On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of
> their applications if possible. They *may* keep standard RPM
> packaging.
At least we see where this is going.
If RPMs of the graphical application
Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg
new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error
message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do
anything until I kill it ...
I can't pin down the exact date it stopped working (since I
Hello:
Fabio Valentini wrote on 07/14/2017 06:04 PM:
Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg
new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error
message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do
anything until I kill it ...
I
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-07-14 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below
Hello
After another testing it looks more like Intel HD Graphics (i915)
problem (xorg-x11-drv-intel or kernel).
I've tried add "video=DP-1:d" to grub boot line but it didn't help.
Screen went to black after cca 2.5 hour and after that laptop shutdown.
It is really hard to test it because
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
> the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks? Sandboxing isn't one
> of them - as already explained, sandboxing is orthogonal to packaging.
+1, completely!
I think it is completely unacceptable
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017, at 07:53 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> When I see the plans that are floated around, the other stuff might also end
> up being containerized in a similar way, just using other technologies
> (e.g., Docker).
There are definitely apps today that are designed to run in
> If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
> the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks? Sandboxing isn't one
> of them - as already explained, sandboxing is orthogonal to packaging.
+1, completely!
+1
___
devel
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
>
On 2017-07-14, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Fabio Valentini wrote on 07/14/2017 06:04 PM:
>> Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg
>> new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error
>> message (other than the bodhi
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 07-07-17 16:43, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 08:14 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2017-07-14, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>> Fabio Valentini wrote on 07/14/2017 06:04 PM:
>>> Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg
>>> new-sources" is getting stuck (for
On 2017-06-15, Jan Kurik wrote:
>= Proposed System Wide Change: perl Package to Install Core Modules =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl_Package_to_Install_Core_Modules
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Petr Písař
>
> dnf install perl will install all core Perl modules that
Owen Taylor wrote:
> As for standard application RPMs, it's really going to be something
> we figure out over time. My vision is something like:
>
> F27: packagers are *able* to create Flatpaks of their application.
> They must also maintain standard RPMs.
>
> F28: packagers (of
On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 23:43 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> While I may be missing something, I don't think current Fedora package
> needs ruby cairo-gl bindings.
> Also, ruby-cairo gem does not have examples for cairo-gl surface nor have
> test suite for that, so I guess the ruby-cairo upstream
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 00:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > = System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Graphical_Applications_as_Fl
> > > atpaks
>
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-07-14)
===
Meeting started by jforbes at 16:00:06 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-07-14/fesco.2017-07-14-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Jul 14, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 14 July 2017 at 19:12, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> As above, it could be the exact same sandbox technology with the same
>> portals and everything. The sandboxed program would just be files in
>>
On 14 July 2017 at 20:28, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Is this really more reliable than using dnf (for graphical packages
> like Recepies and Builder)?
It's hugely more reliable. You can't actually trust rpm to do anything
atomically, and this is the main reason we force
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 19:30:18 +0100
Richard Hughes wrote:
> How could that work? The runtime gets mounted in /usr and the app gets
> mounted in /app in a different place.
> https://media.readthedocs.org/pdf/flatpak/latest/flatpak.pdf is a good
> read.
I just read that. I'm
> On Jul 14, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> The app store model also assumes that the app store operator acts as
> some sort of gate keeper, so there has to be some policy enforcement at
> this level, too. It is not sufficient to pass through just what the
>
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 07:25:11PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Maybe tangential to the proposal/discussion/ranting, but you can
> actually use gnome-software on the command line.
> /usr/libexec/gnome-software-cmd (no GTK parts get loaded) has got a
> bit cleverer in F26 and is set to get even
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 05:05:23PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > At least we see where this is going.
> >
> > If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
> > the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks? Sandboxing isn't one
> > of them - as already explained,
On 14 July 2017 at 12:32, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> From what I read, only GNOME Software app supports Flatpaks and not
> everyone uses GNOME Software to install software.
Maybe tangential to the proposal/discussion/ranting, but you can
actually use
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:26:04PM -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> But we have not been. Very few applications actually have SELinux profiles,
> and they are all maintained downstream rather than upstream. The volume of
> erroneous SELinux denials in Bugzilla is too high, and the response
2017-07-14 19:05 GMT+02:00 Debarshi Ray :
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
>> > F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of
>> > their applications
I'll take sphinx.
