Review swap: python-rstcheck - Checks syntax of reStructuredText and code blocks nested within it

Hello, Would anyone like to swap reviews? python-rstcheck is a rather simple python package, so I'd be happy to review a similar package in return. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506405 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Re: Fedora 27 ships with outdated intel driver from 20160929

On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 09:04 +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Hi there, > > For Fedora 26 (or was it 25) it was decided to replace the > intel-optimized xorg-x11-drv-intel with the generic > modesetting+glamor > approach. > While this works well for >= Sandy-Bridge (gen6) based chips, I >

Re: Fedora 27 ships with outdated intel driver from 20160929

Hi Sergio, > Please read : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413251 > Since F26 xorg-x11-server defualts to use modeset driver instead of > intel. As mentioned in the bug report, xorg-x11-server is still used for gen2 and gen3. Furthermore glamor doesn't work that well for gen4/gen5

Re: NSS Default File Format SQL in Fedora 28

On 25 October 2017 at 10:45, Kai Engert wrote: > TL;DR: The change originally planned for Fedora 27 will now be done for > Rawhide Fedora 28, probably tomorrow. > > > We had previously announced to change the NSS crypto library to use the > new sql file format by default. Please see

Re: Fedora 27 ships with outdated intel driver from 20160929

On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 09:04 +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Hi there, > > For Fedora 26 (or was it 25) it was decided to replace the > intel-optimized xorg-x11-drv-intel with the generic > modesetting+glamor > approach. > While this works well for >= Sandy-Bridge (gen6) based chips, I >

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 05:56:10PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > You want to read this thread first: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7ZWMVGQ3RXDWAJNP3OOZXBC57SYB5IF5/ Yeah, this. :) Vit, have you made any progress? Jason, to your "is it

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

2017-10-25 16:54 GMT+02:00 Jason Brooks : > Hi all -- > > As part of a documentation project I'm working on with the Fedora > Atomic WG, I started packaging asciibinder[1] with the intention of > getting the package into Fedora. Along the way[2], I encountered a > bunch of

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

You want to read this thread first: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7ZWMVGQ3RXDWAJNP3OOZXBC57SYB5IF5/ Vít Dne 25.10.2017 v 16:54 Jason Brooks napsal(a): > Hi all -- > > As part of a documentation project I'm working on with the Fedora >

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

On 10/25/2017 09:49 AM, William Moreno wrote: 2017-10-25 9:38 GMT-06:00 Sandro Bonazzola >: 2017-10-25 16:54 GMT+02:00 Jason Brooks >: Hi all -- As part of a

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: It's a bit hard to read your message because the lines you wrote are in the middle of quoted ones without any extra empty lines, I hope I got your intent right. > On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 22:24 +0300, Ville

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Hello, ...again, updated lists below. The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if you're able to help out. When doing so, please note your FAS account name. 1) No co-maintainers at the moment: -

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

2017-10-25 9:38 GMT-06:00 Sandro Bonazzola : > > > 2017-10-25 16:54 GMT+02:00 Jason Brooks : > >> Hi all -- >> >> As part of a documentation project I'm working on with the Fedora >> Atomic WG, I started packaging asciibinder[1] with the intention of >>

Re: NSS Default File Format SQL in Fedora 28

On 25.10.2017 15:22, James Hogarth wrote: > There's always process if something is high enough level to be > considered a "Change" > > Please follow the appropriate process to have this included as a > system level change for F28. Ok. The change was previously accepted for Fedora 27. I've

packaging ruby dependencies

Hi all -- As part of a documentation project I'm working on with the Fedora Atomic WG, I started packaging asciibinder[1] with the intention of getting the package into Fedora. Along the way[2], I encountered a bunch of required, unpackaged dependencies, which would also have to be added to

Package review requests: Splitting the "sustmi" GNOME Shell extensions into separate packages

I'm the RPM package maintainer for these two GNOME Shell extensions: * gnome-shell-extension-sustmi-windowoverlay-icons * gnome-shell-extension-sustmi-historymanager-prefix-search They're both currently subpackages of the main "sustmi" package, because upstream had been developing them in a

Review Swap

libstorj - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506315 Needed to enable Storj support for FileZilla.  I'll take one of yours. -Gwyn -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171025.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

Dne 25.10.2017 v 18:10 Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 05:56:10PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> You want to read this thread first: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7ZWMVGQ3RXDWAJNP3OOZXBC57SYB5IF5/ > > Yeah, this. :) >

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 06:35:36PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I'm waiting for your feedback basically: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HI5UZHSDQB5BRLKBXZWOC3YCND7BACGU/ Oh! Sorry! I somehow missed that. Hey Jason, can you take a look? I'm

Update to MUMPS-5.1.2

Hi all. I'm going to update MUMPS to the latest release 5.1.2 on rawhide this weekend. All dependent packages will be rebuilt: $ repoquery --whatrequires MUMPS MUMPS-openmpi MUMPS-mpich MUMPS-devel-0:5.1.1-2.fc26.i686 MUMPS-devel-0:5.1.1-2.fc26.x86_64 MUMPS-examples-0:5.1.1-2.fc26.x86_64

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

Hi Jason, Packaging deps is a virtuous circle: it makes the work of the next person who needs them for other software easier, which increases the chance other software is packaged, which increases the value of the distro as a whole, its attractiveness, and the probability that someone will

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

On 10/25/2017 01:43 PM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Hi Jason, Packaging deps is a virtuous circle: it makes the work of the next person who needs them for other software easier, which increases the chance other software is packaged, which increases the value of the distro as a whole,

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-10-26 16:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2017-10-26 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2017-10-26 09:00 PDT  US/Pacific 2017-10-26

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 3:43 PM, wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Packaging deps is a virtuous circle: it makes the work of the next person who > needs them for other software easier, which increases the chance other > software is packaged, which increases the value of the

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Final release Go/No-Go Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Final release Go/No-Go Meeting on 2017-10-26 from 17:00:00 to 19:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important meeting, wherein we shall

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Modular Server 27 Beta Release Go/No-Go - 3rd round

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Modular Server 27 Beta Release Go/No-Go - 3rd round on 2017-10-26 from 17:00:00 to 19:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

username: pyc0d3r, full name: umar abdullahi On Oct 25, 2017 6:36 AM, "Ville Skyttä" wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Umar Parooq > wrote: > > i can take zopfli > > Thanks, but I'm unable to guess/locate your username in FAS. Could you >

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

And i can take python-libdiscid On Oct 23, 2017 8:26 PM, "Ville Skyttä" wrote: > Hello, > > The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if > you're able to help out. > > 1) No co-maintainers at the moment: > > - git-bz > - isrcsubmit > - jing-trang > -

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On 25/10/17 07:58, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Umar Parooq wrote: username: pyc0d3r, full name: umar abdullahi src.fedoraproject.org doesn't know of such a username, so I'm afraid I'm not able to transfer packages to you. That would be

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Umar Parooq wrote: > username: pyc0d3r, full name: umar abdullahi src.fedoraproject.org doesn't know of such a username, so I'm afraid I'm not able to transfer packages to you. ___ devel mailing

Fedora 27 ships with outdated intel driver from 20160929

Hi there, For Fedora 26 (or was it 25) it was decided to replace the intel-optimized xorg-x11-drv-intel with the generic modesetting+glamor approach. While this works well for >= Sandy-Bridge (gen6) based chips, I experience performance regressions for day-to-day work (eclipse, libreoffice, ...)

NSS Default File Format SQL in Fedora 28

TL;DR: The change originally planned for Fedora 27 will now be done for Rawhide Fedora 28, probably tomorrow. We had previously announced to change the NSS crypto library to use the new sql file format by default. Please see the attached message for the technical details. Because of blocker

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 08:34:54AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > (Does a thing exist where I could search FAS users by real name, BTW?) I find it easiest to do /msg zodbot fas Name in IRC. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

I can take ccache if no one else wants it Michael / mich181189 On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, at 10:52 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 08:34:54AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > (Does a thing exist where I could search FAS users by real > > name, BTW?)> > I find it easiest

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Michael Cullen wrote: > I can take ccache if no one else wants it Transferred, thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 22:24 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Hello, > > The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if > you're able to help out. > > 1) No co-maintainers at the moment: > > - git-bz Would be happy to take this > -

[Bug 1504136] Upgrade perl-Test-MockModule to 0.13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504136 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1485919] Do not provide "perl(setup)"

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485919 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1485919] Do not provide "perl(setup)"

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485919 --- Comment #15 from Tuomo Soini --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging_Autoprovides_and_Requires_Filtering -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1505672] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505672 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 961 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 723 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 306

[Bug 1505673] perl-SNMP-Info-3.38 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505673 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1506117] New: perl-Net-FTPSSL-0.39 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506117 Bug ID: 1506117 Summary: perl-Net-FTPSSL-0.39 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-FTPSSL Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1506120] New: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0131 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506120 Bug ID: 1506120 Summary: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0131 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-LibXML Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[389-devel] Please review 49312: SIGSEV when setting invalid changelog config value

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49412 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/3f00b1682d2a5815b4437ec3c7e03eb0eb84d30e113b9926343b62ba59a03283-0001-Ticket-49412-SIGSEV-when-setting-invalid-changelog-c.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1485919] Do not provide "perl(setup)"

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485919 Tuomo Soini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t...@foobar.fi ---

[Bug 1506120] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0131 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506120 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED