License change in python-pkginfo

python-pkginfo's license has changed from the Python license to MIT in version 1.4.0. -- Jeremy Cline XMPP: jer...@jcline.org IRC: jcline signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 04:07:51PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/23/2018 12:23 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote: > >tl;dr: Unless someone steps up to maintain Python 2 after 2020, we > >need to start dropping python2 packages now. > Bummer - I am speechless. > > >Python 2.7 will reach end of

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180324.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-28-20180323.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180324.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

Petr Viktorin wrote: > As with any orphaning, that leaves two options: > - someone else agrees now to take over in 2020 (keeping in mind this is > a security-critical package and will be abandoned upstream), or IMHO, this is clearly the right thing to do. I have been doing security backports for

Fedora 28-20180324.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 14/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 210998 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/210998 ID: 211030 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180324.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180323.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180324.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 8 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 301 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 31.55 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

On 03/24/2018 01:59 AM, Christopher wrote: > If this seems reasonable, I'd be happy to help start editing some of the > wiki pages... but it'd be helpful if everybody maintaining > infrastructure documentation was on the same page. +1 from me. ___ devel

Fedora Rawhide-20180324.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 16/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 210833 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/210833 ID: 210858 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL:

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 24.3.2018 v 06:59 Christopher napsal(a): >> Can we stop saying "dist-git" in our docs? Nobody knows what that is. >> The service at https://src.fedoraproject.org is clearly branded as "Fedora >> Package Sources". > >

[Test-Announce] 2018-03-26 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 28 Blocker Review Meeting

# F28 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2018-03-26 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have several proposed blockers and freeze exception issues to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday. If you have time this weekend, you can take a look

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

Dne 24.3.2018 v 06:59 Christopher napsal(a): > Can we stop saying "dist-git" in our docs? Nobody knows what that is. > The service at https://src.fedoraproject.org is clearly branded as "Fedora > Package Sources". BTW dist-git is (for some time) documented quite well:

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

Neal Gompa wrote: > Unlike VCSes like CVS and SVN, Git does not handle binaries very well, > and so they needed to be moved out of the VCS into an external store. Actually, the external lookaside cache was already used in Fedora in the CVS days. Kevin Kofler

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): poppler (libpoppler.so.73 -> libpoppler.so.74)

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > It's due to this change in upstream poppler: > > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/commit/poppler/Dict.h?id=8794789a72f845b009656e6d7ae6a00b709e09bc > > I think it suggests texlive is actually doing

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 05:59:38AM +, Christopher wrote: > Can we stop saying "dist-git" in our docs? Nobody knows what that is. > The service at https://src.fedoraproject.org is clearly branded as "Fedora > Package Sources". > > Using the jargon "dist-git" in our documentation is simply

Re: Orphaning ofono

Hello, Rex. Recently a new version of modem-manager-gui has been released. This new release added an option to use ofono as the modem manager. I've updated the mmgui package and ran into a problem where the rawhide [1] and F28 [2] builds succeed, but the F27 [3] and F26 [4] builds fail, as it

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: >> Unlike VCSes like CVS and SVN, Git does not handle binaries very well, >> and so they needed to be moved out of the VCS into an external store. > > Actually, the external lookaside cache was

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-03-26 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. Once again, F28 Beta validation will be the focus this week: go/no-go is on Thursday (again), and we'll be trying to get things in shape by then (again). If anyone would like to have a meeting, and is willing to run it in my place,

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On 2018-03-24, 15:09 GMT, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I'm not personally a fan of either variant of the language > - it's silly that we let programmers use an unsafe, slow, interpreted > scripting language when we've known how to make better programming > environments for at least 40 years. Just

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): poppler (libpoppler.so.73 -> libpoppler.so.74)

On 03/24/2018 07:12 PM, Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: >> It's due to this change in upstream poppler: >> >> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/commit/poppler/Dict.h?id=8794789a72f845b009656e6d7ae6a00b709e09bc