--
Ben Cotton
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/12/2017 06:26 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> I kinda agree here (though I am a bit surprised, as I did not think you
> were a very big SELinux fan). We absolutely could be investing more in
> SELinux. But we have not been. Very few applications actually have
> SELinux profiles, and they
On 14 July 2017 at 19:12, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> As above, it could be the exact same sandbox technology with the same
> portals and everything. The sandboxed program would just be files in
> /usr instead of a Flatpak.
How could that work? The runtime gets mounted in /usr and
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
>> > F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of
>> > their
One major reason is that it enables us to move towards having the Atomic
Workstation
version be the primary one and maybe in the (very) long run be the only one.
A bit more detail about that can be found here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/AtomicWorkstation
Or this talk from FLOCK
Missing expected images:
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 18/137 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170712.n.1):
ID: 120732 Test: x86_64 universal
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
>> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
>> FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
>>
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of
> > their applications if possible. They *may* keep standard RPM
> > packaging.
>
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of
> > their applications if possible. They *may* keep standard RPM
> > packaging.
>
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:27 PM Matthew Miller
> > How about reliable online updates of running applications as a
> > benefit?
>
> AND the ability to roll back, to choose beta or stable streams, etc.
>
These are reasonably good advantages but if there isn't a seamless
transition between them, it
On Friday, 14 July 2017 at 10:44, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of
> > their applications if possible. They *may* keep standard RPM
> > packaging.
>
> At
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [14/07/2017 13:32] :
>
> Is `dnf install foo' still going to work when foo is converted to a
> Flatpak and no longer built as a plain RPM?
I was unable to find Recipes (an application in the latest GNOME) either
by dnf or Gnome Software. Using Google, I found out
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:32:03PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Owen Taylor wrote:
> > As for standard application RPMs, it's really going to be something
> > we figure out over time. My vision is something like:
> >
> > F27: packagers are *able* to create Flatpaks of their application.
> >
Rex, the 10.2.7-2 version is finally out (after 20h of building :/ )
I did a scratch build of the 'os-autoinst' package and it looks like it
does not complain about the missing symbols anymore:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20519110
Did that solved the issue, or am I just
Looks like the problem has been fixed ->
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470876#c6
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello,
I was able to successfully use 'fedpkg new-sources' (still from f25) right
now.
clime
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg
> new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:04:23AM +, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg
> new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error
> message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do
> anything until I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470196
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||Github
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470196
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49325
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/8ef878a1004308b10982350df76c0378063147024706bdc774bd8b755e07cd67-0001-Ticket-49325-Proof-of-concept-rust-tqueue-in-sds.patch
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane
From 57c60f31f60494a43dc978dc874bad2b3b789e35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:15:30 +0200
Subject: Rename perl dependency in scriptlets
---
perl-XML-LibXML.spec | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3
From 5d2d98f2b22b6bba7ee06168dc4e45f6495b319b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 10:22:16 +0200
Subject: perl package installs all core modules
This commit renames perl to perl-interprer and perl-core to perl.
---
From 3f7d1e5123b8cced6e5c7b00918c76bb38b79f27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:00:48 +0200
Subject: Remove obsolete Group tags
---
perl.spec | 114 --
1 file
From aa787938a49e2a1559a3aa50c75535d76fc8d354 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 08:35:58 +0200
Subject: Remove spurious non-perl Provides from pregenerated dependency list
---
gendep.macros | 1 -
1 file changed, 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471090
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.46-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-20f5e516cd
--
You are receiving this
From 3dcd10a1605125e41b180fc8440eacdbfbac2a65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:09:37 +0200
Subject: 6.512 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
From 8c8feba582034ee02500a40e2f5ac21eef1edc14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Pazdziora
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 14:29:33 +0200
Subject: 1471090 - Rebase to upstream version 1.46.
(cherry picked from commit b7218e03acbd15476b0a3254cc9d768c5910816b)
---
.gitignore
47662ce685edb0f5e036f3e68af069eef9713eef94d662e7ecfc88e53a22e9e34ad6e3b461a5d1aecd33791653f538bc675055673ab30ec08f08f9f6192262fd
Term-ProgressBar-2.20.tar.gz
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 01:52:40PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Therefore I offered them that Fedora can make "dnf install perl" working as
> thay want and it will be implemented by renaming perl-core to perl and
> giving a new name to present perl package.
