[Bug 1484857] perl-Net-GitHub-0.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484857 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-GitHub-0.90-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6897902794 -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Providing ABI/API assurances for the base runtime in Fedora.

On 2017-09-01, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > I've written up some of the key ideas here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BaseRuntimeInterface > > Any feedback would be appreciated, including bikeshed on component > name prefix for frozen interface pakcages e.g. base-*. > What if

[EPEL-devel] Re: problem installing the new version of lightdm

That solve my problem Thanks! -Original Message- From: Anssi Johansson [mailto:e...@miuku.net] Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 2:56 PM To: epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: [EPEL-devel] Re: problem installing the new version of lightdm Yossi Nachum kirjoitti 4.9.2017 klo

[Bug 1484857] perl-Net-GitHub-0.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484857 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-GitHub-0.90-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c589dd16f3 -- You are receiving this mail

adelton pushed to perl-Net-GitHub (f26). "1484857 - Rebase to upstream version 0.90."

From 17510a85918712eddbf764f2d5d696fb10f8b6a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Pazdziora Date: Sep 04 2017 11:35:03 + Subject: 1484857 - Rebase to upstream version 0.90. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 31daba7..d4ce59e 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

adelton pushed to perl-Net-GitHub (f26). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

From 7c958cdf07a5204984529bec8038f33e96125b66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2017 05:19:43 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Net-GitHub.spec

adelton pushed to perl-Net-GitHub (f26). "Merge branch 'f27' into f26"

From 288ff2682786347c01ba7275bca12781d014e4a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Pazdziora Date: Sep 04 2017 12:18:43 + Subject: Merge branch 'f27' into f26 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 31daba7..d4ce59e 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@

[EPEL-devel] Re: problem installing the new version of lightdm

Yossi Nachum kirjoitti 4.9.2017 klo 14.47: yum install lightdm Try this: yum install lightdm --enablerepo=cr More info: https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

adelton pushed to perl-Date-Manip (f27). "1487801 - Rebase to upstream version 6.60."

From a8596b062891be27cf7bfacbef38c28f4ccd8b85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Pazdziora Date: Sep 04 2017 11:39:33 + Subject: 1487801 - Rebase to upstream version 6.60. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 9a68405..bf1ce25 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

[EPEL-devel] problem installing the new version of lightdm

Hi All, Lightdm package got an update on Sep 1st and since then we can't install it on our centos 7 server. yum install lightdm Loaded plugins: langpacks Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package lightdm.x86_64 0:1.18.3-4.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency:

adelton pushed to perl-Net-GitHub (f27). "1484857 - Rebase to upstream version 0.90."

From 17510a85918712eddbf764f2d5d696fb10f8b6a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Pazdziora Date: Sep 04 2017 11:35:03 + Subject: 1484857 - Rebase to upstream version 0.90. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 31daba7..d4ce59e 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

Re: Non-responsive maintainer process for caillon, and retiring xchat

Hey, On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:32:38PM +0200, V??t Ondruch wrote: > Unfortunately, you have missed this dependency: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486752 Yes, sorry for missing it initially. However, I emailed konr...@fedoraproject.org last Thursday after you pinged me on

adelton pushed to perl-Date-Manip (master). "1487801 - Rebase to upstream version 6.60."

From a8596b062891be27cf7bfacbef38c28f4ccd8b85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Pazdziora Date: Sep 04 2017 11:39:33 + Subject: 1487801 - Rebase to upstream version 6.60. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 9a68405..bf1ce25 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

adelton uploaded Date-Manip-6.60.tar.gz for perl-Date-Manip

46ac9696aea04167427957a43de1b44041ea05d3eaf01ffbdbfda9f458b3073f36ec46c9661ac437f96731d0f40aebc206ef385c6c4aff1b147917fc2c89a1cf Date-Manip-6.60.tar.gz

adelton uploaded Net-GitHub-0.90.tar.gz for perl-Net-GitHub

46c2eb7be36c4aa8e21ecbc3e86493ca32b18a285cf5cafa0aba96c8dcc4a52377c2dce5812a7f8376ddc6b0878997e2f62e5fc049deaf9038e3b1b36feaf7da Net-GitHub-0.90.tar.gz

adelton pushed to perl-Net-GitHub (master). "1484857 - Rebase to upstream version 0.90."