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser wrote: > > Looking at the dist-git README further reinforces this impression. The > first sentence says: "DistGit (Distributed Git) is Git with additional > data storage". My initial reaction to that is "so, it is basically > just

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 08:56:02PM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2018-03-24, 15:09 GMT, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I'm not personally a fan of either variant of the language > > - it's silly that we let programmers use an unsafe, slow, interpreted > > scripting language when we've known how to

Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

Can we stop saying "dist-git" in our docs? Nobody knows what that is. The service at https://src.fedoraproject.org is clearly branded as "Fedora Package Sources". Using the jargon "dist-git" in our documentation is simply confusing, since it doesn't match what the service calls itself, and

Re: Facing problems in pagure

Hi Tanmoy, How long ago did you add your SSH key to FAS? Is it a new repository? Historically, and I believe currently, there is a delay before everything is fully configured. This may be solved by just waiting for about 30 minutes. regards, bex On Sat, Mar 24, 2018, at 12:43 PM, Tanmoy

Facing problems in pagure

I am facing some problems in pagure. I have configured everything successfully. But when I try to clone files with ssh this returns. signing failed: agent refused operation permission denied (publickey). fatal: could not read from remote repository. please make sure you have the correct access

Re: How to change release-monitoring bug-filing without pkgdb?

On 03/23/2018 10:11 PM, Christopher wrote: >> > Thanks. That clarifies things significantly. "Docs could definitely be > better" is a severe understatement :) > > FWIW, I found the-new-hotness code at > https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness > I was going to try to do a pull request to

Summary/Minutes from last FESCo Meeting (2018-03-23)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2018-03-23) === Meeting started by tyll at 15:00:34 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-03-23/fesco.2018-03-23-15.00.log.html Meeting summary

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): poppler (libpoppler.so.73 -> libpoppler.so.74)

On 24 March 2018 at 03:14, Kevin Fenzi wrote: [..] >> BTW In situations like this is possible to observe how really bad idea >> was building ALL Fedora +5.6k texlive* packages from single sec file. > > Except that is no longer the case. texlive-base only has ~120 or so >

[EPEL-devel] yum does not find a package that I submitted to EPEL7 stable

I released open-eid as a new package in epel7-testing [1], but when I run # yum --enablerepo=epel-testing install open-eid I obtain various message like Error: Package: webextension-token-signing-1.0.6-4.el7.x86_64 (epel-testing) Requires: esteidcerts but esteidcerts package is in EPEL7

[Bug 1558427] Useless dependency on perl(Path::Iter) prevents from bootstrapping Perl packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.40-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Re: yum does not find a package that I submitted to EPEL7 stable

> "GM" == Germano Massullo writes: GM> but esteidcerts package is in EPEL7 *stable* repositories [2], so GM> why do I get such message? That update report indicates that it was pushed to stable, but as far as I can tell it does not actually appear in the stable

[Bug 1560220] New: perl-String-CamelCase-0.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560220 Bug ID: 1560220 Summary: perl-String-CamelCase-0.04 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-String-CamelCase Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1560218] New: perl-MooX-StrictConstructor-0.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560218 Bug ID: 1560218 Summary: perl-MooX-StrictConstructor-0.009 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MooX-StrictConstructor Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] Re: yum does not find a package that I submitted to EPEL7 stable

The package should appear in the repositories with the next EPEL7 compose. - J< ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560213] New: perl-DBD-CSV-0.51 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560213 Bug ID: 1560213 Summary: perl-DBD-CSV-0.51 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBD-CSV Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1560182] New: The version of perl-Gtk2-Unique is out of date, causing shutter to crash

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560182 Bug ID: 1560182 Summary: The version of perl-Gtk2-Unique is out of date, causing shutter to crash Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: perl-Gtk2-Unique

[Bug 1560173] New: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560173 Bug ID: 1560173 Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.18 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged