, Thomas Spura wrote: > Kalev Lember > > schrieb am So., 13. Sep. 2015 um 13:37 Uhr: > > On 09/09/2015 10:10 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: > > I retired ScientificPython as it does require an older numpy and >

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Dne 11.9.2015 v 23:09 Orion Poplawski napsal(a): > What does Fedora users gain with "dnf install rails" or "dnf install > ipython" versus "gem install rails" and "pip install ipython"? Easier installation of packages with binary extensions? RubyGems can't specify dependencies on system libraries,

Re: rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:03:13 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > >> > %build >> > mkdir %{buildroot}/etc/R >> >> I already tried this method, with no sucess. Finally, after a close >> look at my SPEC file, I found one $

Re: rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:03 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 09/14/2015 09:52 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: >>> For some practical reason, I want sysconfdir to be /etc/R, and not the >>> default

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 13:56, Haïkel wrote: > 2015-09-14 13:17 GMT+02:00 Andrew Haley : > > On 09/13/2015 09:23 PM, Haïkel wrote: > >> I'm not speaking about PHP, most of the upstream I deal with > >> are python developers. Bad habits are rather spreading than > >>

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 04:34 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> How do you propose to resolve symbol conflicts if both the system >> library and the bundled library are loaded into the same process? The >> current ELF linking scheme lacks good support for bundling libraries >> whose exported symbols have not

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 16:54 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 12 September 2015 at 04:10, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > I agree that the discussion here needs to be more broad-based; see > > the > > other thread fork. I was just providing support for Stephen's > >

Packaging guidelines for documentation clairfication needed

While working through a package review[1] this excerpt from the documentation section[2] was brought to my attention: "Marking a *relative* path with %doc in the %files section will cause RPM to copy the referenced file or directory from %_builddir to the proper location for documentation. Files

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting September, 14th 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued) - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued) - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 20:46 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > On 09/11/2015 08:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > We certainly agree on that. > > > > > > which has already been > > > > answered by the board. > > > > ( people will first debate where to draw the line if that > > > >

Fedora 23 Beta Release Readiness Meeting on Thursday, September 17th

This Thursday, we will meet on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Beta release of Fedora 23 on Tuesday, September 22, 2015. Please note that this meeting will occur even if the release is delayed at the Go/No-Go meeting on the same day two hours

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/14/2015 07:08 AM, Josef Stribny wrote: On 09/12/2015 12:41 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 09/11/2015 09:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: What does Fedora users gain with "dnf install rails" or "dnf install ipython" versus "gem install rails" and "pip install ipython"? This

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting September, 14th 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 14.09.2015 15:33, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > > - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued) > - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued) > - define the minimal install (continued) > - define the docker base image (continued) > - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) > -

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 14 packages were orphaned - ScientificPython [f22, f21] was orphaned by kevin A collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-14 14:38 GMT+02:00 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski : > > This case doesn't automatically mean that we should allow bundling. > Especially, if there are multiple consumers of the library in question. > A recent example is kwsys, which is bundled in every project

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 16:54 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 12 September 2015 at 04:10, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > I agree that the discussion here needs to be more broad-based; see > > the > > other thread fork. I was just providing support for Stephen's > >

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 10:13 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > We also haven't established any kind of migration plan between the > two > repositories. In the darktable example, one of the reasons we ended > up > going back to the FPC and re-requesting an exception was that we > don't > have any

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 17:55 +0200, Haïkel wrote: > > New bundling exception could be granted automatically in cases > > where: > > * the bundled code is not packaged in Fedora yet > > * no other Fedora package bundles it already > > > > Interesting idea, unbundling on demand. > > I may ask

perl-libintl-1.24-1.fc24 license change

perl-libintl-1.24-1.fc24 changed license from (LGPLv2+) to (GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+). -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 12:45 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > and much more important: > > if Fedora changes to more and more recommend "pip", "gem" and "cpan" > like installs instead RPM packages it is no longer a distribution > over > the long because that would mean finally you have a core OS

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 14 September 2015 at 10:43, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson >> wrote: >>> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 10:13 -0400, Stephen

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 10:13 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> We also haven't established any kind of migration plan between the >> two >> repositories. In the darktable example, one of the reasons we ended

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 11:09 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > What we haven't managed to do yet is update the package review > > > process > > > to better account for the distinction, such as by adopting a > > > "COPR > > > first" model, where folks put a package up in COPR with bundled > > >

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/14/2015 09:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 16:54 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> On 12 September 2015 at 04:10, Adam Williamson >> wrote: >>> I agree that the discussion here needs to be more broad-based; see >>> the >>> other thread fork. I

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 14 September 2015 at 10:43, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 10:13 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >>> We also haven't established any kind of migration plan

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 20:38:58 +0200, you wrote: >> There is a reason that the Atomic / CoreOS idea combined with Docker >> is gaining traction, and it is because it deals with the reality of >> dealing with software whose dependencies don't work in the traditional >> distribution world > >so i

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On 09/07/2015 05:21 AM, Miloslav Trmac wrote: 2015-09-02 23:24 GMT+02:00 Brendan Conoboy >: [blc] >> 5. Ring membership is at the source package level, not the binary >> package. If one source package's binary/noarch sub-package is in ring

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On 09/07/2015 05:34 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 2.9.2015 v 20:59 Brendan Conoboy napsal(a): 5. Ring membership is at the source package level, not the binary package. If one source package's binary/noarch sub-package is in ring 0, all sub-packages are in ring 0. So we are going to include

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On 09/07/2015 06:52 AM, Miloslav Trmac wrote: [snip] Oh I’m not at all suggesting that the Fedora universe should not be self-hosting, or that this self-hosting property should not be regularly verified by mass rebuilds or the like. I just wanted to say that that having various /subsets/ of the

Installation of symlinks - should wrapper scripts be used instead?

I maintain the cross-binutils and cross-gcc packages. These produce powerpc64 subpackages with binaries in. However, since I was asked to provide support for ppc64-linux-gnu-x in addition to powerpc64-linux-gnu-x commands, I provide symlink rpms for the ppc64 name that link to the former name.

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 21:35, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:38:55PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > New bundling exception could be granted automatically in cases where: > > * the bundled code is not packaged in Fedora yet > > * no other Fedora

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On 09/07/2015 06:42 AM, Ian Malone wrote: On 7 September 2015 at 13:21, Miloslav Trmac wrote: Also, it seems to me that it would be useful to, at least conceptually, to not think about Fedora as a self-hosting perpetual motion^Wrecompilation machine, but as “just another

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > ... > > To allow or not allow bundling is the small side point here - the questions > should be more of "Are we a distribution of packages? Are we an OS? Where > do we see the distribution/OS fit in how software is

Re: Packaging guidelines for documentation clairfication needed

On 09/14/2015 04:13 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: While working through a package review[1] this excerpt from the documentation section[2] was brought to my attention: "Marking a /relative/ path with |%doc| in the |%files| section will cause RPM to copy the referenced file or directory from

Bugzilla upgrade on 2015-09-20

I'm resending this announcement and FAQ from the bugzilla-announce list as it will be of interest to Fedora Developers and users. A Upgrade FAQ is available at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/docs/bugzilla-upgrade-faq.html And the announcement post is:

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/12/2015 12:41 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 09/11/2015 09:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: What does Fedora users gain with "dnf install rails" or "dnf install ipython" versus "gem install rails" and "pip install ipython"? This indeed is very good question. I'm not sure how

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 17:24 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > I don't believe this is the pip package maintainer's fault, I believe > it's due to the fact that our processes for updating packages are far > too manual and thus require significant amounts of additional work > following even a backwards

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 12 September 2015 at 04:10, Adam Williamson wrote: > I agree that the discussion here needs to be more broad-based; see the > other thread fork. I was just providing support for Stephen's > contention that this is not some airy-fairy theoretical problem, there > are

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 14 September 2015 at 00:05, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sex, 2015-09-11 at 22:41 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: >> >> On 09/11/2015 09:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> > What does Fedora users gain with "dnf >> > install rails" or "dnf install ipython" versus "gem install

rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

For some practical reason, I want sysconfdir to be /etc/R, and not the default /etc Here is what I did: %build . mkdir -p {_builddir}/R-%{version}/etc/R . %configure --sysconfdir=/etc/R .. make throw me an error: --sysconfdir=/etc/R: No such file or directory $ ls

Re: rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 09:52 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > For some practical reason, I want sysconfdir to be /etc/R, and not > the > default /etc > > Here is what I did: > > %build > . > mkdir -p {_builddir}/R-%{version}/etc/R > . > %configure > --sysconfdir=/etc/R > .. >

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:45:13 +0200, you wrote: >if Fedora changes to more and more recommend "pip", "gem" and "cpan" >like installs instead RPM packages it is no longer a distribution over >the long because that would mean finally you have a core OS and handle >anything else like Microsoft or

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Am 14.09.2015 um 20:31 schrieb Gerald Henriksen: On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:45:13 +0200, you wrote: if Fedora changes to more and more recommend "pip", "gem" and "cpan" like installs instead RPM packages it is no longer a distribution over the long because that would mean finally you have a core

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:38:55PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > New bundling exception could be granted automatically in cases where: > * the bundled code is not packaged in Fedora yet > * no other Fedora package bundles it already > However, the above puts the burden of

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 07:51 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Dne 10.9.2015 v 15:53 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): >> * Increases the available pool of software that can be packaged >> substantially (many modern languages such as Ruby and Go are >>

Re: Resources for upstream testing?

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Dave Love wrote: > Dave Johansen writes: > > >> We do have docker images that can be used [0] - but we currently don't > >> have a user friendly way to find them. You currently have to look > >> through koji to find

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Am 14.09.2015 um 20:50 schrieb Adam Williamson: On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 20:38 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: It's not a case of whether anyone here wants to go down that road or not, because we are already there. There is a reason that the Atomic / CoreOS idea combined with Docker is gaining

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 20:57 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > Um. But weren't you just saying: > > > > "if Fedora changes to more and more recommend "pip", "gem" and > > "cpan" > > like installs instead RPM packages it is no longer a distribution > > over > > the long because that would mean finally

Fedora Rawhide 20150914 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde Live i386 Cloud base Disk i386 Cloud base Disk x86_64 Kde Live x86_64 Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Kde Disk armhfp No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150913 No images in Rawhide 20150913 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 18 of 23 ID: 2332Test: x86_64

Recommendations for bisecting a test failure?

I'm working on packaging hgsubversion ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 ) and I've run into some test failures on F23/Rawhide that seem to be caused by the update to subversion 1.9.0. Upstream has recommended that I try and bisect the source of the failure (

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Am 14.09.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Adam Williamson: On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 20:57 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Um. But weren't you just saying: "if Fedora changes to more and more recommend "pip", "gem" and "cpan" like installs instead RPM packages it is no longer a distribution over the long

Fedora 23 Branched 20150914 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Cloud base Disk i386 No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150913 No images in 23 Branched 20150913 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 24 of 46 ID: 2403Test: i386 generic_boot default_install ID: 2398Test: i386

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

Kalev Lember schrieb am So., 13. Sep. 2015 um 13:37 Uhr: > On 09/09/2015 10:10 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: > > I retired ScientificPython as it does require an older numpy and doesn't > > build anytime soon with the current numpy and will be FTBFS for a longer > > time [1]. >

Re: rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:04 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 09:52 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > For some practical reason, I want sysconfdir to be /etc/R, and not > > the > > default /etc > > > > Here is what I did: > > > > %build > > . > >

Re: rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 14.09.2015 um 10:15 schrieb arnaud gaboury: >> >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:04 AM Adam Williamson >> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at

Need the i686 rpms for plugins in the x86_64 repo

Hello, A couple of packages I [co-]maintain are heavily plugin-based, and those plugins are installed under /usr/lib(64)//, while the core libraries are installed into /usr/lib(64) Then, there are other projects that have their own set of libraries, depend on the core libraries, and also

Fedora 23 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting on Thursday, September 17th

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 23 Beta. Please follow the [FedoCal] link to find the time of the meeting in your time-zone. [FedoCal]

Re: rpmbuild - change sysconfdir

Am 14.09.2015 um 10:15 schrieb arnaud gaboury: On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:04 AM Adam Williamson > wrote: On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 09:52 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > For some practical reason, I want sysconfdir to be

rpmbuild SPEC file - shared library path

I build my app with shared libraries. In my spec file, I source a script which export LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Below is how I proceed in my spec file: %global _prod_dir /opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016/linux %global _mklroot_dir %{_prod_dir}/mkl %global

[Bug 1230534] Upgrade perl-Crypt-PWSafe3 to 1.21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230534 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

ppisar uploaded Crypt-PWSafe3-1.21.tar.gz for perl-Crypt-PWSafe3

4f770e04dee6b423281bafdf7a8b0f49 Crypt-PWSafe3-1.21.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Crypt-PWSafe3/Crypt-PWSafe3-1.21.tar.gz/md5/4f770e04dee6b423281bafdf7a8b0f49/Crypt-PWSafe3-1.21.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

[Bug 1230534] Upgrade perl-Crypt-PWSafe3 to 1.21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230534 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1231077] Upgrade perl-Time-Period to 1.25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231077 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

ppisar pushed to perl-File-LibMagic (master). "1.13 bump"

From 9b6f65412f19d5ff3d45fb580652345baa6b72a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:40:27 +0200 Subject: 1.13 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 275b736..0b08a1f 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@

[Bug 1262578] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150912 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262578 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150912-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15802 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1256166] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150820 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256166 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150912-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15802 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1231082] Upgrade perl-Unicode-LineBreak to 2014.06

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231082 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1262785

ppisar uploaded Data-Password-1.12.tar.gz for perl-Data-Password

895e429d8374aacbb67c153dae6ca418 Data-Password-1.12.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Data-Password/Data-Password-1.12.tar.gz/md5/895e429d8374aacbb67c153dae6ca418/Data-Password-1.12.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

ppisar pushed to perl-File-LibMagic (master). "ExtUtils::CBuilder needed for Config::AutoConf to handle C language"

From f8a93e73d539048060baa0729df75809e3236a70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:17:49 +0200 Subject: ExtUtils::CBuilder needed for Config::AutoConf to handle C language diff --git a/perl-File-LibMagic.spec

[Bug 1230583] Upgrade perl-File-LibMagic to 1.12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230583 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

ppisar pushed to perl-Data-Password (master). "1.12 bump"

From 3f3db7cacb893961d187844995a98e2a28b6109b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:40:26 +0200 Subject: 1.12 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index f9f0f1c..8e02cf4 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1

jplesnik pushed to perl-Time-Period (master). "1.25 bump"

From 6dc3e0d0323665ac6476ee8aa97b01bb690a3f6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:07:38 +0200 Subject: 1.25 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 81c773f..5e35a65 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@

Re: [389-devel] please review: Ticket #47761 - Added a few testcases to the basic testsuite

Hi team, please, review my patch. :) On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:32:22AM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote: > https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47761 > > https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47761/0001-Ticket-47761-Added-a-few-testcases-to-the-basic-test.patch > -- > 389-devel mailing

ppisar uploaded File-LibMagic-1.13.tar.gz for perl-File-LibMagic

bbc0d525950aab95be42efd418b7c334 File-LibMagic-1.13.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-File-LibMagic/File-LibMagic-1.13.tar.gz/md5/bbc0d525950aab95be42efd418b7c334/File-LibMagic-1.13.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

[Bug 1262578] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150912 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262578 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150912-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15801 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1230553] Upgrade perl-Data-Password to 1.12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230553 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

jplesnik uploaded Time-Period-1.25.tar.gz for perl-Time-Period

92f33afda0f440be7335a163ac246ab1 Time-Period-1.25.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Time-Period/Time-Period-1.25.tar.gz/md5/92f33afda0f440be7335a163ac246ab1/Time-Period-1.25.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

ppisar uploaded File-LibMagic-1.12.tar.gz for perl-File-LibMagic

817bcbc86708f3f7618b69771d75a855 File-LibMagic-1.12.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-File-LibMagic/File-LibMagic-1.12.tar.gz/md5/817bcbc86708f3f7618b69771d75a855/File-LibMagic-1.12.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

pghmcfc uploaded Math-BigInt-GMP-1.41.tar.gz for perl-Math-BigInt-GMP

1fcb8850e926a6fd6285cdb410e078b6 Math-BigInt-GMP-1.41.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP/Math-BigInt-GMP-1.41.tar.gz/md5/1fcb8850e926a6fd6285cdb410e078b6/Math-BigInt-GMP-1.41.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

ppisar pushed to perl-Crypt-PWSafe3 (master). "1.21 bump"

From 44e05e20d77a604688a0b324dd3c3ba91562f6b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:25:34 +0200 Subject: 1.21 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 5f72a73..8586aae 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1

[Bug 1230553] Upgrade perl-Data-Password to 1.12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230553 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1262820] perl-Tree-R-0.072 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262820 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Failed to kick off scratch build. cmd: sha256sum /var/tmp/thn-Mz2X4H/100.0% return code: 1 stdout: stderr: sha256sum:

[Bug 1262820] New: perl-Tree-R-0.072 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262820 Bug ID: 1262820 Summary: perl-Tree-R-0.072 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Tree-R Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: dd...@cpan.org

[Bug 1230583] Upgrade perl-File-LibMagic to 1.12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230583 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1230589] Upgrade Flickr-Upload to 1.4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230589 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

ppisar uploaded Flickr-Upload-1.5.tar.gz for perl-Flickr-Upload

0cc5af18cf1d103f2c4b1d3659170300 Flickr-Upload-1.5.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Flickr-Upload/Flickr-Upload-1.5.tar.gz/md5/0cc5af18cf1d103f2c4b1d3659170300/Flickr-Upload-1.5.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

  1   2   >