From 17510a85918712eddbf764f2d5d696fb10f8b6a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Pazdziora Date: Sep 04 2017 11:35:03 + Subject: 1484857 - Rebase to upstream version 0.90. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 31daba7..d4ce59e 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

Re: Need help ?

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Ellen OSullivan wrote: > I'm a newbie, would like to help out with something. I'm dev/qa > automation at work but fairly new to Linux. Willing to clean the floors, > make the coffee :-) > Hi Ellen, if you familiarize yourself with testing

Re: RFC: retiring yum

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > Hi, > > *Igor Gnatenko* wrote on Fri, 01 Sep 2017 19:01:49 +0200: > > <..> > Do you still have some critical missing functionality in DNF? And let > us know reasons why would you like to keep YUM available

Re: F26 and kernel-4.13

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi guys, > > my question: is it planned to make and release kernel-4.13 for F26? I saw > that it has been declared as mainline and stable on kernel.org. The latest stable kernel will always go to the latest

Re: Verifying sources against gpg signature during RPM build ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 11:29 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > A number of packages that I maintain have GPG signatures provided > alongside > the sources for new releases. Is there any best pratice approach / > RPM macro > magic for verifying the

[Bug 1488024] perl-Config-MVP-Slicer-0.303 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488024 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Config-MVP-Slicer-0.303-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-28dcbcf414 -- You are receiving

Self Introduction: Jens Reimann

Hi, I've been working with Linux since around 1999. And around that time I started creating a few RPM packages for Red Hat Linux, so that they would easily install. Over time I got "distracted" with Ubuntu and Java. Working since around 2007 on open source projects, in the last years mainly for

ppisar pushed to perl-Config-MVP-Slicer (f27). "0.303 bump"

From ce380a6275df629eceb51a5676f8f0be492db02f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 11:03:05 + Subject: 0.303 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 35fca01..63035ef 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1 +1,2 @@

[Bug 1488024] perl-Config-MVP-Slicer-0.303 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488024 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-Config-MVP-Slicer (master). "0.303 bump"

From ce380a6275df629eceb51a5676f8f0be492db02f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 11:03:05 + Subject: 0.303 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 35fca01..63035ef 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1 +1,2 @@

ppisar uploaded Config-MVP-Slicer-0.303.tar.gz for perl-Config-MVP-Slicer

b0e22b02c0a486a3e95040907131081a957e354022b4f36265a54ea119459cf2f6499a34511c766a245dfe5b597695a481ad2bd2e9f40e2e6085dbbb489554f1 Config-MVP-Slicer-0.303.tar.gz

Re: Build weirdness

On 04.09.2017 12:42, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 1.9.2017 v 22:56 Sandro Mani napsal(a): Hi I've got another weird situation: I wanted to get pjproject building again, rebased and added necessary patches, did the scratch build, and all looked good [1]. So I went ahead and committed the result,

Re: Raising requirement for application icons in GNOME Software

Hi, On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > At the moment the appstream-builder requires a 48x48px application > icon[1] to be included in the AppStream metadata. I'm sure it's no > surprise that 48x48 padded to 64x64 and then interpolated up to

Re: Build weirdness

Dne 1.9.2017 v 22:56 Sandro Mani napsal(a): > Hi > > I've got another weird situation: I wanted to get pjproject building > again, rebased and added necessary patches, did the scratch build, and > all looked good [1]. So I went ahead and committed the result, fired > off the build, but to my

Re: Non-responsive maintainer process for caillon, and retiring xchat

Dne 31.8.2017 v 13:14 Debarshi Ray napsal(a): > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:06:16AM +, Debarshi Ray wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 03:19:52PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote: >>> I would like to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process [1] for >>> Christopher Aillon [2]. A long time ago,

Verifying sources against gpg signature during RPM build ?