>
> Thus I created this Fedora Change
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470196
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 122431
155c55dcbb05b83a7bf35ef70d4436b54ad0dc8684871c03048ac7dc364c5ce408152409fdc88d7c53f38ff7d767ec2c181da8c1e6118826ba0120ef20b77f59
Cache-FastMmap-1.46.tar.gz
here is a revised patch, integrating Williams comments and a
contribution by Thierry
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/6d855f63e2e6968692eb06332c322aedbdc3e528232e63881344077864be75ec-0001-Ticket-49287-v3-extend-csnpl-handling-to-multiple-ba.patch
On 07/05/2017 01:02 PM, Ludwig Krispenz
From 5ebefb91769c3d9336b71dd77109dc3c978b23e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:26:36 +0200
Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter
From 574df36c280e1f4cd1ebf54bad3dac381bcdf359 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:17:23 +0200
Subject: 2.20 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Term-ProgressBar.spec | 5 -
sources| 2 +-
3 files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471090
Bug ID: 1471090
Summary: perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.46 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Cache-FastMmap
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471089
Bug ID: 1471089
Summary: perl-Coro-6.512 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Coro
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469517
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
From 8c8feba582034ee02500a40e2f5ac21eef1edc14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Pazdziora
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 14:29:33 +0200
Subject: 1471090 - Rebase to upstream version 1.46.
(cherry picked from commit b7218e03acbd15476b0a3254cc9d768c5910816b)
---
.gitignore
perl-SDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SDL-2.546-7.fc26.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.24()(64bit)
perl-SDL-2.546-7.fc26.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-SDL-2.546-7.fc26.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.24
perl-HTML-FormFu-MultiForm has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-HTML-FormFu-MultiForm-1.00-9.fc26.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-HTML-FormFu-MultiForm-1.00-9.fc26.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On ppc64le:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-21.fc26.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.24()(64bit)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-21.fc26.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On aarch64:
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-6.fc27.aarch64 requires
libperl.so.5.24()(64bit)
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-6.fc27.aarch64 requires
libplplot.so.13()(64bit)
From b7218e03acbd15476b0a3254cc9d768c5910816b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Pazdziora
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 14:29:33 +0200
Subject: 1471090 - Rebase to upstream version 1.46.
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Cache-FastMmap.spec | 7 +--
sources
From 2fd4382d13034fd653de96ed0614cd0100e2be74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 14:40:04 +0200
Subject: Fix for new version of MariaDB 10.2 (bug #1470196)
---
...4.043-Fix-build-failures-for-MariaDB-10.2.patch | 74 ++
39cb946fd87961811d73b089d144bb25fcac046874a4a918ca2f58fde5feb19a16adf7c977641f8b5ca39fbbb92f92ba464ebc3b99ef4a8cd24f210b302d65f1
Coro-6.512.tar.gz
perl-Gtk3-WebKit has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-7.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-7.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On ppc64le:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-2.01-2.fc26.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-2.01-2.fc26.noarch requires
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-18.fc26.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-18.fc26.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On ppc64le:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49031
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/7d3d1450ab9aa9c43422fbc6c7327b5ed9d236492c2de91866cc1e4df187dd41-0001-Add-performance-tests-for-memberof-plugin.patch
Thanks,
-Sankar R.
___
389-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471307
Bug ID: 1471307
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280226 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471307
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old
sources. It's likely this package does not use the version macro in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470196
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471089
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/48
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/44349b844e78b688e9633a325cadf268328f2ad22737094a45244c0dcd168641-0001-Issue-48-Add-support-for-USN-plugin.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
pkgdb_updater updated: description of rpms/perl-MooX-StrictConstructor
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-MooX-StrictConstructor/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
pkgdb_updater updated: description of rpms/perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderMaketext
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderMaketext/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
pkgdb_updater updated: description of rpms/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-Util
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-Util/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
pkgdb_updater updated: description of rpms/perl-Image-Sane
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Image-Sane/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
pkgdb_updater updated: description of rpms/perl-MooX-Singleton
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-MooX-Singleton/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
dist.abicheck FAILED for perl-5.26.0-395.fc27
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/59e89c8a-6877-11e7-a988-5254008e42f6/task_output/perl-5.26.0-395.fc27.log
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
86 matches
Mail list logo