A number of packages that I maintain have GPG signatures provided alongside the sources for new releases. Is there any best pratice approach / RPM macro magic for verifying the GPG signature of sources during build, or are packagers just (re)inventing the wheel each time ? Regards, Daniel --

Re: RFC: retiring yum

Dne 2.9.2017 v 16:00 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> So I think F28/F29 would be best time for retiring YUM. Right now DNF >> should be already stable and

Re: RFC: retiring yum

Dne 1.9.2017 v 19:56 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: >> Do you still have some critical missing functionality in DNF? And let >> us know reasons why would you like to keep YUM available (hopefully >> there are no)!

Re: F26 and kernel-4.13

It can be when 4.13.3-4.13.5 released. пн, 4 сент. 2017 г. в 12:40, Joachim Backes : > Hi guys, > > my question: is it planned to make and release kernel-4.13 for F26? I > saw that it has been declared as mainline and stable on kernel.org. > > Kind regards > >

[Bug 1487810] perl-Shell-Config-Generate-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487810 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Shell-Config-Generate-0.29-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a8823b334d -- You are receiving

Re: RFC: retiring yum

Dne 1.9.2017 v 22:10 Hedayat Vatankhah napsal(a): > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091702 This is blocker for me as well. Mirek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

ppisar pushed to perl-Shell-Config-Generate (f27). "0.29 bump"

From 80212a964d0f4144e360ee0f206a24540aaf167f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 09:42:05 + Subject: 0.29 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 4e69ac4..4216072 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@

[Bug 1487810] perl-Shell-Config-Generate-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487810 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-Shell-Config-Generate (master). "0.29 bump"

From 80212a964d0f4144e360ee0f206a24540aaf167f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 09:42:05 + Subject: 0.29 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 4e69ac4..4216072 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@

ppisar uploaded Shell-Config-Generate-0.29.tar.gz for perl-Shell-Config-Generate

63abea0d5f95a23570fd94a32d5ee7ccefbc95766e4678cf0144d801dfc8ea26ea95ddb2d0c487090f7fb833ec51b879144a592a247321688c7357fc17e7578f Shell-Config-Generate-0.29.tar.gz

F26 and kernel-4.13

Hi guys, my question: is it planned to make and release kernel-4.13 for F26? I saw that it has been declared as mainline and stable on kernel.org. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) Kernel-4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64 Joachim Backes

[Bug 1487808] perl-Net-HTTP-6.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487808 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-HTTP-6.17-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fc5db65474 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1487808] perl-Net-HTTP-6.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487808 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-HTTP-6.17-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6f187ccc78 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1487808] perl-Net-HTTP-6.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487808 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-HTTP-6.17-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cd4e693ba5 -- You are receiving this mail

ppisar pushed to perl-Net-HTTP (f25). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

From 224faf9e71958461e6223d918b2f1f2ff8aa4ef3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 09:31:14 + Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter --- diff --git

ppisar pushed to perl-Net-HTTP (f25). "6.17 bump"

From 97f37d64e9ea7d2adc6c343995692fb738ff9fb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 09:31:14 + Subject: 6.17 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 4270860..dffc291 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -12,3 +12,4 @@

ppisar pushed to perl-Net-HTTP (f26). "6.17 bump"

From 491b414382ca92ae1f9f09f8f90da698e6268a78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 09:30:37 + Subject: 6.17 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 4270860..dffc291 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -12,3 +12,4 @@

ppisar pushed to perl-Net-HTTP (f26). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

From 30c24f76d6290ae9ce28351350197bb54326ba65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 09:30:06 + Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter --- diff --git

ppisar pushed to perl-Net-HTTP (f27). "6.17 bump"

From e61c0686308bc43c792c287b594e8a52104f0b37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 09:27:20 + Subject: 6.17 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 4270860..dffc291 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -12,3 +12,4 @@

[Bug 1487808] perl-Net-HTTP-6.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487808 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-Net-HTTP (master). "6.17 bump"

From e61c0686308bc43c792c287b594e8a52104f0b37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 09:27:20 + Subject: 6.17 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 4270860..dffc291 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -12,3 +12,4 @@

ppisar uploaded Net-HTTP-6.17.tar.gz for perl-Net-HTTP

ce4453896fea1194342ed5279173fe3289ae7a2f489145930bd74eb680a347d974675b65d387aa7735d2c5404d7c5a34049b10a1ba87f36df0ad6e3d45d4f2f8 Net-HTTP-6.17.tar.gz

[Bug 1487803] perl-Locale-Codes-3.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487803 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Locale-Codes-3.54-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-26df81eb70 -- You are receiving this

ppisar pushed to perl-Locale-Codes (f27). "3.54 bump"

From 486e6db66adcdf89d2b00ee78ff566e0e5f72460 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 09:17:02 + Subject: 3.54 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 79ba4fb..013ebba 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -27,3 +27,4 @@

[Bug 1487803] perl-Locale-Codes-3.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487803 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-Locale-Codes (master). "3.54 bump"

From 486e6db66adcdf89d2b00ee78ff566e0e5f72460 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 04 2017 09:17:02 + Subject: 3.54 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 79ba4fb..013ebba 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -27,3 +27,4 @@

ppisar uploaded Locale-Codes-3.54.tar.gz for perl-Locale-Codes

6f0420601f77d3d8cd4df55e24e3786ba99049dc06b0c54bdcda18626d6fdee5198561438011d37108ea68cafecb7848dbe2c1d8779e8066619d421ffcad6009 Locale-Codes-3.54.tar.gz

Re: RFC: retiring yum

Dne 2.9.2017 v 16:00 Neal Gompa napsal(a): On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 So I think F28/F29 would be best time for retiring YUM. Right now DNF should be already stable and provide same

Re: Raising requirement for application icons in GNOME Software

On 1 September 2017 at 20:47, John Reiser wrote: > Yes, losing 16 pixels width will be unfortunate, but it is a > better default because it looks nicer. I've tried this, and the "cropped" icons look much worse than the padded ones. Plus, multiplying by 3 is a much more

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 13:45 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat > symlink >  from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? I really do not care. If the gpg v1 is still maintained upstream and there is somebody

Re: CI projects in Copr

On Friday, September 1, 2017 12:16:32 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote: > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Marc Dequènes (Duck) > > On 09/01/2017 01:28 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > > > But I think an off-line talk might be the best. Depends on you. > > > > I can understand you don't

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

On 09/04/2017 08:56 AM, Remi Collet wrote: > gnupg v2 is a nightmare for "server", I maintain some PHP extensions and > libraries which works perfectly against v1, and not against v2 > > And, AFAIK, v1 is still maintained. $ date|gpg2 --passphrase aaa -ca This shows a popup asking me for a

[Bug 1488024] New: perl-Config-MVP-Slicer-0.303 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488024 Bug ID: 1488024 Summary: perl-Config-MVP-Slicer-0.303 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Config-MVP-Slicer Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

Le 03/09/2017 à 13:45, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? -1 gnupg v2 is a nightmare for "server", I maintain some PHP extensions and libraries which

Re: [DONE] Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

Hi Zbyszek, > ... > python-djvulibre-0.3.9-11.fc28error: invalid application of > 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'enum ddjvu_status_e' You can use a new spec that updates to 0.8 version including Python 3 subpackage [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312327]. Best regards

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 910 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 672 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 254

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 788 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 782 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 672

<    1   2